D. C. Criminal Reforms to Immediately Make Everyone Safe Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/4922

Last Updated: July 12, 2026

D. C. Criminal Reforms to Immediately Make Everyone Safe Act of 2025

HR. 4922, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.

The sponsor

Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$123,150 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Justice" section, p. 584-586 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate.

September 16, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The D.C. Criminal Reforms to Immediately Make Everyone Safe Act of 2025 (HR 4922). A bill that promises to "make everyone safe" but, in reality, only serves to further entrench the inefficient and bureaucratic machinery of government.

From a purely economic perspective, this bill is a non-starter. The creation of a new website to track juvenile crime statistics will undoubtedly be a costly endeavor, with estimates suggesting a price tag of at least $10 million in the first year alone. And what of the ongoing maintenance costs? The Attorney General's office will need to allocate significant resources to keep this website up and running, taking away from more pressing priorities.

But it's not just the financial burden that concerns me – it's the regulatory overreach. This bill creates a slew of new regulations governing the collection and dissemination of juvenile crime data. The affected industries? Law enforcement, corrections, and social services, to name a few. Compliance requirements will be onerous, with timelines for implementation stretching out over several years.

And then there are the penalties for non-compliance. Fines, fees, and even potential jail time for those who fail to meet the bill's stringent standards. It's a classic case of government overreach, stifling innovation and progress in the name of "safety."

But what about the economic impact? The creation of this new website will undoubtedly lead to job losses in the private sector, as companies are forced to adapt to the new regulatory landscape. And what of the opportunity costs? Resources that could be better spent on actual crime prevention initiatives will instead be squandered on bureaucratic busywork.

In conclusion, HR 4922 is a prime example of government inefficiency and overreach. It's a bill that promises much but delivers little, except for more red tape and regulatory burdens. As a rational actor, I must oppose this legislation in the strongest possible terms.

Recommendations:

* Oppose HR 4922 in its current form * Advocate for significant revisions to reduce regulatory burdens and costs * Consider alternative solutions that prioritize private sector innovation and efficiency

Estimated economic impact: -$50 million (first year), -$200 million (five-year projection)

Affected industries: Law enforcement, corrections, social services, technology

Compliance requirements: Onerous, with timelines stretching out over several years

Enforcement mechanisms: Fines, fees, potential jail time for non-compliance

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$123,150

21 donors

PACs

Organizations

$750

Committees

Individuals

$122,400

No PAC contributions found

SHANNON GREEN COLLECTION

1 transaction

$500

NAPLES SMART, LLC

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

TENEV, VLADIMIR

2 transactions

$10,000

COX, JOE B

1 transaction

$6,600

STALLINGS, KYLE

1 transaction

$6,600

ZALIK, DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

ZALIK, HELEN

1 transaction

$6,600

BAUM, DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

WALDRIP, EMORY

1 transaction

$6,600

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

1 transaction

$6,600

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

1 transaction

$6,600

REHNERT, GEOFFREY

1 transaction

$6,600

CRISWELL, HARRY E III

1 transaction

$6,600

JOHNSON, CHARLES B

1 transaction

$6,600

VOCCOLA, FREDERICK J

1 transaction

$6,600

WILSON, DONALD R JR

1 transaction

$6,600

SACKS, DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

ADAMS, CAROL

1 transaction

$5,000

BAPPERT, CORY

1 transaction

$5,000

FUENTE, CARLOS

1 transaction

$5,000

BHATT, BAIJU

1 transaction

$5,000

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9]

ID: C001116

Top Contributors

SYFAN, STEPHEN

SYFAN LOGISTICS • EXEC VP

IndividualGAINESVILLE, GA

$6,600

May 31, 2024

SCOTT, ROBERT S.

RAC PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE

IndividualBOGART, GA

$6,600

Oct 11, 2024

FOWLER, CHARLES W. JR.

