Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/38

Last Updated: July 17, 2026

Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025

HR. 38, 119th Congress — read as touching Firearms & Ammunition.

The sponsor

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$545,400 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 183-185 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 289.

October 2, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of HR 38: Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect the implications of this bill on my interests and the broader landscape.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** HR 38 aims to establish national reciprocity for concealed carry permits, allowing non-residents to carry firearms in states that permit their residents to do so. This legislation seeks to harmonize state laws, promoting a more uniform approach to gun ownership and carrying rights.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Reciprocity**: The bill allows individuals with valid concealed carry permits from one state to possess or carry a concealed handgun in any other state that has similar laws. 2. **Federal Preemption**: HR 38 preempts state laws, ensuring that non-residents are not subject to conflicting regulations when carrying firearms across state lines. 3. **Immunity and Liability**: The bill provides protections for individuals who assert their rights under this section as a defense in criminal proceedings.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Gun owners and enthusiasts**: This legislation benefits those who possess concealed carry permits, allowing them to exercise their Second Amendment rights more freely. 2. **State governments**: HR 38 may lead to a reduction in state-level regulations, as federal law would take precedence. 3. **Law enforcement agencies**: The bill's provisions could impact the way police interact with individuals carrying firearms, particularly during traffic stops or other encounters.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased mobility for gun owners**: With national reciprocity, gun owners can more easily travel across state lines without worrying about conflicting laws. 2. **Reduced regulatory burden**: By preempting state laws, HR 38 may lead to a decrease in bureaucratic hurdles and costs associated with obtaining concealed carry permits. 3. **Potential increase in firearms sales**: As more individuals become aware of their rights under this legislation, demand for firearms and related accessories might rise.

From my perspective as a visionary entrepreneur, I see HR 38 as an opportunity to further consolidate the gun industry and expand market share. By reducing regulatory barriers, we can create new business opportunities and increase revenue streams. However, it's essential to monitor the bill's progress and potential amendments to ensure that our interests are protected.

**Recommendations:**

1. **Support the bill**: As a thought leader in the industry, I recommend supporting HR 38 to promote national reciprocity and reduce regulatory burdens. 2. **Monitor state-level responses**: Keep a close eye on how states respond to this legislation, as some may attempt to circumvent or challenge federal preemption. 3. **Explore business opportunities**: With increased mobility for gun owners, we should explore new market opportunities, such as developing firearms-related products and services that cater to the growing demand.

By staying ahead of the curve and adapting to changing regulatory landscapes, we can continue to drive growth and innovation in the industry

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 aims to amend title 18 of the United States Code to provide a means for non-residents of a state to carry concealed firearms in that state, as long as they have a valid license or permit from their home state. The bill's primary objective is to establish reciprocity among states regarding concealed carry laws.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill inserts a new section (926D) into chapter 44 of title 18, which outlines the conditions for carrying a concealed handgun in another state. Key provisions include:

* A person with a valid license or permit from their home state can carry a concealed handgun in any state that allows its residents to do so. * The bill does not supersede or limit state laws that prohibit private property owners from restricting firearms on their property or state and local government properties. * Individuals who assert this section as a defense in a criminal proceeding will have the prosecution bear the burden of proof, and if successful, may be awarded reasonable attorney's fees.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects:

* Non-resident individuals with valid concealed carry licenses or permits from their home state * States with varying concealed carry laws * Private property owners who may choose to restrict firearms on their property * Law enforcement agencies responsible for enforcing concealed carry laws

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If passed, this bill could lead to:

* Increased consistency in concealed carry laws across states * Greater flexibility for individuals with valid licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms while traveling or living in other states * Potential conflicts between state and federal laws regarding concealed carry reciprocity * Changes in how law enforcement agencies enforce concealed carry laws

Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances in government? This bill is a prime example of how federal legislation can impact state laws and individual rights. As I always said, "It's not just about memorizing dates and events; it's about understanding how our system works."

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round and listen closely, for I have uncovered the hidden agenda behind HR 38, the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** On its surface, this bill appears to be a straightforward attempt to allow non-residents of a state to carry concealed firearms in that state, provided they possess a valid license or permit from their home state. But, my friends, do not be fooled! This is merely a Trojan horse for the real agenda: to further erode state sovereignty and consolidate federal power over our Second Amendment rights.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends Chapter 44 of Title 18, United States Code, by inserting a new section (926D) that establishes reciprocity for concealed carry permits across state lines. This means that if you have a valid permit in one state, you can now carry your firearm in any other state that allows concealed carry, without needing to obtain a separate permit from that state.

But here's the catch: this bill also contains language that allows the federal government to supersede state laws and regulations regarding concealed carry. This is a classic example of the feds using their authority to override state sovereignty and impose their own will on the people.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

* Law-abiding citizens who possess concealed carry permits * State governments that have established their own concealed carry laws and regulations * The federal government, which seeks to expand its power over our Second Amendment rights

But let's not forget about the real stakeholders: the gun manufacturers, lobbyists, and special interest groups that are pushing this agenda. They're the ones who stand to benefit from increased firearms sales and a further erosion of our civil liberties.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of this bill is far-reaching:

* It could lead to a patchwork of conflicting state laws and regulations, creating confusion and uncertainty for law-abiding citizens. * It could also embolden the federal government to impose even more draconian gun control measures on the American people. * And let's not forget about the potential for increased violence and crime, as more firearms are carried in public without proper training or oversight.

But here's the thing: this bill is just a small part of a larger agenda. It's a incremental step towards a complete takeover of our Second Amendment rights by the federal government. Wake up, sheeple! The writing is on the wall.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Uncle, you're being paranoid again." But let me tell you, my friends, I'm not just being paranoid – I'm being vigilant. And it's time for all of us to wake up and take notice of the hidden agendas that are shaping our country.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round! We've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here. The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 - what a mouthful, right? (smirk)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is all about freedom, folks! It's about giving law-abiding citizens the right to carry concealed firearms across state lines without fear of persecution from those pesky elites in Washington. The main objective here is to create a national standard for concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring that your Second Amendment rights aren't trampled on just because you crossed into another state.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

Now, let's get down to brass tacks. This bill amends Title 18 of the United States Code to allow non-residents to carry concealed firearms in states where residents are allowed to do so. It also sets out specific requirements for carrying a concealed handgun, including having a valid ID and a permit or license from your home state.

But here's the kicker: this bill essentially overrides any state laws that might restrict concealed carry. (wink) That's right, folks - if you've got a permit in one state, you're good to go in all of 'em! Well, almost all of 'em... there are some exceptions for private property and government buildings, but we'll get to those later.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

So, who's affected by this bill? Well, it's pretty simple: law-abiding citizens who want to exercise their Second Amendment rights. That means you, me, and every other patriot out there who wants to protect themselves and their families.

But let's not forget about the elites - those pesky bureaucrats in Washington who think they can take away our freedoms with a stroke of their pen. This bill is a big ol' middle finger to them, folks! (smirk)

**Potential Impact & Implications**

Now, I know what you're thinking: "What about all the chaos this will cause?" Fear not, dear viewer, for this bill has got it covered. It sets out specific protections for individuals who carry concealed firearms in accordance with its provisions.

But let's be real - this bill is a game-changer. It's a bold statement that our Second Amendment rights are non-negotiable. And if you're one of those elites who thinks otherwise... well, I've got news for you: the American people won't be silenced! (dramatic music plays)

In conclusion, folks, this bill is a freedom-lover's dream come true. It's a bold step towards restoring our Second Amendment rights and telling those elites in Washington to take a hike. So, let's get behind it and make America great again - one concealed carry permit at a time! (wink)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another brilliant example of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 is a masterclass in doublespeak. Its stated purpose is to provide "a means by which nonresidents of a State whose residents may carry concealed firearms may also do so in the State." In other words, it's a thinly veiled attempt to nationalize concealed carry laws, allowing gun owners to carry their firearms across state lines with impunity.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, by inserting a new section (926D) that overrides state and local laws governing concealed carry. It allows individuals with a valid ID and a concealed carry permit from their home state to carry firearms in any state that doesn't explicitly prohibit it. The bill also includes provisions for reciprocity, allowing states to recognize out-of-state permits.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: gun owners, the NRA, and politicians eager to curry favor with these groups. However, this bill will also impact law enforcement agencies, which will be forced to navigate a complex web of conflicting state laws. Additionally, states with stricter gun control laws will see their regulations undermined by this federal overreach.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a recipe for disaster. By allowing individuals to carry concealed firearms across state lines without proper training or oversight, we can expect an increase in gun-related accidents and violent crimes. It's a classic case of "solution in search of a problem," as most states already have reciprocity agreements in place.

But let's not be naive – this bill isn't about public safety; it's about pandering to the gun lobby and scoring cheap political points. The real disease here is the corruption that infects our legislative process, where politicians prioritize special interests over the well-being of their constituents.

