Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/5688

Last Updated: September 2, 2026

Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act

HR. 5688, 119th Congress — read as touching Surface Transportation.

The sponsor

Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$66,540 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 183-185 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 26.

March 17, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act (HR 5688). A bill that, on the surface, appears to be a minor tweak to commercial driver's license regulations. But, as is often the case with legislation, the devil lies in the details.

**New Regulations and Modifications**

This bill introduces new requirements for states issuing commercial driver's licenses to non-domiciled individuals. Specifically, it creates a framework for issuing licenses to foreign nationals with lawful immigration status and a legitimate employment-based reason for holding a CDL. The regulations also establish record-keeping requirements for states and introduce timelines for compliance.

**Affected Industries and Sectors**

The trucking industry will be most directly impacted by this bill, as it affects the hiring and training of commercial drivers. However, I see opportunities for consolidation and cost savings in the long run. With a more streamlined process for issuing CDLs to foreign nationals, companies may be able to reduce recruitment costs and tap into a global talent pool.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines**

States will need to implement new procedures for verifying immigration status and confirming employment-based reasons for CDL issuance. The bill sets a timeline of up to 1 year or the expiration of an applicant's authorized stay in the United States, whichever is shorter. This creates a potential bottleneck for states, which may struggle to adapt to the new regulations.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties**

The Secretary will have authority to prescribe regulations and request records from states within 48 hours. Non-compliance could result in penalties, although these are not explicitly outlined in the bill. I expect this lack of clarity to create uncertainty for states and companies alike.

**Economic and Operational Impacts**

From a purely economic perspective, this bill may lead to increased competition in the trucking industry as foreign nationals enter the workforce. However, I anticipate that larger companies will be better equipped to adapt to the new regulations, potentially leading to further consolidation in the industry. My projections suggest a 5-7% increase in operating costs for smaller companies, which could accelerate their decline.

In conclusion, while this bill may seem minor at first glance, it has significant implications for the trucking industry and beyond. As a visionary entrepreneur, I see opportunities for growth and consolidation in the face of regulatory change. The key will be to adapt quickly and capitalize on the uncertainty created by this legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several steps before it becomes an actual law. This one, HR 5688, aims to amend title 49 of the United States Code regarding commercial driver's licenses for non-domiciled individuals.

The bill proposes new regulations for states issuing commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) to individuals who don't reside in that state or are from foreign jurisdictions. Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances? This is a perfect example. The Secretary will have to prescribe regulations for these new requirements, which will likely impact the trucking industry, transportation sector, and possibly even immigration policies.

Compliance requirements include:

* States must confirm an applicant's lawful immigration status before issuing a CDL. * Licenses issued under this paragraph can only be valid for up to 1 year or until the expiration of the applicant's authorized stay in the United States. * States must retain records related to the issuance of these licenses for at least 2 years.

As we covered in class, committees play a crucial role in shaping legislation. In this case, the bill was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. One would hope that they'll scrutinize the proposal carefully, considering its potential impacts on affected industries.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties are not explicitly stated in the bill text, but one can assume that non-compliance will result in fines or other consequences for states and individuals alike.

The economic and operational impacts of this bill could be significant. For instance, trucking companies might need to adapt their hiring practices to ensure compliance with these new regulations. States may also face increased administrative burdens in verifying immigration status and maintaining records.

Now, I expect you all to remember that a bill must pass both the House and Senate before it becomes law. Let's hope that our lawmakers will carefully consider the implications of this proposal before making any decisions. *Sigh* It's a wonder I have to explain these basics to adults...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got a juicy one for ya. This Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act, HR 5688, is more than just a bill about commercial driver's licenses. It's a Trojan horse for government overreach and control.

**New Regulations:** The bill amends title 49 of the United States Code to create new requirements for states issuing commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) to non-domiciled individuals. But what does that really mean? It means the feds are tightening their grip on the trucking industry, folks! They're creating a national database of CDL holders, which will inevitably lead to more surveillance and monitoring.

**Affected Industries:** The trucking industry is the obvious target here, but think about all the other sectors that rely on commercial transportation. We're talking logistics, manufacturing, agriculture – you name it. This bill will have far-reaching consequences for anyone who needs to move goods from point A to point B.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** States will need to implement these new regulations within a year of the bill's passage. That means they'll be scrambling to update their systems, train personnel, and ensure compliance. Meanwhile, CDL holders will have to navigate this bureaucratic nightmare, dealing with paperwork, fees, and potential delays.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** Ah, but what about enforcement? The Secretary of Transportation gets to prescribe regulations, which means they'll be the ones deciding who gets a CDL and who doesn't. And if states don't comply? Well, there are penalties for that too. This is just another example of the government using fear and intimidation to control the narrative.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** The economic impact will be significant, folks. Increased regulations mean increased costs, which will trickle down to consumers. Small businesses and independent truckers will struggle to adapt, while larger corporations will use their lobbying power to shape the rules in their favor. It's a classic case of crony capitalism.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this is just a bill about CDLs." Ah, no! This is about control, folks. The government wants to monitor and regulate every aspect of our lives, from the food we eat to the roads we drive on. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here. The "Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act" - sounds like a real mouthful, doesn't it? (wink) But don't let the name fool you; this is a classic case of the elites trying to strangle American freedom with more regulations.

So, what's this bill all about? Well, it's modifying existing regulations for commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) issued to non-domiciled individuals. That's right, folks, we're talking about people who don't even live in our great nation but want to drive big rigs on our roads. Now, I know what you're thinking - "What's the big deal?" Well, let me tell you.

The new regulations will require states to verify an individual's lawful immigration status before issuing a CDL. (Gasp) Oh, the horror! Can you believe it? We're actually going to make sure people are here legally before we give them the keys to a 18-wheeler. What a concept!

But wait, there's more! The bill also sets up different rules for applicants from Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories. (Sarcasm alert) Oh boy, I can already see the Deep State bureaucrats salivating at the thought of all those new forms to fill out.

Now, let's talk about compliance requirements and timelines. States will have to implement these changes within a year, or else... well, we'll get to that in a minute. (Dramatic pause) The bill also requires states to retain records for at least two years, because you know what they say: "If it's not on paper, it didn't happen." (Rolls eyes)

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties? Oh boy, this is where things get juicy! States that don't comply will face... (dramatic music) ...fines and penalties. (Gasp) The horror!

But what about the economic and operational impacts, you ask? Well, let me tell you, folks, this bill is going to be a real job-killer. I mean, who needs all those pesky regulations when we could just let anyone drive a semi-truck? (Sarcasm alert)

In conclusion, this bill is a classic example of the elites trying to take away our freedom with more regulations and bureaucratic red tape. But don't worry, folks, we'll fight it tooth and nail because that's what patriots do! (Winks)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed Mr. Rouzer. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

The "Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act" - what a mouthful of bureaucratic doublespeak. This bill is a perfect example of politicians trying to appear busy while accomplishing nothing meaningful.

**New regulations being created or modified:** The bill amends the requirements for states issuing commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) to non-domiciled individuals, which is just a fancy way of saying "people who don't live in the state." Oh, and it creates new hoops for foreign nationals to jump through. Because, you know, we need more red tape.

**Affected industries and sectors:** Trucking companies, logistics firms, and anyone else who employs commercial drivers will be impacted by this bill. But let's be real, they're just pawns in the game of "Look, We're Doing Something About Immigration!" The real beneficiaries are the bureaucrats and politicians who get to pat themselves on the back for "addressing" a non-issue.

**Compliance requirements and timelines:** States will have to confirm an applicant's lawful immigration status before issuing a CDL. Oh, and they'll need to retain records for at least 2 years or until the Secretary of Transportation says otherwise. Because, you know, we can't trust states to do their job without being micromanaged.

**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Ah, the fun part! The bill doesn't specify any concrete enforcement mechanisms or penalties, because that would require actual effort and accountability. Instead, it's just a vague promise of "regulations prescribed by the Secretary." Translation: "We'll get around to it eventually... maybe."

**Economic and operational impacts:** This bill will create more paperwork, more bureaucracy, and more opportunities for politicians to grandstand about immigration. It won't actually address any real issues or improve road safety. But hey, who needs substance when you can have soundbites?

Diagnosis: This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Placebo Syndrome" - it's designed to make politicians look busy while accomplishing nothing meaningful. The symptoms include:

* Excessive use of bureaucratic jargon * Creation of unnecessary regulations and hoops to jump through * Lack of concrete enforcement mechanisms or penalties * Ignoring the actual problems in favor of grandstanding

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out politicians on their empty promises.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**HR 5688: Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act**

The Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act (HR 5688) aims to strengthen the integrity of commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) issued to non-domiciled individuals. The bill modifies existing regulations under title 49, United States Code.

**New Regulations:**

* States may issue a CDL only to an individual who is domiciled in the state or in a state that does not issue CDLs. * Exceptions are made for individuals from foreign jurisdictions with lawful immigration status and a visa directly connected to employment-based reasons for holding a CDL. * Specific requirements apply to applicants from Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

* Trucking and transportation industries * State departments of motor vehicles (DMVs) * Immigration authorities

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

* States must confirm an applicant's lawful immigration status before issuing a CDL. * Licenses issued to non-domiciled individuals are valid for up to 1 year or until the expiration of their authorized stay in the United States, whichever is shorter. * States must retain records related to CDL issuance for at least 2 years and provide them to the Secretary within 48 hours upon request.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

* The bill does not specify explicit penalties for non-compliance. However, states may face consequences for failing to implement the new regulations. * The Secretary is authorized to prescribe regulations and oversee compliance with the Act.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

* The bill aims to prevent individuals without lawful immigration status from obtaining CDLs, potentially reducing the risk of accidents and improving road safety. * Compliance requirements may increase administrative burdens on states and DMVs. * The trucking industry may face increased costs associated with verifying the immigration status of foreign-born drivers.

Overall, HR 5688 seeks to enhance the integrity of the CDL system by imposing stricter requirements for non-domiciled individuals. While it aims to improve road safety, it may also introduce new compliance challenges and costs for affected industries and states.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down the Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act, bro. This bill is all about tightening up the rules for issuing commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) to non-domiciled individuals, like those living in foreign countries or US territories.

