No Tax on Home Sales Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/4327
Last Updated: April 9, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14]

ID: G000596

Follow the money

The bill

No Tax on Home Sales Act

HR. 4327, 119th Congress — read as touching Real Estate.

The sponsor

Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$144,650 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

61% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 730-732 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Alford asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4327, a bill originally introduced by Representative Greene (GA), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

January 20, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece from the esteemed members of Congress. The "No Tax on Home Sales Act" - because what's a few billion dollars in lost revenue when you can pander to your constituents and line the pockets of your real estate buddies?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor with homeowners, particularly those in affluent areas who are likely to benefit from this tax giveaway. The sponsors claim it's about "helping" people by eliminating the dollar limitations on excluding gains from primary residence sales. Yeah, right. It's really about buying votes and fattening up campaign coffers.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code to eliminate the $250,000 ($500,000 for joint filers) exemption limit on gains from primary residence sales. This means that homeowners can now sell their homes without paying taxes on any profit they make, no matter how large. Because who needs revenue when you can have votes?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Homeowners, particularly those in high-end markets, will be the primary beneficiaries of this bill. Real estate agents and developers will also see a boost as more people are incentivized to buy and sell homes. And, of course, the politicians who sponsored this bill will reap the rewards of their "generosity" come election time.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a fiscal nightmare waiting to happen. By eliminating the exemption limit, the government stands to lose billions in revenue. Who's going to make up for that lost income? You guessed it - the middle class and low-income families who can't afford to play the real estate game. The wealthy will get wealthier, while the rest of us foot the bill.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Politician-itis" - a disease characterized by an insatiable desire for power, votes, and campaign contributions, regardless of the cost to the country. Symptoms include reckless disregard for fiscal responsibility, pandering to special interests, and a complete lack of transparency.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out these politicians for what they are - self-serving charlatans who care more about their own careers than the well-being of the nation.

Related Topics

Taxation & IRS Regulations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$144,650
20 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$6,950
Committees
$0
Individuals
$137,700

No PAC contributions found

1
PREWETT SERVICES LLC
2 transactions
$6,700
2
THE WETZEL FAMILY TRUST
1 transaction
$250

No committee contributions found

1
KNIGHT, JZ
2 transactions
$13,200
2
CARTER, GARY
2 transactions
$13,200
3
LUKE, DON MR
1 transaction
$11,600
4
RADGOWSKI, STEVEN
1 transaction
$7,300
5
HAHN, SAMUEL
1 transaction
$6,600
6
ELLIOTT, BEVERLY B MS
1 transaction
$6,600
7
MCMANUS, DEBORAH
1 transaction
$6,600
8
FORSYTHE, GERALD R
1 transaction
$6,600
9
KARVELA, ELENI MARIA
1 transaction
$6,600
10
LAMELAS, PETER
1 transaction
$6,600
11
LOMANGINO, ANTHONY
1 transaction
$6,600
12
LOMANGINO, LYNDA
1 transaction
$6,600
13
MACRICOSTAS, ARIS
1 transaction
$6,600
14
MACRICOSTAS, GEORGE
1 transaction
$6,600
15
RIZZUTO, LEE
1 transaction
$6,600
16
FAUST, ANNE R MS
1 transaction
$6,600
17
HINES, ROBERT TODD
1 transaction
$6,600
18
WEASLER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 7 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4]

ID: O000086

Top Contributors

10

1
UTE INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationFORT DUCHESNE, UT
$3,300
Nov 12, 2024
2
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$2,000
Sep 30, 2024
3
PALMER, JEFFERY
NONERETIRED
IndividualMAPLETON, UT
$13,200
May 29, 2023
4
JENKINS, JAMES W.
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualSALT LAKE CITY, UT
$10,000
May 13, 2024
5
HOLSCHER, KELLY
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA
$6,600
Aug 22, 2024
6
LISONBEE, DAVID
4LIFE RESEARCHBUSINESS OWNER
IndividualPROVO, UT
$6,600
Mar 19, 2024
7
OVERHOLT, DAVID W. MR.
UNIFIED PURCHASING GROUPPRESIDENT
IndividualSOUTH JORDAN, UT
$6,600
Apr 3, 2024
8
DAICHENDT, JOE
ACI JETBUSINESS OWNER
IndividualLADERA RANCH, CA
$6,600
Mar 16, 2023
9
GRIFFIN, KENNETH
CITADEL LLCFOUNDER CEO
IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
Apr 10, 2023
10
PALMER, KELLY
NONERETIRED
IndividualMAPLETON, UT
$6,600
Jun 13, 2023

Rep. Taylor, David J. [R-OH-2]

ID: T000490

Top Contributors

10

1
POLITICAL EDUCATION PATTERNS LOCAL 18 OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
OrganizationCLEVELAND, OH
$5,000
Aug 9, 2024
2
ELITE MOVING & TRANSPORT LLC
OrganizationBATAVIA, OH
$700
Mar 1, 2024
3
WOESTE, BILL
BEECHMONT AUTOMOTIVE GROUPAUTO DEALER
IndividualCINCINNATI, OH
$3,435
Jul 23, 2024
4
SIMS, MICHAEL
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualCINCINNATI, OH
$3,435
Oct 9, 2024
5
ATIKIAN, SETRAK
SELFINSURANCE
IndividualGALENA, OH
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
6
MELKUMIAN, VIOLETTA
SELFSELF EMPLOYED
IndividualWESTERVILLE, OH
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
7
SAFARYAN, ERNA
SELFDENTIST
IndividualGALENA, OH
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
8
SAFARYAN, SERGEY
SELFAUTO DEALER
IndividualGALENA, OH
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
9
SAFARYAN, TIGRAN
SELFAUTO DEALER
IndividualCOLUMBUS, OH
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
10
HOUSER, JOHN
IndividualBATAVIA, OH
$3,300
Dec 13, 2023

Rep. Hamadeh, Abraham J. [R-AZ-8]

ID: H001098

Top Contributors

10

1
CLB PARTNERS
OrganizationGILBERT, AZ
$12,000
Jan 28, 2024
2
ADVANTAGE INSURANCE PLLC
OrganizationPHOENIX, AZ
$3,300
May 7, 2024
3
JARDIN RATZKEN PLLC
OrganizationTEMPE, AZ
$1,000
Feb 26, 2024
4
JARDIN RATZKEN PLLC
OrganizationTEMPE, AZ
$1,000
Mar 26, 2024
5
HAMADEH, WASEEM J
HOH INVESTMENT GROUPMANAGING MEMBER
IndividualPHOENIX, AZ
$13,200
Dec 29, 2023
6
MANLEY, DWIGHT
SELF-EMPLOYEDINVESTMENTS
IndividualBREA, CA
$13,200
Dec 13, 2023
7
HAYDEN, STEPHEN
ENTREPRENEURENTREPRENEUR
IndividualELLENSBURG, WA
$13,200
Mar 14, 2024
8
PRICE, KAPU
PATRIOT DISPOSALSELF-EMPLOYED
IndividualPRESCOTT, AZ
$13,200
Feb 29, 2024
9
HAYDEN, STEPHEN
ENTREPRENEURENTREPRENEUR
IndividualELLENSBURG, WA
$13,200
Mar 14, 2024
10
NOWOCIEN, PIOTR
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualPINECREST, FL
$9,900
Mar 16, 2024

Rep. Alford, Mark [R-MO-4]

ID: A000379

Top Contributors

10

1
OTOE-MISSOURIA TRIBE OF INDIANS
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Jun 21, 2023
2
CM DUBOIS STRATEGIES LLC
OrganizationWEBSTER GROVES, MO
$2,000
Mar 18, 2024
3
WAYPOINT CONSULTING LLC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,100
Dec 13, 2023
4
CHERRY, DERON
UNITED BEVERAGE COMPANYPRESIDENT
IndividualKANSAS CITY, MO
$3,300
Sep 30, 2024
5
CHERRY, DERON
UNITED BEVERAGE COMPANYPRESIDENT
IndividualKANSAS CITY, MO
$3,300
Sep 30, 2024
6
REDFORD, STAN
REDFORD CONSTRUCTIONOWNER
IndividualRAYMORE, MO
$3,300
Jul 26, 2024
7
THOMPSON, CRAIG
GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTHCEO
IndividualCLINTON, MO
$3,300
Sep 7, 2024
8
COOPER, SHANNON
Individual
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
9
GRAY, CHARLES M
REMAXBROKER
IndividualCLINTON, MO
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
10
GUTHRIE, JASON
J&S FARMSOWNER
Individual
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

ID: H001102

Top Contributors

10

1
CARSTEN, KATHERINE M
NO EMPLOYERHOMEMAKER
IndividualWAXHAW, NC
$10,000
Feb 14, 2024
2
HORNE, CHRIS
HORNE HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONINGPRINICPAL
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$6,600
Nov 3, 2023
3
DIMICCO, DANIEL
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualWAXHAW, NC
$6,600
Jan 17, 2024
4
GREENBLATT, SCOTT
VETERANS GUARDIANOWNER
IndividualPINEHURST, NC
$6,600
May 17, 2024
5
HENDLEY, JOHN NANCE
BREWER-HENSLEY OIL COMPANYEXECUTIVE
IndividualMONROE, NC
$6,600
Jun 7, 2024
6
BUTLER, DONALD R
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualMOORESVILLE, NC
$6,600
Sep 13, 2023
7
CHERRY, LINDA
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$6,600
Sep 13, 2023
8
GOLDING, ERNEST G
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualADVANCE, NC
$6,600
Sep 13, 2023
9
KIDD, VICKIE
SELFREAL ESTATE
IndividualMOORESVILLE, NC
$6,600
Sep 12, 2023
10
LAMB, JOHN R
AMERICAN AIRLINESPILOT
IndividualMOORESVILLE, NC
$6,600
Sep 21, 2023

Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

ID: C001110

Top Contributors

10

1
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
COMWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Jun 14, 2024
2
SANTA YENEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$5,000
Aug 19, 2024
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Aug 13, 2024
4
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Dec 18, 2023
5
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
May 25, 2023
6
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
May 25, 2023
7
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Sep 15, 2023
8
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS
OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA
$2,000
Sep 26, 2024
9
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$2,000
Apr 22, 2024
10
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$2,000
Sep 15, 2023

Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1]

ID: M000871

Top Contributors

10

1
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION
OrganizationMAYETTA, KS
$3,300
Jul 18, 2023
2
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$2,500
Sep 9, 2024
3
DEMETREE, MARK
DEMETREE SALT LLCCEO
IndividualLEAWOOD, KS
$13,200
Nov 3, 2023
4
CORDES, SHANE L.
MIDWEST ATCCEO
IndividualCHERRY HILLS VILLA, CO
$13,200
Nov 3, 2023
5
FLOYD, MARTIE
SELF-EMPLOYEDFARMER
IndividualJOHNSON, KS
$6,600
Dec 8, 2023
6
HEBENSTREIT, JAMES
BARTLETT AND COMPANYPRESIDENT
IndividualKANSAS CITY, MO
$6,600
Dec 4, 2023
7
FLOYD, MARTIE
SELF-EMPLOYEDFARMER
IndividualJOHNSON, KS
$6,600
Dec 8, 2023
8
BARTON, TIMOTHY
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$6,600
Nov 2, 2023
9
HURD, MATTHEW D.
INSCOPRESIDENT
IndividualWELLSVILLE, KS
$6,600
Dec 11, 2023
10
OLSEN, LINDSAY
MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST CORPORATIONPRESIDENT
IndividualPRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS
$6,600
Mar 16, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 66 nodes and 38 connections (50 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $218,185

Top Donors - Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

  • +Real Estateconfidence 0.95

    Section 2 eliminates dollar limitations on the exclusion of gain from sales of principal residences under IRC §121, providing a tax benefit to homeowners and thereby benefiting the real estate industry by potentially increasing home sales and market activity.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate61.0%
Pages: 730-732