GLOBAL DEFENSE MGMT • PRESIDENT

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,500

Oct 29, 2024

BECK, SAMUEL

BECK FUNERAL HOME • FUNERAL DIRECTOR

IndividualCLAYTON, GA

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

HINMAN, ROY H

SELF EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSAINT AUGUSTINE, FL

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

FROST IV, EDWIN BRANT

SELF EMPLOYED • FINANCIAL SERVICES

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 24, 2024

FROST, KRISTA

NONE • HOMEMAKER

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 24, 2024

ACTON, MICHAEL

SELF EMPLOYED • DEVELOPER

IndividualHOMER, GA

$3,300

Nov 7, 2023

JEPSON, JEFFREY

EVANS GENERAL CONTRACTORS • CONSTRUCTION

IndividualPOOLER, GA

$3,300

Nov 19, 2023

MATHENY, DAVID

SILENCER SHOP • OWNER

IndividualLEANDER, TX

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

ID: W000806

Top Contributors

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Apr 18, 2024

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKESWICK, VA

$6,600

Apr 15, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Feb 15, 2024

FILBURN, MARK

WHITESTONE CONSTRUCTION • PRESIDENT

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,400

Jun 26, 2024

FILBURN, MARK

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,400

Sep 4, 2024

ASNESS, CLIFF

AQR • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Jun 6, 2024

ASNESS, LAUREL

MARCUM LLP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Jun 6, 2024

BEUCHER, NICK

CEO • TAVISTOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

IndividualORLANDO, FL

$3,300

May 28, 2024

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKESWICK, VA

$3,300

Apr 18, 2024

DEVORE, DEBBIE

SEA & SHORELINE • ACCOUNTANT

IndividualWINTER GARDEN, FL

$3,300

May 31, 2024

Rep. Fine, Randy [R-FL-6]

ID: F000484

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2]

ID: B001309

Top Contributors

KUHLMAN, RUTHIE

IndividualKNOXVILLE, TN

$3,300

Sep 4, 2023

KUHLMAN, RUTHIE

IndividualKNOXVILLE, TN

$3,300

Sep 4, 2023

FUHRMAN, LINDSEY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSOUTH MIAMI, FL

$3,300

Jul 26, 2023

FUHRMAN, SCOTT

BISCAYNE GLOBAL MANAGEMENT • CHAIRMAN

IndividualSOUTH MIAMI, FL

$3,300

Jul 26, 2023

KUHLMAN, RUTHIE

OLD GRAY CEMETERY • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

IndividualKNOXVILLE, TN

$3,300

Jul 29, 2023

KUHLMAN, RUTHIE

OLD GRAY CEMETERY • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

IndividualKNOXVILLE, TN

$3,300

Jul 29, 2023

STOWERS, HARRY

STOWERS MACHINERY CORPORATION • EXECUTIVE

IndividualKNOXVILLE, TN

$3,300

Jul 25, 2023

STOWERS, HARRY

STOWERS MACHINERY CORPORATION • EXECUTIVE

IndividualKNOXVILLE, TN

$3,300

Jul 25, 2023

HUFFAKER, RAY F

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPOWELL, TN

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

COOLEY, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 26, 2023

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

ID: H001077

Top Contributors

HEBERT, MARC

JONES WALKER • ATTORNEY

IndividualMETAIRIE, LA

$3,500

Sep 8, 2024

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

B&G FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC. • CORP. SECRETARY

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Nov 25, 2024

FREY, GERARD A.

