American Decade of Sports Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/5021

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

American Decade of Sports Act

HR. 5021, 119th Congress — read as touching Entertainment & Streaming.

The sponsor

Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$93,100 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 201-204 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 3.

December 2, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The American Decade of Sports Act, HR 5021, is a bill that seeks to leverage major sporting events in the United States to enhance the country's soft power, diplomatic relationships, and global leadership. As a self-serving billionaire, I'll analyze this bill through the lens of wealth and power implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to create a sports diplomacy strategy that showcases American national strengths and forges new diplomatic connections. The Department of State will submit a 5-year strategy to Congress, outlining plans to partner with local host cities, diaspora communities, athletes, and private sector entities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs to submit a sports diplomacy strategy within 120 days. It also establishes an Office of Sports Diplomacy, which will report directly to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges. The office will be responsible for implementing the strategy, coordinating with host cities, and partnering with the sports industry.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include local host cities, diaspora communities, athletes, private sector entities, human rights organizations, and civil society stakeholders. As a billionaire investor in the sports industry, I'll be closely watching how this bill affects my interests and potential profits.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From my perspective, this bill presents opportunities for consolidation and deregulation in the sports industry. By leveraging sporting events to advance commercial diplomacy, I see potential for increased revenue streams and market expansion. However, I'm also wary of potential regulatory hurdles that could arise from the implementation of this strategy.

In conclusion, the American Decade of Sports Act has significant implications for my wealth and influence. As a self-serving billionaire, I'll be monitoring its progress closely to ensure that it aligns with my interests and maximizes my profits. The bill's focus on sports diplomacy and commercial diplomacy presents opportunities for growth, but also potential risks that need to be mitigated.

To further analyze the implications of this bill, I'd like to see more data on the projected economic impact of the sporting events and the potential return on investment for private sector entities involved. Additionally, I'd like to explore ways to optimize the implementation of the sports diplomacy strategy to maximize profits and minimize regulatory hurdles. With the right approach, this bill could be a game-changer for my business interests and further solidify my position as a leader in the sports industry.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in 8th grade civics, the process of how a bill becomes a law is quite straightforward. Yet, here we are, breaking down the American Decade of Sports Act for those who seem to have forgotten the basics. The main purpose of this bill, HR 5021, is to require a sports diplomacy strategy that leverages major sporting events in the United States to enhance soft power, diplomatic relationships, and global leadership. Remember when we learned about the importance of diplomacy and international relations? This bill aims to promote American interests through sports, which should have been obvious from the get-go.

The key provisions of this bill include the creation of a 5-year sports diplomacy strategy, submitted by the Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, which will be reviewed and updated every 5 years. The strategy must include elements such as partnering with local host cities, diaspora communities, and private sector entities to showcase American strengths and forge new diplomatic connections. As we covered in middle school, committees play a crucial role in shaping legislation, and in this case, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate will be involved in reviewing and providing input on the strategy.

The bill also establishes an Office of Sports Diplomacy within the Department of State, which will report directly to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges. This office will be responsible for implementing the sports diplomacy strategy, coordinating with relevant bureaus and offices, and working with host cities, diaspora communities, and the sports industry to promote American interests. It's astonishing that this needs to be explained, but apparently, some people need a refresher on how government agencies work.

The affected parties and stakeholders include the Department of State, local host cities, diaspora communities, private sector entities, athletes, and foreign governments. As we learned in civics class, checks and balances are essential to ensuring that power is distributed evenly among branches of government. In this case, the bill requires consultation with Congress and ensures that the strategy is made publicly available, which should have been a given.

The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant, as it aims to promote American soft power and diplomatic relationships through sports. If implemented effectively, it could lead to increased international cooperation, cultural exchange, and economic benefits for the United States. However, it's disappointing that we need to spell out the importance of diplomacy and international relations, which should have been ingrained in everyone's understanding of how government works.

In conclusion, this bill is a reminder that some people seem to have forgotten the basics of civics and government. As I taught you in 8th grade, the process of how a bill becomes a law is straightforward, and it's astonishing that we need to break down something as simple as a sports diplomacy strategy. Nevertheless, it's essential to understand the main purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and potential impact of this bill to appreciate its significance in promoting

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The American Decade of Sports Act, HR 5021 - it's all about control, folks! On the surface, this bill seems like a harmless attempt to leverage sports diplomacy to enhance US soft power and global leadership. But let me tell you, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to create a 5-year sports diplomacy strategy to capitalize on major sporting events in the US over the next decade. The Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs will submit this strategy to Congress, outlining plans to partner with local host cities, diaspora communities, athletes, and private sector entities to showcase American strengths and forge new diplomatic connections.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes an Office of Sports Diplomacy within the Department of State, which will report directly to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges. This office will be responsible for implementing the sports diplomacy strategy, coordinating with host cities, and engaging local diaspora communities. The bill also requires the Department of State to ensure an expeditious and secure visa process for athletes, their families, and international visitors attending the games.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects a wide range of stakeholders, including:

* Local host cities and their social, political, and economic partners * Diaspora communities * Athletes and sports industry professionals * Private sector entities * Human rights organizations * Civil society stakeholders * The Department of State and its various bureaus

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where it gets interesting. This bill could have far-reaching implications for US foreign policy, cultural exchange, and economic development. By leveraging sports diplomacy, the US government may be able to:

* Enhance its soft power and global influence * Foster new diplomatic relationships and partnerships * Promote American culture and values abroad * Boost tourism and economic development in host cities

But, my friends, don't be fooled! This bill could also be a Trojan horse for more sinister agendas. Think about it: by controlling the narrative around sports diplomacy, the government may be able to:

* Manipulate public opinion and shape cultural attitudes * Use sports as a tool for propaganda and social control * Expand its surveillance and data collection capabilities under the guise of "security" measures

Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, and I'm here to connect the dots. This bill may seem innocuous on the surface, but trust me, it's just another piece in the grand puzzle of government control and manipulation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here - the American Decade of Sports Act, or HR 5021. (Sarcastic smile) Because what's more pressing for our great nation than leveraging sports to enhance our soft power and global leadership? I mean, who needs actual policy substance when you can just... (pauses for dramatic effect) ...use sports?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to create a sports diplomacy strategy that will supposedly make America great again by showcasing our national strengths and forging new diplomatic connections through major sporting events. (Rolls eyes) Yeah, because nothing says "freedom" like using taxpayer dollars to promote American interests through sports. The Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs will submit a 5-year strategy to Congress, which will include plans to partner with local host cities, diaspora communities, athletes, and the sports industry.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Department of State to develop a comprehensive sports diplomacy strategy, which will be made publicly available. (Smirking) Because transparency is key when it comes to using sports as a tool for diplomatic manipulation. The strategy will include elements such as partnering with local host cities, coordinating internally within the Department of State, and ensuring an expeditious visa process for athletes and international visitors.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects a wide range of stakeholders, including (dramatic voice) the sports industry, major sports leagues, individual athletes, local host cities, diaspora communities, human rights organizations, civil society stakeholders, and even the Department of State itself. (Sarcastic tone) Oh, and let's not forget the "elites" who will be making all the decisions behind closed doors.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is... (pauses for comedic effect) ...well, it's a mixed bag, folks! On one hand, it could lead to increased diplomatic engagement and cultural exchange between the United States and foreign nations. (Smirking) But on the other hand, it could also be seen as a thinly veiled attempt to promote American interests through sports, which might not sit well with our international friends. (Winking at the camera) And let's be real, folks, this bill is all about freedom - the freedom to use sports as a tool for diplomatic manipulation, that is.

In conclusion, the American Decade of Sports Act is a bill that will supposedly make America great again through sports diplomacy. (Sarcastic tone) Because what could possibly go wrong with using taxpayer dollars to promote American interests through sports? (Smirking) Stay vigilant, folks, and remember: this is all about freedom - the freedom to use sports as a tool for diplomatic manipulation. (Winking at the camera)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The American Decade of Sports Act (HR 5021) claims to promote "sports diplomacy" by leveraging major sporting events in the US to enhance soft power, diplomatic relationships, and global leadership. How quaint. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to justify more bureaucratic waste, cronyism, and pork-barrel spending.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates an "Office of Sports Diplomacy" within the Department of State, because what every government needs is another redundant agency. It also requires the development of a 5-year sports diplomacy strategy, which will undoubtedly be a bloated, jargon-filled document that accomplishes nothing. Other provisions include partnering with local host cities, diaspora communities, and private sector entities to "showcase United States national strengths" – code for "line the pockets of wealthy donors and lobbyists."

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: politicians looking for photo ops, corporate sponsors seeking to exploit the events for marketing purposes, and bureaucrats eager to expand their fiefdoms. Oh, and let's not forget the athletes and their families, who will be subjected to an "expeditious and secure visa process" – because nothing says "diplomacy" like a Kafkaesque bureaucratic nightmare.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will achieve precisely what it sets out to do: waste taxpayer money on pointless diplomatic gestures, enrich a select few, and further erode the public's trust in government. The "sports diplomacy strategy" will be a meaningless exercise in self-aggrandizement, while the Office of Sports Diplomacy will become a dumping ground for incompetent bureaucrats and cronies. Meanwhile, the actual benefits of international sports competitions – cultural exchange, people-to-people connections, and economic growth – will be lost in the noise of bureaucratic posturing.

In conclusion, HR 5021 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice: a pointless, self-serving exercise in political grandstanding, designed to benefit the powerful and well-connected at the expense of the taxpayer. It's a disease, really – a metastasizing tumor of corruption, incompetence, and cynicism that threatens to consume what's left of our democratic institutions. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this train wreck unfold.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of the American Decade of Sports Act (HR 5021)**

### Main Purpose & Objectives The main purpose of the American Decade of Sports Act is to require the development and implementation of a sports diplomacy strategy that leverages major sporting events hosted in the United States over the next decade. The objective is to enhance U.S. soft power, diplomatic relationships, and global leadership through strategic partnerships and cultural exchanges.

### Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law The bill introduces several key provisions: - Requires the Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs to submit a 5-year sports diplomacy strategy to Congress within 120 days of enactment, with subsequent strategies submitted every 5 years. - Mandates the strategy to include elements such as diplomatic objectives, partnership plans with local host cities and stakeholders, internal coordination within the Department of State, visa process improvements, and financial and personnel support descriptions. - Establishes the Office of Sports Diplomacy within the Department of State to manage sports diplomacy exchange programs and implement the strategies, reporting directly to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges. - Allocates not less than 3 additional full-time equivalent staff to the Office of Sports Diplomacy to support strategy implementation.

### Affected Parties & Stakeholders The affected parties and stakeholders include: - The Department of State, particularly the Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs and the newly established Office of Sports Diplomacy. - Local host cities and their social, political, and economic partners. - Diaspora communities in the United States. - The U.S. sports industry, major sports leagues, and individual athletes. - Private sector entities, human rights organizations, and civil society stakeholders. - Foreign governments and international visitors attending sporting events in the United States.

### Potential Impact & Implications The potential impact of the American Decade of Sports Act includes: - Enhanced U.S. soft power and diplomatic relationships through strategic sports diplomacy. - Improved cultural exchanges and people-to-people connections between the U.S. and foreign nations. - Economic benefits from increased tourism and commercial ties with foreign countries. - Efficient and expeditious visa processing for international visitors, athletes, and support staff. - Promotion of American arts, film, and music on an international stage. However, the success of these efforts will depend on effective implementation, coordination among stakeholders, and adequate resource allocation. The Act's emphasis on leveraging sports as a tool for diplomacy presents both opportunities for fostering global connections and challenges in navigating the complexities of international relations and cultural exchange.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down the American Decade of Sports Act, dude. This bill is all about leveraging major sporting events in the US to boost our soft power, diplomatic relationships, and global leadership. It's like, we're talkin' about using sports as a tool for international diplomacy, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to create a sports diplomacy strategy that'll help the US make the most of hosting major sporting events over the next decade. They want to use these events to showcase American strengths, build new diplomatic connections, and promote our values and culture. It's all about spreading the stoke, dude.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Department of State to develop a 5-year sports diplomacy strategy, which will be submitted to Congress and made public. This strategy will include plans for partnering with local host cities, diaspora communities, athletes, and private sector entities to promote US interests. They'll also need to coordinate internally to leverage sporting events for diplomatic purposes, like advancing commercial diplomacy and promoting cultural exchange. One of the key changes is the establishment of a new Office of Sports Diplomacy within the Department of State, which will be responsible for implementing the strategy.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects a bunch of different parties, bro. You've got the Department of State, local host cities, diaspora communities, athletes, private sector entities, and human rights organizations all involved. They'll need to work together to make this sports diplomacy strategy a reality. For example, local host cities will need to partner with the Department of State to identify new avenues for engagement with foreign entities, while athletes and private sector entities will be key partners in promoting US interests abroad.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is huge, dude. By leveraging sports diplomacy, the US could strengthen its relationships with other countries, promote cultural exchange, and advance our commercial interests. It's like, we're talkin' about using sports to bring people together and build bridges, bro. However, there are also some potential challenges and limitations to consider. For example, the bill will require significant resources and funding to implement, and there may be concerns around the impact of large-scale sporting events on local communities.

In terms of specific examples, the bill could lead to increased investment in sports infrastructure and tourism development in host cities, which could have a positive impact on local economies. Additionally, the promotion of cultural exchange programs through sports diplomacy could help to break down cultural barriers and promote greater understanding between nations. However, there may also be concerns around the potential for exploitation or manipulation of athletes and local communities for diplomatic purposes.

Overall, this bill is all about using sports as a tool for good, dude. It's like, we're talkin' about promoting American values and culture through the power of sports. If done right, it could have some seriously positive implications for US

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**The American Decade of Sports Act: A Comprehensive Analysis**

As a former D.C. lobbyist turned whistleblower, I have dissected the American Decade of Sports Act (HR 5021) to reveal its true intentions and potential implications. The bill's main purpose is to leverage major sporting events in the United States over the next decade to enhance the country's soft power, diplomatic relationships, and global leadership.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill requires the Department of State to develop a 5-year sports diplomacy strategy to achieve its objectives. This strategy will be submitted to Congress within 120 days of enactment and will include elements such as partnering with local host cities, diaspora communities, and the sports industry to showcase American national strengths and forge new diplomatic connections.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes an Office of Sports Diplomacy within the Department of State, which will report directly to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges. This office will be responsible for implementing the sports diplomacy strategy, coordinating with relevant bureaus and offices, and partnering with the sports industry and local host cities. The bill also requires the Department of State to ensure an expeditious and secure visa process for athletes, their families, and support staff attending sporting events in the United States.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the Department of State, local host cities, diaspora communities, the sports industry, major sports leagues, individual athletes, human rights organizations, and civil society stakeholders. The bill also involves private sector entities, such as sponsors and broadcasters, which will likely play a significant role in shaping the sports diplomacy strategy.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The American Decade of Sports Act has the potential to enhance the United States' global influence and diplomatic relationships through sports diplomacy. However, it also raises concerns about the commercialization of sports and the potential for conflicts of interest between government agencies, private sector entities, and special interest groups. For instance, the bill's emphasis on partnering with the sports industry and local host cities may lead to undue influence from corporate sponsors and private donors.

Notably, the bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received significant donations from the sports industry, including the National Football League (NFL) and the National Basketball Association (NBA). These donations may have influenced the bill's provisions, such as the establishment of the Office of Sports Diplomacy and the requirement for an expeditious visa process. Furthermore, the bill's reliance on private sector partnerships may lead to a lack of transparency and accountability in the implementation of the sports diplomacy strategy.

In conclusion, while the American Decade of Sports Act has the potential to promote American interests abroad through sports diplomacy, it is essential to carefully examine its provisions and potential implications to ensure that they align with the public interest. As a whistleblower, I will continue to monitor this bill's progress and expose any undue influence or conflicts of interest that may arise.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$93,100

22 donors

PACs

Organizations

$20,500

Committees

Individuals

$72,600

No PAC contributions found

SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA

1 transaction

$6,600

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$3,300

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

1 transaction

$3,300

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$3,300

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,000

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,000

CHEROKEE NATION

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

BRUCE, CHERYL LYNN

2 transactions

$13,200

DROR, BRIAN

2 transactions

$6,600

MARSHALL, KERRY

2 transactions

$6,600

ROBSON ORR, SYBIL

2 transactions

$6,600

WELTERS, ANTHONY

2 transactions

$6,600

GILL, AIMEE

1 transaction

$3,300

GILL, FAISAL

1 transaction

$3,300

GRYNSZTEJN, MADELEINE

1 transaction

$3,300

SHAPIRO, TOM

1 transaction

$3,300

THURMOND, KARL

1 transaction

$3,300

JOHNSON, LACY

1 transaction

$3,300

MISCIKOWSKI, CYNTHIA

1 transaction

$3,300

BULLOCK, GALEN

1 transaction

$3,300

DROR, DONIEL

1 transaction

$3,300

EMERSON, LANGSTON

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4]

ID: H001058

Top Contributors

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI

$3,300

Dec 11, 2023

THALOP LLC

OrganizationINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$1,000

Aug 29, 2024

BARREL DOG, LLC

OrganizationHOLLAND, MI

$1,000

Sep 1, 2024

NOAH HOMES LLC

OrganizationINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

THALOP LLC

OrganizationINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

B&B DAIRY

OrganizationPLAINVIEW, TX

$500

Jul 28, 2024

B&B DAIRY

OrganizationPLAINVIEW, TX

$500

Sep 5, 2024

STRAIGHT LINE RED ANGUS

OrganizationBANGOR, MI

$250

Jul 23, 2024

VAN ANDEL, AMY

THE STEVE AND AMY VAN ANDEL FOUNDATION • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

IndividualADA, MI

$75,000

Mar 29, 2024

VAN ANDEL, STEPHEN

AMWAY • CHAIRMAN

IndividualADA, MI

$75,000

Mar 29, 2024

Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

ID: M001137

Top Contributors

AGUA CALIENTE BAN OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Jul 19, 2023

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Mar 30, 2023

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$2,500

Sep 30, 2024

CROWN, LESTER

N/A • RETIRED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$6,600

Jul 18, 2024

LIPPMAN, MARIE C.

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$5,000

Mar 7, 2023

CUKIERMAN, JORAM

CITADEL • FINANCE

IndividualSCARSDALE, NY

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

SILVERMAN, DOUG

SENATOR INVESTMENT GROUP LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

SHAMAH, ALAN

FIT FOR LIFE LLC • BUSINESS EXECUTIVE

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

SHAMAH, JOSEPH

FIT FOR LIFE LLC • CO-FOUNDER & CEO

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

ARMSTRONG, BRIAN

COINBASE • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Aug 29, 2023

Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10]

ID: M001157

Top Contributors

SOUTH SPUR LP

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Jan 31, 2024

TRACEY FOX KING & WALTERS

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$1,000

Feb 17, 2023

CHILDS, JOHN W.

JW CHILDS ASSOCIATES • OWNER

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$50,000

Dec 12, 2023

LANIER, BECKY MRS.

LANIER LAW FIRM • ATTORNEY

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Mar 4, 2024

LANIER, MARK W.

LANIER LAW FIRM • ATTORNEY

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Mar 4, 2024

CHILDS, JOHN W

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$38,400

Mar 15, 2024

CHILDS, JOHN W.

JW CHILDS ASSOCIATES • OWNER

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$38,400

May 7, 2024

CHILDS, JOHN W

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$33,400

Nov 14, 2024

CARLTON, C. CRAIG MR.

C.C. CARLTON INDUSTRIES • OWNER

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$25,000

Feb 13, 2024

LUROS, HILARY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$25,000

Feb 27, 2024

Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]

ID: M001219

Top Contributors

EYE OF THE TIGER PAC

PACARLINGTON, VA

$5,000

Sep 20, 2024

JOHNSON FOR LOUISIANA

CCMMETARIE, LA

$2,000

Oct 18, 2024

ROBERT J. TORRES TRUST

OrganizationTAMUNING, GU

$250

Feb 19, 2024

MOYLAN, JUDITH A.

MOYLAN'S INSURANCE • PRESIDENT

IndividualBARRIGADA HEIGHTS, GU

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

ANDERSON, KIM FELL

SECURITY TITLE • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualTAMUNING, GU

$3,300

Sep 20, 2024

HABECK, TERRY W

AVIATION CONCEPTS INC. • CEO

IndividualBARRIGADA, GU

$3,300

Aug 20, 2024

YSRAEL, MICHAEL

YTANO TA PARTNERS • CEO

IndividualTUMON, GU

$3,300

Aug 20, 2024

YSRAEL, THERESA

Y TANO TA PARTNERS • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualTAMUNING, GU

$3,300

Aug 20, 2024

FLORES, PHILIP J.

BANK PACIFIC • PRESIDENT

IndividualHAGATNA, GU

$3,000

Jun 13, 2024

SGRO, ANTHONY P

PARADISE FITNESS • PRESIDENT

IndividualHAGATNA, GU

$3,000

Jun 20, 2024

Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27]

ID: S000168

Top Contributors

POARCH BANK OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

May 26, 2023

POARCH BANK OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Jun 7, 2024

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE

OrganizationMIAMI, FL

$1,000

Dec 19, 2023

DIAZ-OLIVER, REMEDIOS MRS.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$6,600

Dec 29, 2023

FALIC, JANA

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL

$6,600

Dec 31, 2023

MENDOZA GOMEZ, ROSSY A.

ROSE CAFE • OWNER

IndividualCORAL GABLES, FL

$6,600

Dec 29, 2023

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Oct 17, 2023

WEEKLEY, RICHARD

SELF-EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Nov 7, 2023

BARQUET, ROY

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$6,600

Dec 6, 2023

PETERFFY, THOMAS

INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Dec 27, 2023

Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]

ID: L000599

Top Contributors

MURTAGH, COSSU, VENDITTI & CASTRO-BLANCO, LLP

OrganizationWHITE PLAINS, NY

$1,000

Feb 24, 2024

BATMASIAN, JAMES

INVESTMENTS LIMITED • OWNER

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 27, 2023

BATMASIAN, JAMES

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 29, 2023

AUSTIN, ROBERT

UNAKA CO., INC. • BUSINESSMAN

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,600

Jul 18, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,534

Feb 15, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,534

Feb 22, 2024

SCALA, MARY ELLEN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPORT CHESTER, NY

$5,300

Aug 27, 2023

DEUTSCH, SHMULEY

SELF • PRESIDENT

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,900

Jun 24, 2024

DEUTSCH, SHMULEY

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,900

Jun 25, 2024

PERLMUTTER, RAFUEL

GOLDEN TASTE • CEO

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,400

Jun 24, 2024

Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

ID: C001127

Top Contributors

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Nov 4, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 20, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Sep 8, 2023

FIGGERS, FREDDIE

FIGGERS • INVENTOR

IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL

$6,600

Jun 8, 2023

FIGGERS, FREDDIE

IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL

$6,600

Sep 25, 2023

MOISE, RUDOLPH

IndividualDAVIE, FL

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

GEORGE, DAVID J.

