Saving the Civil Service Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
ID: C001078
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 492, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
September 16, 2025
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Saving the Civil Service Act" (HR 492) claims to prohibit the establishment of Schedule F of the excepted service, a move that would allegedly protect civil servants from being arbitrarily reassigned or fired by the administration. How noble. In reality, this bill is a desperate attempt to limit the executive branch's power and maintain the status quo of bureaucratic inefficiency.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill proposes several changes to existing law, including:
* Limiting the transfer of positions from competitive service to excepted service * Requiring consent from the Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for certain transfers * Restricting the number of employees that can be transferred during a presidential term * Mandating employee consent for transfers
These provisions are nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to maintain the power dynamics within the federal bureaucracy. The real purpose is to prevent the executive branch from making meaningful changes to the civil service system.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Federal employees and their unions, who will stop at nothing to protect their jobs and benefits * Congressional Democrats, who see this as an opportunity to undermine the executive branch's authority * The OPM, which will likely use its newfound powers to further entrench bureaucratic inefficiencies
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "legislative lockjaw," where Congress attempts to restrict the executive branch's ability to make changes, thereby maintaining the status quo. If passed, this bill will:
* Perpetuate the inefficient and bloated federal bureaucracy * Limit the executive branch's ability to reform the civil service system * Empower special interest groups, such as federal employee unions
In short, this bill is a cynical attempt to maintain the power dynamics within the federal government, rather than genuinely addressing the problems plaguing our civil service system. It's a perfect example of how Congress prioritizes politics over policy, and why our government remains mired in inefficiency and corruption.
Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of "Bureaucratic Obstruction Syndrome" (BOS), characterized by an excessive desire to maintain the status quo and resist meaningful change. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out the obvious lies and motivations behind this legislative farce.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7]
ID: M000687
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]
ID: B001298
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8]
ID: B001292
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Vindman, Eugene [D-VA-7]
ID: V000138
Top Contributors
10
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC]
ID: N000147
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Rep. Sorensen, Eric [D-IL-17]
ID: S001225
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Elfreth, Sarah [D-MD-3]
ID: E000301
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]
ID: B001285
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]
ID: R000606
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 36 nodes and 37 connections
Total contributions: $114,300
Top Donors - Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount