Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/40
Last Updated: November 20, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]

ID: P000617

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

January 3, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

âś…

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed representatives. HR 40, the "Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act," is a masterclass in bureaucratic obfuscation and pandering.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to establish a commission to study the legacy of slavery and its ongoing impact on African Americans. Sounds noble, but let's not be fooled – this is just a vehicle for politicians to grandstand about their commitment to social justice while doing nothing concrete.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a commission with 13 members, including representatives from various government agencies, civil rights organizations, and academia. Their task? To study the history of slavery, its ongoing effects on African Americans, and propose reparations. Oh, and they'll also make recommendations for "racial healing, understanding, and transformation." How quaint.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: African American communities, civil rights organizations, and politicians looking to score points with their constituents. But let's not forget the real stakeholders – the ones who will actually benefit from this bill: the commission members themselves, who'll enjoy a nice paycheck and a chance to pad their resumes.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It won't address the systemic issues plaguing African American communities; it's just a feel-good measure designed to appease voters. The commission will likely produce a report that's heavy on rhetoric and light on concrete solutions. Meanwhile, politicians will tout their "commitment" to social justice while doing nothing to actually address the problems.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Legislative Theater-itis," a condition characterized by grandiose language, empty promises, and a complete lack of substance. The symptoms? A commission that's more focused on self-aggrandizement than actual problem-solving, and politicians who are more interested in scoring points than making meaningful change.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out the emperor's new clothes. Unfortunately, this bill will likely pass with flying colors, and we'll be left with another example of how our government excels at producing meaningless legislation.

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties Transportation & Infrastructure National Security & Intelligence Congressional Rules & Procedures Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Small Business & Entrepreneurship State & Local Government Affairs Government Operations & Accountability Federal Budget & Appropriations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$69,500
18 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$1,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$68,500

No PAC contributions found

1
A ARMUSANDNEEBOM CONSULTING LLC
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
KAZIMI, ABBAS
2 transactions
$6,600
2
MCGRATH, KATHLEEN
2 transactions
$6,600
3
ABRAMS, JEFFREY JACOB
2 transactions
$6,600
4
LOWERY, FRED
1 transaction
$5,800
5
SIMMONS, IAN
1 transaction
$3,300
6
HANNA, GABBY
1 transaction
$3,300
7
PATTULLO, BETSY
1 transaction
$3,300
8
MURRAY, GEORGIA
1 transaction
$3,300
9
KASSIM, SADIK
1 transaction
$3,300
10
ALSAWALHI, HEIAM J.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
SABIR, SAMEER AHMED
1 transaction
$3,300
12
KHALIL, NORA
1 transaction
$3,300
13
CLARKE, BARBARA
1 transaction
$3,300
14
JORDAN, WAYNE
1 transaction
$3,300
15
BEEUWKES, NANCY
1 transaction
$3,300
16
WATSON, ROSLYN
1 transaction
$3,300
17
JURVETSON, KARLA
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12]

ID: A000370

Top Contributors

10

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
Organization ADA, OK
$1,000
Dec 14, 2023
2
NORDHOFF, HENRY L
Individual HARRISON, ID
$3,300
Nov 27, 2023
3
BRUTTEN, MARC
BRIXTON CAPITAL • CHAIRMAN
Individual SOLANA BEACH, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
4
NORDHOFF, ROBIN THARP
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual HARRISON, ID
$3,300
Apr 24, 2023
5
BROWN, REGINALD
KIRKLAND & ELLIS • LAWYER
Individual ALEXANDRIA, VA
$3,300
Aug 26, 2023
6
HAYDEN, RUFUS L
SELF EMPLOYED • INVESTOR
Individual ALHAMBRA, CA
$3,300
Sep 13, 2023
7
SWORTWOOD, DONALD
SELF EMPLOYED • INVESTOR
Individual SAN DIEGO, CA
$3,300
Sep 4, 2023
8
WERNER, RACHEL
CORNERSTONE LEGACY • SELF EMPLOYED
Individual VALLEY, NE
$3,300
Sep 11, 2023
9
JETT, ANN L
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual SANTA YNEZ, CA
$2,500
Oct 6, 2023
10
JETT, THOMAS LAWRENCE
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual SANTA YNEZ, CA
$2,500
Oct 6, 2023

Rep. Balint, Becca [D-VT-At Large]

ID: B001318

Top Contributors

10

1
CHEROKEE NATION
Organization TAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Jul 1, 2024
2
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$1,000
Jul 1, 2024
3
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$1,000
May 30, 2023
4
RECHNITZ, JOAN
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
Individual RED BANK, NJ
$6,600
Apr 22, 2024
5
COHEN, PETER
PARTNERSHIP FUND FOR NEW YORK CITY • ATTORNEY
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Dec 12, 2023
6
WOHL, JANE E
Individual BRATTLEBORO, VT
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
7
WOHL, ELIZABETH
LAW FIRM • ATTORNEY
Individual BRATTLEBORO, VT
$3,300
Dec 5, 2023
8
FERARI, KAIA
MUNOZ & CO • ADMIN
Individual GREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Dec 6, 2023
9
WISHIK, HEATHER
NONE • RETIRED
Individual WOODSTOCK, VT
$3,300
Dec 11, 2023
10
WOHL, BARRY
NORTHEAST WYOMING PEDIATRIC ASSOC PC • PHYSICIAN
Individual SHERIDAN, WY
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023

Rep. Barragán, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44]

ID: B001300

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]

ID: B001281

Top Contributors

10

1
EDWARDS, JEFFREY W.
INSTALLED BUILDING PRODUCTS/EDWARDS CO • PRESIDENT, CEO, CHAIRMAN
Individual COLUMBUS, OH
$5,000
Oct 9, 2024
2
BANFIELD, WILLIAM
QUICKEN LOANS • CHIEF RISK OFFICER
Individual ROCHESTER HILLS, MI
$3,300
May 1, 2024
3
COHEN, PHILIP
PRN FUNDING LLC • MANAGEMENT
Individual PEPPER PIKE, OH
$3,300
Apr 22, 2024
4
LAVINE, JEANNIE
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual BOSTON, MA
$3,300
Jun 28, 2024
5
LAVINE, JONTHAN
BAIN CAPITAL • INVESTOR
Individual BOSTON, MA
$3,300
Jun 28, 2024
6
STOKES, RAVEN R
SELF • MOTHER
Individual BEXLEY, OH
$3,300
Jun 12, 2024
7
WALKER, KIRT A
NATIONWIDE FINANCIAL • PRESIDENT & CEO
Individual NEW ALBANY, OH
$3,300
May 29, 2024
8
WILLIAMS, CLIFTON
TAFT LAW • LOBBYIST
Individual CHAGRIN FALLS, OH
$3,300
Aug 18, 2024
9
HUGHES, CARL F
CONLON PUBLIC STRATEGIES • PUBLIC STRATEGIES
Individual MARION, OH
$3,300
Oct 27, 2024
10
GILBERT, DAN
ROCKET MORTGAGE • CEO
Individual DETROIT, MI
$3,300
Nov 16, 2023

Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8]

ID: B001292

Top Contributors

10

1
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
Organization MARKSVILLE, LA
$3,300
Nov 10, 2023
2
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
Organization MARKSVILLE, LA
$1,700
Nov 10, 2023
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
Organization PRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Mar 26, 2024
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
Organization PRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 7, 2023
5
CAFRITZ, JANE
CALVIN CAFRITZ ENTERPRISES • MANAGER
Individual WASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Oct 2, 2024
6
HIRST, THOMSON M
N/A • RETIRED
Individual ALEXANDRIA, VA
$3,300
Oct 11, 2024
7
MURTAGH, PAUL
PRECISION X-RAY INC. • BUSINESS OWNER
Individual ALEXANDRIA, VA
$3,300
Oct 5, 2024
8
TOMPKINS, GRAVES
GENERAL ATLANTIC • FINANCE
Individual BROOKLYN HGTS, NY
$3,300
Sep 29, 2024
9
MALLOY, GEOFFREY
MALLOY AUTO GROUP • PRESIDENT
Individual MCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 10, 2024
10
ARNOLD, LAURA
ARNOLD VENTURES • CO-FOUNDER
Individual HOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Aug 16, 2024

Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2]

ID: B000490

Top Contributors

10

1
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA
Organization MANSURA, LA
$3,300
Dec 30, 2023
2
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA
Organization MANSURA, LA
$2,500
Oct 30, 2024
3
MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION
Organization OKMULGEE, OK
$1,000
Oct 28, 2024
4
DIMICCO, MARILYN J.
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual WAXHAW, NC
$6,600
Mar 15, 2023
5
BRADSHAW, STANLEY
BRADSHAW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT • INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Individual PINEHURST, NC
$5,800
Feb 12, 2023
6
MOTT, CHARLOTTE M.
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual WAXHAW, NC
$5,800
Feb 6, 2023
7
UIHLEIN, RICHARD
ULINE • CEO/OWNER
Individual LAKE FOREST, IL
$5,800
Jan 26, 2023
8
RUSSELL, NATHANIEL JAMES
NJR GROUP • PRESIDENT
Individual ALBEMARLE, NC
$5,800
May 2, 2023
9
BEULEY, KENNETH R.
THE KEITH CORPORATION • CFO
Individual CHARLOTTE, NC
$5,000
Mar 16, 2023
10
HENDLEY, JOHN
Individual MONROE, NC
$3,300
Nov 29, 2023

Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

ID: B001278

Top Contributors

10

1
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS
Organization SILETZ, OR
$3,300
May 21, 2024
2
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS
Organization SILETZ, OR
$3,300
May 21, 2024
3
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE
Organization GRAND RONDE, OR
$1,500
Nov 16, 2023
4
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA RESERVATION
Organization PENDLETON, OR
$1,500
Feb 15, 2024
5
MARGOLIN, PHILLIP
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual PORTLAND, OR
$3,300
Oct 19, 2024
6
SHERMAN, JOHN LEE
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual PORTLAND, OR
$3,300
Nov 21, 2023
7
BRADLEY, KATHERINE
CITY BRIDGE FOUNDATION • FOUNDING CHAIR
Individual WASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Nov 22, 2023
8
PAULSON, JANE S
PAULSON COLETTI • ATTORNEY
Individual PORTLAND, OR
$3,300
Oct 4, 2023
9
MACQUEEN, MARJORIE
NONE • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual TOLOVANA PARK, OR
$3,300
Jun 25, 2023
10
CHAPMAN, MATT
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual PORTLAND, OR
$3,300
Jun 4, 2023

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

ID: B001313

Top Contributors

10

1
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Mar 5, 2024
2
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Mar 5, 2024
3
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization LAKESIDE, CA
$2,000
Jun 28, 2024
4
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$1,000
Feb 23, 2024
5
MOORE, KENNETH
STUART, MOORE, STAUB, ATTORNEYS AT LAW • ATTORNEY
Individual SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
$3,300
Nov 17, 2023
6
CANNON, ANN C
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
Individual CONCORD, NC
$2,500
Feb 26, 2024
7
DAWSON, JAMES
SELF • SALES
Individual SEMORA, NC
$1,041
Dec 31, 2023
8
DOCKERY, RANDY
REMAX • REALTOR
Individual MURPHY, NC
$1,041
Nov 17, 2023
9
KISTNER, ERIC
ERIC KISTNER • ENTREPRENEURS
Individual KINGSPORT, TN
$1,041
Nov 22, 2023
10
FRYE, ANJANETTE
RCF PROPERTIES INC • BROKER
Individual DAYTON, OH
$1,041
Feb 1, 2024

Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]

ID: B001285

Top Contributors

10

1
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Mar 5, 2024
2
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Mar 5, 2024
3
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization LAKESIDE, CA
$2,000
Jun 28, 2024
4
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$1,000
Feb 23, 2024
5
PRISELAC, TOM M.
CEDAR SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS • EXECUTIVE
Individual SANTA MONICA, CA
$3,300
Oct 31, 2024
6
BUCHMAN, MICHELLE J.
N/A • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual CARBONDALE, CO
$3,300
Nov 18, 2023
7
CONROY, ROBERTA
N/A • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual SANTA MONICA, CA
$3,300
Dec 1, 2023
8
SAVAGE, KEVIN
N/A • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual BEVERLY HILLS, CA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
9
STEVENS, SETH R.
SOUTHERN CA PERMANENTE GROUP • DERMATOLOGIST
Individual NEWBURY PARK, CA
$3,300
Oct 28, 2023
10
UNTERMAN, JANET M.
N/A • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual PACIFIC PALISADES, CA
$3,300
Dec 8, 2023

Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7]

ID: C001072

Top Contributors

10

1
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization LAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
May 22, 2023
2
INDIANA IMPORT LLC
Organization FISHERS, IN
$1,000
Nov 11, 2023
3
MNAYMEH, HALA
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual CORAL GABLES, FL
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
4
DE LA CRUZ, FABIO
WESTON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • PARTNER
Individual INDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
5
KHAN, AZHER M
CALDERON TEXTILES • PRESIDENT
Individual CARMEL, IN
$3,300
Dec 8, 2023
6
HOGAN, ALAN P.
THE HOGAN GROUP, INC. • CONSULTANT
Individual INDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Feb 22, 2023
7
JOHNSON, LACY M.
ICE MILLER • ATTORNEY
Individual INDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Mar 16, 2023
8
STACK, ANN M.
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual INDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Feb 22, 2023
9
ABDALLA, MIKE A.
MAGNA PROPERTIES • PRESIDENT
Individual INDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Mar 11, 2024
10
MAMOUN, IHSAN
SDI RADIOLOGY • PHYSICIAN
Individual SEFFNER, FL
$3,300
Jan 23, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 34 nodes and 33 connections

Total contributions: $98,350

Top Donors - Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

1 Org17 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.

Introduction

Low 52.3%
Pages: 368-370

— 336 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise on civil rights, the next conservative Administration should take sweeping action to assure that the purpose of the Civil Rights Act is not inverted through a disparate impact standard to provide a pretext for theoretically endless federal meddling. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities; Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities (Equity in IDEA) l Effective January 18, 2017, the department issued final regulations under Part B of IDEA that require states to consider race and ethnicity in the identification, placement, and discipline of students with disabilities. The new Administration should rescind this regulation. Students should never be denied access to special education services because of their race or ethnicity, but this is happening in school districts across the country thanks to the Obama Administration’s Equity in IDEA regulation. This was not the intent of the regulation, but it is an inevitable byproduct of its flawed assumptions. The Obama Administration looked at the racial statistics on special education assignment and made two assumptions: that African American students were dis- proportionately overrepresented, and that this overrepresentation constituted a harm that required federal pressure to ameliorate. School districts deemed to overrepresent minority students in special education assignment, or in discipline amongst special education students, are tagged by their state education agencies as engaging in “significant disproportionality,” and are required to reallocate 15 percent of their IDEA Part B money into coordinated early intervening services that are intended to address the “root causes of dispro- portionality.” In practice, this can mean raiding special education funding to pay for CRT-inspired “equity” consultants and professional development. This is especially problematic given that both of the assumptions behind Equity in IDEA are flawed. Special education services provide extra assistance to students; they do not harm them. And according to the most rigorous research on the subject, conducted by Penn State’s Paul Morgan, black students are actually underrep- resented in special education once adequate statistical controls are made. That means that this regulation effectively further depresses the provision of valuable services to an already underserved group. l The next Administration should immediately commence rulemaking to rescind the Equity in IDEA regulation. No replacement regulation is required. l The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) should prepare a digest of the best research on this subject and share — 337 — Department of Education it directly with state superintendents and state special education leaders across the country, who have been led by this regulation to believe a false problem diagnosis. Every effort should be made to dissuade states from continuing to operate on the assumption that overrepresentation requires state intervention after the federal pressure is rescinded. Provide School Meals to Children in Need; Do Not Use Federal Meals to Support Radical Ideology In May 2022, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) tried to advance a radical political agenda using the federal school meal program. Nearly a century ago, federal lawmakers adopted the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP) and other services that provide meals for K–12 students to give children from low-income families access to food while at school. Since the 1940s, federal lawmakers have greatly expanded these meal programs, creating an entitlement for nearly all students, regardless of family income levels, and have turned the meal programs into some of the most wasteful federal pro- grams in Washington. Now, the USDA is threatening to withhold federal taxpayer spending for these meals from schools that do not implement Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 so that the term “sex” is replaced with “sexual orientation and gender identity” (SOGI). l The next Administration should prohibit the USDA or any other federal agency from withholding services from federal or state agencies—including but not limited to K–12 schools—that choose not to replace “sex” with “SOGI” in that agency’s administration of Title IX. The Administration will have significant support for this policy change among state officials and Members of Congress. Twenty-two state attorneys general filed a lawsuit after the USDA’s announcement that the agency intended to withhold spending from schools that do not replace sex with SOGI. Members of Congress also introduced legislation in 2022 that would prohibit the agency from carrying out its intentions regarding Title IX. Phase Out Existing Income-Driven Repayment Plans While income-driven repayment (IDR) of student loans is a superior approach relative to fixed payment plans, the number of IDR plans has proliferated beyond reason. And recent IDR plans are so generous that they require no or only token repayment from many students. l The Secretary should phase out all existing IDR plans by making new loans (including consolidation loans) ineligible and should implement

Introduction

Low 48.6%
Pages: 10-13

— ix — Acknowledgments This work, Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, is a col- lective effort of hundreds of volunteers who have banded together in the spirit of advancing positive change for America. Our work is by no means the comprehensive compendium of conservative policies, nor is our group the exclusive cadre of conservative thinkers. The ideas expressed in this volume are not necessarily shared by all. What unites us is the drive to make our country better. First and foremost, we thank the chapter authors and contributors who gave so freely of their time in service of their country. We were particularly grateful to have the help of dedicated members of The Heritage Foundation’s management and policy teams. Executive Vice President Derrick Morgan, Chief of Staff Wesley Coopersmith, Associate Director of Project 2025 Spencer Chretien, and Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies Director Paul Ray devoted a significant amount of their valuable time to reviewing and editing the lengthy manuscript and provided expert advice and insight. The job of transforming the work of dozens of authors and hundreds of contributors into a cohesive manuscript fell upon Heritage’s formidable team of editors led by Director of Research Editors Therese Pennefather, Senior Editor William T. Poole, Marla Hess, Jessica Lowther, Karina Rollins, and Kathleen Scaturro, without whose tireless efforts you would not be reading these words. The talented work of Data Graphics Services Manager John Fleming, Manager of Web Development and Print Projects Jay Simon, Director of Marketing Elizabeth Fender, Senior Graphic Designer Grace Desandro, and Senior Designer Melissa Bluey came together to bring the volume to life. We also thank the dedicated junior staff who provided immeasurable assistance, especially Jordan Embree, Sarah Calvis, and Jonathan Moy. Most important, we are grateful to the leadership, supporters, and donors of each of the Project 2025 advisory board member organizations and those of The Heritage Foundation, without whom Project 2025 would not be possible. Thank you. Paul Dans & Steven Groves

Introduction

Low 48.6%
Pages: 10-13

— ix — Acknowledgments This work, Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, is a col- lective effort of hundreds of volunteers who have banded together in the spirit of advancing positive change for America. Our work is by no means the comprehensive compendium of conservative policies, nor is our group the exclusive cadre of conservative thinkers. The ideas expressed in this volume are not necessarily shared by all. What unites us is the drive to make our country better. First and foremost, we thank the chapter authors and contributors who gave so freely of their time in service of their country. We were particularly grateful to have the help of dedicated members of The Heritage Foundation’s management and policy teams. Executive Vice President Derrick Morgan, Chief of Staff Wesley Coopersmith, Associate Director of Project 2025 Spencer Chretien, and Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies Director Paul Ray devoted a significant amount of their valuable time to reviewing and editing the lengthy manuscript and provided expert advice and insight. The job of transforming the work of dozens of authors and hundreds of contributors into a cohesive manuscript fell upon Heritage’s formidable team of editors led by Director of Research Editors Therese Pennefather, Senior Editor William T. Poole, Marla Hess, Jessica Lowther, Karina Rollins, and Kathleen Scaturro, without whose tireless efforts you would not be reading these words. The talented work of Data Graphics Services Manager John Fleming, Manager of Web Development and Print Projects Jay Simon, Director of Marketing Elizabeth Fender, Senior Graphic Designer Grace Desandro, and Senior Designer Melissa Bluey came together to bring the volume to life. We also thank the dedicated junior staff who provided immeasurable assistance, especially Jordan Embree, Sarah Calvis, and Jonathan Moy. Most important, we are grateful to the leadership, supporters, and donors of each of the Project 2025 advisory board member organizations and those of The Heritage Foundation, without whom Project 2025 would not be possible. Thank you. Paul Dans & Steven Groves — xi — The Project 2025 Advisory Board Alabama Policy Institute Alliance Defending Freedom American Compass The American Conservative America First Legal Foundation American Accountability Foundation American Center for Law and Justice American Cornerstone Institute American Council of Trustees and Alumni American Legislative Exchange Council The American Main Street Initiative American Moment American Principles Project Center for Equal Opportunity Center for Family and Human Rights Center for Immigration Studies Center for Renewing America Claremont Institute Coalition for a Prosperous America Competitive Enterprise Institute Conservative Partnership Institute Concerned Women for America Defense of Freedom Institute Ethics and Public Policy Center Family Policy Alliance Family Research Council First Liberty Institute Forge Leadership Network Foundation for Defense of Democracies Foundation for Government Accountability FreedomWorks The Heritage Foundation Hillsdale College Honest Elections Project

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.