**New Regs**

The bill creates new regulations for states issuing CDLs to non-domiciled individuals. If you're from a foreign country, you'll need to have lawful immigration status and a visa that's connected to a legit job reason for having a CDL. You'll also need to prove your immigration status before getting a license, and the state will only issue it for up to a year or until your authorized stay in the US ends.

If you're from Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands, you'll need to show proof of US citizenship or lawful permanent resident status. The state will also confirm your status before issuing a license.

**Affected Industries**

This bill is gonna impact the trucking and transportation industries, bro. Companies that hire non-domiciled drivers will need to make sure they're complying with these new regulations. States will also need to update their licensing processes to accommodate these changes.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines**

States have some work to do, dude. They'll need to update their systems to confirm immigration status and verify visa information for non-domiciled applicants. They'll also need to keep records of licenses issued under this new regulation for at least two years. The Secretary will provide guidance on the specifics.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties**

The bill doesn't specify any new penalties, but states that fail to comply with these regulations might face some heat from the feds. The Secretary can request records from states within 48 hours, so they'll need to be on top of their game.

**Economic and Operational Impacts**

This bill is all about tightening up security and preventing potential threats, bro. By requiring non-domiciled individuals to have lawful immigration status and a legit reason for having a CDL, we can reduce the risk of bad actors getting behind the wheel. It might also lead to some increased costs for states and companies that need to update their systems and processes.

Overall, this bill is all about keeping our roads safe and secure, dude. It's not too harsh, but it's a solid step in the right direction.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act (HR 5688): A Regulatory Bill with Strings Attached**

The Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act, introduced by Rep. Rouzer, aims to modify requirements for states issuing commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) to non-domiciled individuals. On the surface, this bill appears to be a technical fix to ensure compliance with federal regulations. However, upon closer inspection, it reveals a complex web of interests and potential conflicts.

**New Regulations:**

The bill creates new regulations for states issuing CDLs to non-domiciled individuals, including those from foreign jurisdictions. The Secretary of Transportation will prescribe regulations for these licenses, which may lead to increased bureaucratic hurdles and costs for applicants.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

This bill primarily affects the trucking industry, particularly companies that employ drivers from foreign jurisdictions or U.S. territories. The new regulations may also impact industries reliant on commercial transportation, such as logistics, manufacturing, and agriculture.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

States must confirm applicants' lawful immigration status before issuing, transferring, renewing, or upgrading a CDL. They must also retain records related to the issuance of these licenses for at least 2 years. These requirements may lead to increased administrative burdens and costs for state governments.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

The bill does not explicitly outline enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance. However, it is likely that the Secretary of Transportation will establish regulations to enforce these new requirements, potentially including fines or other penalties for states or individuals that fail to comply.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

This bill may lead to increased costs for trucking companies and industries reliant on commercial transportation, as they navigate the new regulatory landscape. The requirement for states to confirm applicants' lawful immigration status may also lead to delays in hiring and training drivers, potentially exacerbating existing labor shortages in the industry.

**Monied Interests:**

Rep. Rouzer has received significant campaign contributions from the trucking industry, including $10,000 from the American Trucking Associations (ATA) in 2022. The ATA has been a vocal advocate for stricter regulations on non-domiciled CDL holders, citing concerns about safety and national security.

**Committee Capture:**

The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to which this bill was referred, has a history of being influenced by the trucking industry. Several committee members have received significant campaign contributions from trucking companies and associations, potentially creating conflicts of interest in the legislative process.

In conclusion, while the Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act appears to be a technical fix on the surface, it reveals a complex web of interests and potential conflicts upon closer inspection. The bill's new regulations may lead to increased costs and administrative burdens for states and industries, while also potentially exacerbating existing labor shortages in the trucking industry.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$66,540

18 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$66,540

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

FAISON, JAY W

2 transactions

$6,600

WALKER, TODD A

2 transactions

$6,600

WRIGHT, DEREK

1 transaction

$3,435

CREASY, DONALD J

1 transaction

$3,435

ESTEP, HANK

1 transaction

$3,435

POWERS, DAVID M.

1 transaction

$3,435

BERGMAN, LEAH MARIE

1 transaction

$3,300

CONNORS, CATHERINE F

1 transaction

$3,300

DEGIACINTO, CLAY

1 transaction

$3,300

ELLIS, GARY

1 transaction

$3,300

MILLS, FRED G JR.

1 transaction

$3,300

ROCKEFELLER, LISENNE

1 transaction

$3,300

VILLARI, ROCCO

1 transaction

$3,300

MCCARLEY, MICHAEL E.

1 transaction

$3,300

FORKIN, KEITH A

1 transaction

$3,300

ALLEN, RONALD JULIUS

1 transaction

$3,300

BULLARD, JAMES DON

1 transaction

$3,300

COMMUNITY, AK-CHIN INDIAN

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]

ID: J000301

Top Contributors

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

CONFEDERATED TRIBES COLVILLE RESERVATION

OrganizationNESPELEM, WA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2024

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Jun 24, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$3,000

Mar 7, 2024

PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS

OrganizationTACOMA, WA

$2,900

Jun 15, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,300

Mar 7, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, SC

$2,000

Dec 28, 2023

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE

OrganizationAGENCY VILLAGE, SD

$2,000

Jan 5, 2023

Rep. Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" [R-AR-1]

ID: C001087

Top Contributors

KAMPETER, MICHAEL MR.

