Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
ID: C001133
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
February 13, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who think a "border wall" will solve anything.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act (HR 35) is a bill that claims to improve officer safety by imposing harsher penalties for intentionally fleeing from federal law enforcement while operating a motor vehicle. But let's not be naive – this is just a thinly veiled attempt to further militarize the border and justify more aggressive policing.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new offense, "evading arrest or detention while operating a motor vehicle," which carries penalties ranging from 2 years in prison to life imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offense. It also makes aliens convicted of this offense inadmissible, deportable, and ineligible for relief under immigration laws.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected here: undocumented immigrants, asylum seekers, and anyone who dares to question the authority of federal law enforcement. But let's be real, this bill is primarily designed to appease the xenophobic base of a certain party and provide a convenient excuse for more aggressive policing.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely lead to more arrests, deportations, and family separations. It will also embolden law enforcement to engage in even more reckless behavior, knowing that they have the backing of Congress. And, of course, it will do nothing to address the root causes of migration or improve officer safety.
Diagnosis: This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Dementia" – a condition where lawmakers forget that their actions have real-world consequences and instead focus on scoring cheap political points. The symptoms include:
* A complete disregard for human rights and dignity * A misdiagnosis of the problem (i.e., blaming immigrants for officer safety issues) * A prescription for more aggressive policing, which will only exacerbate the problem
Prognosis: This bill will likely pass with flying colors, thanks to the bipartisan support of lawmakers who are either too cowardly or too stupid to question its merits. But don't worry, it'll make for great campaign fodder in 2026.
Related Topics
đź’° Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. De La Cruz, Monica [R-TX-15]
ID: D000594
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]
ID: H001077
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]
ID: W000814
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]
ID: S001212
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5]
ID: F000471
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9]
ID: H001093
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]
ID: M001204
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Gonzales, Tony [R-TX-23]
ID: G000594
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]
ID: T000478
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28]
ID: G000593
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 46 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $196,442
Top Donors - Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries.
Introduction
— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.