REFUEL DEPOT LLC • SALES

IndividualLEADWOOD, KS

$3,300

Sep 27, 2024

GOLDEN, SYLVIA

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Aug 18, 2024

GORI, PHILIP

SELF • INVESTOR

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$3,300

Sep 16, 2024

MUELLER, KYLE

ZUTEK • DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES

IndividualOLATHE, KS

$3,300

Sep 27, 2024

Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-36]

ID: L000582

Top Contributors

PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Sep 24, 2024

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 19, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Jun 4, 2024

DEMOCRACY ENGINE

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$2,000

May 19, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,000

Jun 21, 2024

ONEIDA NATION

OrganizationONEIDA, WI

$1,000

Oct 8, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Sep 28, 2024

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$1,000

Aug 20, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Dec 27, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

Oct 3, 2023

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

ID: T000468

Top Contributors

LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Feb 1, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,500

Jun 30, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

Jun 30, 2023

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$1,000

Jun 11, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,000

Sep 8, 2023

NET2LINK, LLC

OrganizationPEMBROKE PINES, FL

$250

Oct 23, 2024

CHANG, RONIE

GOLDEN REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENTS • REALTOR

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Nov 2, 2024

PRITZKER, JAY

STATE OF ILLINOIS • GOVERNOR

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

SCHMIDT, ERIC

HILLSPIRE LLC • MANAGER

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

Rep. Amo, Gabe [D-RI-1]

ID: A000380

Top Contributors

HOFFMAN, REID

GREYLOCK PARTNERS • VENTURE CAPITALIST

IndividualANACORTES, WA

$6,600

Sep 29, 2023

HOFFMAN, REID

GREYLOCK PARTNERS • VENTURE CAPITALIST

IndividualANACORTES, WA

$6,600

Sep 29, 2023

CHACE, ARNOLD

CORNISH ASSOCIATES • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER

IndividualPROVIDENCE, RI

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

FISHER, CYNTHIA

PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATE.ORG • FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

MOCARSKI, THADEUS

NOVACAP MANAGEMENT • INVESTOR

IndividualTIVERTON, RI

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

SCHOENFELDER, LUKE

ALTAMIRA HOLDING COMPANY • CHAIRMAN

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

LANDRY, BARRIE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

LAVINE, JEANNIE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

LAVINE, JONATHAN

BAIN CAPITAL • INVESTOR

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

HIRSCH, JEFFREY

STARZ • EXECUTIVE

IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA

$3,300

Feb 22, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 75 nodes and 43 connections (73 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $176,650

Top Donors - Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

7 Orgs15 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

+Entertainment & Streamingconfidence 0.80
Section 2(b)(2) mentions partnering with creatives and Section 3(a)(6) mentions elevating American arts, film, and music creators to promote cultural exchange, which benefits the entertainment and streaming industry.
+Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.60
Section 2(b)(2) includes partnering with private sector entities, which could include big tech platforms involved in sports broadcasting, streaming, or digital engagement around sporting events.
+Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.60
Section 2(b)(4) calls for an expeditious and secure visa process for athletes and visitors, which may increase demand for communication services, and Section 3(a)(7) involves coordinating visa processing, potentially benefiting telecom providers supporting international visitors.
+Labor Unionsconfidence 0.50
Section 2(b)(2) includes partnering with civil society stakeholders, which may encompass labor unions involved in event staffing, hospitality, or construction related to hosting sporting events.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Entertainment & Streaming$6,050
from 6 contributions
- NISSEN, STEVEN$3,300
- REINSDORF, ANDREW$1,000
- PATACK, MELISSA$500
- BALLANTYNE, MICHELE$500
- WOLFSON, AIMEE$500
Telecommunications$1,250
from 4 contributions
- GILES, JOHNNIE$500
- GREEN, DONOVAN$250
- JAMES-MOORE, BEATRICE$250
- DAVIS, GLEAM$250
Big Tech Platforms$500
from 1 contribution
- RANDLE, CHRISTOPHER$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Moderate

Vector: 65%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on sports diplomacy through the Department of State to enhance U.S. soft power and global engagement, which aligns with Project 2025's goal of reforming the State Department to better serve the President's foreign policy agenda, though the bill does not address bureaucratic reform or ideological alignment concerns raised in the Project 2025 text."

Key themes:Department of Stateforeign policydiplomacynational intereststrategic engagement

— 169 — Department of Homeland Security 19. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General, Management Directive No. 0810.1, June 10, 2004, https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/foia/mgmt_directive_0810_1_the_office_of_inspector_general. pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 20. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/5005 (accessed January 18, 2023). — 171 — 6 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kiron K. Skinner The U.S. Department of State’s mission is to bilaterally, multilaterally, and regionally implement the President’s foreign policy priorities; to serve U.S. citizens abroad; and to advance the economic, foreign policy, and national security interests of the United States. Since the U.S. Founding, the Department of State has been the American gov- ernment’s designated tool of engagement with foreign governments and peoples throughout the world. Country names, borders, leaders, technology, and people have changed in the more than two centuries since the Founding, but the basics of diplomacy remain the same. Although the Department has also evolved throughout the years, at least in the modern era, there is one significant problem that the next President must address to be successful. There are scores of fine diplomats who serve the President’s agenda, often helping to shape and interpret that agenda. At the same time, however, in all Administrations, there is a tug-of-war between Presidents and bureaucracies— and that resistance is much starker under conservative Presidents, due largely to the fact that large swaths of the State Department’s workforce are left-wing and predisposed to disagree with a conservative President’s policy agenda and vision. It should not and cannot be this way: The American people need and deserve a diplomatic machine fully focused on the national interest as defined through the election of a President who sets the domestic and international agenda for the nation. The next Administration must take swift and decisive steps to reforge the department into a lean and functional diplomatic machine that serves the

Department of State

Moderate

Vector: 62%

Pages: 220-222AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 State Department section aim to strengthen U.S. diplomatic relationships and partnerships through State Department-led initiatives, though the bill employs sports diplomacy as a soft‑power tool while Project 2025 emphasizes core security, economic, and human rights engagement and avoiding divisive cultural policies."

Key themes:diplomatic engagementsoft powerpartnership buildingState Department coordinationcultural exchange

— 187 — Department of State United States, but at least some of them would eventually try if allowed to consolidate their operations and plan such attacks. The immediate threat they pose lies in their abilities and willingness to strike American targets in their regions of operation or to harm U.S. interests in other ways. The U.S. should support capable African military and security operations through the State Department and other federal agencies responsible for granting foreign military education, training, and security assistance. l Build a coalition of the cooperative. Rather than thinning limited federal resources by spreading funds across all countries (including some that are unsupportive or even hostile to the United States,) the next Administration should focus on those countries with which the U.S. can expect a mutually beneficial relationship. After being designated focus countries by the State Department, such nations should receive a full suite of American engagement. That said, the next Administration should still maintain a baseline level of contact even with those countries with which it has less- than-fruitful relationships in order to encourage positive developments and to be in position to seize unexpected diplomatic opportunities as they arise. l Focus on core diplomatic activities, and stop promoting policies birthed in the American culture wars. African nations are particularly (and reasonably) non-receptive to the U.S. social policies such as abortion and pro-LGBT initiatives being imposed on them. The United States should focus on core security, economic, and human rights engagement with African partners and reject the promotion of divisive policies that hurt the deepening of shared goals between the U.S. and its African partners. Europe American foreign policy has long benefited from cooperation with the countries of Europe (generally, the EU), and any conservative Administration should build on this resource. Yet the transatlantic relationship is complex, with security, trade, and political dimensions. First, the Europe, Eurasia, and Russia region is made up of relatively wealthy and technologically advanced societies that should be expected to bear a fair share of both security needs and global security architecture: The United States cannot be expected to provide a defense umbrella for countries unwilling to contribute appropriately. At stake after 2024 will be examining the status of the Wales Pledge of 2 percent of gross domestic product toward defense by NATO members. The new Administration will also want to encourage nations to exceed that pledge. Second, transatlantic trade is a significant part of the global economy, and it is in the U.S. national interest to amplify it, especially because this means weaning

Department of State

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 208-210AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on sports diplomacy and cultural exchange, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes treaty oversight, constitutional alignment, and countering China—there is minimal thematic overlap beyond general State Department reform."

Key themes:Department of Stateforeign policydiplomacy

— 175 — Department of State numerous logistical challenges in negotiating, approving, and implementing trea- ties and agreements. This is particularly true under the Biden Administration. For example, under the Biden Administration, the State Department was considered sufficiently unreliable in terms of alignment and effectiveness such that its political leadership invoked its Circular 175 (C-175) authority to delegate its diplomatic capacity to other agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security. At time of publication, the State Department is negotiating (or seeking to nego- tiate) large-scale, sovereignty-eroding agreements that could come at considerable economic and other costs to the American people. Although such agreements should be evaluated and approved as are treaties, the Biden Administration is likely to simply call them “agreements.” The Biden State Department not only approves but also enforces treaties that have not been ratified by the U.S. Senate. This practice must be thoroughly reviewed—and most likely jettisoned. The next President should recalibrate how the State Department handles trea- ties and agreements, primarily by restoring constitutionality to these processes. He or she should direct the Secretary of State to freeze any ongoing treaty or inter- national agreement negotiations and assess whether those efforts align with the new President’s foreign policy direction. The next Administration should also direct the secretary to order an immediate stand-down on enforcement of any treaties that have not been ratified by the Senate, and order a thorough review of the degree to which such enforcement has impacted the department’s functions, policies, and use of resources. The Secretary of State, in cooperation with the Office of the Attorney General and the White House Counsel’s Office, should also conduct a review to identify “agreements” that are really treaty commitments within the ordinary public mean- ing of the Constitution,6 and suspend compliance pending presidential transmittal of those agreements to the Senate for advice and consent. The next Administration should also move to withdraw from treaties that have been under Senate consider- ation for 20 years or more, with the understanding that those treaties are unlikely to be ratified. Under circumstances in which ratification of a stale treaty before the Senate still serves national interests, the treaty letter of transmittal and sub- mission should be updated for current circumstances. The Secretary of State must revoke most outstanding C-175 authorities that have been granted to other agen- cies during previous Administrations, although such revocations should be closely coordinated with the White House for logistical reasons. Coordinate with Other Agencies. Interagency engagement in this new environment must be similarly adjusted to mirror presidential direction. Indeed, coordination among federal agencies is challenging even in the most well-oiled Administrations. Although such coordination is inescapable and sometimes produc- tive, agencies tend to leverage each other’s resources in ways that occasionally have off-mission consequences for the agency or agencies with the resources. Ideally, the — 176 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Secretary of State should work as part of an agile foreign policy team along with the National Security Advisor, the Secretary of Defense, and other agency heads to flesh out and advance the President’s foreign policy. Bureaucratic stovepipes of the past should be less important than commitment to, and achievement of, the President’s foreign policy agenda. The State Department’s role in these interagency discussions must reflect the President’s clear direction and disallow resources and tools to be used in any way that detracts from the presidentially directed mission. Coordinate with Congress. Congress has both the statutory and appropri- ations authority to impact the State Department’s operations and has a strong interest in key aspects of American foreign policy. The department must therefore take particular care in its interaction with Congress, since poor interactions with Congress, regardless of intentions, could trigger congressional pushback or have other negative impacts on the President’s agenda. This will require particularly strong leadership of the Department of State’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs. The Secretary of State and political leadership should ensure full coordination with the White House regarding congressional engage- ment on any State Department responsibility. This may lead to, for example, the President authorizing the State Department to engage with Members of Congress and relevant committees on certain issues (including statutorily designated con- gressional consultations), but to remain “radio silent” on volatile or designated issues on which the White House wants to be the primary or only voice. All such authorized department engagements with Congress must be driven and handled by political appointees in conjunction with career officials who have the relevant expertise and are willing to work in concert with the President’s political appoin- tees on particularly sensitive matters. Respond Vigorously to the Chinese Threat. The State Department recently opened the Office of China Coordination, or “China House.” This office is intended to bring together experts inside and outside the State Department to coordinate U.S. government relations with China “and advance our vision for an open, inclu- sive international system.”7 Whether China House will streamline U.S. government communication, consensus, and action on China policy—given the presence of other agencies with strong competing or adverse interests—remains to be seen. The unit is dependent on adequate and competent staff being assigned by other bureaus within the State Department. Nonetheless, the concept is one a Republican Administration should support mutatis mutandis. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been “at war” with the U.S. for decades. Now that this reality has been accepted throughout the gov- ernment, the State Department must be prepared to lead the U.S. diplomatic effort accordingly. The centralization of efforts in one place is critical to this end. Review Immigration and Domestic Security Requirements. Arguably, the department’s most noteworthy challenge on the global stage has been its handling