In conclusion, HR 38 is a symptom of a larger problem: the erosion of state sovereignty and the prioritization of ideology over evidence-based policy-making. It's a bill that will only serve to further polarize our nation and put innocent lives at risk. Bravo, Congress – you've managed to create another masterpiece of legislative malpractice.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 (HR 38)**

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 aims to provide a means by which non-residents of a state whose residents may carry concealed firearms can also do so in that state. The bill seeks to establish national reciprocity for concealed carry permits, allowing individuals with valid permits from one state to carry concealed firearms in other states.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends Chapter 44 of Title 18, United States Code, by adding a new section (926D) that establishes the following key provisions:

1. **Reciprocity**: Allows individuals with valid concealed carry permits from one state to possess or carry a concealed handgun in any state that: * Has a statute permitting residents to apply for a concealed carry permit. * Does not prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms by residents for lawful purposes. 2. **Requirements**: To exercise reciprocity, an individual must: * Possess a valid identification document with a photograph. * Carry a valid license or permit issued by their state of residence. 3. **Limitations**: The bill does not supersede or limit state laws that: * Permit private persons or entities to prohibit or restrict concealed firearms on their property. * Prohibit or restrict firearms on state or local government property.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

1. **Concealed Carry Permit Holders**: Individuals with valid permits from one state can now carry concealed firearms in other states that meet the bill's requirements. 2. **States and Local Governments**: States and local governments must recognize and honor out-of-state concealed carry permits, unless they have laws prohibiting or restricting concealed firearms on specific properties. 3. **Law Enforcement Agencies**: Law enforcement agencies must be aware of the new reciprocity provisions and ensure that individuals exercising their rights under this section are not arrested or detained without probable cause.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

1. **Increased Reciprocity**: The bill expands national reciprocity for concealed carry permits, allowing more individuals to exercise their Second Amendment rights across state lines. 2. **Consistency in State Laws**: By establishing a federal framework for concealed carry reciprocity, the bill promotes consistency among state laws and reduces confusion for permit holders traveling between states. 3. **Potential Conflicts with State Laws**: The bill may lead to conflicts with state laws that have stricter requirements or restrictions on concealed firearms, potentially leading to court challenges and litigation.

Overall, the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 aims to promote national reciprocity for concealed carry permits, while respecting state laws and regulations.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 (HR 38) is all about allowing non-residents to carry concealed firearms in states where residents are already allowed to do so. The main objective is to create a national standard for concealed carry reciprocity, making it easier for folks with valid permits or licenses to pack heat while traveling across state lines.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This bill amends Title 18 of the United States Code by adding a new section (926D) that establishes a framework for concealed carry reciprocity. Here are the key takeaways:

* Non-residents with valid permits or licenses can carry concealed firearms in states that allow residents to do so. * The bill doesn't supersede state laws that prohibit carrying firearms on private property or government buildings. * If someone is arrested or detained for violating a state's firearm laws, they can assert this section as a defense and the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that their conduct didn't meet the requirements.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects:

* Non-resident concealed carry permit holders who want to travel across state lines with their firearms. * State governments that have different concealed carry laws and regulations. * Law enforcement agencies responsible for enforcing firearm laws. * Private property owners and government entities that may prohibit carrying firearms on their premises.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If this bill becomes law, it could:

* Increase the number of people carrying concealed firearms across state lines, potentially leading to more gun-related incidents or accidents. * Create conflicts between states with different concealed carry laws, which could lead to lawsuits and court battles. * Affect the ability of private property owners and government entities to regulate firearms on their premises.

On the other hand, proponents argue that this bill will:

* Enhance Second Amendment rights by allowing law-abiding citizens to exercise their right to bear arms across state lines. * Simplify concealed carry laws and regulations, making it easier for people to travel with their firearms.

