The bill
Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025
HR. 3632, 119th Congress — read as touching Electric Utilities.
Sponsored by
Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
ID: G000568
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 3632, 119th Congress — read as touching Electric Utilities.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
December 16, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. The Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025 - a bill so cleverly crafted, it's almost as if they want us to believe it's actually about ensuring power plant reliability.
Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**New regulations being created or modified:** Ah, yes! The bill amends the Federal Power Act to require owners or operators of generating facilities to provide notice of planned retirements of certain electric generating units. How noble. But what's really happening here is that they're creating a new regulatory framework to justify bailing out struggling power plants.
**Affected industries and sectors:** The usual suspects - public utilities, transmission organizations, and state commissions. You know, the ones who will be "regulated" into submission by this bill. Meanwhile, the real beneficiaries are the fossil fuel lobby and their friends in Congress.
**Compliance requirements and timelines:** Oh boy, it's a regulatory nightmare! Owners or operators of generating facilities must provide notice of planned retirements at least 180 days prior to the retirement date. And if they don't comply? Well, that's where the "enforcement mechanisms" come into play (more on that later). The bill also establishes a 5-year term for orders, rules, and regulations, with an option for extension because, you know, 5 years just isn't enough time to figure out how to actually make power plants reliable.
**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Ah, the fun part! If owners or operators fail to comply, they might face... wait for it... a hearing! Yes, that's right. A hearing. Where they'll be forced to explain themselves to the Commission. Oh, the horror! And if they still don't comply? Well, there are no actual penalties mentioned in the bill, but I'm sure the Commission will come up with something suitably toothless.
**Economic and operational impacts:** Let's just say this bill is a gift to the fossil fuel industry. By requiring notice of planned retirements, it creates an artificial barrier to transitioning away from dirty energy sources. And by allowing for extensions of orders, rules, and regulations, it ensures that power plants can keep on polluting for years to come.
In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in regulatory capture, designed to prop up the fossil fuel industry at the expense of actual power plant reliability and environmental protection. It's a disease masquerading as a cure - a classic case of "legislative lupus," where the symptoms are treated while the underlying illness (corruption, greed, and stupidity) is left unchecked.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
10
ID: O000019
Top Contributors
10
ID: O000177
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001205
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 56 nodes and 32 connections (41 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $154,600
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 1 harmed.
Section 207(a)(2)(B)(i) allows the Commission to require continuing operation of an electric generating unit, which benefits electric utilities by ensuring continued revenue from generation assets; also subsection (a)(2)(B)(ii) requires development of transmission plans that support utility service.
Section 207(a)(2)(B)(ii) mandates that affected State commissions, Transmission Organizations, or public utilities develop and implement long-term plans for interstate transmission facilities, directly benefiting energy infrastructure operators involved in transmission planning and construction.
Section 207(b)(1) requires advance notice of planned retirements of generating units >=5 MW, making it harder for coal plant owners to retire units quickly, potentially imposing costs on coal-dependent generators and thus harming coal mining demand.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025