LIZARD Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
ID: P000048
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
đ Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
đ How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative lunacy, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The LIZARD Act of 2025 - because who needs an actual acronym when you can just spell out a reptile's name and pretend it's clever?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** To delist the dunes sagebrush lizard from the Endangered Species List, thereby allowing oil and gas companies to drill with reckless abandon in its habitats. Because, clearly, the only thing standing between America and energy independence is a tiny, spiky lizard.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**
* The bill removes the dunes sagebrush lizard from the lists of threatened and endangered species, effectively neutering the Endangered Species Act. * It amends Section 4(a) of the ESA to exclude the lizard from future listings, ensuring that no pesky scientists or conservationists can ever try to protect it again.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
* The oil and gas industry: They're the real winners here. With the lizard out of the way, they can frack and drill to their hearts' content. * Environmental groups: They'll be left crying in the wilderness (literally) as their efforts to protect this species are rendered moot. * The dunes sagebrush lizard: Well, it's not like anyone actually cares about its well-being. It's just a tiny, insignificant creature that happens to live in areas with valuable fossil fuels.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
* This bill is a symptom of the chronic disease known as " Politician-itis": a condition where elected officials prioritize short-term gains and campaign donations over long-term consequences and actual governance. * It's a classic case of " Species-icide by Legislation" - where politicians use their power to deliberately harm or destroy a species for the benefit of special interests. * The real impact will be felt in the ecosystems that rely on this lizard, which will likely suffer irreparable damage. But hey, who needs biodiversity when you have oil and gas?
In conclusion, the LIZARD Act is a masterclass in legislative malpractice. It's a bill that says, "We don't care about science, we don't care about conservation, and we definitely don't care about this lizard." Bravo, Congress. You've managed to make a mockery of the Endangered Species Act and proved once again that you're more interested in serving your corporate overlords than protecting the environment.
Diagnosis: Terminal Stupidity with symptoms of Corruption, Greed, and Environmental Neglect. Prognosis: Poor.
Related Topics
đ° Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Congress 119 ⢠2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Donor Network - Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 17 nodes and 23 connections
Total contributions: $101,135
Top Donors - Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
â 539 â Department of the Interior ENDNOTES 1. See generally William Perry Pendley, Sagebrush Rebel: Reaganâs Battle with Environmental Extremists and Why It Matters Today (Regnery, 2013), preface, pp. xvi-xxii. 2. U.S. Const. art. IV, § 3, cl. 2. âThe Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.â 3. In Wyoming, the federal government owns 48 percent of the land; in Wyomingâs Teton County, the federal government owns 97 percent of the land. 4. Pendley, Sagebrush Rebel. 5. Keith Schneider, âThe 1992 Campaign; Bush on the Environment: A Record of Contradictions,â New York Times, July 4, 1992, https://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/04/us/the-1992-campaign-bush-on-the-environment-a- record-of-contradictions.html (accessed March 15, 2023). 6. William Perry Pendley, War on the West: Government Tyranny on Americaâs Great Frontier (Regnery, 1995). 7. William Perry Pendley, âBureau of Land Management Yesterday and Today: Energy Independence,â Cowboy State Daily, April 5, 2022, https://cowboystatedaily.com/2022/04/05/bureau-of-land-management- yesterday-and-today-energy-independence/ (accessed March 15, 2023). 9. Ibid. 9. William Perry Pendley, âPerspective: Bidenâs War on Western Energy,â The Gazette, November 6, 2022, https:// gazette.com/opinion/perspective-biden-s-war-on-western-energy/article_3823a584-5bb2-11ed-a598- 235c22e34687.html (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Ibid. 11. Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960, Public Law 86â517. 12. Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 159 (August 20, 2021), pp. 46873â46877. 13. Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 19 (February 1, 2021), pp. 7619â7633, and White House, âExecutive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,â January 20, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order- protecting-public-health-and-environment-and-restoring-science-to-tackle-climate-crisis/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 14. National Environmental Policy Act, Public Law 91â160. 15. Antiquities Act of 1906, Public Law 59â209. 16. âYou know what thereâs not is a shall for? âI shall manage the land to stop climate change,â or something similar to that,â Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt testified. âYou guys come up with the shalls.â Chris DâAngelo, âInterior Secretary Blames Congress for His Inaction on Climate Change,â High Country News, May 9, 2019. 17. Federal Land Policy and Land Management Act of 1976, Public Law 94â579; Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Public Law 95â372; and 30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq. 18. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3398: Revocation of Secretaryâs Orders Inconsistent with Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,â April 16, 2021, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3398-508_0.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 19. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3348: Concerning the Federal Coal Moratorium,â March 29, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/so_3348_coal_moratorium.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 20. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3349: American Energy Independence,â March 29, 2017, https:// www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/so_3349_-american_energy_independence.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 21. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3350: America First Offshore Energy Strategy,â May 1, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/press-release/secretarial-order-3350-offshore-508.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 22. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3351: Strengthening the Department of the Interiorâs Energy Portfolio,â May 1, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/press-release/secretarial-order-3351-energy- counselor-508.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 23. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3352: National Petroleum ReserveâAlaska,â May 31, 2017, https:// www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/so-3352.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023).
Introduction
â 539 â Department of the Interior ENDNOTES 1. See generally William Perry Pendley, Sagebrush Rebel: Reaganâs Battle with Environmental Extremists and Why It Matters Today (Regnery, 2013), preface, pp. xvi-xxii. 2. U.S. Const. art. IV, § 3, cl. 2. âThe Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.â 3. In Wyoming, the federal government owns 48 percent of the land; in Wyomingâs Teton County, the federal government owns 97 percent of the land. 4. Pendley, Sagebrush Rebel. 5. Keith Schneider, âThe 1992 Campaign; Bush on the Environment: A Record of Contradictions,â New York Times, July 4, 1992, https://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/04/us/the-1992-campaign-bush-on-the-environment-a- record-of-contradictions.html (accessed March 15, 2023). 6. William Perry Pendley, War on the West: Government Tyranny on Americaâs Great Frontier (Regnery, 1995). 7. William Perry Pendley, âBureau of Land Management Yesterday and Today: Energy Independence,â Cowboy State Daily, April 5, 2022, https://cowboystatedaily.com/2022/04/05/bureau-of-land-management- yesterday-and-today-energy-independence/ (accessed March 15, 2023). 9. Ibid. 9. William Perry Pendley, âPerspective: Bidenâs War on Western Energy,â The Gazette, November 6, 2022, https:// gazette.com/opinion/perspective-biden-s-war-on-western-energy/article_3823a584-5bb2-11ed-a598- 235c22e34687.html (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Ibid. 11. Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960, Public Law 86â517. 12. Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 159 (August 20, 2021), pp. 46873â46877. 13. Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 19 (February 1, 2021), pp. 7619â7633, and White House, âExecutive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,â January 20, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order- protecting-public-health-and-environment-and-restoring-science-to-tackle-climate-crisis/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 14. National Environmental Policy Act, Public Law 91â160. 15. Antiquities Act of 1906, Public Law 59â209. 16. âYou know what thereâs not is a shall for? âI shall manage the land to stop climate change,â or something similar to that,â Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt testified. âYou guys come up with the shalls.â Chris DâAngelo, âInterior Secretary Blames Congress for His Inaction on Climate Change,â High Country News, May 9, 2019. 17. Federal Land Policy and Land Management Act of 1976, Public Law 94â579; Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Public Law 95â372; and 30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq. 18. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3398: Revocation of Secretaryâs Orders Inconsistent with Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,â April 16, 2021, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3398-508_0.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 19. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3348: Concerning the Federal Coal Moratorium,â March 29, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/so_3348_coal_moratorium.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 20. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3349: American Energy Independence,â March 29, 2017, https:// www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/so_3349_-american_energy_independence.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 21. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3350: America First Offshore Energy Strategy,â May 1, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/press-release/secretarial-order-3350-offshore-508.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 22. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3351: Strengthening the Department of the Interiorâs Energy Portfolio,â May 1, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/press-release/secretarial-order-3351-energy- counselor-508.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 23. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3352: National Petroleum ReserveâAlaska,â May 31, 2017, https:// www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/so-3352.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). â 540 â Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 24. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3354: Supporting and Improving the Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program and Federal Solid Mineral Leasing Program, July 6, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/ files/uploads/so_-_3354_signed.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 25. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3355: Streamlining National Environmental Policy Reviews and Implementation of Executive Order 13807, âEstablishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure Projects,â August 31, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/ files/elips/documents/3355_-_streamlining_national_environmental_policy_reviews_and_implementation_ of_executive_order_13807_establishing_discipline_and_accountability_in_the_environmental_review_ and_permitting_process_for.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 26. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3358: Executive Committee for Expedited Permitting,â October 25, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so_3358_executive_committee_for_ expedited_permitting_0.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 27. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3360: Rescinding Authorities Inconsistent with Secretaryâs Order 3349, âAmerican Energy Independence,â December 22, 2017, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/ documents/3360_-_rescinding_authorities_inconsistent_with_secretarys_order_3349_american_energy_ independence.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 28. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3380: Public Notice of the Costs Associated with Developing Department of the Interior Publications and Similar Documents,â March 10, 2020, https://www.doi.gov/sites/ doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3398-508_0.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 29. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3385: Enforcement Priorities,â September 14, 2020, https:// www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/signed-so-3385-enforcement-priorities.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 30. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder 3389: Coordinating and Clarifying National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Reviews,â September 14, 2020, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/signed- so-3385-enforcement-priorities.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 31. Bureau of Land Management, âUpdating Oil and Gas Leasing Reform: Land Use Planning and Lease Parcel Reviews,â IM 2018â034, January 31, 2018, https://www.blm.gov/policy/im-2018-034 (accessed March 16, 2023). 32. Lease Now Act, S. 4228, 117th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2022). 33. ONSHORE Act, S. 218, 116th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2019). https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate- bill/218/text (accessed March 18, 2023). 34. Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 130 (July 8, 2022), pp. 40859â40863. 35. The Biden Administrationâs 2023â2028 proposed program is fatally flawed. Katie Tubb, âComment for the 2023â2028 National OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Program,â BOEMâ2022â0031, October 6, 2022, http:// thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2022/Regulatory_Comments/BOEM%202023-2028%20lease%20plan%20 comment%20KTubb.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 36. See Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117â169, §§ 50261â50263. 37. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Public Law No. 115â97, § 20001, and U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3401: Comprehensive Analysis and Temporary Halt on All Activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Relating to the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program,â June 1, 2021, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/ documents/so-3401-comprehensive-analysis-and-temporary-halt-on-all-activitives-in-the-arctic-national- wildlife-refuge-relating-to-the-coastal-plain-oil-and-gas-leasing-program.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 38. In 2016, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell instituted a moratorium on new coal leases while conducting a programmatic environmental impact statement under NEPA to address concerns about competition and inconsistency with the Obama Administrationâs climate policy. In 2017, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke lifted the moratorium and ended development of a programmatic environmental impact statement. In April 2021, Interior Secretary Debra Haaland rescinded Zinkeâs order and initiated a new review of the coal-leasing program. See U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3338: Discretionary Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement to Modernize the Federal Coal Program,â January 15, 2016, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi. gov/files/elips/documents/archived-3338_-discretionary_programmatic_environmental_impact_statement_ to_modernize_the_federal_coal_program.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023); U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3348â; U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3398â; and Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 159 (August 20, 2021), pp. 46873â46877.