— 698 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Fundamental Tax Reform. Achieving fundamental tax reform offers the prospect of a dramatic improvement in American living standards and an equally dramatic reduction in tax compliance costs. Lobbyists, lawyers, benefit consul- tants, accountants, and tax preparers would see their incomes decline, however. The federal income tax system heavily taxes capital and corporate income and discourages work, savings, and investment. The public finance literature is clear that a consumption tax would minimize government’s distortion of private economic decisions and thus be the least eco- nomically harmful way to raise federal tax revenues.28 There are several forms that a consumption tax could take, including a national sales tax, a business transfer tax, a Hall–Rabushka flat tax,29 or a cash flow tax.30 Supermajority to Raise Taxes. Treasury should support legislation instituting a three-fifths vote threshold in the U.S. House and the Senate to raise income or corporate tax rates to create a wall of protection for the new rate structure. Many states have implemented such a supermajority vote requirement. Tax Competition. Tax competition between states and countries is a positive force for liberty and limited government.31 The Biden Administration, under the direction of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, has pushed for a global minimum corporate tax that would increase taxation and the size of government in the U.S. and around the world. This attempt to “harmonize” global tax rates is an attempt to create a global tax cartel to quash tax competition and to increase the tax burden globally. The U.S. should not outsource its tax policy to international organizations. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Organi- zation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in conjunction with the European Union, has long tried to end financial privacy and impose regulations on countries with low (or no) income taxes. In fact, on tax, environmental, corpo- rate governance and employment issues, the OECD has become little more than a taxpayer-funded left-wing think tank and lobbying organization.32 The United States provides about one-fifth of OECD’s funding.33 The U.S. should end its finan- cial support and withdraw from the OECD. TAX ADMINISTRATION The Internal Revenue Service is a poorly managed, utterly unresponsive and increasingly politicized agency, and has been for at least two decades. It is time for meaningful reform to improve the efficiency and fairness of tax administration, better protect taxpayer rights, and achieve greater transparency and accountability. A substantial number of the problems attributed to the IRS are actually a function of congressional action that has made the Internal Revenue Code ridiculously complex, imposed tremendous administrative burdens on both the public and the IRS, and given massive non-tax missions to the IRS. But the culture, administrative practices, and management at the IRS need to change. — 699 — Department of the Treasury Doubling the IRS? The Inflation Reduction Act contains a radical $80 billion expansion of the IRS—enough to double the size of its workforce.34 Unless Congress reverses this policy, the IRS will become much more intrusive and impose still greater costs on the American people. The Biden Administration has also sought to make the tax system’s adminis- trative burden much worse in other ways. For example, it has proposed creating a comprehensive financial account information reporting regime that would apply to all business and personal accounts with more than $600. Banks would be required to collect the taxpayer identification numbers of and file a revised Form 1099-K for all affected payees, as well as provide additional information.35 This massive increase in the scope and breadth of information reporting should be unequivo- cally opposed. Management. The IRS has approximately 81,000 employees.36 Of those, only two are presidential appointments—the Commissioner and the Chief Counsel.37 As a practical matter, it is impossible for these two officials to overcome bureau- cratic inertia and to implement policy changes that the IRS bureaucracy wants to impede. That is why, notwithstanding decades of sound and fury, almost nothing has changed at the IRS. For the IRS to change and become more accountable, more transparent, and better managed, there is a need to increase the number of Presidential appoint- ments subject to Senate confirmation, and not subject to Senate confirmation, at the IRS. At the very least, Congress should ensure that the Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement, the Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support, the National Taxpayer Advocate, the Commissioner of the Wage and Investment Division, the Commissioner of the Large Business and International Division, the Commissioner of the Small Business Self-Employed Division, and the Com- missioner of the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division are presidential appointees.38 Information Technology. Despite the investment of billions of dollars for at least two decades, IRS information technology (IT) systems remain deficient.39 The IRS inadequately protects taxpayer information, its IT systems do not ade- quately support operations or taxpayer services, and its matching and detection algorithms are antiquated. These problems are not primarily about resources. The IRS has spent approxi- mately $27 billion on IT during the past decade, with $7 billion of that designated as “development, modernization and enhancement.“40 The problem is one of man- agement. The bureaucracy is not up to the task, and neither Congress nor a long line of IRS commissioners has forced changes. A Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support with strong IT management skills should be appointed by the IRS Commissioner or the President (once the position is made a presidential appointment). The various subordinates to the

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills