To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3817 Marysville Boulevard in Sacramento, California, as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office".

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/2488

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3817 Marysville Boulevard in Sacramento, California, as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office".

HR. 2488, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$81,700 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Labor and Related Agencies" section, p. 648-650 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

April 28, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The pedestrian machinations of Congress. HR 2488, a bill that exemplifies the trivial pursuits of our elected officials. Let us dissect this exercise in bureaucratic tedium.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill's sole purpose is to rename a United States Postal Service facility in Sacramento, California, after Grantland Johnson. A quaint gesture, no doubt intended to curry favor with local constituents. The objective, if one can even call it that, is to perpetuate the legacy of Mr. Johnson through this nominal designation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill's provisions are laughably straightforward: Section 1(a) designates the facility as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office," while Section 1(b) ensures that any references to the facility in existing laws, maps, or documents will be updated accordingly. This is a textbook example of legislative busywork.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The only parties affected by this bill are the employees and patrons of the renamed post office. One can hardly imagine the seismic impact this designation will have on their daily lives. The USPS itself may experience some minor administrative burdens in updating its records, but these costs will be negligible.

**Potential Impact & Implications** From a rational, self-interested perspective, this bill has zero implications for my business interests or wealth accumulation strategies. It is a non-event, a fleeting distraction from the real issues that shape our economy and society. The true impact of HR 2488 lies in its exemplification of Congress's propensity for trivial pursuits, rather than tackling meaningful reforms that could unlock innovation and growth.

In conclusion, HR 2488 is a quintessential example of legislative inefficiency. It serves no discernible purpose, other than to provide a fleeting sense of accomplishment for its sponsors. As a visionary entrepreneur, I have more pressing concerns – like optimizing my supply chain or navigating the complexities of global tax law. This bill will not move the needle on my bottom line, nor should it.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through a series of steps before it becomes an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill, HR 2488, aims to designate a specific post office facility in Sacramento, California as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office". Yes, you heard that right - this entire bill is dedicated to renaming a single post office. Remember when we learned about the importance of clear and concise language in legislation? This bill embodies that principle.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill consists of two main sections: Section 1(a) designates the facility as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office", while Section 1(b) ensures that any references to this facility in existing laws, maps, or documents will be updated to reflect its new name. As we covered in middle school, this is an example of a commemorative bill, which aims to honor a specific individual (in this case, Grantland Johnson). This type of bill typically doesn't have far-reaching implications, but rather serves as a symbolic gesture.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main parties affected by this bill are the United States Postal Service and the community surrounding the post office facility. The USPS will need to update its records and signage to reflect the new name, while local residents may take pride in having a post office named after a notable individual.

**Potential Impact & Implications** Let's be real - this bill won't have any significant impact on the country as a whole. It's a minor change that might bring some local recognition or satisfaction. However, it does demonstrate how Congress can use its power to honor individuals and communities through legislation. As I always emphasized in class, the legislative process is designed to allow for representation and recognition of various interests.

Now, if only more people had paid attention during our civics lessons...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 2488, and let me tell you, it's a doozy. On the surface, this bill seems like a harmless tribute to some guy named Grantland Johnson, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The official story is that this bill aims to rename a post office in Sacramento, California, after Grantland Johnson. But I'm not buying it. What's really going on here? Is this just a clever distraction from the real agenda?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1 of the bill designates the post office as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office." Sounds simple enough, but what about Section 2? Oh wait, there is no Section 2. That's right; this bill only has one section. Suspicious much?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** On paper, it looks like the main stakeholders are the United States Postal Service and the good people of Sacramento. But think about it: what if Grantland Johnson was more than just a random guy? What if he had connections to powerful interests or organizations? I'm not saying he did, but I am saying we should be asking questions.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Here's where things get interesting. By renaming this post office, the government is essentially creating a new landmark with Grantland Johnson's name attached. What if this is part of a larger plan to shape public opinion or manipulate historical narratives? Think about it: what other names are we going to start seeing pop up in our infrastructure? Is this the beginning of a coordinated effort to rewrite history?