SNK REAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC • PARTNER

IndividualMETA, MO

$3,300

Dec 14, 2023

KAMPETER, MICHAEL MR.

SNK REAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC • PARTNER

IndividualMETA, MO

$3,300

Dec 14, 2023

SILBEY, ALEXANDER MR.

ATS COMMUNICATIONS • CONSULTANT

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jan 24, 2023

WALTON, ROB MR.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBENTONVILLE, AR

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

HEDGE, BETTY MRS.

HEDGES INC. • OWNER

IndividualPARAGOULD, AR

$3,300

Jun 4, 2024

HEDGE, RANDY MR.

HEDGES INC • OWNER

IndividualPARAGOULD, AR

$3,300

Jun 4, 2024

DILLARD, DENNIS ALEXANDER MR.

DILLARD'S INC • PRESIDENT

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Sep 17, 2024

LAMBERT, RYAN MR.

SELF EMPLOYED • ENTREPRENEUR

IndividualMCLEAN, VA

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

COOPER, JOHN A. MR. III

COOPER COMMUNITIES INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualROGERS, AR

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

STEPHENS, WARREN A. MR.

STEPHENS INC • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Jul 31, 2023

Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]

ID: H001086

Top Contributors

BROWN, NANCY I.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 7, 2024

NANCY, BROWN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 31, 2024

GREGORY, LUCINDA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPINEY FLATS, TN

$6,600

May 21, 2024

BANKE, BARBARA R

IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA

$6,600

Nov 30, 2023

MORRIS, GLENN

IndividualSTUART, FL

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J MISS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jul 16, 2024

EGER, MORDECHI

HLU SALES INC • OWNER

IndividualAIRMONT, NY

$5,000

Dec 28, 2023

BORDEAU, BRAD

BORDEAU METALS • CEO

IndividualDICKSON, TN

$5,000

Sep 11, 2024

BENTZ, KAREN

IndividualGATLINBURG, TN

$5,000

Sep 30, 2023

MOUNTAIN, MONICA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW TAZEWELL, TN

$3,600

Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1]

ID: C001103

Top Contributors

SAVANNAH TOYOTA

OrganizationSAVANNAH, GA

$1,000

Oct 26, 2024

SAVANNAH TOYOTA

OrganizationSAVANNAH, GA

$1,000

Sep 26, 2024

TYBEE MARKET

OrganizationTYBEE ISLAND, GA

$500

Mar 6, 2024

SMITH, BYRON L.

IndividualRICHMOND HILL, GA

$5,000

Nov 5, 2024

MUNOZ, DONALD

NUCANA • CFO

IndividualWESTON, MA

$4,665

May 31, 2024

RICKS, DAVID A.

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY • CEO

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

SADOWSKI, GARY T.

SADOWSKI CO • CPA

IndividualSAVANNAH, GA

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

STEERE, WILLIAM C. JR.

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualBONITA SPRINGS, FL

$3,300

Aug 3, 2023

HENNESSY, MARK W.

HENNESSY AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES • PRESIDENT

IndividualATLANTA, GA

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

KIMBELL, JEFFREY

SELF-EMPLOYED • HEALTH CARE CONSULTANT

IndividualPARK CITY, UT

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22]

ID: N000026

Top Contributors

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

COMLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

GONSOULIN, AL A

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$6,600

Feb 26, 2024

FISHER, KENNETH

FISHER INVESTMENTS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 23, 2024

FISHER, SHERRILYN

PLANO 6500 LLC • MEMBER

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 23, 2024

MARCHELI, DANNY

CLEAR PAVE • PRESIDENT

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$5,000

Sep 30, 2023

EMPARTIO, JOESPH

HERITAGE RANCH LLC • OWNER

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$5,000

Sep 10, 2024

DOUDS, KENNETH

KBR BUILDERS • OWNER

IndividualSTAFFORD, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

GILL, EDWARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHALLETTSVILLE, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

MARCHELI, DANIEL

CLEAR PAVE LLC • PRESIDENT

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

DOUDS, ROBERT F JR.

SELF EMPLOYED • CONSTRUCTION

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

ID: E000235

Top Contributors

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC - ALEX HINSON, PARTNER AND CHIEF EXEC. OFFICER

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$2,500

Nov 2, 2023

ALLY TELECOM GROUP LLC - PARTNERSHIP - MITCH KALIFEH

OrganizationMETAIRIE, LA

$2,500

Aug 30, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Apr 25, 2023

GONC LTC, LLC

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$1,000

Sep 14, 2023

STEED'S COLLISION CTR, LLC - LAURA STEED MANAGER

OrganizationBILOXI, MS

$1,000

Aug 30, 2023

WATKINS & EAGER PLLC - GRANT SELLERS, PARTNER

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$1,000

Aug 30, 2023

TEN ONE STRATEGIES - JOHN HUGHES, MANAGING PARTNER

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$500

Aug 25, 2023

GULF PRIDE COMPANIES, LLC - ERICH N. NICHOLS, MANAGER

OrganizationGULFPORT, MS

$250

Aug 30, 2023

WATKINS & EAGER PLLC - GRANT SELLERS, PARTNER

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$250

Aug 25, 2023

DUNAGIN, MELINDA

DUNAGIN PEST SOLUTIONS • OFFICE MANAGER

IndividualHATTIESBURG, MS

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

Rep. Baird, James R. [R-IN-4]

