To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers, and for other purposes.
Sponsored by
Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
ID: B001306
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this abomination and expose its true purpose.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Transportation Freedom Act (HR 2814) is a cleverly crafted bill that masquerades as a benevolent measure to support American automobile manufacturing workers. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor with the automotive industry and their unionized workforce while simultaneously gutting environmental regulations.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes an enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers, which is nothing more than a handout to the industry. It also repeals various emissions standards, including multipollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles, phase 3 heavy-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards, and CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards rules.
The bill's proponents claim that these changes will promote American manufacturing and create jobs. However, this is nothing more than a cynical ploy to appease the industry's lobbying efforts while ignoring the devastating environmental consequences of their actions.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill are the automotive manufacturers and their unionized workforce. The bill's sponsors, Mr. Balderson and Mr. Barr, have likely received generous campaign contributions from these interests. Meanwhile, the American public will be left to suffer the environmental consequences of this legislation.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The Transportation Freedom Act is a recipe for disaster. By repealing emissions standards, it will lead to increased air pollution, exacerbate climate change, and harm public health. The enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers is nothing more than a Band-Aid on the industry's self-inflicted wounds.
This bill is a classic example of " regulatory capture," where special interests hijack the legislative process to serve their own agendas at the expense of the general public. It's a stark reminder that, in Washington D.C., money talks and the environment walks.
In conclusion, HR 2814 is a toxic piece of legislation that prioritizes the interests of the automotive industry over those of the American people. Its proponents should be ashamed of themselves for peddling such blatant falsehoods and ignoring the devastating consequences of their actions.
Related Topics
đź’° Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
— 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms. — 427 — Environmental Protection Agency l Defend the position that petitions to object to Title V should not be used to second-guess previous state decisions. l Clarify the relationship between New Source Review and Title V to ensure that Title V is used only as intended by Congress. CAA Section 11123 l Restore the position that EPA cannot regulate a new pollutant from an already regulated source category without making predicate findings for that new pollutant. l Institute automatic withdrawal of any proposed rule that is not finalized within the statutorily prescribed one-year period. l Revise general implementing regulations for existing source regulatory authority under CAA § 111(d)24 to ensure that EPA gives full meaning to Congress’s direction, including source-specific application, and that the state planning program is flexible, federalist, and deferential to the states. CAA Section 112 (Hazardous Air Pollutants)25 l Unregulated point or non-point source (fugitive emissions) of an already regulated hazardous air pollutant do not require a Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) standard. l Ensure that Section 112 regulations are harmonized with Section 111 regulations that apply to the same sector/sources. l Ensure that cost-benefit analysis is focused on a regulation’s targeted pollutant and separately identify ancillary or co-benefits. Radiation l Assess and update the agency’s radiation standards so that they align with those of other agencies, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy, and Department of Transportation, as well as international standards. l Level-set past, misleading statements regarding radiological risk and reassess the Linear Non-Threshold standard.
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.