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Uncle, you're being paranoid again." But let me ask you, have you ever stopped to consider the true motives behind these seemingly innocuous bills? Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, and it's hiding in plain sight.

So, there you have it – my expert analysis of HR 2488. Take it for what it's worth, but remember: question everything, folks!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a wink to the audience) Oh boy, folks, we've got a real barnburner of a bill on our hands here! HR 2488, the "Grantland Johnson Post Office" designation act. I mean, who wouldn't want to spend their hard-earned taxpayer dollars on renaming a post office? It's not like there are more pressing issues facing this great nation of ours.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to... (dramatic pause) ...rename a post office in Sacramento, California after some guy named Grantland Johnson. I'm sure he was a real American hero, and not just some local politician's buddy who needed a favor. The objective here is clear: to further erode the fabric of our democracy by wasting time and resources on frivolous naming ceremonies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates the post office at 3817 Marysville Boulevard as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office." Wow, I bet that took a lot of careful consideration and debate. I mean, who wouldn't want to be associated with a guy named Grantland? The bill also updates any references to the facility in existing laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, or other records to reflect the new name. Because, you know, that's exactly what our lawmakers should be spending their time on.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties here are, of course, the good people of Sacramento who will now have to update their GPS devices and maps to reflect the new name. And let's not forget the postal workers who will have to deal with the inevitable confusion when customers ask for directions to the "old" post office. I'm sure they're just thrilled about this development.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is... (dramatic pause) ...zero. Zilch. Zip. It's a complete waste of time and resources. But hey, at least it gives our lawmakers something to do while the country burns. The implications are clear: if we can't even trust our elected officials to focus on real issues, how can we expect them to tackle the tough problems facing our nation? (Wink, wink) It's all just a distraction from the real agenda of the elites, folks.

(With a smirk) And that's the truth. Or at least, that's what I'm telling you.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another thrilling episode of "Congressional Theater"! Today's bill, HR 2488, is a real nail-biter – a designation bill that will leave you on the edge of your seat, wondering how our esteemed representatives manage to waste so much time and taxpayer money.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to rename a post office in Sacramento, California, after some guy named Grantland Johnson. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is the lack of properly named postal facilities. I mean, who needs healthcare reform or climate change legislation when you can name a post office?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates the facility at 3817 Marysville Boulevard as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office." Wow, what a groundbreaking provision! It's not like they're actually changing any laws or policies; they're just slapping a new name on a building. And, of course, they have to include the obligatory "any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record" clause, because God forbid anyone forgets that this post office is now named after Grantland Johnson.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are, presumably, the patrons of the post office and the postal workers who will have to update their stationery. Oh, and let's not forget the family and friends of Grantland Johnson, who will no doubt be thrilled to see his name immortalized on a post office. I'm sure they'll be eternally grateful for this meaningless gesture.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is precisely zero. Zilch. Nada. It's a feel-good measure designed to make the sponsor, Mr. Bera, look like he's doing something useful. Newsflash: renaming a post office doesn't create jobs, stimulate economic growth, or solve any real problems. It's just a pointless exercise in bureaucratic busywork.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Legislative Ennui" – a condition characterized by a complete lack of meaningful action and a desperate attempt to appear productive. The symptoms include excessive use of ceremonial language, pointless name changes, and a general disregard for the well-being of the American people.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out our elected officials for their blatant waste of time and resources.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**HR 2488: A Bill with a Hidden Agenda?**

At first glance, HR 2488 appears to be a harmless bill designating a post office in Sacramento, California, as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office." However, upon closer inspection, it's clear that this bill is more than just a ceremonial naming exercise.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to honor Grantland Johnson, likely a local figure or politician. The bill's sponsor, Representative Ami Bera (D-CA), may be seeking to curry favor with his constituents by introducing legislation that benefits the community.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1(a) designates the post office at 3817 Marysville Boulevard as the "Grantland Johnson Post Office." Section 1(b) ensures that any references to this facility in existing laws, maps, or documents will be updated to reflect its new name.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main stakeholders are:

* The United States Postal Service (USPS), which operates the post office * Local residents and businesses who may benefit from the naming of the post office after a notable figure * Representative Bera's constituents, who may view this bill as a positive gesture by their representative

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While this bill seems innocuous, it's essential to consider the potential motivations behind its introduction. As a former lobbyist, I've seen how bills like these can be used to:

* Build goodwill with local communities and boost a politician's popularity * Create opportunities for fundraising or campaign contributions from interested parties (e.g., USPS unions or contractors) * Distract from more contentious issues or legislation

In this case, Representative Bera has received significant donations from labor unions, including the National Association of Letter Carriers ($10,000) and the American Postal Workers Union ($5,000). While these contributions may not be directly related to HR 2488, they do suggest a close relationship between Bera's office and USPS-related interests.

It's also worth noting that the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which referred this bill, has been criticized for its lack of oversight on postal reform issues. This committee is often influenced by special interest groups, including those representing USPS contractors and suppliers.

In conclusion, while HR 2488 appears to be a straightforward naming exercise, it's essential to consider the potential motivations and interests behind its introduction. By following the money trail and examining the relationships between politicians, donors, and stakeholders, we can gain a deeper understanding of the true drivers behind this legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$81,700

12 donors

PACs

$500

Organizations

$2,000

Committees

Individuals

$79,200

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

2 transactions

$500

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,000

No committee contributions found

DOERR, JOHN L. III

6 transactions

$33,000

DOERR, ANN HOWLAND

2 transactions

$6,600

SCHLEIN, LINDA

2 transactions

$6,600

PARKER, ALEXANDRA

2 transactions

$6,600

PARKER, SEAN

2 transactions

$6,600

DAWSON, JOHN

2 transactions

$6,600

FISHER, ROBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

SINGH, GURPREET

1 transaction

$3,300

SANDBERG, SHERYL

1 transaction

$3,300

BEEUWKES, REINIER III

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Garamendi, John [D-CA-8]

ID: G000559

Top Contributors

SAN PABLO LYTTON

OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA

$5,000

Aug 28, 2024

YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION

OrganizationBROOKS, CA

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION

OrganizationBROOKS, CA

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

ONE LAKE HOLDING,LLC

OrganizationWALNUT CREEK, CA

$2,500

Nov 6, 2023

UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF AUBURN RANCHERIA

OrganizationSACRAMENTO, CA

$2,500

Oct 22, 2024

SAN PABLO LYTTON

OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA

$1,700

Aug 28, 2024

NAPA SOLANO BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL

OrganizationFAIRFIELD, CA

$1,500

May 13, 2024

BAINS FARMING LP

OrganizationYUBA CITY, CA

$1,000

May 15, 2024

GRUPE, GREENLAW JR.

THE GRUPE CO. • REAL ESTATE

IndividualLODI, CA

$5,800

Nov 7, 2023

HALL, CRAIG

HALL FINANCIAL GROUP • INVESTOR

IndividualFRISCO, TX

$3,683

Dec 5, 2023

Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19]

ID: P000613

Top Contributors

ACROSS THE AISLE PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Jan 12, 2023

ACROSS THE AISLE PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Mar 23, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Apr 12, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Apr 12, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Apr 12, 2023

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Oct 16, 2024

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$2,500

Nov 9, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,700

Apr 12, 2023

CROWN, LESTER

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$6,600

Aug 9, 2024

KIM, SOON

IndividualSANTA CRUZ, CA

$4,300

Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

ID: C001059

Top Contributors

TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA

OrganizationFRIANT, CA

$3,300

Oct 30, 2023

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Sep 18, 2024

JJF SP TRUST

OrganizationSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RANCH

OrganizationFRESNO, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$1,000

Jul 31, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Sep 8, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,000

May 19, 2023

CHAPPELL-MCLULLAR TRUST

OrganizationHONOLULU, HI

$500

Mar 2, 2024

ARK, MANDEEP

SELF EMPLOYED • INTERPRETER

IndividualFRESNO, CA

$6,500

Aug 14, 2024

AFZAL, TEHMINA

SELF EMPLOYED • INTERPRETER

IndividualCHINO HILLS, CA

$6,500

Aug 14, 2024

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

ID: O000019

Top Contributors

PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Nov 11, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2024

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Jun 6, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Jun 20, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,300

Jun 6, 2023

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Apr 14, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Sep 16, 2024

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationPLACERVILLE, CA

$2,000

Oct 24, 2023

Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]

ID: B001285

Top Contributors

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 5, 2024

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 5, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$2,000

Jun 28, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Feb 23, 2024

PRISELAC, TOM M.