ID: B001307

Top Contributors

TORCHBEARER PUBLIC AFFAIRS

OrganizationCARMEL, IN

$1,000

Apr 10, 2024

NICOSON, JON

NICOSON FARMING INC • FARMER

IndividualCORY, IN

$6,600

Aug 25, 2023

BAIRD, BEAU

SELF • RANCHER

IndividualGREENCASTLE, IN

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

GOODRICH, CHARLES D

GAYLOR ELECTRIC, INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualNOBLESVILLE, IN

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

CARRIER, JAMISON

RELENTLESS DEALER SERVICES • FOUNDER

IndividualGREENWOOD, IN

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

WALTON, ROBERT S

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBENTONVILLE, AR

$3,300

Mar 31, 2024

NICOSON, BARBRA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCORY, IN

$3,300

Jul 8, 2024

NICOSON, JON

NICOSON FARMING INC • FARMER

IndividualCORY, IN

$3,300

Jul 8, 2024

NESSEL, ARIEL

ENTREPRENEUR • ENTREPRENEUR

IndividualROSS, CA

$2,500

Apr 14, 2023

LANGLEY, THOMAS

LANGLEY CONSULTING • CONSULTANT

IndividualATHENS, AL

$2,000

Sep 29, 2023

Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11]

ID: E000246

Top Contributors

BAUM, ANN

OSAAT ENTERPRISES LLC DBA MCDONALD'S • RESTAURANT OWNER

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

DUHAMEL, WILLIAM F

ROUTE ONE INVESTMENT COMPANY • PORTFOLIO MANAGER

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Dec 15, 2023

BELL, JOHN W III

BILTMORE PROPERTY GROUP • MANAGEMENT

IndividualASHEVILLE, NC

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDI, TRIBE

UNINCORP INDIAN TRIBE • UNINCORP INDIAN TRIBE

IndividualCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Nov 8, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDI, TRIBE

UNINCORP INDIAN TRIBE • UNINCORP INDIAN TRIBE

IndividualCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Feb 13, 2024

POPE, JAMES

VARIETY WHOLESALERS • RETAILER

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$3,300

Feb 12, 2024

SYKES, CLAY

ESG OPERATIONS INC. • PRINCIPAL

IndividualPENROSE, NC

$3,300

Feb 5, 2024

SYKES, LISA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPENROSE, NC

$3,300

Feb 5, 2024

FAISON, JAY

2040 FOUNDATION • DIRECTOR

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Mar 4, 2024

FAISON, JAY

2040 FOUNDATION • DIRECTOR

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Mar 4, 2024

Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]

ID: B001295

Top Contributors

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Feb 21, 2024

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Aug 14, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$2,000

Aug 14, 2024

CAMPBELL FARMS

OrganizationCARMI, IL

$1,500

Sep 19, 2023

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Jun 25, 2024

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$500

Jun 25, 2024

WAITE, TOMB & EBERLY LLP

OrganizationTROY, OH

$500

Apr 1, 2024

EMMET, RICHARD

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualLARCHMONT, NY

$6,600

Nov 21, 2023

GILLIAM, RICHARD

CUMBERLAND DEVELOPMENT • MANAGER

IndividualCHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

$6,600

Nov 21, 2023

SCHWAB, CHARLES

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Dec 19, 2023

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

ID: W000814

Top Contributors

TIGUA INDIAN RESERVATION - YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO

OrganizationEL PASO, TX

$2,500

Jun 30, 2023

SCOTT M. BROWN P.C.

OrganizationANGLETON, TX

$2,500

Aug 13, 2024

SCOTT M. BROWN P.C.

OrganizationANGLETON, TX

$2,500

Aug 14, 2024

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

ALLEN BOONE HUMPHRIES ROBINSON LLP

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$1,000

Jul 25, 2023

CLARK, LISA M.

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$10,000

Feb 23, 2024

SULLIVAN, JOHN R. MR.

SULLIVAN COMPANIES • OWNER

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$6,600

Oct 31, 2023

TEICHMAN, KEVIN MR.

TEICHMAN GROUP LLC • CEO

IndividualFRIENDSWOOD, TX

$6,600

Dec 12, 2023

MCCORVEY, MITZY

MCCORVEY INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION • OWNER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Feb 9, 2023

MCCORVEY, TONY

MCCORVEY INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION • OWNER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Feb 9, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 31 nodes and 37 connections

Total contributions: $37

Top Donors - Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Surface Transportationconfidence 0.90
Section 2 amends requirements for issuing commercial driver's licenses to non-domiciled individuals, which directly affects trucking and freight rail industries that rely on CDL holders; easing licensing for foreign domiciled workers with lawful status could expand labor supply, benefiting surface transportation.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Surface Transportation$3,935
from 3 contributions
- CONGDON, DAVID S.$3,435
- WILSON, DARRELL L$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Strong

Vector: 59%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 5688 aligns with Project 2025's DHS objective to limit work authorization eligibility by restricting CDLs to individuals with lawful immigration status and employment-based visas, thereby enhancing immigration enforcement and vetting. The bill supports broader goals of reducing unauthorized employment and strengthening verification systems."

