Veterans Readiness and Employment Program Integrity Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/3579
Last Updated: February 4, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

ID: C001133

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

September 16, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. The Veterans Readiness and Employment Program Integrity Act (HR 3579) - a title that screams "we're doing something good for veterans, trust us."

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to make "certain improvements" to the Veterans Readiness and Employment program, because, you know, it wasn't working well enough already. The real purpose? To create a veneer of accountability while maintaining the status quo.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Application requirement**: The Secretary of Veterans Affairs can no longer provide an initial evaluation without receiving a complete application from the veteran, including work records and educational transcripts. Wow, what a revolutionary concept - actually requiring relevant information before providing services. 2. **Maximum duration of employment assistance**: Veterans are now limited to 365 days of assistance, with an option for an additional 180 days if they're "actively seeking employment." Because, clearly, the problem was that veterans were just too darn comfortable on the government's dime. 3. **Reporting and data collection requirements**: The Secretary must submit reports on veteran employment outcomes and wait times for vocational rehabilitation programs. Oh boy, I can already see the thrilling spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* Veterans (supposedly) * Department of Veterans Affairs * Congressional committees (who get to pretend they're doing something useful)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a token effort to address the systemic issues plaguing veteran services, while actually accomplishing little. The changes are minor and won't significantly improve outcomes for veterans.

In reality, this bill serves as a distraction from the real problems:

* Inefficient bureaucracy * Lack of resources * Insufficient support for veterans

The politicians behind this bill are more concerned with appearing to care about veterans than actually doing something meaningful. It's a classic case of "legislative placebo" - making people feel like they're getting help while maintaining the status quo.

In conclusion, HR 3579 is a masterclass in legislative misdirection, designed to make politicians look good without actually solving anything. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create another bill that's more about appearances than actual substance.

Related Topics

Transportation & Infrastructure Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence State & Local Government Affairs Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Congressional Rules & Procedures Civil Rights & Liberties
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$152,234
27 donors
PACs
$1,000
Organizations
$19,234
Committees
$0
Individuals
$132,000
1
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,000
1
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$5,134
2
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
3
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
4
THE CHICKASAW NATION
2 transactions
$3,000
5
DELTA AIRLINES
1 transaction
$2,500
6
MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
7
COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
REIZOVIC, ROY
2 transactions
$13,200
2
EMMET, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
3
EVANS, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$6,600
4
KENDRICK, KEN
1 transaction
$6,600
5
KENDRICK, RANDY
1 transaction
$6,600
6
MCCALLISTER, ROSS
1 transaction
$6,600
7
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$6,600
8
STERN, ELIZABETH MAY
1 transaction
$6,600
9
WEEKLEY, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
10
ASSENMACHER, ROBERT
1 transaction
$6,600
11
ASSENMACHER, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$6,600
12
BIDWILL, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$6,600
13
BRAVERMAN, VERONICA
1 transaction
$6,600
14
CHAMBERLAIN, JAIME
1 transaction
$6,600
15
CHAMBERLAIN, MARTHA
1 transaction
$6,600
16
CHAPMAN, TED
1 transaction
$6,600
17
CHRIST, HAROLD
1 transaction
$6,600
18
COONS, BETH
1 transaction
$6,600
19
COTTER, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

ID: V000135

Top Contributors

10

1
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
Organization CHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Dec 9, 2024
2
HO CHUNK NATION
Organization BLACK RIVER FALLS, WI
$3,300
Nov 2, 2024
3
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
Organization CRANDON, WI
$3,300
Sep 17, 2024
4
AIPAC PAC CONDUIT ACCOUNT
Organization WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Oct 23, 2024
5
ALLIANCE OF BANKERS FOR WISCONSIN
Organization MADISON, WI
$250
Apr 23, 2024
6
ANDERSON, JOHN R. MR.
ANDERSON ENTERPRISES LLC • OWNER
Individual ROCKFORD, IL
$10,000
Dec 19, 2023
7
BROIN, JEFF
POET LLC • CEO
Individual SIOUX FALLS, SD
$6,600
Aug 24, 2023
8
UIHLEIN, RICHARD E. MR.
ULINE INC. • CEO
Individual LAKE BLUFF, IL
$6,600
Feb 28, 2023
9
LEVY, EDWARD C.
EDW. C. LEVY CO. • CHAIRMAN
Individual BIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
Mar 28, 2024
10
LEVY, EDWARD C.
Individual BIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
May 6, 2024

Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

ID: C001127

Top Contributors

10

1
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Nov 4, 2024
2
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
Organization HOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 20, 2024
3
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
Organization HOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Sep 8, 2023
4
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
FIGGERS • INVENTOR
Individual FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Jun 8, 2023
5
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
Individual FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Sep 25, 2023
6
MOISE, RUDOLPH
Individual DAVIE, FL
$3,300
Oct 7, 2024
7
GEORGE, DAVID J.
REFUEL DEPOT LLC • SALES
Individual LEADWOOD, KS
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024
8
GOLDEN, SYLVIA
NONE • RETIRED
Individual WEST PALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Aug 18, 2024
9
GORI, PHILIP
SELF • INVESTOR
Individual BOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Sep 16, 2024
10
MUELLER, KYLE
ZUTEK • DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
Individual OLATHE, KS
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024

Rep. Murphy, Gregory F. [R-NC-3]

ID: M001210

Top Contributors

10

1
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATION
Organization MASHANTUCKET, CT
$3,300
Nov 4, 2024
2
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
Organization TAMA, IA
$2,500
Nov 5, 2024
3
MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT
Organization UNCASVILLE, CT
$2,000
Mar 30, 2023
4
WINNER'S PROPERTIES LLC
Organization VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
$3,300
Dec 1, 2023
5
CLB PARTNERS LLC
Organization TRENTON, NJ
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
6
CIS REALTY GROUP
Organization LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
$3,300
Dec 18, 2023
7
CIS REALTY GROUP
Organization LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
$3,300
Dec 18, 2023
8
MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
Organization NEWARK, NJ
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
9
BARK AND BEE HONEY COMPANY LLC
Organization LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
10
CLB PARTNERS LLC
Organization TRENTON, NJ
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 39 nodes and 39 connections

Total contributions: $177,034

Top Donors - Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC7 Orgs19 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Introduction

Strong
Vector: 65%
Pages: 679-681 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill's focus on improving the efficiency, accountability, and transparency of the Veterans Readiness and Employment program aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on promoting continuous improvement in the VA system. While not directly implementing a specific policy objective, HR 3579 supports the broader goal of enhancing the overall effectiveness of veterans' services."

Key themes: veterans' services program accountability transparency and reporting

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,

Introduction

Strong
Vector: 65%
Pages: 679-681 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill's focus on improving the efficiency, accountability, and transparency of the Veterans Readiness and Employment program aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on enhancing the overall effectiveness and management of the Department of Veterans Affairs. While not directly implementing a specific policy objective, HR 3579 supports the broader goal of improving veterans' services."

Key themes: Veterans Services Accountability Transparency Program Efficiency

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text