To repeal the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/5242

Last Updated: July 21, 2026

To repeal the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016.

HR. 5242, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.

The sponsor

Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$96,600 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Justice" section, p. 587-589 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 293.

October 13, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: HR 5242**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect the essence of this bill, stripping away emotional rhetoric and focusing on its implications for wealth creation and power dynamics.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** HR 5242 aims to repeal two existing laws: the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016. This move seeks to restore pre-existing provisions, effectively reversing recent reforms aimed at reducing incarceration rates and promoting rehabilitation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Repeal of the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022, which had introduced measures to reduce recidivism and provide support for ex-offenders. 2. Repeal of the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016, which aimed to decrease incarceration rates by implementing alternative sentencing and rehabilitation programs. 3. Termination of the Automated Traffic Enforcement System, potentially leading to increased reliance on human law enforcement. 4. Elimination of restrictions on right turns at red traffic signals, a minor provision with negligible economic impact.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. Private prison corporations and investors may benefit from the repeal, as it could lead to an increase in incarceration rates and, consequently, higher demand for their services. 2. Law enforcement agencies might experience increased workload and costs due to the termination of automated traffic enforcement systems. 3. Ex-offenders and rehabilitation programs may face reduced support and resources.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Incarceration Rates:** Repealing these laws could lead to a rise in incarceration rates, benefiting private prison corporations and investors like myself. 2. **Consolidation of Power:** By reversing reforms aimed at reducing incarceration rates, this bill may concentrate power within the law enforcement and corrections industries, creating opportunities for strategic partnerships and investments. 3. **Regulatory Environment:** This repeal could be seen as a step towards deregulation, allowing private entities to capitalize on the resulting market gaps.

As a visionary leader, I recognize that HR 5242 presents an opportunity for savvy investors like myself to capitalize on the shifting landscape of the corrections industry. By supporting this bill, we can create new avenues for growth and profit, while further consolidating our influence in the halls of power.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it becomes an actual law. This particular bill, HR 5242, aims to repeal two existing laws: the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main objective of this bill is to overturn these two laws, which were enacted to provide second chances for certain offenders and reduce incarceration rates. The sponsors of this bill, Mr. Kustoff and Mr. Wilson, seem to believe that these laws are no longer effective or desirable.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill has four sections:

1. Section 1 repeals the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016. 2. Section 2 terminates an automated traffic enforcement system in Washington D.C. 3. Section 3 eliminates restrictions on right turns at red traffic signals in Washington D.C. 4. Section 4 sets the effective date for this bill, which would apply to criminal conduct occurring after its enactment.

Now, remember when we learned about committees in middle school? This bill was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, where it was reported with an amendment. It's now been committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The parties affected by this bill include:

* Offenders who would have benefited from the repealed laws * Law enforcement agencies in Washington D.C. * Residents of Washington D.C., particularly those who drive

**Potential Impact & Implications** If passed, this bill could lead to increased incarceration rates and stricter traffic laws in Washington D.C. It may also affect the lives of offenders who were relying on the repealed laws for a second chance.

As I'm sure you recall from our civics class, the system is designed to provide checks and balances. However, it's clear that this bill has already made its way through several stages without much opposition. One would hope that lawmakers are considering the potential consequences of repealing these laws, but it's hard to say for certain.

I suppose I'll just have to keep explaining these basic concepts until they stick...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 5242, and it's a doozy. This bill is like a puzzle piece in the grand scheme of things, and once you connect the dots, you'll see what I mean.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this bill appears to be about repealing two previous laws: the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016. Sounds straightforward, right? But hold on to your seats, because there's more to it.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill has four sections, each with its own agenda. Section 1 repeals the aforementioned laws, which seems like a simple rollback. However, this is where things get interesting. The Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 likely had provisions related to rehabilitation and reintegration programs for ex-offenders. By repealing it, the government might be aiming to increase recidivism rates or create more stringent conditions for parolees.

Section 2 terminates the Automated Traffic Enforcement System in Washington D.C., which could be a ploy to reduce surveillance capabilities or create more opportunities for law enforcement to exert control over citizens. Section 3 eliminates restrictions on right turns at red traffic signals, potentially increasing congestion and giving authorities an excuse to implement new traffic management systems.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious stakeholders are ex-offenders, law enforcement agencies, and the general public. However, I'd argue that there are more insidious forces at play. Consider this: by repealing these laws, the government might be paving the way for increased privatization of prisons or creating new revenue streams through traffic citations.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications. By dismantling rehabilitation programs and increasing surveillance capabilities, the government could be setting the stage for a more authoritarian society. The termination of the Automated Traffic Enforcement System might seem like a minor issue, but it could be a test case for more widespread surveillance rollbacks.