SELF EMPLOYED • FARMERS

IndividualIOTA, LA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

CRAPPEL, ADAM

AE OFFICE MACHINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualPATTERSON, LA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

ULINE • CEO

IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL

$3,300

Jan 26, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

COOLEY, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

BG FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Mar 12, 2024

DAVIS, JORDAN

WESTERN CONSTRUCTION ROOFING • SALES PROJECT MANAGER

IndividualHARRISON, ID

$3,300

Jan 9, 2024

Rep. Gill, Brandon [R-TX-26]

ID: G000603

Top Contributors

BOERNE STAGE AIRFIELD

OrganizationBOERNE, TX

$2,500

Mar 12, 2024

HOLMES LAW

OrganizationDALLAS, TX

$500

Feb 14, 2024

WILLIAMS, JOHN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWESLEY CHAPEL, FL

$6,818

Feb 6, 2024

AZRIELI, MATTHEW

BASTE RECORDS • EXECUTIVE

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

BENNETT, MATT

CHRISTIAN UNION • MINISTER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

GILL, BEVERLY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCLYDE, TX

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

GILL, JUDITH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCLYDE, TX

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

GILL, RUSSELL

DELTA AIR LINES • PILOT AND RANCHER

IndividualCLYDE, TX

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

GILL, JUDITH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCLYDE, TX

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

SCHOOLEY, BRUCE

NOBLE PRODUCTIONS INC • SELF-EMPLOYED

IndividualALAMO, CA

$6,818

Nov 20, 2023

Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2]

ID: W000795

Top Contributors

CATAWBA INDIAN NATION

OrganizationROCK HILL, SC

$2,000

May 6, 2024

LEVKOWITZ, HOWARD

SELF EMPLOYED • INVESTOR

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$6,600

Nov 28, 2023

VICKAR, KERRY

LKV MANAGEMENT • CHAIRMAN

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$5,000

Nov 21, 2023

LOWELL, RANDY R.

BURR FORMAN • ATTORNEY

IndividualISLE OF PALMS, SC

$3,700

May 8, 2024

VALLARINO, MANUEL R.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE BEACH, SC

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

VALLARINO, MARY EMILY J.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE BEACH, SC

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

CASSELS, W. TOBIN III

SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,300

Dec 1, 2023

CASSELS, W. TOBIN JR.

SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES • CHAIRMAN & CEO

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,300

Dec 1, 2023

HOEFER, JOHN M. S. ESQ.

WILLOUGHBY & HOEFER P.A. • ATTORNEY

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,300

Nov 8, 2023

LIEBERMAN, JEREMY A.

KLEE TUCHIN BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualFLUSHING, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

ID: L000596

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Donor Network - Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 70 nodes and 34 connections (49 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $179,650

Top Donors - Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped, 1 harmed.

−Private Prisons & Immigration Detentionconfidence 0.80
Section 2 limits youth offender status to individuals under 18 years of age, which may reduce the number of youths incarcerated in private prisons, thereby potentially harming the industry (SEC. 2. YOUTH OFFENDERS).
+Law Enforcement & Surveillance Techconfidence 0.70
Section 3 establishes a website for updated statistics on juvenile crime, which may provide law enforcement agencies with valuable data to inform their strategies and operations, potentially benefiting the industry (SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF WEBSITE ON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUVENILE CRIME STATISTICS).

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech$1,500
from 3 contributions
- NORTON, JAMES$1,500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Justice

Moderate

Vector: 62%

Pages: 584-586AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4922 focuses on juvenile justice reform in D.C., including youth offender definitions and crime statistics transparency, which aligns with Project 2025's broader emphasis on reducing violent crime and enhancing DOJ accountability, though it does not directly address FBI political accountability or federal intervention in rule-of-law-deficient jurisdictions."

Key themes:violent crime reductionlaw enforcement accountabilityjuvenile justicedata transparencycriminal justice reform

— 552 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise The Director of the FBI must remain politically accountable to the President in the same manner as the head of any other federal department or agency. To ensure prompt political accountability and to rein in perceived or actual abuses, the next conservative Administration should seek a legislative change to align the FBI Director’s position with those of the heads of all other major departments and agencies. RENEWING THE DEPARTMENT’S FOCUS ON VIOLENT CRIME Despite the DOJ’s pronouncements that violent crime continues to be a top pri- ority, it has increased across the United States. The department’s leadership must make actually reducing violent crime a priority across the United States—and it must do so in partnership with state and local officials in a manner that is tailored to the needs and conditions in those states and localities. Targeting Violent and Career Criminals, Not Parents. The next conserva- tive Administration must ensure that the Department of Justice devotes significant effort to reducing violent crime nationwide. The Attorney General should require all U.S. Attorneys to develop a jurisdictional-specific plan—whenever possible in coordination with state and local law enforcement—to reduce violent crime within each of their districts. Then the Attorney General should hold each U.S. Attorney accountable for achieving actual results. In recent years, federal and state officials have succumbed to calls from anti–law enforcement advocates for so-called criminal justice reform. The pleas- ant-sounding terminology of reform masks the darker reality of this movement, which is one that has supported dismantling effective federal, state, and local law enforcement and stripped away some of the most fundamental tools that law enforcement has long had at its disposal. This campaign is not just ill-advised; it has clearly had real-world consequences in the form of catastrophic increases in crime—particularly violent crime—nationwide. As discussed in the next section, the Department of Justice has a special obligation to restore law and order in such districts.37 Juxtaposed against this increase in violent crime are things like Attorney Gen- eral Merrick Garland’s October 4, 2021, memorandum directing the commitment of significant resources and energies to combating imaginary, politically conve- nient threats of violence toward members of school boards and their staffs during the heat of the Virginia gubernatorial race.38 There was no similar effort to inves- tigate elected officials and other public officers who conspired with outside allies to target and harass parents who were merely exercising their constitutional and statutory rights.39 If we are to continue to have informed and civil dialogue in the United States on issues of public concern, the DOJ must enforce applicable civil rights laws in an even-handed way when citizens’ livelihoods are threatened merely because they have exercised their rights. — 553 — Department of Justice Enhancing the Federal Focus on and Resources in Jurisdictions with Rule-of-Law Deficiencies. A disturbing number of state and local jurisdictions have enacted policies that directly undermine public safety, leave doubt about whether criminals will be punished, and weaken the rule of law. While the prose- cution of criminal offenses in most jurisdictions across the country must remain the responsibility of state and local governments, the federal government owes a special responsibility to Americans in jurisdictions where state and local prose- cutors have abdicated this duty.40 Jurisdictions suffering from deficiencies in the rule of law warrant, as appropri- ate within our federal system, greater attention and additional federal resources that are sufficient to protect the rights of American citizens and federal interests. In the next conservative Administration, the DOJ, acting primarily through its U.S. Attorneys, should therefore: l Use applicable federal laws to bring federal charges against criminals when local jurisdictions wrongfully allow them to evade responsibility for their conduct.41 The department should also increase the federal law enforcement presence in such jurisdictions and explore innovative solutions to bring meaningful charges against criminals and criminal organizations in such jurisdictions. l Where warranted and proper under federal law, initiate legal action against local officials—including District Attorneys—who deny American citizens the “equal protection of the laws” by refusing to prosecute criminal offenses in their jurisdictions. This holds true particularly for jurisdictions that refuse to enforce the law against criminals based on the Left’s favored defining characteristics of the would-be offender (race, so-called gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.) or other political considerations (e.g., immigration status). l Pursue policies and legislation that encourage prosecution of violent crimes as well as appropriate sentences for such offenses. The Biden Administration has adopted policies that do not prevent armed career criminals, who actually commit violent crimes, from committing those crimes. A recent U.S. Sentencing Commission report shows that armed career criminals are consistently sentenced below their minimum sentencing guidelines range.42 There are valid reasons for sentence reductions in particular cases (for example, if the defendant has provided substantial assistance in prosecuting other offenders). At the same time, the DOJ must ensure that its line

Department of Justice

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 584-586AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on juvenile justice transparency in D.C., while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes FBI reform, violent crime reduction, and DOJ accountability—there is minimal thematic overlap beyond a general connection to law enforcement."

Key themes:law enforcementcriminal justiceaccountability

— 551 — Department of Justice The DOJ needs a hard firewall between its legitimate activities (monitoring online activity for potential threats in its mission space, looking at social media profiles for evidence of intent or other criminal activity, etc.) and those in which it must not engage (asking or demanding public forums or publishers to remove material based on the content and/or viewpoints expressed or itself censoring speech). l Streamline the non–law enforcement functions within the FBI, such as its Office of General Counsel, and obtain those services from other offices within the department. The next conservative Administration should eliminate any offices within the FBI that it has the power to eliminate without any action from Congress.34 For example, few Americans know that the FBI maintains a core of approximately 300 attorneys within its Office of General Counsel, an office that has been involved in some of the FBI’s most damaging recent scandals.35 These attorneys are not necessary to the functioning of the FBI in their current capacity. Legal advice should come from attorneys at the DOJ, whether those attorneys are within the Criminal Division, the National Security Division, the Justice Management Division, or the Office of Legal Counsel. Moving legal review outside the FBI would serve as a crucial check on an agency that has recently pushed past legal boundary after legal boundary. Similarly, the FBI does not need its own Office of Congressional Affairs separate and apart from the DOJ Office of Legislative Affairs, nor does it need its own Office of Public Affairs. l Emphasize, fund, and reward field offices while shrinking headquarters staff. While the FBI has essential headquarters functions that must be fulfilled and should likely be fulfilled by a team in Washington, D.C., the next conservative Administration should make a priority of deploying, funding, and rewarding the work of the field offices to the greatest extent possible. The Department of Justice must value badges over bureaucracy, must rethink its internal reporting structures, and should aim to realign the FBI’s resources accordingly. l Submit a legislative proposal to Congress to eliminate the 10-year term for the Director. After J. Edgar Hoover’s decades-long term as FBI Director came to an end following his death in 1972, and in light of oversight conducted by Congress into alleged Intelligence Community and FBI abuses in the 1970s, Congress limited the Director’s tenure to one “ten- year term.”36 The realities of the FBI’s abuses and overreach in recent years demonstrate that further reform is still necessary. — 552 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise The Director of the FBI must remain politically accountable to the President in the same manner as the head of any other federal department or agency. To ensure prompt political accountability and to rein in perceived or actual abuses, the next conservative Administration should seek a legislative change to align the FBI Director’s position with those of the heads of all other major departments and agencies. RENEWING THE DEPARTMENT’S FOCUS ON VIOLENT CRIME Despite the DOJ’s pronouncements that violent crime continues to be a top pri- ority, it has increased across the United States. The department’s leadership must make actually reducing violent crime a priority across the United States—and it must do so in partnership with state and local officials in a manner that is tailored to the needs and conditions in those states and localities. Targeting Violent and Career Criminals, Not Parents. The next conserva- tive Administration must ensure that the Department of Justice devotes significant effort to reducing violent crime nationwide. The Attorney General should require all U.S. Attorneys to develop a jurisdictional-specific plan—whenever possible in coordination with state and local law enforcement—to reduce violent crime within each of their districts. Then the Attorney General should hold each U.S. Attorney accountable for achieving actual results. In recent years, federal and state officials have succumbed to calls from anti–law enforcement advocates for so-called criminal justice reform. The pleas- ant-sounding terminology of reform masks the darker reality of this movement, which is one that has supported dismantling effective federal, state, and local law enforcement and stripped away some of the most fundamental tools that law enforcement has long had at its disposal. This campaign is not just ill-advised; it has clearly had real-world consequences in the form of catastrophic increases in crime—particularly violent crime—nationwide. As discussed in the next section, the Department of Justice has a special obligation to restore law and order in such districts.37 Juxtaposed against this increase in violent crime are things like Attorney Gen- eral Merrick Garland’s October 4, 2021, memorandum directing the commitment of significant resources and energies to combating imaginary, politically conve- nient threats of violence toward members of school boards and their staffs during the heat of the Virginia gubernatorial race.38 There was no similar effort to inves- tigate elected officials and other public officers who conspired with outside allies to target and harass parents who were merely exercising their constitutional and statutory rights.39 If we are to continue to have informed and civil dialogue in the United States on issues of public concern, the DOJ must enforce applicable civil rights laws in an even-handed way when citizens’ livelihoods are threatened merely because they have exercised their rights.

