Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/4398
Last Updated: December 4, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Emmer, Tom [R-MN-6]

ID: E000294

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

December 3, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

âś…

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act (HR 4398) claims to address delays in signing death certificates for veterans who die from natural causes. The bill's sponsors, a bipartisan coalition of self-proclaimed patriots, want to ensure that deceased veterans are buried in a timely manner and their families receive survivor benefits without unnecessary delays.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires VA physicians or nurse practitioners to certify the death of a veteran within 48 hours of learning about it. If they can't comply, a coroner or medical examiner can step in. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs must submit an annual report on compliance with this provision.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Veterans' families, VA physicians and nurse practitioners, coroners, medical examiners, and the Department of Veterans Affairs are all affected by this bill. But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the politicians who sponsored this bill and their donors.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It doesn't address the root causes of delays in death certificate signing, such as understaffing or bureaucratic inefficiencies within the VA. Instead, it creates more paperwork and reporting requirements, which will likely lead to more delays and red tape.

Now, let's examine the real motivations behind this bill:

* The American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, and other veterans' organizations have been lobbying for this bill. Coincidentally, these groups are also major donors to the campaigns of the bill's sponsors. * The VA has a history of mismanaging funds and resources. This bill might be an attempt to deflect attention from more pressing issues, like the VA's chronic understaffing and inadequate care for veterans.

In medical terms, this bill is a classic case of " legislative placebo effect." It makes politicians look good, but it doesn't actually address the underlying problems. The patient (veterans' families) might feel better in the short term, but the disease (VA's inefficiencies) remains untreated.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "PAC-itis," where politicians prioritize campaign donations over actual solutions to veterans' issues. Treatment: Apply a healthy dose of skepticism and scrutiny to the motivations behind this bill.

Related Topics

Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Small Business & Entrepreneurship Federal Budget & Appropriations State & Local Government Affairs Congressional Rules & Procedures Transportation & Infrastructure Government Operations & Accountability Civil Rights & Liberties National Security & Intelligence
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Emmer, Tom [R-MN-6]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$1,164,550
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$64,550
Committees
$0
Individuals
$1,100,000

No PAC contributions found

1
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
2 transactions
$16,700
2
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$10,000
3
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
4
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCIL
1 transaction
$5,000
5
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$5,000
6
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
3 transactions
$4,950
7
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
2 transactions
$4,000
8
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$3,300
9
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000
10
SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000
11
ONEIDA NATION
2 transactions
$2,000
12
MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT
1 transaction
$1,000
13
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
14
BRYANT SONGY SNELL
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
AUSTIN, TANI DRU
1 transaction
$250,000
2
AUSTIN, WILLIAM F.
1 transaction
$250,000
3
HILL, VERNON
2 transactions
$200,000
4
DEVRIES, TIMOTHY C.
1 transaction
$100,000
5
ROSEN, TOM
1 transaction
$100,000
6
WALTON, ROB MR..
1 transaction
$100,000
7
BROIN, JEFF
1 transaction
$100,000

Donor Network - Rep. Emmer, Tom [R-MN-6]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 22 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $1,164,550

Top Donors - Rep. Emmer, Tom [R-MN-6]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

14 Orgs7 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.

Introduction

Low 52.2%
Pages: 688-691

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra.

Introduction

Low 52.2%
Pages: 688-691

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra. — 657 — Section Four THE ECONOMY The next Administration must prioritize the economic prosperity of ordi- nary Americans. For several decades, establishment “elites” have failed the citizenry by refusing to secure the border, outsourcing manufacturing to China and elsewhere, spending recklessly, regulating constantly, and generally controlling the country from the top down rather than letting it flourish from the bottom up. The proper role of government, as was articulated nearly 250 years ago, is to secure our God-given, unalienable rights in order that we might enjoy the pursuit of happiness, the benefits of free enterprise, and the blessings of liberty. Finding the right approach to trade policy is key to the fortunes of everyday Americans. In Chapter 26, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Kent Lassman and former White House director of trade and manufacturing policy Peter Navarro debate what an effective conservative trade policy would look like. Lass- man argues that the best trade policy is a humble, limited-government approach that would encourage free trade with all nations. He maintains that aggressive trade policies involve an increased government role that future leftist Administra- tions will utilize to push “climate change” and “equity”-based activism. Focusing more on gross domestic product (GDP) growth than on median income, he writes that “people mistakenly believe that U.S. manufacturing and the U.S. economy are in decline” when in truth “American manufacturing output is currently at an all-time high.” Meanwhile, we continue to experience “record-setting real GDP” despite our “long-run decline in manufacturing employment.” Lassman does not think that an aggressive U.S. trade policy would lead to more manufacturing jobs. Rather, he writes, “Federal Reserve research shows” that the

Introduction

Low 52.0%
Pages: 679-681

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.