The bill
International Maritime Pollution Accountability Act of 2025
HR. 4341, 119th Congress β read as touching Surface Transportation.
Sponsored by
Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-7]
ID: M001163
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 4341, 119th Congress β read as touching Surface Transportation.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real motivations behind HR 4341, the "International Maritime Pollution Accountability Act of 2025."
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's ostensible purpose is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the marine shipping industry by imposing fees on vessels that exceed certain pollution thresholds. How quaint. The actual objective? To create a new revenue stream for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and line the pockets of special interest groups.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces a Byzantine system of definitions, exemptions, and exceptions, which will inevitably lead to bureaucratic nightmares and opportunities for regulatory capture. The key provisions include:
* Assessing fees on shipping vessels that exceed certain pollution thresholds * Exempting Jones Act vessels (because, of course, domestic shipping interests must be protected) * Defining "covered voyages" and "criteria air pollutants" in a way that will surely confuse even the most seasoned regulatory experts
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* Shipping companies and vessel owners, who will pass on the costs to consumers * Environmental groups, who will claim victory while ignoring the bill's numerous loopholes and exemptions * The EPA, which will gain new powers and funding opportunities * Lobbyists and special interest groups, who will profit from the regulatory chaos
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation. The actual impact on pollution reduction will be negligible, while the economic costs will be significant. Expect:
* Increased shipping costs, which will be passed on to consumers * Regulatory compliance headaches for vessel owners and operators * Opportunities for regulatory capture and corruption * A minor increase in EPA funding, which will be squandered on bureaucratic inefficiencies
In conclusion, HR 4341 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to create the illusion of environmental progress while serving special interests and expanding bureaucratic power. The real disease here is not pollution, but the corrupting influence of money and power in politics.
Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-7]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 42 nodes and 22 connections (43 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $70,500
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 2 harmed.
The bill imposes fees on shipping and other vessels (covered voyages) based on lifecycle CO2-e emissions and criteria air pollutants, which directly affects surface transportation industries such as freight shipping, trucking, and logistics that rely on maritime transport for cargo movement. Sections 5 and 6 assess fees on operators of covered voyages, which include vessels transporting cargo or freight, thereby increasing costs for surface transportation entities involved in global supply chain
The bill assesses fees on fuel consumed by vessels within the exclusive economic zone, territorial sea, and internal waters of the United States (Sections 5(b)(2)(A)(i) and 6(b)(2)(A)(i)-(iii)), which directly impacts energy infrastructure industries such as oil and gas pipelines, LNG export terminals, and midstream operators that supply marine fuels. These entities may face reduced demand or increased regulatory burden due to fees on fuel consumption.
Section 7(a)(2) allocates 25% of collected fees to the Maritime Administration for grants, rebates, and low-interest loans to replace or retrofit Jones Act vessels with zero-emission technologies, including battery propulsion. This could increase demand for electricity to charge batteries, benefiting electric utilities through increased load and potential grid infrastructure investments.
Section 7(d) and 7(e) fund grants for replacing or retrofitting harbor craft and ferry vessels with battery-powered propulsion, which may involve construction and engineering firms involved in shipbuilding, port infrastructure upgrades, and electrical system installations for zero-emission vessels.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-7])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.