Introduction
â 528 â Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise BLMâs LEOs must keep in touch, work closely, and coordinate with fellow fed- eral, state, and local law enforcement officers. In the Trump Administration, they joined state and local law enforcement in arresting dangerous suspects in Cortez, Colorado; responded to a request from a rural sheriff in Arizona to rescue a family stuck in freezing temperatures; and, teamed up in an all-hands-on-deck effort to locate a missing American Indian teenager in rural Montana. More important, western LEOs need the assurance that the BLM LEOs with whom they work are professionals who report through a professional chain of command. Wild Horses and Burros. In 1971, Congress ordered the BLM to manage wild horses and burros to ensure their iconic presence never disappeared from the western landscape. For decades, Congress watched as these herds overwhelmed the landâs ability to sustain them, crowded out indigenous plant and other animal species, threatened the survival of species listed under the Endangered Species Act, invaded private and permitted public land, disturbed private property rights, and turned the sod into concrete. BLM experts said in 2019 that some affected land will never recover from this unmitigated damage. There are 95,000 wild horses and burros roaming nearly 32 million acres in the Westâtriple what scientists and land management experts say the range can sup- port. These animals face starvation and death from lack of forage and water. The population has more than doubled in just the past 10 years and continues to grow at a rate of 10 to 15 percent annually. This number includes the more than 47,000 animals the BLM has already gathered from public lands, at a cost to the American taxpayer of nearly $50 million annually to care for them in off-range corrals. This is not a new issueâit is not just a western issueâit is an American issue. What is happening to these once-proud beasts of burden is neither compassionate nor humane, and what these animals are doing to federal lands and fragile ecosys- tems is unacceptable. In 2019, the American Association of Equine Practitioners and the American Veterinary Medication Associationâtwo of the largest organi- zations of professional veterinarians in the worldâissued a joint policy calling for further reducing overpopulation to protect the health and well-being of wild horses and burros on public lands. The National Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board, a panel of nine experts and professionals convened to advise the BLM, endorsed the joint policy. Furthermore, animal welfare organizations such as the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the Humane Society of the United States recognize that the prosperity of wild horses and burros on public lands is threatened if herds continue to grow unabated. The BLMâs multi-pronged approach in its 2020 Report to Congress46 included expanded adoptions and sales of horses gathered from overpopulated herds; increased gathers and increased capacity for off-range holding facilities and pas- tures; more effective use of fertility control efforts; and improved research, in concert with the academic and veterinary communities, to identify more effective â 529 â Department of the Interior contraceptive techniques and strategies. All of that will not be enough to solve the problem, however. Congress must enact laws permitting the BLM to dispose humanely of these animals. IMMEDIATE ACTIONS REGARDING ALASKA Alaska is a special case and deserves immediate action.47 When Alaska was admitted to the Union in 1959, nearly its entire landmass was federally owned; therefore, Alaska was granted the right to select 104 million acres (out of 375 million acres) to manage for the benefit of its residents.48 In less than eight years, Alaska selected 26 million acres. Then-Interior Secretary Stewart Udallâwho served during the Kennedy and Johnson Administrationsâput a freeze on further land selections to protect any claims that might be asserted by Native Alaskans.49 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. The discovery of oil at Prudhoe Bay in 1968 made resolution of the issue by Congress a matter of urgency. As a result, in 1971, Congress passed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), which allowed the Native community to select 44 million acres.50 Environmentalists, upset that too much of the land they coveted would be selected by the state and Native Alaskans for development, demanded the inclusion in the act of a provisionâSection 17(d)(2)âthat ordered the Interior Secretary to withdraw 80 million acres for future designation by Congress as parks, refuges, wild and scenic rivers, and national forests.51 The deadline for this congressional action was 1978, and as it neared, the Carter Administration, impatient and worried, decided to force Congressâs hand. The Administration unilaterally withdrew 100 million acres from any use by the state or Native Alaskans.52 Alaska promptly sued, charging that the Administration had failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act.53 In a lame duck session at the end of 1980, Congress passed (over the objec- tions of the Alaskan delegation) the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, which revoked all of the withdrawals of the Carter Administration and sub- stituted congressional designations that put 100 million acres permanently in federal enclaves, doubled the acreage of national parks and refuges, and tripled the amount of land declared to be wilderness.54 Through all of this, Alaska pressed for the DOI to convey the lands to which Alaska was entitled by federal law, but the department grudgingly transferred only portions of that land. By the time Ronald Reagan took office, Alaska had received less than half the lands to which it was entitled after its admission into the Union, and Native Alas- kans had received only one-third of the land due to them.55 From January of 1981 through 1983, however, under Reagan, Alaska received 30 million acres and a com- mitment of land transfers at the rate of 13 million acres annually. In the same period, Native Alaskans received 11 million acres, which constituted nearly 60 percent of their entitlement, and an additional 15 million acres were transferred by the end of 1988.56
Showing 3 of 5 policy matches
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.