Department of Justice

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 587-589AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on juvenile justice reform and transparency in D.C., while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes federal enforcement of violent crime, mandatory minimums, and dismantling criminal enterprises—there is minimal thematic overlap."

Key themes:criminal justicepublic safetylaw enforcement

— 554 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise attorneys are consistently using the tools at their disposal in cases with violent offenders, including pursuing mandatory minimum sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA).43 The department should also support legislative efforts to provide further tools, such as the Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, which Senators Tom Cotton (R–AR), Marsha Blackburn (R–TN), and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R–MS) introduced in 2021 in response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions neutering the ACCA.44 l Enforce the death penalty where appropriate and applicable. Capital punishment is a sensitive matter, as it should be, but the current crime wave makes deterrence vital at the federal, state, and local levels. However, providing this punishment without ever enforcing it provides justice neither for the victims’ families nor for the defendant. The next conservative Administration should therefore do everything possible to obtain finality for the 44 prisoners currently on federal death row. It should also pursue the death penalty for applicable crimes—particularly heinous crimes involving violence and sexual abuse of children—until Congress says otherwise through legislation.45 DISMANTLING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES Criminal organizations are as old as crime itself, but are more extensive, sophisticated, and dangerous today than at any other point in history. The Department of Justice has a key role in tackling transnational criminal orga- nizations like Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Mexican drug cartels as well as purely domestic criminal organizations like those built on the more traditional mafia crime model as part of its obligation to ensure the safety and security of the American people. The department’s primary directive under the next Administration should be to return to an unapologetic focus on dismantling these criminal organizations and incarcerating their membership. Once this reprioritization occurs, the depart- ment’s political leadership should take concrete steps to use agency reach and resources to prevent these criminal organizations from operating and surviving. Assaulting the business model of these criminal organizations—which are massive, diversified enterprises with nationwide or international operations—is essential for success. The next Administration will therefore need to: l Revitalize the DOJ’s use of the array of statutory tools that exist for dealing with the threat of criminal organizations. The most potent ones are the simplest. For example, the department should:

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4922 focuses on juvenile justice reform in Washington D.C., including youth offender definitions and crime statistics transparency, while the Project 2025 HHS section centers on healthcare policy, civil rights in health programs, reproductive rights, and related federal regulations. There is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the bill and the cited HHS provisions."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 608-610AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on juvenile justice reform in Washington D.C., including youth offender definitions and crime statistics transparency, while the Project 2025 DOJ section centers on FBI accountability, political bias allegations, and national security initiatives—there is no substantive thematic or policy overlap."

