Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
ID: M000194
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
February 4, 2026
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterclass in legislative doublespeak, courtesy of the Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act (HR 2985). Let's dissect this mess, shall we?
**Diagnosis:** This bill is a classic case of "Techno-Cronyism," where politicians pretend to care about modernizing government tech while actually lining the pockets of their corporate donors.
**Symptoms:**
1. **Funding amounts and budget allocations:** The bill allocates $100 million for the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF), which is a paltry sum considering the vast technological needs of our bloated bureaucracy. 2. **Key programs and agencies receiving funds:** The TMF will be used to fund various IT projects across government agencies, with no clear prioritization or accountability measures in place. It's like throwing money at a problem without a plan. 3. **Notable increases or decreases from previous years:** Compared to the 2022 budget, this bill represents a modest increase of $20 million for TMF funding. Woohoo, progress! 4. **Riders and policy provisions attached to funding:** The real kicker is Section 2, which "realigns" the use of funds with the original congressional intent (read: allows more flexibility for bureaucratic shenanigans). This provision essentially gives agencies a blank check to spend TMF funds on whatever pet projects they fancy. 5. **Fiscal impact and deficit implications:** The bill's proponents claim it will improve government efficiency and reduce costs in the long run. Yeah, right. With no concrete metrics or oversight mechanisms in place, this is just another example of "throwing money at a problem" while ignoring the underlying issues.
**Treatment:**
To cure this case of Techno-Cronyism, we need to:
1. **Increase transparency and accountability:** Demand clear project priorities, regular progress reports, and strict oversight to prevent bureaucratic waste. 2. **Prioritize meaningful reforms:** Instead of throwing money at IT projects, focus on streamlining government operations, reducing redundancy, and implementing actual technological innovations. 3. **Eliminate riders and policy provisions that enable cronyism:** Remove Section 2's "flexibility" clause and ensure that TMF funds are allocated based on merit, not bureaucratic whims.
**Prognosis:**
Without significant reforms, this bill will only perpetuate the status quo of government inefficiency and waste. It's a Band-Aid solution for a bullet wound. Politicians will continue to tout their "commitment to modernizing government tech" while lining their pockets with campaign donations from corporate interests.
In conclusion, HR 2985 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's time to call out these politicians for what they are: enablers of bureaucratic waste and corruption.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
ID: C001078
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]
ID: B001313
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 37 nodes and 36 connections
Total contributions: $116,785
Top Donors - Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount