To amend title XVIII to reform the Medicare Advantage program.

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/3467
Last Updated: June 4, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1]

ID: S001183

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2408-2410)

June 3, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

âś…

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity and expose its true intentions.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The stated purpose of HR 3467 is to "reform" the Medicare Advantage program. How quaint. In reality, this bill is a Trojan horse designed to further entrench the interests of insurance companies and healthcare providers at the expense of patients and taxpayers.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

1. **Capitated Payments**: The bill mandates that Medicare Advantage plans use capitated payments, which will inevitably lead to more restrictive networks and reduced access to care for beneficiaries. 2. **Payment Modifications**: The bill reduces blended benchmark rates, modifies risk adjustment requirements, and eliminates quality benchmark increases. These changes will result in lower reimbursement rates for providers, leading to decreased quality of care and increased costs for patients. 3. **Automatic Enrollment**: Beneficiaries will be automatically enrolled into the lowest-premium Medicare Advantage plan available, with an opt-out provision that's about as useful as a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. 4. **Mandatory Continuous Enrollment**: Patients will be locked into their chosen plan for three years, with limited exceptions. This provision is designed to prevent patients from escaping poor-quality plans and seeking better care elsewhere.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

1. **Insurance Companies**: They'll reap the benefits of reduced reimbursement rates and increased patient lock-in. 2. **Healthcare Providers**: They'll face decreased reimbursement rates and increased administrative burdens, leading to reduced quality of care. 3. **Patients**: They'll be forced into restrictive plans with limited provider networks, reduced access to care, and higher out-of-pocket costs.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

1. **Reduced Access to Care**: Patients will face barriers to accessing necessary care due to restricted provider networks and decreased reimbursement rates. 2. **Increased Costs**: Patients will bear the brunt of increased out-of-pocket costs, while insurance companies and healthcare providers reap the benefits. 3. **Decreased Quality of Care**: Providers will be incentivized to prioritize profits over patient outcomes, leading to a decline in overall quality of care.

In conclusion, HR 3467 is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. It's a bill designed to perpetuate the interests of powerful stakeholders at the expense of vulnerable patients and taxpayers. The real disease here is not the Medicare Advantage program, but rather the corrupting influence of money and power on our healthcare system.

Related Topics

Transportation & Infrastructure Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence State & Local Government Affairs Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Congressional Rules & Procedures Civil Rights & Liberties
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$105,804
20 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$47,104
Committees
$0
Individuals
$58,700

No PAC contributions found

1
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
5 transactions
$9,600
2
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
3
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$6,600
4
HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS
2 transactions
$5,800
5
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
6
WSS
1 transaction
$3,300
7
MASHANTUCKET (WESTERN) PEQUOT TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
8
COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES
2 transactions
$3,000
9
ONEIDA NATION
2 transactions
$3,000
10
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,650
11
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$500
12
POPOLO
1 transaction
$454

No committee contributions found

1
STOCKWELL, JESSE
1 transaction
$10,000
2
STENSON, ERIC
1 transaction
$10,000
3
HOWARD, DAX
2 transactions
$10,000
4
BRUSER, KENNAN R.
1 transaction
$7,100
5
GROSE, MADISON
1 transaction
$6,600
6
WILSON, MICHAEL D.
1 transaction
$5,000
7
MILZCIK, EILEEN
1 transaction
$5,000
8
MILZCIK, GREGORY
1 transaction
$5,000

Donor Network - Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 21 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $105,804

Top Donors - Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

12 Orgs8 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Introduction

Strong
Vector: 71%
Pages: 497-499 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 3467 aligns with Project 2025's objectives to reform Medicare Advantage, including making it the default enrollment option and removing burdensome policies that micromanage MA plans. The bill also shares goals related to payment model reforms and beneficiary experience enhancements."

Key themes: Medicare Advantage Reform Payment Model Reforms Beneficiary Experience Enhancements

— 465 — Department of Health and Human Services 1. Make Medicare Advantage the default enrollment option. 2. Give beneficiaries direct control of how they spend Medicare dollars. 3. Remove burdensome policies that micromanage MA plans. 4. Replace the complex formula-based payment model with a competitive bidding model. 5. Reconfigure the current risk adjustment model. 6. Remove restrictions on key benefits and services, including those related to prescription drugs, hospice care, and medical savings account plans.26 Legacy Medicare Reform. Legislation reforming legacy (non-MA) Medicare should: l Base payments on the health status of the patient or intensity of the service rather than where the patient happens to receive that service. l Replace the bureaucrat-driven fee-for-service system with value- based payments to empower patients to find the care that best serves their needs. l Codify price transparency regulations. l Restructure 340B drug subsidies27 toward beneficiaries rather than hospitals. l Repeal harmful health policies enacted under the Obama and Biden Administrations such as the Medicare Shared Savings Program28 and Inflation Reduction Act.29 Medicare Part D Reform. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) created a drug price negotiation program in Medicare that replaced the existing private-sector negotiations in Part D with government price controls for prescription drugs. These government price controls will limit access to medications and reduce patient access to new medication. This “negotiation” program should be repealed, and reforms in Part D that will have meaningful impact for seniors should be pursued. Other reforms should include eliminating the coverage gap in Part D, reducing the government share in — 466 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise the catastrophic tier, and requiring manufacturers to bear a larger share. Until the IRA is repealed, an Administration that is required to implement it must do so in a way that is prudent with its authority, minimizing the harmful effects of the law’s policies and avoiding even worse unintended consequences.30 Medicaid. Over the past 45 years, Medicaid and the health safety net have evolved into a cumbersome, complicated, and unaffordable burden on nearly every state. The program is failing some of the most vulnerable patients; is a prime target for waste, fraud, and abuse; and is consuming more of state and federal budgets. The dramatic increase in Medicaid expenditures is due in large part to the ACA (Obamacare), which mandates that states must expand their Medicaid eligibility standards to include all individuals at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), and the public health emergency, which has prohibited states from performing basic eligibility reviews. The overlap of available benefits among the various health agencies has led to a complex, confusing system that is nearly impossible to navigate—even for recipients. Recipients are often faced with a “welfare cliff” of benefit losses as they earn above a certain amount, which is contrary to the fundamental purpose of empowering individuals to achieve economic independence. Benefits increasingly involve nonmedical services such as air conditioning and housing, many of which are already handled by departments other than HHS. Improper payments within Medicaid are higher than those of any other federal program. These payments are evidence of the inappropriateness of Medicaid’s expansion, which, stemming largely from public health emergency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirements and the Affordable Care Act, has crowded out the primary targets of these programs: those who are most in need. True health care reform cannot be accomplished in a bureaucratic silo or only through Medicaid and health safety net programs. Reform of the tax code is also essential to genuine, effective reform of our health care system. All components of the health care system should be part of the reform efforts, and it is imperative that the system be modified to assist states with their current programs. Therefore, the next Administration should: l Reform financing. Allow states to have a more flexible, accountable, predictable, transparent, and efficient financing mechanism to deliver medical services. This system should include a more balanced or blended match rate, block grants, aggregate caps, or per capita caps. Any financial system should be designed to encourage and incentivize innovation and the efficient delivery of health care services. Federal and state financial participation in the Medicaid program should be rational, predictable, and reasonable. It should also incentivize states to save money and improve the quality of health care.

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text