— 575 — Department of Justice 22. Editorial Board, “About Those Domestic-Terrorist Parents,” The Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2021, https://www. wsj.com/articles/about-those-domestic-terrorists-national-school-boards-association-merrick-garland-memo- fbi-11635285900 (accessed February 3, 2023); John Malcom, “Are Parents Being Tagged as ‘Domestic Terrorists’ by the FBI? Justice Department Needs to Show Its Cards,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/are-parents-being-tagged-domestic-terrorists-the- fbi-justice (accessed February 3, 2023); Victor Nava, “FBI Treated Twitter as a ‘Subsidiary,’ Flagged Tweets and Accounts for ‘Misinformation,’” New York Post, updated December 16, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/12/16/fbi- treated-twitter-as-subsidiary-flagged-tweets-for-misinformation/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 23. Mary Margaret Olohan, “DOJ’s Kristen Clarke: A Pro-Abortion Activist Enforcing the Law Against Pro-Lifers,” The Daily Signal, October 26, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/10/26/dojs-kristen-clarke-pro- abortion-activist-enforcing-law-pro-lifers/ ; Josh Gerstein, “DOJ Official Pressed on Targeting of Supreme Court Justices,” Politico, July 28, 2022, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/28/doj-official-pressed-on- targeting-of-supreme-court-justices-00048506 (accessed February 3, 2023). 24. Solomon, “FBI Email Chain May Provide Most Damning Evidence of FISA Abuses Yet”; Post Editorial Board, “The FBI Knew RussiaGate Was a Lie—But Hid That Truth”; O’Neill, “FBI Pressured Twitter, Sent Trove of Docs Hours Before Post Broke Hunter Laptop Story.” 25. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, “History: The Nation Calls, 1908–1923,” https:// www.fbi.gov/history/brief-history/the-nation-calls (accessed February 3, 2023). 26. Press release, “FBI and Law Enforcement Partners Arrest Nearly 6,000 Violent Criminals This Summer,” U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, September 13, 2022, https://www.fbi.gov/news/ press-releases/press-releases/fbi-and-law-enforcement-partners-arrest-nearly-6000-violent-criminals-this- summer (accessed February 3, 2023). 27. See, for example, Joseph Goldstein, “As Seen in ‘Goodfellas’: Arrest Is Made in ’78 Lufthansa Robbery,” The New York Times, January 23, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/nyregion/arrests-in-cold-case- investigation-including-78-lufthansa-heist.html (accessed February 3, 2023). 28. Danielle Wallace, “FBI Nationwide Operation Locates 121 Actively Missing Kids, Child Sex Trafficking Victims,” Fox News, August 15, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-nationwide-operation-locates-actively-missing- kids-child-sex-trafficking-victims (accessed February 3, 2023). 29. Adam Shaw, “FBI Stepped in After Suspected Chinese Spy Got Close to Swalwell, Other Politicians, Report Finds,” Fox News, December 8, 2020, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-chinese-spy-swalwell-other- politicians (accessed February 3, 2023). 30. The precise scope and contours of this review warrant special consideration. A review of all ongoing drug trafficking investigations or specific violent crime investigations may not warrant the department’s attention in the same way as high-profile, politically sensitive investigations likely will. Nevertheless, the goal should be as comprehensive a review as possible. 31. 28 U.S. Code § 531, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/531 (accessed February 3, 2023). Emphasis added. 32. The same could be said to apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and potentially to the U.S. Marshals Service, although the USMS’s mission protecting the federal courts could present compelling reasons why the department should maintain it as a direct report to the Deputy Attorney General. 33. See, for example, Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 1, October 27, 1787, https://founders.archives. gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0152 (accessed February 3, 2023). 34. An argument could also be made that the upper echelons of the FBI’s leadership should physically relocate back to the Robert F. Kennedy building to ensure proper accountability and to emphasize organizational reality: The FBI is a component of the department, not its equal, as outlined above. 35. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Audit of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Office of the General Counsel in National Security Matters, Report No. 22-116, September 2022, https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/22-116.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 36. S. 2212, Crime Control Act of 1976, Public Law No. 94-503, October 15, 1976, § 203, 90 Stat. 2427 (codified as amended at 28 U.S. Code § 532), https://www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-90/STATUTE-90-Pg2407. pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 37. See “Enhancing Federal Focus and Resources in Jurisdictions with Rule-of-Law Deficiencies,” infra. — 576 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 38. Garland Memorandum, October 4, 2021; press release, “America First Legal Seeks Two Federal Investigations on Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Infamous Oct. 4th Memo Siccing the FBI on Concerned Parents,” America First Legal Foundation, March 14, 2022, https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-seeks-two-federal- investigations-on-attorney-general-merrick-garlands-infamous-oct-4th-memo-siccing-the-fbi-on-concerned- parents/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 39. Luke Rosiak, “In Aftermath of Enemies List, School Committee Pledges to ‘Silence the Opposition,’” Daily Wire, March 27, 2021, https://www.dailywire.com/news/after-enemies-list-school-body-pledges-to-silence-the- opposition (accessed February 3, 2023). 40. The language of the Equal Protection Clause “reflects that ‘achieving equal protection against lawbreakers was at the core of the Clause’s objectives.’” Lefebure v. D’Aquilla, 15 F.4th 650, 669 (5th Cir. 2021) (Graves, J. dissenting) (quoting Lawrence Rosenthal, “Policing and Equal Protection,” Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 21, No. 53 (2003), p. 70) cert. denied, 212 L. Ed. 2d 791, 142 S. Ct. 2732 (2022)), https://casetext.com/case/ lefebure-v-daquilla-2 (accessed February 3, 2023). 41. See, for example, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler’s actions in 2020 calling on federal officials—executing their mission to protect federal property and officials—to leave the city, saying, “They’re not wanted here” despite the fact that local reports found that “[o]ut of more than a thousand arrests reported by the Portland Police Bureau and other local law enforcement since late May 2020, only about 8.4% of the cases are still open” and that the “rest have been dismissed or listed as no complaint, which means authorities are not currently pursuing charges.” BBC News, “Portland Protests: Mayor Demands Federal Officers Leave City,” July 20, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53466718 (accessed February 3, 2023), and Hannah Lambert, “91% of Portland Protest Arrests Not Being Prosecuted,” Portland Tribune, January 5, 2021, https://archive.ph/ OSDbz (accessed February 3,2023). 42. Figure 4, “Trend in Average Guideline Minimum and Average Sentence Imposed for Armed Career Criminals Fiscal Years 2010–2019,” in U.S. Sentencing Commission, Federal Armed Career Criminals: Prevalence, Patterns, and Pathways, March 2021, p. 26, https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/ research-publications/2021/20210303_ACCA-Report.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 43. 18 U.S. Code § 924(e), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/924 (accessed February 3, 2023). 44. S. 1586, Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, 117th Congress, introduced May 12, 2021, https://www. congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1586 (accessed February 6, 2023). 45. This could require seeking the Supreme Court to overrule Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008), in applicable cases, but the department should place a priority on doing so. 46. 21 U.S. Code § 801 et seq., https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/chapter-13/subchapter-I/part-A (accessed February 3, 2023). 47. 18 U.S. Code §§ 1961–1968, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96 (accessed February 3, 2023). 48. For more on this topic generally, see “Ensuring Enforcement and Administration of Our Immigration Laws,” infra. 49. See Paul J. Larkin, “Twenty-First Century Illicit Drugs and Their Discontents: The Scourge of Illicit Fentanyl,” Heritage Foundation Legal Memorandum No. 313, November 1, 2022), https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2022-11/LM313.pdf. 50. Jessica Rendall, “100,000 People Died from Drug Overdoses in the US in One Year, a Record,” CNET, November 18, 2021, https://www.cnet.com/health/medical/100000-people-died-from-drug-overdoses-in- the-us-in-one-year-a-record/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 51. U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division, “Information About the Department of Justice’s China Initiative and a Compilation of China-Related Prosecutions Since 2018,” last updated November 19, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/archives/nsd/information-about-department-justice-s-china-initiative-and- compilation-china-related (accessed February 3, 2023). 52. Ronn Blitzer and Jake Gibson, “Biden DOJ Ending National Security Initiative Aimed at Countering China amid Complaints About Bias,” Fox News, February 23, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-ending-china- initiative-national-security-program-bias (accessed February 3, 2023). 53. National Security Strategy, The White House, October 2022, p. 23, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). See also ibid., p. 8.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Donalds, Byron

Make SWAPs Efficient Act of 2025

119/hr/1676

Value Over Cost Act of 2026

119/hr/1118

Safe and Smart Federal Purchasing Act

119/hr/856

Back to All Bills