Overall, bro, this bill is a complex issue that's gonna spark some intense debates. It's like trying to catch a gnarly wave – you gotta be ready for the ride.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 38: Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to establish a national concealed carry reciprocity system, allowing individuals with valid concealed carry permits or licenses from one state to carry firearms in other states that have similar laws. The primary objective is to ensure that law-abiding citizens can exercise their Second Amendment rights while traveling across state lines.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Reciprocity**: The bill creates a reciprocity system, allowing individuals with valid concealed carry permits or licenses from one state to carry firearms in other states that have similar laws. 2. **Federal Preemption**: The bill preempts state and local laws that restrict the carrying of concealed firearms by non-residents, except for private property owners who can still prohibit firearms on their premises. 3. **Immunity**: The bill provides immunity from prosecution for individuals who carry or possess a concealed handgun in accordance with the law, unless there is probable cause to believe they are doing so in a manner not provided for by this section.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Gun owners and enthusiasts**: The bill benefits individuals who hold valid concealed carry permits or licenses and wish to exercise their Second Amendment rights while traveling across state lines. 2. **State governments**: State governments with existing concealed carry laws will need to adapt to the new federal framework, potentially leading to changes in their own laws and regulations. 3. **Law enforcement agencies**: Law enforcement agencies may face challenges in enforcing the new law, particularly when dealing with out-of-state visitors who may not be familiar with local firearms regulations.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased gun rights**: The bill expands the rights of gun owners to carry concealed firearms across state lines, potentially leading to increased gun ownership and carrying. 2. **Conflicts between state and federal laws**: The bill's preemption clause may lead to conflicts between state and federal laws, particularly in states with stricter gun control regulations. 3. **Potential for increased gun violence**: Critics argue that the bill could lead to an increase in gun violence, as more individuals will be carrying concealed firearms in public places.

**Monied Interest Analysis:**

The National Rifle Association (NRA) is a key supporter of this legislation, having contributed significantly to the campaigns of many co-sponsors. The NRA has long advocated for national concealed carry reciprocity, and this bill aligns with their goals. Other gun rights organizations, such as Gun Owners of America, also support the bill.

**Committee Capture:** The House Judiciary Committee, which reported the bill out of committee, has a history of being influenced by the NRA and other gun rights groups. Several members of the committee have received significant campaign contributions from these organizations, potentially influencing their decisions on this legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$545,400

20 donors

PACs

Organizations

$8,100

Committees

Individuals

$537,300

No PAC contributions found

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$3,300

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$3,300

CATAWBA INDIAN NATION

1 transaction

$1,500

No committee contributions found

HENDRICK, JOSEPH RIDDICK III

1 transaction

$50,000

GROSS, MARK J.

1 transaction

$50,000

WARLICK, ANDERSON D. MR.

1 transaction

$50,000

BARNHILL, ROBERT E. MR. JR.

1 transaction

$50,000

ALLISON, DENNIS KEITH MR.

2 transactions

$50,000

PARRISH, R. DOYLE MR.

2 transactions

$50,000

CURRIE, NEILL MR.

2 transactions

$50,000

HUNTER, FRED NEAL

1 transaction

$35,000

SULLIVAN, SCOTT C.

1 transaction

$25,000

KANE, JOHN

1 transaction

$25,000

SMITH, EDDIE C. MR. JR.

1 transaction

$25,000

CARLSON, MARSHALL

1 transaction

$13,200

GILL, MALINDA

1 transaction

$13,200

HODGKIN, JAY

1 transaction

$13,200

O'MALLEY, JAMES B. MR.

1 transaction

$13,200

RAWL, JULIAN WHITE

1 transaction

$12,500

CUPISZ, ANTHONY

1 transaction

$12,000

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Murphy, Gregory F. [R-NC-3]

ID: M001210

Top Contributors

DOISE, DARYL

OCEANS HEALTHCARE • EXEC VP

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,700

Apr 1, 2024

DOISE, DARYL

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,700

Apr 10, 2024

KAPOOR, DEEPAK

SOLARIS HEALTH • PHYSICIAN EXECUTIVE

IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL

$6,600

Sep 23, 2024

KAPOOR, DEEPAK

IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

BLACKSTONE • CEO AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

ARUMUGHAM, PRADEEP

ECU • DOCTOR

IndividualKINSTON, NC

$3,300

Dec 11, 2023

BOWEN, JOEY M

PRIVATEER TOBACCO CO. INC. • TOBACCONIST

IndividualGREENVILLE, NC

$3,300

Nov 15, 2023

BOWEN, JOEY M

PRIVATEER TOBACCO CO. INC. • TOBACCONIST

IndividualGREENVILLE, NC

$3,300

Nov 15, 2023

CLARK, MELISSA A

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualGREENVILLE, NC

$3,300

Oct 6, 2023

CLARK, MELISSA A

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualGREENVILLE, NC

$3,300

Oct 6, 2023

Rep. Hern, Kevin [R-OK-1]

ID: H001082

Top Contributors

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

PACBANNING, CA

$2,000

Jun 15, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

PACBANNING, CA

$1,000

May 26, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTABLEQUAIL, OK

$3,300

Nov 14, 2023

CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Feb 10, 2023

CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 15, 2024

OSAGE NATION

OrganizationPAWHUSKA, OK

$3,300

Jun 18, 2024

UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,000

Sep 30, 2023

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KYMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$2,500

Oct 13, 2023

SYCUAN BAN OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$2,500

Jul 15, 2024

MARSH POINTE MANAGEMENT LLC

OrganizationTAHLEOUAH, OK

$2,000

Aug 29, 2023

Rep. Jackson, Ronny [R-TX-13]

ID: J000304

Top Contributors

TARPLEY, JAMES

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualRIVERSIDE, CA

$6,600

May 17, 2023

TARPLEY, JAMES

IndividualRIVERSIDE, CA

$6,600

May 17, 2023

BURKHARDT, JOAN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCAMARILLO, CA

$6,534

Sep 27, 2023

BURKHARDT, JOAN

IndividualCAMARILLO, CA

$6,534

Sep 29, 2023

HIMEBAUGH, PAUL

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$6,270

Jun 30, 2024

ARCHER, LYNNE

ARCHER AUTO GROUP • SECRETARY

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$3,435

Jan 10, 2024

ARCHER, LYNNE

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$3,435

Jan 10, 2024

BURZYNSKI, STANISLAW

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,435

Sep 30, 2024

PERRIN, JOE

SELF-EMPLOYED • FARM/RANCH

IndividualHEREFORD, TX

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

DAMBROSIO, KATHLEEN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPRICE, UT

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9]

ID: C001116

Top Contributors

SYFAN, STEPHEN

SYFAN LOGISTICS • EXEC VP

IndividualGAINESVILLE, GA

$6,600

May 31, 2024

SCOTT, ROBERT S.

RAC PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE

IndividualBOGART, GA

$6,600

Oct 11, 2024

FOWLER, CHARLES W. JR.

GLOBAL DEFENSE MGMT • PRESIDENT

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,500

Oct 29, 2024

BECK, SAMUEL

BECK FUNERAL HOME • FUNERAL DIRECTOR

IndividualCLAYTON, GA

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

HINMAN, ROY H

SELF EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSAINT AUGUSTINE, FL

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

FROST IV, EDWIN BRANT

SELF EMPLOYED • FINANCIAL SERVICES

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 24, 2024

FROST, KRISTA

NONE • HOMEMAKER

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 24, 2024

ACTON, MICHAEL

SELF EMPLOYED • DEVELOPER

IndividualHOMER, GA

$3,300

Nov 7, 2023

JEPSON, JEFFREY

EVANS GENERAL CONTRACTORS • CONSTRUCTION

IndividualPOOLER, GA

$3,300

Nov 19, 2023

MATHENY, DAVID

SILENCER SHOP • OWNER

IndividualLEANDER, TX

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

Rep. Cammack, Kat [R-FL-3]

ID: C001039

Top Contributors

PASS THE HAT

OrganizationATHENS, GA

$3,610

Jul 15, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 14, 2024

S & K BARRINGTON FARMS

OrganizationMAYO, FL

$600

Mar 31, 2024

83 FARMS, LLC

OrganizationBELL, FL

$283

Mar 31, 2023

RADIANT CREDIT UNION

OrganizationGAINESVILLE, FL

$250

Jun 30, 2023

ADOLFSSON, MARCUS

RETIRED

IndividualGULFPORT, FL

$6,600

Jun 30, 2023

KEMMERER, JOHN

KEMMERER MANAGEMENT CORP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$6,600

Apr 18, 2023

KEMMERER, KAREN

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$6,600

May 11, 2023

HOROWITZ, BEN

ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ • ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$6,600

Apr 11, 2024

GASTON, BILL FAYE

BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualGAINESVILLE, FL

$5,205

Feb 29, 2024

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

ID: C001120

Top Contributors

CHEVRON

OrganizationSAN RAMON, CA

$5,000

Sep 4, 2024

COMPLETE EMERGENCY CARE HOLDING LLC

OrganizationSOUTHLAKE, TX

$3,500

Mar 11, 2024

SANDLIAN REALTY

OrganizationWICHITA, KS

$1,000

Feb 7, 2024

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

RUSSELL W H KRIDEL MD PA

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$250

Feb 28, 2023

JONES RANCH LLC

OrganizationCORPUS CHRISTI, TX

$250

Mar 13, 2024

MAFRIGE, DAVID

SELF • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 21, 2023

MAFRIGE, DAVID

SELF • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 21, 2023

ODEN, KEITH

CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST • EXECUTIVE VICE CHAIRMAN

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 27, 2023

ODEN, KEITH

CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST • EXECUTIVE VICE CHAIRMAN

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 27, 2023

Rep. Harrigan, Pat [R-NC-10]

ID: H001101

Top Contributors

STARNES, BRYAN

ALG SENIOR LLC • CFO

IndividualGRANITE FALLS, NC

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

ATALA, KATHERINE DAWSON

WAKE FOREST UNIV SCHOOL OF MED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualWINSTON SALEM, NC

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

SMITH, HARRY

RISE CAPITAL • FOUNDER

IndividualATLANTIC BEACH, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

CHEROKEE INDIANS, EASTERN BAND OF

INDIAN TRIBE • INDIAN TRIBE

IndividualCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

TREFZGER, CHARLIE

ALG SENIOR • CEO

IndividualGRANITE FALLS, NC, NC

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

SMITH, HARRY

RISE CAPITAL • FOUNDER

IndividualATLANTIC BEACH, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

KELLIGREW, JIM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Nov 19, 2024

DUNN, MELANIE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMORGANTON, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

WILSON, PETE

WILSON WALSH CONSULTING • ATTORNEY CONSULTANT

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

SCHILBERG, BERNARD

IMC • CEO

IndividualSOUTH WINDSOR, CT

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

ID: P000048

Top Contributors

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Apr 18, 2024

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 27, 2024

DIMEMMO, COLETTE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualFORT MYERS, FL

$6,600

Oct 24, 2024

PUDWILL, JAMES

IndividualNIPOMO, CA

$6,600

Sep 16, 2024

GELBMAN, JOEL

IndividualNAPLES, FL

$6,600

Sep 16, 2024

GELBMAN, JOEL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNAPLES, FL

$6,600

Aug 26, 2024

PUDWILL, JAMES

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNIPOMO, CA

$6,600

Aug 3, 2024

WILSON, CELIA R

OIL AND GAS • SELF-EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$5,800

Mar 31, 2024

WILSON, CELIA R

SELF • OIL AND GAS

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$5,800

Apr 9, 2024

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

ID: E000071

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS AGUA CALIENTE

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2024

INDIAN COMMUNITY AK-CHIN

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Feb 9, 2024

BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS AGUA CALIENTE

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,000

Nov 6, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 11, 2023

TIGUA INDIAN RESERVATION TRIBAL COUNCIL GENERAL FUND

OrganizationEL PASO, TX

$2,500

Aug 9, 2023

INDIAN COMMUNITY AK-CHIN

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$2,000

Sep 30, 2024

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Oct 16, 2024

TALK FARMS

OrganizationITASCA, TX

$500

Dec 31, 2023

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

ID: T000478

Top Contributors

WINRED EARMARKS

PACARLINGTON, VA

$27,879

Oct 22, 2024

WINRED EARMARKS

PACARLINGTON, VA

$21,566

Oct 29, 2024

WINRED EARMARKS

PACARLINGTON, VA

$10,970

Nov 25, 2024

WINRED EARMARKS

PACARLINGTON, VA

$5,493

Nov 19, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,000

Nov 5, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Jun 18, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Jun 18, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Mar 31, 2023

TEXTOR, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLOCUST VALLEY, NY

$13,200

Apr 17, 2024

WINE, SCOTT

POLARIS • CEO

IndividualEXCELSIOR, MN

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 55 nodes and 38 connections (39 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $615,644

Top Donors - Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Firearms & Ammunitionconfidence 0.95
Section 2(a) allows nonresidents with valid concealed carry permits from their home state to carry concealed handguns in any state that has a permitting statute or does not prohibit concealed carry by residents, expanding market for firearms and ammunition. Section 2(f)(1) exempts such carriers from federal prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(q) (gun-free school zones), further reducing legal barriers. Section 2(f)(2) permits carry in federal lands (National Parks, Wildlife Refuges, BLM, Army Cor

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 64%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on concealed carry reciprocity while the Project 2025 DHS section concerns immigration enforcement; they share only a tangential theme of federal authority over state/local laws but address unrelated policy domains."

Key themes:federal preemptionstate law compliancelaw enforcement responsibilities

— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.

Department of Defense

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on concealed carry reciprocity and Second Amendment rights, while the Project 2025 DoD section emphasizes defense support of civil authorities, intelligence oversight, and military readiness. There is only a tangential connection through federal-state relations and law enforcement support, but no direct alignment of objectives."

Key themes:federal preemptionlaw enforcement supportstate-federal relations

— 128 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Constitution, Preamble, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/preamble/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 2. U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 8, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 3. U.S. Constitution, Article II, § 2, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 4. Established pursuant to S. 1605, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, Public Law No. 117-81, 117th Congress, December 27, 2021, Division A, Title X, § 1004, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ81/ PLAW-117publ81.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 5. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division G, Title IX, §§ 70901–70953, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 6. S. 2943, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 114th Congress, December 23, 2016, Division A, Title IX, § 901, https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg2000. pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 7. H.R. 3622, Goldwater–Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-433, 99th Congress, October 1, 1986, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/STATUTE-100-Pg992.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 8. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Historical Sales Book, Fiscal Years 1950–2021, p. 7, https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/dsca_historical_sales_book_FY21.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 9. Paul K. Kerr, “Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL31675, updated June 10, 2022, p. 1, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/ RL31675.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 10. Keith Webster, “How to Reform America’s Military Sales Process,” The Hill Congress Blog, October 6, 2022, https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/3675933-how-to-reform-americas-military-sales-process/ (accessed February 15, 2023). 11. See Thomas W. Spoehr, “The Administration and Congress Must Act Now to Counter the Worsening Military Recruiting Crisis, Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5283, July 28, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/sites/ default/files/2022-07/IB5283.pdf. 12. Ibid. 13. Ronald Reagan Institute, “Reagan National Defense Survey,” conducted November 2021, p. 4, https://www. reaganfoundation.org/media/358085/rndf_survey_booklet.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 14. See Paul J. Larkin, “Protecting the Nation by Employing Military Spouses,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, June 6, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/jobs-and-labor/commentary/protecting-the-nation-employing- military-spouses. 15. See Jude Schwalbach, “Military Families Deserve Flexible Education Options,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, April 14, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/military-families-deserve- flexible-education-options. 16. See Chapter 7, “The Intelligence Community,” infra. 17. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); the National Security Agency (NSA); the National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency (NGA); the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO); and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the military services: U.S. Air Force Intelligence, U.S. Navy Intelligence, U.S. Army Intelligence, and U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, which also receive guidance and oversight from the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI). 18. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 19. The Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the U.S. Coast Guard; the Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Office of National Security Intelligence; the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research; and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. — 129 — Department of Defense 20. Staff Study, IC21: Intelligence Community in the 21st Century, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1996, p. 71, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA315088.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 21. Ronald O’Rourke, “Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R43838, updated November 8, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43838/93 (accessed February 15, 2023). 22. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Defense Intelligence and Security: DOD Needs to Establish Oversight Expectations and to Develop Tools That Enhance Accountability, GAO-21-295, May 2021, https://www.gao.gov/ assets/gao-21-295.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 23. The U.S. military has a long history of providing support to civil authorities, particularly in response to disasters but for other purposes as well. The Defense Department currently defines defense support of civil authorities (DSCA) as “Support provided by U.S. Federal military forces, DoD civilians, DoD contract personnel, DoD Component assets, and National Guard forces (when the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Governors of the affected States, elects and requests to use those forces in Title 32, U.S.C., status) in response to requests for assistance from civil authorities for domestic emergencies, law enforcement support, and other domestic activities, or from qualifying entities for special events. Also known as civil support.” U.S. Department of Defense, Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA),” December 29, 2010, p. 16, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/CG-5R/nsarc/DoDD%203025.18%20Defense%20Support%20 of%20Civil%20Authorities.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 24. U.S. Army, “Who We Are: The Army’s Vision and Strategy,” https://www.army.mil/about/ (accessed February 17, 2023). 25. “[T]he Army’s internal assessment must be balanced against its own statements that unit training is focused on company-level operations [reflective of counterintelligence requirements] rather than battalion or brigade operations [much less division or corps to meet large-scale ground combat operations against a peer competitor such as Russia or China]. Consequently, how these ‘ready’ brigade combat teams would perform in combat operations is an open question.” “Executive Summary” in 2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength, ed. Dakota L. Wood (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 16, http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws. com/2022/Military_Index/2023_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 26. For background on the USN’s fleet size, see Brent D. Sadler, “Rebuilding America’s Military: The United States Navy,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 242, February 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-02/SR242.pdf, and Ronald O’Rourke, “Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL32665, December 21, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32665 (accessed February 15, 2023). 27. The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is the process by which the services develop and the Joint Staff approves the requirements for major defense acquisitions. See Defense Acquisition University, “Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDA),” https://www.dau. edu/acquipedia/pages/articledetails.aspx#!371 (accessed February 15, 2023). 28. The board would seek to balance a mix of active military and civilians with expertise in and responsibility for major acquisitions and former military and civilians with experience in strategy and acquisitions. The proposed composition would include the Vice Chief of Naval Operations as Chairman, with three-star level membership from the Joint Staff, the Navy and Defense Acquisition Executives, and the Naval Sea Systems Command. In addition, there would be four-star retired naval officers/Navy civil servants as members, one each named by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of Defense. Finally, there would be a member appointed by the Secretary of the Navy who had previous senior experience in the defense industry. 29. See James Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, U.S. Department of Defense, https:// dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023), and U.S. Department of Defense, 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America Including the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review and the 2022 Missile Defense Review, https://oldcc.gov/ resource/2022-national-defense-strategy (accessed February 17, 2023).

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 64%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns state-level concealed carry reciprocity and gun rights, whereas the Project 2025 Department of Defense section focuses on defense policy, military recruitment, and intelligence matters, showing no substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:federalismSecond Amendment

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on expanding concealed carry reciprocity under the Second Amendment, while the Project 2025 DHS section emphasizes immigration enforcement, border security, and counterterrorism—there is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 168 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, § 101(b)(1), https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 2. See, for example, “Elon Musk Slams CISA Censorship Network as ‘Propaganda Platform,’” Kanekoa News, December 28, 2022, https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/elon-musk-slams-cisa-censorship-network (accessed March 14, 2023). 3. H.R. 2680, An Act to Amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 89-236, 89th Congress, October 3, 1965, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79- Pg911.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 4. Added to the Immigration and Nationality Act by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. See H.R. 3610, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law No. 104-208, 104th Congress, September 30, 1996, Division C, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ208/ PLAW-104publ208.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 5. 8 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8 (accessed March 14, 2023). 6. 18 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18 (accessed March 14, 2023). 7. 5 U.S. Code §§ 551–559, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5/subchapter-II (accessed March 14, 2023). 8. Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Budget Comparison and Adjustments Appropriation and PPA Summary,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. CIS-4, https://www.uscis.gov/ sites/default/files/document/reports/U.S._Citizenship_and_Immigration_Services%E2%80%99_Budget_ Overview_Document_for%20Fiscal_Year_2023.pdf#:~:text=The%20FY%202023%20Budget%20includes%20 %24913.6M%2C%204%2C001%20positions%3B,of%20%24444.1M%20above%20the%20FY%202022%20 President%E2%80%99s%20Budget (accessed March 14, 2023), and Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Comparison of Budget Authority and Request,” in ibid., p. CIS-5. 9. H.R. 7311, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Public Law No. 110-457, 110th Congress, December 23, 2008, § 235, https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ457/PLAW- 110publ457.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1070866/ download (accessed January 18, 2023). 11. Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/ (accessed January 18, 2023). 12. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [Public Law 93–288; Approved May 22, 1974] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–328, Enacted December 29, 2022], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ COMPS-2977/pdf/COMPS-2977.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 13. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. FEMA-24, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Federal%20Emergency%20 Management%20Agency_Remediated.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 14. Report, United States Secret Service: An Agency in Crisis, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Congress, December 9, 2015, https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Oversight-USSS-Report.pdf (accessed January 18, 2023). 15. 5 U.S. Code § 7103, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7103 (accessed March 15, 2023). 16. S. 3418, Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-579, 93rd Congress, December 31, 1974, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg1896.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 17. H.R. 1428, Judicial Redress Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-126, 114th Congress, February 24, 2016, https://www. congress.gov/114/plaws/publ126/PLAW-114publ126.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 18. H.R. 1158, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law No. 116-93, 116th Congress, December 20, 2019, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1158 (accessed January 18, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on expanding concealed carry reciprocity across states, a gun rights issue, while the Project 2025 DHS section emphasizes immigration enforcement, border security, counterterrorism, and agency oversight, with no substantive connection to firearms policy."

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Hudson, Richard

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey to the State of North Carolina a certain parcel of real property located at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on which the State shall construct a veterans’ State home, and for other purposes.

119/hr/10159

National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act

119/hr/2196

Love Lives On Act of 2025

119/hr/1004

Back to All Bills