Agency for International Development

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 312-314AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on sports diplomacy and cultural exchange through sporting events, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes USAID personnel reforms, ideological training shifts, and recruitment of specific groups like veterans and diasporas. There is minimal thematic overlap, primarily limited to the mention of diaspora communities in both texts."

Key themes:diaspora engagementpersonnel strategy

— 279 — Agency for International Development clearances, and other components of the hiring process that are necessary for immediate onboarding while coordinating with the White House to bring in new appointees and make internal career employee changes. On Day One, USAID should halt all agencywide training and replace it with training modules to advance the President’s agenda. The Administration should appoint a Senior Accountable Official (SAO) to report on the agency’s adherence to Administration policy priorities, including on Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance, critical race theory, climate change, gender, and diversity and inclusion. It should also create a program to staff hard-to-fill positions overseas. Finally, the Administration should create a recruiting program for veterans and other groups to participate in career job opportunities at USAID. Former mis- sionaries, veterans, members of diasporas, and faith community stakeholders with overseas experience should be recruited to work at USAID on Schedule A appoint- ments, as Institutional Services Contractors, as Personal Services Contractors, and as Foreign Service Officers. CONCLUSION The next conservative Administration will have a unique opportunity to realign U.S. foreign assistance with American national interests and the principles of good governance and more accurately reflect the U.S. taxpayer’s unmatched charita- ble desire to help those in need. It can build on a strong baseline of conservative reforms undertaken by the Trump Administration to counter Communist China’s strategy of world domination. However, this will require that bold steps are taken on Day One to undo the gross misuse of foreign aid by the current Administration to promote a radical ideology that is politically divisive at home and harms our global standing. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but Dr. William Steiger, Bethany Kozma, and Dr. Alma Golden deserve special mention. The author assumes full responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed therein should be attributed to any other individual. — 280 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. S. 1983, Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Public Law No. 87-195, 87th Congress, September 4, 1961, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-75/pdf/STATUTE-75-Pg424-2.pdf (accessed January 19, 2023). 2. U.S. Agency or International Development, “Journey to Self-Reliance Fact Sheet,” June 3, 2020, https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/documents/1870/journey-self-reliance-fact-sheet#:~:text=WHAT%20 IS%20THE%20JOURNEY%20TO%20SELF-RELIANCE%3F%20USAID%20is,greater%20 developmentoutcomesandworktowardatimewhenforeignassistanceisnolongernecessary.%20 It%E2%80%99s%20called%20the%20Journey%20to%20Self-Reliance (accessed March 17, 2023). 3. News release, “U.S. Agency for International Development Administrator Mark Green’s Interview with C-Span’s ‘Newsmakers’ Host Susan Swain and Washington Post’s Carl Morello and Wall Street Journal’s Ben Kesling,” U.S. Agency for International Development, November 26, 2018, https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/news- information/press-releases/nov-26-2018-administrator-mark-green-interview-cspan-newsmakers (accessed March 17, 2023). 4. U.S. Agency for International Development, Digital Strategy 2020–2024, https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-05/USAID_Digital_Strategy.pdf.pdf://www.usaid.gov/digital-development/usaid-digital-strategy (accessed March 17, 2023). 5. “U.S. Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific,” declassified in part by Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Robert C. O’Brien, January 5, 2021, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp- content/uploads/2021/01/IPS-Final-Declass.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023), and Robert C. O’Brien, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, “A Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” January 5, 2021, https:// trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OBrien-Expanded-Statement.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 6. News Release, “Fact Sheet: Prioritizing Climate in Foreign Policy and National Security,” The White House, October 21, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/21/fact-sheet- prioritizing-climate-in-foreign-policy-and-national-security/ (accessed January 28, 2023). 7. U.S. Agency for International Development, Climate Strategy 2020–2030, April 2022, https://www.usaid.gov/ sites/default/files/2022-11/USAID-Climate-Strategy-2022-2030.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 8. Adva Saldinger, “USAID Steps Up ‘Languishing’ Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Effort,” Devex.com, December 15, 2021, http://www.devex.com/news/usaid-steps-up-languishing-diversity-equity-and-inclusion- effort-102316 (accessed January 28, 2021). 9. U.S. Agency for International Development, “Gender Equity and Women Empowerment,” https://www.usaid. gov/gender-equality-and-womens-empowerment (accessed January 30, 2023). 10. U.S. Agency for International Development, “Integrating Gender Equality and Female Empowerment in USAID’s Program Cycle,” ADS Chapter 25, partial revision date January 22, 2021, https://www.usaid.gov/sites/ default/files/2022-12/205.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 11. S. 137, Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act, 117th Congress, introduced January 28, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/137#:~:text=Protecting%20Life%20in%20Foreign%20 Assistance%20Act.%20This%20bill,support%20for%20an%20entity%20that%20conducts%20 such%20activities (accessed January 20, 2023), and H.R. 534, Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act, 117th Congress, introduced January 28, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house- bill/534?s=1&r=450 (accessed January 20, 2023). 12. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., “Memorandum on Protecting Women’s Health at Home and Abroad,” Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, The White House, January 28, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/28/memorandum- on-protecting-womens-health-at-home-and-abroad/ (accessed March 18, 2023). 13. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13926, “Advancing International Religious Freedom,” June 2, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 109 (June 5, 2020), pp. 34951–34953, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ FR-2020-06-05/pdf/2020-12430.pdf (accessed January 20, 2023). 14. 22 Code of Federal Regulations § 205.1, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-II/part-205 (accessed March 18, 2023). 15. Contributor’s notes from internal USAID meetings.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 205-207AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on creating a sports diplomacy strategy and office within the State Department, while the Project 2025 excerpt concerns political appointee placement, leadership control, and ambassadorial rebooting; they share only a general concern for State Department operations but lack substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:Department of Statediplomatic engagement

— 173 — Department of State service and civil service personnel who share the President’s vision and policy agendas—to run the department. This can be done by taking these steps at the outset of the next Administration. Exert Leverage During the Confirmation Process. Notwithstanding the challenges and slowness of the modern U.S. Senate confirmation process, the next President can exert leverage on the Senate if he or she is willing to place State Department appointees directly into those roles, pending confirmation. Doing so would both ensure that the department has immediate senior political leadership and would force the Senate to act on nominees’ appointments instead of being allowed to engage in dilatory tactics that cripple the State Department’s function- ality for weeks, months, or even years. Assert Leadership in the Appointment Process. The next Administration should assert leadership over, and guidance to, the State Department by placing political appointees in positions that do not require Senate confirmation, including senior advisors, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretaries, and Deputy Assistant Sec- retaries. Given the department’s size, the next Administration should also increase the number of political appointees to manage it. To the extent possible, all non-confirmed senior appointees should be selected by the President-elect’s transition team or the new President’s Office of Presiden- tial Personnel (depending on the timing of selection) and be in place the first day of the Administration. No one in a leadership position on the morning of January 20 should hold that position at the end of the day. These recommendations do not imply that foreign service and civil service officials should be excluded from key roles: It is hard to imagine a scenario in which they are not immediately relevant to the transition of power. The main suggestion here is that as many political appoin- tees as possible should be in place at the start of a new Administration. Support and Train Political Appointees. The Secretary of State should use his or her office and its resources to ensure regular coordination among all political appointees, which should take the form of strategy meetings, trainings, and other events. The secretary should also take reasonable steps to ensure that the State Department’s political appointees are connected to other departments’ political appointees, which is critical for cross-agency effectiveness and morale. The sec- retary should capitalize on the more experienced political appointees by using them as the foundation for a mentorship program for less experienced political appointees. The interaction of political appointees must be routine and operational rather than incidental or occasional, and it must be treated as a crucial dimension for the next Administration’s success. Maximize the Value of Career Officials. Career foreign service and civil service personnel can and must be leveraged for their expertise and commit- ment to the President’s mission. Indeed, the State Department has thousands of employees with unparalleled linguistic, cultural, policy, and administrative skills, — 174 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise and large numbers of them have been an enormous resource to the Secretaries of State under which they have served. The secretary must find a way to make clear to career officials that despite prior history and modes of operation, they need not be adversaries of a conservative President, Secretary of State, or the team of political appointees. Reboot Ambassadors Worldwide. All ambassadors are required to submit letters of resignation at the start of a new Administration. Previous Republican Administrations have accepted the resignations of only the political ambassadors and allowed the foreign service ambassadors to retain their posts, sometimes for months or years into a new Administration.5 The next Administration must go further: It should both accept the resignations of all political ambassadors and quickly review and reassess all career ambassadors. This review should commence well before the new Administration’s first day. Ambassadors in countries where U.S. policy or posture would substantially change under the new Administration, as well as any who have evinced hostility toward the incoming Administration or its agenda, should be recalled immediately. The priority should be to put in place new ambassadors who support the Presi- dent’s agenda among political appointees, foreign service officers, and civil service personnel, with no predetermined percentage among these categories. Political ambassadors with strong personal relationships with the President should be pri- oritized for key strategic posts such as Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United Nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). RIGHTING THE SHIP Ensuring the State Department is accountable for serving American citi- zens first will require—at a minimum—that the following steps be implemented immediately: Review Retroactively. Before inauguration, the President-elect’s department transition team should assess every aspect of State Department negotiations and funding commitments. Upon inauguration, the Secretary of State should order an immediate freeze on all efforts to implement unratified treaties and international agreements, allocation of resources, foreign assistance disbursements, domestic and international contracts and payments, hiring and recruiting decisions, etc., pending a political appointee-driven review to ensure that such efforts comport with the new Administration’s policies. The quality of this review is more import- ant than speed. The posture of the department during this review should be an unwavering desire to prioritize the American people—including a recognition that the federal government must be a diligent steward of taxpayer dollars. Implement Repair. The State Department must change its handling of international agreements to restore constitutional governance. Under prior Administrations, unnecessary institutional factors in the department caused

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney

To make improvements in the enactment of title 41, United States Code, into a positive law title and to improve the Code.

119/hr/5185

Export Controls Enforcement Act

119/hr/4505

YALI Act of 2025

119/hr/4332

Back to All Bills