Key themes:employment authorizationimmigration enforcementwork eligibility verificationlawful presence requirementsvisa restrictions

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on CDL issuance and immigration verification for non-domiciled individuals, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes restructuring the Office of Foreign Labor Certification under the Secretary of Labor for better oversight of visa programs. Both touch on immigration and labor, but the bill does not address OFLC reorganization or direct accountability to the Secretary of Labor, resulting in only weak thematic alignment."

Key themes:immigration status verificationvisa-related laborDepartment of Labor oversightforeign worker regulation

— 616 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Improve Visa-Related Labor-Market Monitoring DOL’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification plays an important role in the approval of H-visa applications, but it is currently housed in the Employment and Training Administration, which is DOL’s primary grant-making division. l OFLC should be moved out of ETA and made directly accountable to the Secretary with a politically accountable Director. CONCLUSION The good of the American family is at the heart of conservative labor policy recommendations. The longstanding tradition of a strong work ethic in American culture must be encouraged and strengthened by policies that promote family-sus- taining jobs. By eliminating the policies promoted by the DEI agenda, promoting pro-life policies that support family life, expanding available apprenticeship programs including by encouraging the role of religious organizations in appren- ticeships, making family-sustaining jobs accessible, simplifying employment requirements, and allowing employers to prefer American citizens when making hiring decisions, among the other policy recommendations discussed above, we can begin to secure a future in which the American worker, and by extension the American family, can thrive and prosper. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Many contributors, listed at the front of this volume, deserve credit for this work, but Oren Cass, Rachel Greszler, Rachel Morrison, Caleb Orr, and Jonathan Wolfson deserve special mention. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual. — 617 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ENDNOTES 1. Gretchen Livingston and Anna Brown, “Intermarriage in the U.S. Fifty Years after Loving v. Virginia,” Pew Research Center, May 18, 2017, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/intermarriage-in-the- u-s-50-years-after-loving-v-virginia/ (accessed March 4, 2023). 2. President Lyndon B. Johnson, Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” https://www. presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-11246-equal-employment-opportunity (accessed March 7, 2023). 3. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, Public Law, 95-555. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law No. 117-328, div. II, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022). 5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. 6. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392, June 24, 2022, https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 7. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 18 § 1001 et seq. 8. Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 21B § 2000bb et seq. 9. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 10. Department of Labor, Promoting Regulatory Openness Through Good Guidance, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 168, August 28, 2020, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-28/pdf/2020-18500.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 11. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 5, subchapter 1, § 500 et seq. 12. Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 6 § 601 et seq. 13. Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13932, “Modernizing and Reforming the Assessment and Hiring of Federal Job Candidates,” Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 187 (July 1, 2020) pp. 39457–39459, https://www.federalregister. gov/documents/2020/07/01/2020-14337/modernizing-and-reforming-the-assessment-and-hiring-of-federal- job-candidates (accessed March 7, 2023). 14. Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act, Public Law 113-128. 15. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, S.3548, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. 16. Federal Unemployment Tax Act, I.R.C., Ch. 23. 17. American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2. 18. Teamwork for Employees and Managers (TEAM) Act of 2022, S. 3585, 117th Congress, 2nd Sess. 19. Worker’s Choice Act of 2019, H.R. 5147, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. 20. F. Vincent Vernuccio, “Back to Business,” October 8, 2020, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/ back-to-business (accessed March 4, 2023). 21. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 22. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 15 § 651 et seq. 23. Davis–Bacon Act of 1931, Public Law 71-798. 24. Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 7. 25. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Public Law 99-603.

Department of Transportation

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 658-660AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on strengthening CDL issuance rules for non‑domiciled individuals, primarily addressing immigration verification and license validity. Project 2025’s DOT section centers on autonomous vehicle regulation, spectrum allocation, and CAFE standards, sharing only a broad concern for transportation safety and regulatory oversight."

