The bill
PILLAR Act
HR. 5078, 119th Congress β read as touching Cybersecurity.
Sponsored by
Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]
ID: O000175
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 5078, 119th Congress β read as touching Cybersecurity.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
November 17, 2025
π Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. The PILLAR Act (HR 5078) is a shining example of how politicians can take a simple concept β reauthorizing a cybersecurity grant program β and turn it into a bloated, self-serving monstrosity.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to reauthorize the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, which provides funding for state and local governments to enhance their cybersecurity capabilities. But don't be fooled; this bill has more to do with padding the pockets of contractors and consultants than actually improving national security.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:
* Expanding the definition of "information systems" to include operational technology systems that use artificial intelligence (because, you know, AI is a magic solution to all cybersecurity problems). * Adding new terms like "foreign entity of concern" and "multi-factor authentication," which are just buzzwords designed to make politicians sound intelligent. * Requiring grant recipients to implement continuous vulnerability assessments and threat mitigation practices (yawn), because that's not something they should have been doing already.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects will benefit from this bill:
* Contractors and consultants who will receive lucrative grants and contracts to "enhance" state and local cybersecurity capabilities. * Politicians who can claim credit for "improving national security" without actually doing anything meaningful. * State and local governments, which will receive funding to buy more cybersecurity snake oil.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill will be negligible, except for the following:
* More taxpayer dollars will be wasted on ineffective cybersecurity initiatives. * The cybersecurity industry will continue to profit from fear-mongering and selling overpriced solutions to gullible politicians. * Our national security will remain compromised due to the lack of meaningful action.
In conclusion, the PILLAR Act is a classic example of legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to appear proactive on cybersecurity while actually doing nothing to address the real problems. Bravo, Congress! You've managed to create another bill that's more concerned with appearances than actual results.
Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: G000597
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001193
Top Contributors
10
ID: E000300
Top Contributors
10
ID: V000138
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 62 nodes and 32 connections (52 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $163,208
Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2 reauthorizes and expands the CISA State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, including provisions for AI systems, multi-factor authentication, and foreign entity of concern definitions, directly benefiting cybersecurity firms through grant funding and expanded scope.
Section 2(1)(A)-(B) defines 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence system' and integrates AI into grant-eligible systems (e.g., subsection (b)(1), (d)(4), (e)(2)(A)(i)), creating demand for AI/cloud infrastructure in state/local cybersecurity projects.
Grant funds can be used for 'information systems or operational technology systems' including AI systems (per subsection (e)(2)(A)(i)-(v)), which may encompass telecom infrastructure used by state/local governments, benefiting telecom vendors.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 417 West 7th Street in Columbia, Tennessee, as the Pharmacistβs Mate First Class John Harlan Willis Post Office Building.
119/hr/6808
Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act
119/hr/2659
To award a Congressional Gold Medal to Charles ''Charlie'' Kirk, in recognition of his unwavering dedication to the American Spirit, even to the point of death at the hand of a terrorist.
119/hr/6278