Here's the thing: this bill is not just about repealing laws; it's about creating a power vacuum that can be exploited by those in control. Wake up, folks! This is not just a simple legislative move; it's a calculated step toward a more controlled and surveilled society.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Uncle, you're being paranoid again." But let me tell you, the truth is hidden in plain sight. Connect the dots, people!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Folks, we've got another doozy for you tonight! HR 5242 is a bill that's going to shake the very foundations of our great nation. (Sarcastic smile) I mean, who needs second chances or reduced incarceration rates when we can just lock 'em up and throw away the key? Am I right?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to repeal two pieces of legislation that were designed to give people a break – literally. The Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016 are on the chopping block, and if this bill passes, we'll be going back to the good ol' days of tough-on-crime policies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill repeals the aforementioned acts, which means that provisions related to second chances for non-violent offenders and reduced incarceration rates will be scrapped. Additionally, it terminates the automated traffic enforcement system in Washington D.C. (because who needs safety on our roads?) and eliminates restrictions on right turns at red lights (because freedom!). Oh, and let's not forget about the effective date – this bill applies to all crimes committed after its enactment, because we want to make sure those pesky elites don't get away with anything.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, it's pretty clear who the winners and losers are here. The winners are law enforcement agencies, private prisons, and anyone who loves a good ol' fashioned tough-on-crime policy. The losers? Non-violent offenders, people of color (who are disproportionately affected by these policies), and anyone who cares about rehabilitation over punishment.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Folks, this bill is a masterclass in doublespeak. On the surface, it's all about "public safety" and "toughening up our laws." But let's be real – this is just another example of our politicians catering to their base while ignoring the root causes of crime and inequality. The impact will be felt by marginalized communities, who will continue to bear the brunt of these draconian policies.

(Smirk) Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't this just a bunch of bureaucratic nonsense?" And to that, I say... (wink) guilty as charged! But hey, when it comes to freedom and the elites, we've got to take a stand – even if it means standing on shaky ground. Stay vigilant, folks!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of HR 5242 is to repeal two previous bills that were designed to reduce incarceration rates and provide second chances for offenders. Because, you know, rehabilitation is overrated, and we need more people in prison to justify the existence of our bloated corrections system.

The real objective here is to pander to law-and-order zealots and special interest groups who think that locking up more people will magically solve all our social problems. It's a classic case of "tough on crime" posturing, with no actual consideration for the consequences or effectiveness of such policies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill repeals two previous laws:

1. The Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022, which aimed to reduce recidivism rates by providing support services and job training for offenders. 2. The Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016, which sought to decrease the number of people incarcerated in DC.

By repealing these laws, HR 5242 effectively restores the status quo ante, ensuring that more people will be locked up for longer periods, with little chance of rehabilitation or reintegration into society.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved here:

* Politicians looking to score points with their base by appearing "tough on crime." * Lobbyists representing the corrections industry and law enforcement unions. * Voters who are too ignorant or apathetic to understand the consequences of such policies.

Meanwhile, the actual stakeholders – offenders, their families, and communities – will be left to suffer the consequences of this misguided legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a recipe for disaster. By increasing incarceration rates and reducing support services, we can expect:

* Higher recidivism rates * Increased crime rates * More broken families and communities * A further bloating of our already-inefficient corrections system

But hey, who needs evidence-based policy when you have ideological posturing and special interest groups driving the agenda?

In conclusion, HR 5242 is a prime example of legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to exploit public fears and ignorance for political gain, with no regard for the human cost or long-term consequences. I'd prescribe a healthy dose of skepticism and critical thinking to anyone who thinks this bill is a good idea. But alas, that's just not how politics works in this country.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: H.R. 5242**

**Main Purpose and Objectives:** H.R. 5242 aims to repeal two laws related to criminal justice reform in the District of Columbia: the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016. The bill seeks to restore previous laws and regulations that were amended or repealed by these acts.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Repeals the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022, which aimed to reduce recidivism rates by providing support services for individuals released from incarceration. 2. Repeals the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016, which reduced penalties for certain crimes and expanded alternatives to incarceration. 3. Terminates the Automated Traffic Enforcement System in the District of Columbia. 4. Eliminates restrictions on right turns at red traffic signals.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:**

1. Residents of the District of Columbia, particularly those who have been impacted by the repealed laws. 2. Law enforcement agencies and courts in the District of Columbia. 3. Community organizations and advocacy groups focused on criminal justice reform. 4. Local businesses and drivers affected by changes to traffic regulations.

**Potential Impact and Implications:**

1. Repealing these laws may lead to increased recidivism rates and reduced support services for individuals released from incarceration. 2. The termination of the Automated Traffic Enforcement System may impact public safety and revenue generated from traffic fines. 3. Changes to traffic regulations may affect driver behavior and road safety in the District of Columbia. 4. The repeal of these laws may be seen as a step backward in efforts to reform the criminal justice system and address issues related to mass incarceration.

Overall, H.R. 5242 seeks to restore previous laws and regulations related to criminal justice reform in the District of Columbia. While its impact is primarily local, it reflects broader debates about crime and punishment at the national level.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's dive into this bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** HR 5242 is all about repealing two previous laws that aimed to reduce incarceration rates and give people a second chance after serving time. The main objective here is to roll back those reforms and restore the original laws. It's like catching a gnarly wave, but then wiping out and going back to where you started.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill repeals two acts:

1. **Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022**: This law allowed for more lenient sentencing and gave judges more discretion in certain cases. By repealing it, the bill restores harsher sentencing guidelines. 2. **Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016**: This law aimed to reduce incarceration rates by providing alternative sentences and programs for non-violent offenders. Repealing this act means those alternatives are no longer available.

Additionally, the bill:

* Terminates an automated traffic enforcement system in DC * Allows right turns at red lights (a pretty chill move, bro)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects a bunch of people, including:

* Former inmates who might've benefited from the repealed laws * Judges and prosecutors who'll have to go back to stricter sentencing guidelines * Law enforcement agencies that'll need to adjust their strategies * DC residents who'll see changes in traffic rules

**Potential Impact & Implications** Repealing these laws could lead to:

* Increased incarceration rates, which might not be the most effective way to reduce crime (it's like trying to catch a wave with a broken board, bro) * More people being locked up for non-violent offenses, which can have negative effects on communities and families * A shift in focus away from rehabilitation and towards punishment

On the other hand, some might argue that these laws were too lenient and allowed for too many loopholes. It's a complex issue, bro.

Anyway, that's HR 5242 in a nutshell – or rather, a seashell. It's all about rolling back reforms and restoring stricter laws. Whether that's a good thing or not is up for debate.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: HR 5242**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** HR 5242, introduced by Rep. Kustoff (R-TN) and cosponsored by Rep. Wilson (R-SC), aims to repeal two laws enacted in the District of Columbia: the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016. The bill's primary objective is to restore previous laws related to traffic enforcement, incarceration, and sentencing.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Repeal of Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022**: This law provided alternatives to incarceration for certain offenses, such as community service or counseling. By repealing it, HR 5242 would reinstate harsher penalties. 2. **Repeal of Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016**: This law aimed to reduce the number of people incarcerated in D.C. by providing alternative sentencing options and reducing mandatory minimum sentences. Repealing this law would likely lead to increased incarceration rates. 3. **Termination of Automated Traffic Enforcement System**: The bill repeals a provision that allowed for automated traffic enforcement, such as speed cameras. 4. **Eliminating Restrictions on Right Turns at Red Traffic Signals**: This section repeals a restriction on right turns at red lights in D.C.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **District of Columbia residents**: Repealing these laws could lead to increased incarceration rates and stricter traffic enforcement, affecting the daily lives of D.C. residents. 2. **Law Enforcement Agencies**: The repeal of automated traffic enforcement systems may impact law enforcement agencies' ability to monitor and enforce traffic laws. 3. **Private Prisons and Correctional Facilities**: With the potential increase in incarceration rates, private prisons and correctional facilities may benefit from increased demand for their services.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Incarceration Rates**: Repealing these laws could lead to a rise in incarceration rates, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. 2. **Stricter Traffic Enforcement**: The termination of automated traffic enforcement systems may result in more aggressive policing and increased fines for drivers. 3. **Potential Increase in Crime Rates**: By reinstating harsher penalties, the bill may inadvertently increase crime rates as individuals may be less likely to seek rehabilitation or alternative sentencing options.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there is no direct evidence of PACs or industry lobby groups backing this specific bill, it's worth noting that private prisons and correctional facilities have historically been major donors to politicians who support stricter sentencing laws. Additionally, law enforcement unions may also be interested in the bill's provisions related to traffic enforcement.

**Committee Capture:** The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which referred the bill, has a history of being influenced by law enforcement interests. The committee's chairman, Rep. Comer (R-KY), has received significant campaign contributions from law enforcement unions

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$96,600

22 donors

PACs

Organizations

$3,900

Committees

Individuals

$92,700

No PAC contributions found

TENNESSEE SAFARI PARK

1 transaction

$3,000

GERMAN FARMS

1 transaction

$350

GROWING ACRES

1 transaction

$300

WALLY CHILDRESS FARMS

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

LONG, CHRISTOPHER MR.

2 transactions

$10,900

SMITH, STEFAN M. MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

AYERS, JANET MRS.

1 transaction

$6,600

AYERS, JAMES W. MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

WEISS, CATHY MRS.

1 transaction

$6,600

BOBANGO, LISA MRS.

2 transactions

$6,600

HASLAM, WILLIAM MR.

1 transaction

$6,000

KRAKER, WESLEY MR.

1 transaction

$5,000

MCINTOSH, JR., BARRY P. MR.

1 transaction

$5,000

KIRK, ROBERT S.

1 transaction

$5,000

JUBRAN, RAJA MR.

1 transaction

$4,000

WHITESIDE, JACQUELINE

1 transaction

$4,000

DUDLEY, CHARLES MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

DOUGLASS, MICHAEL J. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

BALTIER, KEVIN MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

MESKIN, JEFFREY MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

BEREN, ADAM MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

SPURLOCK, MITCHELL MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2]

ID: W000795

Top Contributors

CATAWBA INDIAN NATION

OrganizationROCK HILL, SC

$2,000

May 6, 2024

LEVKOWITZ, HOWARD

SELF EMPLOYED • INVESTOR

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$6,600

Nov 28, 2023

VICKAR, KERRY

LKV MANAGEMENT • CHAIRMAN

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$5,000

Nov 21, 2023

LOWELL, RANDY R.

BURR FORMAN • ATTORNEY

IndividualISLE OF PALMS, SC

$3,700

May 8, 2024

VALLARINO, MANUEL R.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE BEACH, SC

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

VALLARINO, MARY EMILY J.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE BEACH, SC

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

CASSELS, W. TOBIN III

SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,300

Dec 1, 2023

CASSELS, W. TOBIN JR.

SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES • CHAIRMAN & CEO

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,300

Dec 1, 2023

HOEFER, JOHN M. S. ESQ.

WILLOUGHBY & HOEFER P.A. • ATTORNEY

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,300

Nov 8, 2023

LIEBERMAN, JEREMY A.

KLEE TUCHIN BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualFLUSHING, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 32 nodes and 27 connections (29 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $110,200

Top Donors - Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

4 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 1 harmed.

+Private Prisons & Immigration Detentionconfidence 0.80
Section 1 repeals the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016, which could lead to increased incarceration rates, potentially benefiting private prisons.
+Law Enforcement & Surveillance Techconfidence 0.70
Section 1 repeals the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016, which could lead to increased policing and surveillance, potentially benefiting law enforcement and surveillance technology vendors.
−Labor Unionsconfidence 0.60
Section 1 repeals the Second Chance Amendment Act of 2022 and the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act of 2016, which could lead to increased incarceration rates, potentially harming labor unions that advocate for criminal justice reform.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Private Prisons & Immigration Detention$500
from 1 contribution
- LINDAMOOD, CHERRY MRS.$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Justice

Strong

Vector: 61%

Pages: 587-589AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"H.R. 5242 repeals District of Columbia criminal justice reforms that reduced penalties and expanded alternatives to incarceration, aligning with Project 2025's DOJ emphasis on tough‑on‑crime policies, mandatory minimum sentencing, and robust enforcement to dismantle criminal enterprises."

Key themes:tough-on-crimemandatory minimumscriminal justice reform reversallaw enforcement support

— 554 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise attorneys are consistently using the tools at their disposal in cases with violent offenders, including pursuing mandatory minimum sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA).43 The department should also support legislative efforts to provide further tools, such as the Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, which Senators Tom Cotton (R–AR), Marsha Blackburn (R–TN), and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R–MS) introduced in 2021 in response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions neutering the ACCA.44 l Enforce the death penalty where appropriate and applicable. Capital punishment is a sensitive matter, as it should be, but the current crime wave makes deterrence vital at the federal, state, and local levels. However, providing this punishment without ever enforcing it provides justice neither for the victims’ families nor for the defendant. The next conservative Administration should therefore do everything possible to obtain finality for the 44 prisoners currently on federal death row. It should also pursue the death penalty for applicable crimes—particularly heinous crimes involving violence and sexual abuse of children—until Congress says otherwise through legislation.45 DISMANTLING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES Criminal organizations are as old as crime itself, but are more extensive, sophisticated, and dangerous today than at any other point in history. The Department of Justice has a key role in tackling transnational criminal orga- nizations like Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Mexican drug cartels as well as purely domestic criminal organizations like those built on the more traditional mafia crime model as part of its obligation to ensure the safety and security of the American people. The department’s primary directive under the next Administration should be to return to an unapologetic focus on dismantling these criminal organizations and incarcerating their membership. Once this reprioritization occurs, the depart- ment’s political leadership should take concrete steps to use agency reach and resources to prevent these criminal organizations from operating and surviving. Assaulting the business model of these criminal organizations—which are massive, diversified enterprises with nationwide or international operations—is essential for success. The next Administration will therefore need to: l Revitalize the DOJ’s use of the array of statutory tools that exist for dealing with the threat of criminal organizations. The most potent ones are the simplest. For example, the department should: — 555 — Department of Justice 1. Rigorously prosecute as much interstate drug activity as possible, including simple possession of distributable quantities.46 Recent efforts to create the impression that drug possession crimes are not serious offenses has contributed to the explosion of criminal organization activities in the United States. 2. Aggressively deploy the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO),47 which Congress expressly created to empower the Department of Justice to treat patterns of intrastate- level crimes, such as robbery, extortion, and murder, as federal criminal conduct for criminal organizations and networks. The next Administration can use existing tools while it works with Congress to develop new tools. l Secure the border,48 which is the key entry point for many criminal organizations and their supplies, products, and employees. Mexico— which is arguably functioning as a failed state run by drug cartels—is the main point of transit for illegal drugs produced in Central and South America, fentanyl precursors from the Chinese Communist Party–led People’s Republic of China,49 weapons, human smuggling and trafficking, and other contraband. Mexican drug cartels, including the dominant Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), are the main drivers of fentanyl production and distribution in the United States. The southwestern land border is sufficiently porous that Mexican drug cartels have operational control of large sections of the border, which facilitates easy movement of product and personnel. These cartels are also violent and not afraid to demonstrate force on both sides of the border. Their conduct represents a clear and present danger to the United States and its citizens. In addition to finalizing the southwestern land border wall, the next Administration should take a creative and aggressive approach to tackling these dangerous criminal organizations at the border. This could include use of active-duty military personnel and National Guardsmen to assist in arrest operations along the border—something that has not yet been done. A new and forceful approach to interdiction will have a ripple effect on the operations of these criminal organizations, which currently operate freely without concern for criminal prosecution, and will lay the necessary groundwork for initial prosecutions of these organizations and their leaders. It is critical that the federal government staunch the flow of drugs by preventing the far-too-easy access to the United States that now exists.

Department of Justice

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 584-586AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"H.R. 5242 aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on reversing criminal justice reforms perceived as weakening law enforcement, particularly by repealing DC laws that reduced incarceration and expanded alternatives. Both share a focus on restoring stricter criminal penalties and opposing reform movements viewed as undermining public safety."

Key themes:criminal justice reform reversalopposition to incarceration reductionlaw enforcement empowermentviolent crime focusstate/local jurisdiction accountability

— 552 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise The Director of the FBI must remain politically accountable to the President in the same manner as the head of any other federal department or agency. To ensure prompt political accountability and to rein in perceived or actual abuses, the next conservative Administration should seek a legislative change to align the FBI Director’s position with those of the heads of all other major departments and agencies. RENEWING THE DEPARTMENT’S FOCUS ON VIOLENT CRIME Despite the DOJ’s pronouncements that violent crime continues to be a top pri- ority, it has increased across the United States. The department’s leadership must make actually reducing violent crime a priority across the United States—and it must do so in partnership with state and local officials in a manner that is tailored to the needs and conditions in those states and localities. Targeting Violent and Career Criminals, Not Parents. The next conserva- tive Administration must ensure that the Department of Justice devotes significant effort to reducing violent crime nationwide. The Attorney General should require all U.S. Attorneys to develop a jurisdictional-specific plan—whenever possible in coordination with state and local law enforcement—to reduce violent crime within each of their districts. Then the Attorney General should hold each U.S. Attorney accountable for achieving actual results. In recent years, federal and state officials have succumbed to calls from anti–law enforcement advocates for so-called criminal justice reform. The pleas- ant-sounding terminology of reform masks the darker reality of this movement, which is one that has supported dismantling effective federal, state, and local law enforcement and stripped away some of the most fundamental tools that law enforcement has long had at its disposal. This campaign is not just ill-advised; it has clearly had real-world consequences in the form of catastrophic increases in crime—particularly violent crime—nationwide. As discussed in the next section, the Department of Justice has a special obligation to restore law and order in such districts.37 Juxtaposed against this increase in violent crime are things like Attorney Gen- eral Merrick Garland’s October 4, 2021, memorandum directing the commitment of significant resources and energies to combating imaginary, politically conve- nient threats of violence toward members of school boards and their staffs during the heat of the Virginia gubernatorial race.38 There was no similar effort to inves- tigate elected officials and other public officers who conspired with outside allies to target and harass parents who were merely exercising their constitutional and statutory rights.39 If we are to continue to have informed and civil dialogue in the United States on issues of public concern, the DOJ must enforce applicable civil rights laws in an even-handed way when citizens’ livelihoods are threatened merely because they have exercised their rights. — 553 — Department of Justice Enhancing the Federal Focus on and Resources in Jurisdictions with Rule-of-Law Deficiencies. A disturbing number of state and local jurisdictions have enacted policies that directly undermine public safety, leave doubt about whether criminals will be punished, and weaken the rule of law. While the prose- cution of criminal offenses in most jurisdictions across the country must remain the responsibility of state and local governments, the federal government owes a special responsibility to Americans in jurisdictions where state and local prose- cutors have abdicated this duty.40 Jurisdictions suffering from deficiencies in the rule of law warrant, as appropri- ate within our federal system, greater attention and additional federal resources that are sufficient to protect the rights of American citizens and federal interests. In the next conservative Administration, the DOJ, acting primarily through its U.S. Attorneys, should therefore: l Use applicable federal laws to bring federal charges against criminals when local jurisdictions wrongfully allow them to evade responsibility for their conduct.41 The department should also increase the federal law enforcement presence in such jurisdictions and explore innovative solutions to bring meaningful charges against criminals and criminal organizations in such jurisdictions. l Where warranted and proper under federal law, initiate legal action against local officials—including District Attorneys—who deny American citizens the “equal protection of the laws” by refusing to prosecute criminal offenses in their jurisdictions. This holds true particularly for jurisdictions that refuse to enforce the law against criminals based on the Left’s favored defining characteristics of the would-be offender (race, so-called gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.) or other political considerations (e.g., immigration status). l Pursue policies and legislation that encourage prosecution of violent crimes as well as appropriate sentences for such offenses. The Biden Administration has adopted policies that do not prevent armed career criminals, who actually commit violent crimes, from committing those crimes. A recent U.S. Sentencing Commission report shows that armed career criminals are consistently sentenced below their minimum sentencing guidelines range.42 There are valid reasons for sentence reductions in particular cases (for example, if the defendant has provided substantial assistance in prosecuting other offenders). At the same time, the DOJ must ensure that its line

Department of Justice

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 587-589AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on repealing criminal justice reforms in D.C., which contrasts with Project 2025's emphasis on strengthening enforcement tools like mandatory minimums and the death penalty for violent offenders. While both relate to crime policy, the bill's direction—reducing penalties and support services—does not align with Project 2025's goal of increasing punitive measures against criminals."

Key themes:criminal justicesentencing policylaw enforcement

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill deals with repealing District of Columbia criminal justice and traffic reforms, while the Project 2025 DHS section focuses on immigration enforcement, prosecutorial discretion, and detention policies; there is only a tangential connection through the theme of prosecutorial discretion."

Key themes:prosecutorial discretionlaw enforcement authority

— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"H.R. 5242 focuses on repealing criminal justice and traffic laws in the District of Columbia, with no connection to immigration enforcement, border security, or Department of Homeland Security policies outlined in Project 2025."

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Kustoff, David

RPM Access Act

119/hr/3108

Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act

119/hr/517

Improving Social Security’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act

119/hr/5345

Back to All Bills