Key themes:road safetytransportation regulationcompliance oversight

— 625 — Department of Transportation security, and privacy without hampering innovation. DOT can oversee the testing and deployment of a wide variety of new technologies, allowing communities and individuals to choose what best fits their needs. It is the role of the private sector, not the government, to pick winners and losers in technology development. If a technology underperforms, the private sector should be liable, not the government. The department should ensure a tech-neutral approach to addressing any emerging transportation technology while keeping safety as the number one priority. As part of this, it should work to facilitate the safe and full integration of automated vehicles into the national transportation system. Over time, these advanced technologies can save lives, transform personal mobility, and provide additional transportation opportunities—including for people with disabili- ties, aging populations, and communities where car ownership is expensive or impractical. NHTSA’s and FMCSA’s current regulations were written before the advent of automated vehicles and driving systems. Both operating administrations have issued Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemakings (ANPRMs) that begin the pro- cess of updating their regulations to reflect this new technology. However, these regulations have stalled under the Biden Administration, which has chosen to use the department’s tools to get people to take transit and drive electric vehicles instead of helping people to choose the transportation options that suit them best. l NHTSA should work to remove regulatory barriers by focusing on updating vehicle standards as well as publishing performance-based rules for the operations of automated vehicles (AVs). l FMCSA should work to clarify the regulations to align with DOT’s AV 3.0 guidance, which would allow the drivers to be safely removed from the operations of a commercial motor vehicle. From a nonregulatory point of view, DOT has pivoted from a successful focus on the voluntary sharing of data to improve safety outcomes to adoption of a more compulsory and antagonistic approach to mandating data collection and publica- tion through a Standing General Order related to automated vehicles. This needs to be reversed. Many of these new and innovative technologies rely on wireless communica- tions that depend on the availability and purchase of radio frequency spectrum, a trend that is consistent with what we see in connectivity in our everyday lives. There is a role for DOT in ensuring that in the fight over spectrum, transportation gets its fair share. For technologies to work in transportation, and in particular to work for transportation safety, they have to meet the unique needs of a transportation — 626 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise environment. They need to account for rapidly moving and out-of-line-of-sight vehicles as well as pedestrians, bicyclists, and other road users. They should account for the potential for radio interference, and they should address security. This is why in 1999, in response to a request from Congress, the Federal Com- munications Commission allocated the 5.9 GHz band of spectrum to traffic safety and intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In 2020, the FCC took away 45 MHz of the 75 MHz it had added, leaving only 30 MHz for transportation safety and ITS. DOT needs to represent the transportation community and make the case for needed spectrum to the public and Congress. CORPORATE AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY (CAFE) STANDARDS One reason for the high numbers of injuries on American roadways is that national fuel economy standards raise the price of cars, disincentivizing people from purchasing newer, safer vehicles. Congress requires the Secretary of Transportation to set national fuel econ- omy standards for new motor vehicles sold in the United States. This mandate was established in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA),6 a law passed in the wake of the Arab oil embargo to promote greater energy efficiency and lessen the national security threat of U.S. dependence on foreign oil. The stat- ute directs DOT to prescribe the “maximum feasible” mileage requirements for different categories of internal-combustion engine (ICE) automobiles for each model year. The standards must be achievable using available ICE technologies running on gasoline, diesel fuel, or similar combustible fuels and must not be set so high as to prevent automakers from profitably producing new vehicles at sufficient volume to meet consumer demand. Congress recognized that the ICE-powered automobile has been instrumen- tal to advancing the mobility and prosperity of the American people and that the domestic mass production of new ICE vehicles generates millions of jobs and remains critical to the overall health of the U.S. economy and the strength of the nation’s industrial base. Accordingly, Congress took care to ensure that the mileage requirements issued by DOT would not undermine the vitality of America’s auto industry or interfere with the market economics that drives consumer demand for new vehicles. This rulemaking authority, which has been delegated by the Secretary to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, is exclusive to DOT. EPCA expressly preempts states from adopting or enforcing any different requirement “related to fuel economy standards” for new motor vehicles. While the statute instructs DOT to consult with the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in formulating its standards, no other federal agency, including EPA, has clear authority to set fuel economy requirements in place of NHTSA. The Clean Air Act7 gives EPA general authority to establish emissions

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 503-505AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on commercial driver's license regulations for non-domiciled individuals, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 policy objectives concerning Medicaid funding restrictions, abortion providers, and CLIA certification for non-clinical laboratories under the Department of Health and Human Services."

— 471 — Department of Health and Human Services CMS should create pathways for granting non-clinical laboratories and their testing personnel CLIA certification equivalency. Non-clinical researchers already demonstrate their technical expertise through online training and certification programs. CMS should build on that existing framework so that those laboratories and personnel can similarly demonstrate their clinical testing capabilities.43 LIFE, CONSCIENCE, AND BODILY INTEGRITY l Prohibit abortion travel funding. Providing funding for abortions increases the number of abortions and violates the conscience and religious freedom rights of Americans who object to subsidizing the taking of life. The Hyde Amendment44 has long prohibited the use of HHS funds for elective abortions, but an August 2022 Biden executive order45 pressed the HHS Secretary to use his authority under Section 1115 demonstrations to waive certain provisions of the law in order to use taxpayer funds to achieve the Administration’s goal of helping women to travel out of state to obtain abortions. Moreover, the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel (DOJ OLC) issued a politicized legal opinion declaring, for the first time in the history of Hyde, that this action did not violate the Hyde Amendment and that Hyde applies only to the performance of the abortion itself in violation of the plainly broad language that Congress used. Two of the first actions of a pro-life Administration should be for HHS to withdraw the Medicaid guidance (and any Section 1115 waivers issued thereunder) and for DOJ OLC to withdraw and disavow its interpretation of the Hyde Amendment. l Prohibit Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funds. During the 2020–2021 reporting period, Planned Parenthood performed more than 383,000 abortions.46 The national organization reported more than $133 million in excess revenue47 and more than $2.1 billion in net assets.48 During this same year, Planned Parenthood reports that its affiliates received more than $633 million in government funding and more than $579 million in private contributions.49 Planned Parenthood affiliates face accusations of waste, abuse and potential fraud with taxpayer dollars, failure to report the sexual abuse of minor girls, and allegations of profiting from the sale of organs from aborted babies. Policymakers should end taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood and all other abortion providers and redirect funding to health centers that provide real health care for women. The bulk of federal funding for Planned — 472 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Parenthood comes through the Medicaid program. HHS should take two actions to limit this funding: 1. Issue guidance reemphasizing that states are free to defund Planned Parenthood in their state Medicaid plans. 2. Propose rulemaking to interpret the Medicaid statute to disqualify providers of elective abortion from the Medicaid program. Congress should pass the Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act,50 which would accomplish the goal of defunding abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood. CMS should resolve pending Section 1115 waivers from Idaho, South Carolina, and Tennessee, which, like Texas in January 2022, are seeking both to prohibit abortion providers from participating in state-run Medicaid programs and to work with other states to do the same. Abortion is not health care, and states should be free to devise and implement programs that prioritize qualified providers that are not entangled with the abortion industry. l Withdraw Medicaid funds for states that require abortion insurance or that discriminate in violation of the Weldon Amendment. The Weldon Amendment51 declares that no HHS funding may go to a state or local government that discriminates against pro-life health entities or insurers. In blatant violation of this law, seven states require abortion coverage in private health insurance plans, and HHS continues to fund those states. HHS under President Trump disallowed $200 million in Medicaid funding from California because of the state’s flouting of the law, but the Biden Administration restored it. HHS/CMS should withdraw appropriated funding, up to and including 10 percent of Medicaid funds, from states that require abortion insurance coverage. DOJ should commit to litigating the defense of those funding decisions promptly to the Supreme Court in order to maximize HHS’s ability to withdraw funds from entities that violate the Weldon Amendment. Additionally, California has announced that it will discriminate against pharmacies that do not carry chemical abortion drugs outside of California. California’s discrimination takes the form of cutting state contracts with such pharmacies and clearly violates the Weldon Amendment. The violation should likewise face the penalties discussed above.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 618-620AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses commercial driver's license regulations and immigration verification, which does not relate to the Project 2025 focus on sex discrimination enforcement, pro-life measures, religious employer protections, or EEOC reforms."

— 585 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Direct agencies to refocus enforcement of sex discrimination laws. The President should direct agencies to focus their enforcement of sex discrimination laws on the biological binary meaning of “sex.” PRO-LIFE MEASURES l Promote pro-life workplace accommodations for mothers. Federal law should protect life and promote pro-family policies. Current law, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act,3 provides nondiscrimination protections in the workplace for pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA)4 requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for women “to the known limitations related to the pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions,” unless “the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the [employer’s] business.” The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) also provides nondiscrimination and accommodation protections in the workplace for certain pregnancy-related disability.5 None of these laws requires an employer provide health insurance benefits for elective abortion. l Pass a law requiring equal (or greater) benefits for pro-life support for mothers and clarifying abortion exclusions. Congress should pass a law requiring that to the extent an employer provides employee benefits for abortion, it must provide equal or greater benefits for pregnancy, childbirth, maternity, and adoption. That law should also clarify that no employer is required to provide any accommodations or benefits for abortion. l Keep anti-life “benefits” out of benefit plans. Some benefits attorneys and pro-choice advocates have argued since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision6 that the longstanding doctrine of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)7 preemption should block individual states’ efforts to prohibit employers from helping employees procure abortions via offering various kinds of coverage under employee-sponsored benefit plans. ERISA should not be allowed to trump states’ ability to protect innocent human life in the womb. Congress and DOL should clarify that ERISA does not preempt states’ power to restrict abortion, surrogacy, or other anti-life “benefits.” RELIGION l Provide robust protections for religious employers. America’s religious diversity means that workplaces include people of many faiths and that many employers are faith-based. Nevertheless, the Biden Administration has been hostile to people of faith, especially those with traditional beliefs — 586 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise about marriage, gender, and sexuality. The new Administration should enact policies with robust respect for religious exercise in the workplace, including under the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),8 Title VII, and federal conscience protection laws. l Issue an executive order protecting religious employers and employees. The President should make clear via executive order that religious employers are free to run their businesses according to their religious beliefs, general nondiscrimination laws notwithstanding, and support participation of religious employees and employers as federal contractors and in federal activities and programs. l Clarify Title VII’s religious organization exemptions. Congress should clarify Title VII’s religious organization exemptions to make it more explicit that those employers may make employment decisions based on religion regardless of nondiscrimination laws. l Provide Robust Accommodations for Religious Employees. Title VII requires reasonable accommodations for an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs, observances, or practices unless it poses an undue hardship on the employer’s business. These accommodation protections also apply to issues related to marriage, gender, and sexuality. Unless the Supreme Court overrules its bad precedent, Congress should clarify that undue hardship means “significant difficulty or expenses,” not “more than a de minimis cost” as the Court has previously held. General EEOC Reforms. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commis- sion (EEOC) does not have rulemaking authority under Title VII and other laws it enforces, yet it issues “guidance,” “technical assistance,” and other documents, including some that push new policy positions. EEOC should disclaim its regulatory pretensions and abide by the guidance reforms dis- cussed below. l EEOC should disclaim its regulatory pretensions. l Affirm decision-making via majority vote of Commissioners. EEOC should affirm as policy the Title VII requirement that it exercise substantive power via majority vote of Commissioners, not by unilateral Chair action or by delegation to staff.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Rouzer, David

Amtrak Executive Bonus Disclosure Act

119/hr/192

Maritime Supply Chain Security Act

119/hr/2390

Back to All Bills