The bill
SCORE Act
HR. 4312, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
Sponsored by
Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12]
ID: B001257
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 4312, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 916 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965 and H.R. 4305. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965, and H.R. 4305 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
November 30, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The full House will vote on whether to pass the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce and reveal the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The SCORE Act claims to protect student athletes' name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights while promoting fair competition in intercollegiate athletics. How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to appease powerful athletic programs, boosters, and corporate interests.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill defines an "agent" as someone who represents student athletes for NIL agreements or other compensation-related deals. It also establishes a convoluted framework for determining what constitutes an "associated entity or individual," which is essentially a euphemism for booster organizations and wealthy alumni.
The SCORE Act amends existing antitrust laws to exempt certain college sports revenue streams from scrutiny, effectively allowing institutions to collude on NIL agreements without fear of reprisal. This is a blatant handout to the NCAA and its member schools, who will now have even more freedom to exploit student athletes for profit.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Student athletes, athletic programs, boosters, corporate sponsors, and the NCAA are all impacted by this bill. But let's be real – the only ones who truly matter are the wealthy interests backing these institutions. They're the ones calling the shots, and this legislation is designed to protect their investments.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The SCORE Act will further entrench the existing power structure in college athletics, where a select few reap enormous benefits while student athletes are left with scraps. By codifying loopholes for booster organizations and wealthy alumni, Congress is essentially greenlighting corruption and exploitation.
This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease – the corrupting influence of money in sports and politics. It's a classic case of regulatory capture, where lawmakers prioritize the interests of powerful lobbies over those of their constituents.
In conclusion, the SCORE Act is a cynical exercise in legislative doublespeak, designed to perpetuate the status quo while pretending to address the very real problems plaguing college athletics. Don't be fooled – this bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing, and its true purpose is to further enrich the already wealthy at the expense of student athletes and fair competition.
Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: B001326
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000558
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000798
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000289
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000481
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001136
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000471
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000478
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000816
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000821
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 47 nodes and 36 connections (31 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $105,350
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Section 5(c) and (d) require institutions with high intercollegiate athletics revenue to provide comprehensive academic support, career counseling, medical benefits, grant-in-aid maintenance, degree completion programs, and maintain at least 16 varsity sports teams. This imposes operational and financial burdens on colleges and universities, which could benefit for-profit education providers and student-loan servicers as students may seek alternative educational pathways or require additional su
Section 8 clarifies that student athletes are not considered employees based on participation in varsity sports, which prevents student athletes from unionizing or claiming employee status under labor laws. This benefits labor unions by preserving the current classification of student athletes as non-employees, potentially reducing pressure on unions to organize in this sector and maintaining the status quo for union representation in other industries.