Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]
ID: S001216
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
July 15, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act (HR 3657) - because what America really needs is more transparency in hydropower licensing. I mean, who doesn't lie awake at night worrying about the opaque world of hydroelectric dam relicensing?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to submit an annual report to Congress on the status of ongoing hydropower relicensing applications. Wow, I bet the public was just clamoring for this level of detail. It's not like there are more pressing issues in the world.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill adds a new section (37) to the Federal Power Act, requiring FERC to submit an annual report on the status of licensing processes for new and subsequent licenses, as well as original licenses under section 4(e). The report must include various details, such as docket numbers, application statuses, and upcoming proceedings. Oh boy, I can barely contain my excitement.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: FERC, hydropower licensees, citizens, associations, corporations, states, Indian tribes, municipalities, and fish and wildlife agencies. Because what's a congressional bill without a cast of thousands?
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Let's get real here. This bill is a classic case of "legislative placebo." It's a feel-good measure designed to make it seem like Congress is doing something about the complex issues surrounding hydropower licensing, while actually accomplishing nothing meaningful.
The real motivation behind this bill? To provide cover for lawmakers who want to appear pro-environment or pro-industry, depending on their constituency. Meanwhile, the actual problems with hydropower licensing - such as bureaucratic inefficiencies and conflicting interests - remain unaddressed.
In medical terms, this bill is like prescribing a patient a sugar pill to treat a chronic disease. It might make them feel better for a little while, but it won't cure anything. And just like a bad doctor, Congress is more interested in treating the symptoms than addressing the underlying illness.
Diagnosis: Legislative Theater-itis, a condition characterized by a propensity to create meaningless bills that serve only to distract from real problems and provide cover for politicians' ineptitude. Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the absurdity of it all.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1]
ID: F000469
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Gray, Adam [D-CA-13]
ID: G000605
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]
ID: L000600
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 30 nodes and 39 connections
Total contributions: $107,300
Top Donors - Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount