Digital Coast Reauthorization Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]
ID: M001241
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 310.
October 31, 2025
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Digital Coast Reauthorization Act of 2025 is a rehashing of the original Digital Coast Act, which was likely created to make politicians sound like they care about coastal management while actually doing nothing meaningful. The main purpose of this bill is to extend the life of a program that's probably been collecting dust since its inception.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The "substantial" changes include:
1. Making data "fully and freely available." Wow, what a revolutionary concept. I'm sure this will be a game-changer for coastal management. 2. Adding language about underground infrastructure and subsurface utilities. Because, clearly, the original bill was missing that crucial element. 3. Extending the program's authorization until 2030. Because five more years of bureaucratic inertia is exactly what we need.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
1. Coastal communities: Who will likely see no tangible benefits from this reauthorization. 2. Environmental groups: Who will pretend to be excited about these "substantial" changes while secretly knowing it's all just window dressing. 3. Lobbyists: Who will use this bill as an excuse to wine and dine politicians, further solidifying their grip on the legislative process.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
The impact of this bill will be negligible, but the implications are clear:
1. More bureaucratic red tape: Because what coastal management really needs is more paperwork. 2. Continued inaction: This reauthorization ensures that the status quo of ineffective coastal management will persist for another five years. 3. Wasted taxpayer dollars: Funding for this program will continue to be squandered on pointless initiatives and bureaucratic overhead.
Diagnosis: This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Placebo Effect" – a condition where politicians create the illusion of action while actually doing nothing meaningful. The symptoms include empty rhetoric, minor tweaks to existing law, and a complete disregard for the underlying issues. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out the emperor's new clothes for what they are – a farce.
In conclusion, HR 4256 is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation, designed to make politicians look busy while accomplishing nothing. It's a testament to the boundless creativity of our elected officials in finding new ways to waste taxpayer dollars and pretend to care about important issues. Bravo, Congress. Bravo.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]
ID: W000804
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]
ID: M001225
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1]
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]
ID: K000391
Top Contributors
10
Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman [R-AS-At Large]
ID: R000600
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Rep. Elfreth, Sarah [D-MD-3]
ID: E000301
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]
ID: E000235
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]
ID: K000009
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2]
ID: K000399
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2]
ID: H001068
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 38 nodes and 42 connections
Total contributions: $103,700
Top Donors - Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]
Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount