The bill
CBP Canine Home Kenneling Pilot Act
HR. 4057, 119th Congress — read as touching Labor Unions.
Sponsored by
Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]
ID: C001110
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 4057, 119th Congress — read as touching Labor Unions.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 266.
September 25, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a "pilot program" to benefit the poor, neglected canines of U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Office of Field Operations. How touching.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The CBP Canine Home Kenneling Pilot Act (HR 4057) is allegedly designed to assess whether home kenneling would be beneficial for both canine handlers and canines. Yeah, right. It's a "pilot program" that will magically reveal the secrets of effective canine care, despite decades of existing research on the topic.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a pilot program, which will involve at least ten ports of entry, with voluntary participation from canine handlers. Because nothing says "effective policy" like forcing people to participate in a study that may or may not benefit them. The Executive Assistant Commissioner must provide guidance, training, and requirements for the pilot program, because clearly, these individuals are incapable of making decisions on their own.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Canine handlers, canines (obviously), U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Office of Field Operations, National Treasury Employees Union representatives, and various components of the Department of Homeland Security. Oh, and let's not forget the real stakeholders: the politicians who will get to claim they "cared" about canine welfare while lining their pockets with campaign donations from interested parties.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak. It's a thinly veiled attempt to justify increased spending on a program that may or may not be effective, all under the guise of "improving" canine care. The real impact will likely be a waste of taxpayer dollars on unnecessary bureaucracy and a further entrenchment of the status quo.
In medical terms, this bill is akin to prescribing a placebo to treat a patient's symptoms while ignoring the underlying disease. It's a Band-Aid solution designed to make politicians look good, rather than addressing the actual issues plaguing our border protection agencies.
Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with a side of bureaucratic bloat and corruption. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: None, because who needs effective governance when you can just throw money at problems and pretend they'll magically disappear?
Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: G000594
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001229
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000603
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000402
Top Contributors
10
ID: M000317
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000034
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000599
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000621
Top Contributors
10
ID: N000193
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 74 nodes and 45 connections (63 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $129,919
Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 2(b)(2)(C) mentions consultation with representatives of the National Treasury Employees Union, indicating a potential benefit to labor unions.