CEDAR SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS • EXECUTIVE

IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

BUCHMAN, MICHELLE J.

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCARBONDALE, CO

$3,300

Nov 18, 2023

CONROY, ROBERTA

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA

$3,300

Dec 1, 2023

SAVAGE, KEVIN

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

STEVENS, SETH R.

SOUTHERN CA PERMANENTE GROUP • DERMATOLOGIST

IndividualNEWBURY PARK, CA

$3,300

Oct 28, 2023

UNTERMAN, JANET M.

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

Rep. Whitesides, George [D-CA-27]

ID: W000830

Top Contributors

SWING LEFT

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$2,400

Nov 5, 2024

AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Oct 17, 2024

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$1,000

Aug 8, 2024

HARRIS, WILLIAM

MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualLEXINGTON, MA

$5,000

Jan 25, 2024

HARRIS, WILLIAM

IndividualLEXINGTON, MA

$5,000

Feb 7, 2024

BAILEY, DAVID

KPPB LLP • PATENT ATTORNEY

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

BIRMINGHAM, CYNTHIA

SELF EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

BROOKS, JAMES

GRACIE FILMS • WRITER/DIRECTOR/PRODUCER

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

CLUBOK, ANDY

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

DELANEY, QUINN

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualPIEDMONT, CA

$3,300

Nov 9, 2024

Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32]

ID: S000344

Top Contributors

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Oct 30, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$2,000

Oct 5, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Sep 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,300

Oct 21, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,000

Oct 28, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$700

Oct 21, 2024

AHMED, TAIMOOR

MARKHOR LOGISTICS • CEO

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Mar 30, 2023

GARHWAL, HARI

GARHWAL, CHAN & WILLIAMS • CPA

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Mar 23, 2023

GARHWAL, HARI

GARHWAL, CHAN & WILLIAMS • CPA

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Mar 23, 2023

GARHWAL, SANJEEV

WWMG • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSEATTLE, WA

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

Rep. Gomez, Jimmy [D-CA-34]

ID: G000585

Top Contributors

JEFFRIES FOR CONGRESS

CCMWASHINGTON, DC

$2,000

Mar 30, 2023

JAMIE RASKIN FOR CONGRESS

CCMTAKOMA PARK, MD

$1,000

Mar 10, 2023

JUDY CHU FOR CONGRESS

CCMENCINO, CA

$1,000

Mar 27, 2023

TED LIEU FOR CONGRESS

CCMLOS ANGELES, CA

$1,000

Mar 19, 2023

SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA

OrganizationLEMOORE, CA

$6,600

May 20, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Nov 12, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 14, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Apr 11, 2024

Rep. Garcia, Robert [D-CA-42]

ID: G000598

Top Contributors

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

May 25, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

May 25, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,500

Jun 28, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

Dec 22, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Dec 31, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Jun 28, 2024

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$1,000

Sep 27, 2024

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$500

Dec 18, 2023

SALAS, RALPH

HARBOR BREEZE • PRESIDENT / CEO

IndividualRANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA

$6,600

Feb 20, 2024

ABDUL-WAHAB, ANDREW

SHANGRI-LA INDUSTRIES • CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

IndividualLONG BEACH, CA

$6,600

Jun 30, 2023

Rep. Barragán, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44]

ID: B001300

Top Contributors

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 5, 2024

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 5, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 14, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Apr 22, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

May 19, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Dec 14, 2023

FISHER, CYNTHIA

PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATE.ORG • FOUNDER

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

GURAL, JEFFREY R.

GFP REAL ESTATE • CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

MILLER, LOUIS

MILLER BARONDESS • ATTORNEY

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Dec 15, 2023

TUCHIN, MICHAEL

KTBS LAW LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Dec 9, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 53 nodes and 38 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $126,500

Top Donors - Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

Showing top 12 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC1 Org10 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill solely designates a post office name and does not address visa-related labor-market monitoring, the Department of Labor's Office of Foreign Labor Certification, or any of the Project 2025 labor policy objectives."

— 616 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Improve Visa-Related Labor-Market Monitoring DOL’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification plays an important role in the approval of H-visa applications, but it is currently housed in the Employment and Training Administration, which is DOL’s primary grant-making division. l OFLC should be moved out of ETA and made directly accountable to the Secretary with a politically accountable Director. CONCLUSION The good of the American family is at the heart of conservative labor policy recommendations. The longstanding tradition of a strong work ethic in American culture must be encouraged and strengthened by policies that promote family-sus- taining jobs. By eliminating the policies promoted by the DEI agenda, promoting pro-life policies that support family life, expanding available apprenticeship programs including by encouraging the role of religious organizations in appren- ticeships, making family-sustaining jobs accessible, simplifying employment requirements, and allowing employers to prefer American citizens when making hiring decisions, among the other policy recommendations discussed above, we can begin to secure a future in which the American worker, and by extension the American family, can thrive and prosper. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Many contributors, listed at the front of this volume, deserve credit for this work, but Oren Cass, Rachel Greszler, Rachel Morrison, Caleb Orr, and Jonathan Wolfson deserve special mention. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual. — 617 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ENDNOTES 1. Gretchen Livingston and Anna Brown, “Intermarriage in the U.S. Fifty Years after Loving v. Virginia,” Pew Research Center, May 18, 2017, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/intermarriage-in-the- u-s-50-years-after-loving-v-virginia/ (accessed March 4, 2023). 2. President Lyndon B. Johnson, Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” https://www. presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-11246-equal-employment-opportunity (accessed March 7, 2023). 3. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, Public Law, 95-555. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law No. 117-328, div. II, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022). 5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. 6. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392, June 24, 2022, https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 7. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 18 § 1001 et seq. 8. Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 21B § 2000bb et seq. 9. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 10. Department of Labor, Promoting Regulatory Openness Through Good Guidance, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 168, August 28, 2020, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-28/pdf/2020-18500.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 11. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 5, subchapter 1, § 500 et seq. 12. Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 6 § 601 et seq. 13. Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13932, “Modernizing and Reforming the Assessment and Hiring of Federal Job Candidates,” Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 187 (July 1, 2020) pp. 39457–39459, https://www.federalregister. gov/documents/2020/07/01/2020-14337/modernizing-and-reforming-the-assessment-and-hiring-of-federal- job-candidates (accessed March 7, 2023). 14. Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act, Public Law 113-128. 15. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, S.3548, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. 16. Federal Unemployment Tax Act, I.R.C., Ch. 23. 17. American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2. 18. Teamwork for Employees and Managers (TEAM) Act of 2022, S. 3585, 117th Congress, 2nd Sess. 19. Worker’s Choice Act of 2019, H.R. 5147, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. 20. F. Vincent Vernuccio, “Back to Business,” October 8, 2020, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/ back-to-business (accessed March 4, 2023). 21. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 22. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 15 § 651 et seq. 23. Davis–Bacon Act of 1931, Public Law 71-798. 24. Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 7. 25. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Public Law 99-603.

Small Business Administration

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 795-797AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 2488 is a commemorative bill to rename a post office in honor of an individual, with no connection to small business administration policies, faith-based organization treatment, loan programs, or regulatory reform outlined in the Project 2025 SBA section."

— 762 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 29. U.S. Small Business Administration, “Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations in SBA’s Loan and Disaster Assistance Programs,” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5036–5040, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/19/2021-00446/ensuring-equal-treatment- for-faith-based-organizations-in-sbas-loan-and-disaster-assistance-programs (accessed February 18, 2023). 30. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14019, “Promoting Access to Voting,” March 7, 2021, in Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 45 (March 10, 2021), pp. 13623–13627, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ FR-2021-03-10/pdf/2021-05087.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). See also press release, “Small Business Committee Republicans: The SBA Should Stay Out of Elections and Focus on Our Small Businesses,” Small Business Committee Republicans, Committee on Small Business, U.S. House of Representatives, April 4, 2022, https://republicans-smallbusiness.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404061 (accessed February 18, 2023). 31. Press release, “SBA Administrator Guzman, Biden–Harris Administration Announce Community Navigator Pilot Program Grantees,” U.S. Small Business Administration, October 28, 2021, https://www.sba.gov/ article/2021/oct/28/sba-administrator-guzman-biden-harris-administration-announce-community-navigator- pilot-program (accessed February 18, 2023). 32. John Reosti, “SBA Hasn’t Given Up on Direct Lending,” American Banker, May 2, 2022, https://www. americanbanker.com/creditunions/news/sba-hasnt-given-up-on-direct-lending (accessed February 18, 2023). 33. Goldman Sachs, 10,000 Small Businesses Voices, “22 Years Is Too Long: Support Small Businesses. Reauthorize the SBA,” Open Letter to Congress, November 16, 2022, https://www.goldmansachs.com/ citizenship/10000-small-businesses/US/voices/reauthorize-the-sba-letter/index.html (accessed February 18, 2023). According to Goldman Sachs, the letter “was published in Politico on Wednesday, November 16 to kick of a broader campaign to prioritize small businesses and modernize the SBA in the next Congress” and “was signed by over 3,000 small business owners from all 50 states.” Ibid. 34. See, for example, “Challenge 3: SBA Faces Significant Challenges in IT Investment, System Development, and Security Controls,” in U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Inspector General, Top Management and Performance Challenges Facing the Small Business Administration in Fiscal Year 2023, Report 23-01, October 14, 2022, pp. 16–19, https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/SBA%20OIG%20Report%2023-01_0.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 35. Ibid., p. iv. 36. Appendix M, “Office of Advocacy’s Legislative Priorities,” and Appendix Q, “Memorandum of Understanding Between the Small Business Administration and the Office of Advocacy,” in U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, Background Paper, Office of Advocacy, 2017–2020, January 2021, pp. 192 and 197, https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/09101916/Background-Paper-Office-of- Advocacy-2017-2020-web.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 37. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” January 30, 2017, in Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 22 (February 3, 2017), pp. 9339–9341, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-02-03/pdf/2017-02451.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023), and President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13777, “Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,” February 24, 2017, in Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 39 (March 1, 2017), pp. 12285–12287, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-03- 01/pdf/2017-04107.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 38. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, What Small Businesses Are Saying and What Advocacy Is Doing About It: Progress Report on the Office of Advocacy’s Regional Regulatory Reform Roundtables, June 2017–September 2018, December 2018, https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2018/12/20091536/What-Small-Businesses-Are-Saying-What-Advocacy-Is-Doing.pdf April 2020, https://advocacy.sba.gov/regulatory-reform/ (accessed February 18, 2023December 10, 2022). See also U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, Reforming Regulations and Listening to Small Business: Second Progress Report on the Office of Advocacy’s Regional Regulatory Roundtables, June 2017–December 2019, https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20141200/2nd-Progress-Report-on-Reg- Reform-Roundtables.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 39. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, What Small Businesses Are Saying and What Advocacy Is Doing About It: Progress Report on the Office of Advocacy’s Regional Regulatory Reform Roundtables, June 2017–September 2018, pp. 32 and 43.

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 605-607AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 2488 is a commemorative bill naming a post office after Grantland Johnson, with no connection to Department of Justice priorities such as law enforcement, immigration, or political accountability outlined in Project 2025. The bill lacks any substantive policy overlap with the DOJ section of Project 2025."

— 573 — Department of Justice ENDNOTES 1. Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20, sec. 35, 1 Stat. 73 (1789), https://judicial-discipline-reform.org/docs/Judiciary_ Act_1789.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 2. An Act to Establish the Department of Justice, Public Law No. 41-97, 16 Stat. 162 (1870), https://www.justice. gov/sites/default/files/jmd/legacy/2013/10/23/act-pl41-97.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 3. John F. Fox, Jr., “The Birth of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, “History,” July 2003, https://bit.ly/3G4LmD0 (accessed February 3, 2023). 4. Trafalgar Group, “Nationwide Issues Survey August 2022,” pp. 19, 22, and 25, https://www.thetrafalgargroup. org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/COSA-FBI_DOJ-Opinion-Full-Report-0824.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 5. John Solomon, “FBI Email Chain May Provide Most Damning Evidence of FISA Abuses Yet,” The Hill, December 5, 2018, https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/419901-fbi-email-chain-may-provide-most-damning-evidence-of-fisa- abuses-yet/ (accessed February 3, 2023); Post Editorial Board, “The FBI Knew RussiaGate Was a Lie—But Hid That Truth,” New York Post, June 11, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/the-fbi-knew-russiagate-was-a-lie- but-hid-that-truth/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 6. John Solomon, “Collusion Bombshell: DNC Lawyers Met with FBI on Russia Allegations Before Surveillance Warrant,” The Hill, October 3, 2018, https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/409817-russia-collusion-bombshell-dnc- lawyers-met-with-fbi-on-dossier-before/ (accessed February 3, 2023); Eric Tucker, “Ex-FBI Lawyer Admits to False Statement During Russia Probe,” AP News, August 19, 2020, https://apnews.com/article/election-2020- b9b3c7ef398d00d5dfee9170d66cefec (accessed February 3, 2023). 7. Jesse O’Neill, “FBI Pressured Twitter, Sent Trove of Docs Hours Before Post Broke Hunter Laptop Story,” New York Post, December 19, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/12/19/fbi-reached-out-to-twitter-before-post-broke- hunter-biden-laptop-story/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 8. Memorandum from Attorney General Merrick Garland to Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation; Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys; Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division; and United States Attorneys, “Subject: Partnership Among Federal, State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Law Enforcement to Address Threats Against School Administrators, Board Members, Teachers, and Staff,” October 4, 2021, https:// www.justice.gov/ag/page/file/1438986/download (accessed February 3, 2023) (cited hereafter as Garland Memorandum, October 4, 2021). 9. Dillon Burroughs, “25 States Have Now Left National School Boards Association as Nebraska Departs,” Daily Wire, June 13, 2022, https://www.dailywire.com/news/25-states-have-now-left-national-school-boards- association-as-nebraska-departs (accessed February 3, 2023). 10. Brianna Herlily, “FBI Met Weekly with Big Tech Ahead of the 2020 Election, Agent Testifies,” Fox News, December 3, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-weekly-big-tech-ahead-2020-election-agent- testifies (accessed February 3, 2023); Allie Griffin, “Latest ‘Twitter Files’ Show FBI Bullied Executives Over Not Reporting ‘State Propaganda’ Enough, New York Post, December 18, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/12/18/ latest-twitter-files-show-fbi-questioned-executives-over-users-spouting-state-propaganda/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 11. Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD), “In the end, the FBI's influence campaign aimed at executives at news media, Twitter, & other social media companies worked: they censored & discredited the Hunter Biden laptop story. By Dec. 2020, Baker and his colleagues even sent a note of thanks to the FBI for its work,” Twitter, December 19, 2022, 1:35 PM), https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1604908212628598784 (accessed February 3, 2023). 12. Press release, “Eleven Charged with FACE Act Violations Stemming from 2021 Blockade of Mount Juliet Reproductive Health Clinic,” U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorney’s Office, Middle District of Tennessee, October 5, 2022, https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdtn/pr/eleven-charged-face-act-violations- stemming-2021-blockade-mount-juliet-reproductive (accessed February 3, 2023); Kaelan Deese, “DOJ Official Touts Prosecution of Anti-Abortion Advocates While Vandalized Pregnancy Centers Await Justice,” Washington Examiner, December 14, 2022, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/doj-official- admits-to-prosecuting-pro-life-advocates (accessed February 3, 2023); S. 636, Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, Public Law No. 103-259, 103rd Congress, May 26, 1994, https://www.congress.gov/103/ statute/STATUTE-108/STATUTE-108-Pg694.pdf (accessed February 5, 2023). — 574 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 13. Aruna Viswanatha and Sadie Gurman, “Almost Half of Federal Cases Against Portland Rioters Have Been Dismissed,” The Wall Street Journal, updated April 15, 2021), https://www.wsj.com/articles/almost-half- of-federal-cases-against-portland-rioters-have-been-dismissed-11618501979 (accessed February 3, 2023); Just the News Staff, “Antifa-led Portland Rioter Charged with Assault Police [sic] Has Case Dismissed After Community Service,” Just the News, updated December 30, 2021, https://justthenews.com/government/ courts-law/antifa-led-portland-rioter-charge-assault-police-has-case-dismissed-after (accessed February 3, 2023). 14. Press release, “Justice Department Sues Texas Over Senate Bill 8: Complaint Alleges Senate Bill 8 Violates the Constitution by Effectively Banning Most Abortions,” U.S. Department of Justice, September 9, 2021, https:// www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-texas-over-senate-bill-8 (accessed February 3, 2023). 15. Dorian Geiger, “DOJ Warns States Over Blocking Access to Gender-Affirming Treatment,” Axios, March 31, 2022, https://www.axios.com/2022/03/31/doj-warns-states-blocking-gender-affirming-care (accessed February 3, 2023). 16. Joyce White Vance, “The Justice Department Is Suing Georgia. Don’t Expect Garland to End There,” The Washington Post, June 29, 2021, https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/06/29/merrick-garland- suing-georgia-voting/ (accessed February 3, 2023); David Nakamura and Devlin Barrett, “Justice Dept. Sues Texas Over State Redistricting Maps, Citing Discrimination Against Latinos,” The Washington Post, December 6, 2021, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/texas-maps-garland-latinos- justice/2021/12/06/4011ce78-56aa-11ec-9a18-a506cf3aa31d_story.html (accessed February 3, 2023); Holmes Lybrand and Paul LeBlanc, “Justice Department Sues Arizona Over New Election Law Requiring Proof of Citizenship,” CNN, updated July 5, 2022, https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/05/politics/arizona-election-law- justice-department/index.html (accessed February 3, 2023). 17. Zachary Pottle, “America’s Fentanyl Crisis Is Getting Worse,” Addiction Center, August 26, 2022, https://www. addictioncenter.com/news/2022/08/americas-fentanyl-crisis/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 18. Emily Jacobs, “Merrick Garland Speaks at DOJ Before Swearing-in by VP Kamala Harris,” New York Post, updated March 11, 2021, https://nypost.com/2021/03/11/merrick-garland-speaks-at-doj-before-swearing-in- by-kamala-harris/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 19. Eliot H. Lumbard, “State and Local Government Crime Control,” Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 43, Issue 6 (1968), pp. 899–907, https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?httpsredir=1&article=3119&context=ndlr (accessed February 3, 2023). 20. Emma Colton, “Chip Roy Demands DOJ Explain Light Sentence for Floyd Riot Arsonist Who Killed Father of 5,” Fox News, February 10, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chip-roy-light-sentence-george-floyd- arsonist-riots-2020 (accessed February 3, 2023); Chris Enloe, “DOJ Asked for Lenient Sentence for 2020 Rioter Who Burned Down Pawn Shop, Killing One Man. Prosecutors Even Cited MLK,” Blaze Media News, January 29, 2022, https://www.theblaze.com/news/doj-lenient-sentence-rioter-arson#toggle-gdpr (accessed February 3, 2023); Chris Pandolfo, “House Republicans Release 1,000-Page Report Alleging Politicization in the FBI, DOJ,” Fox News, November 4, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-release- 1000-page-report-alleging-politicization-fbi-doj (accessed February 3, 2023); Brooke Singman, “Cruz Slams ‘Politicized’ Biden DOJ for Appointing Trump Special Counsel: ‘Absolutely Disgraceful,’” Fox News, November19, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cruz-slams-biden-doj-appointing-special-counsel-investigate- trump-absolutely-disgraceful (accessed February 3, 2023). 21. 8 U.S. Code § 1324 (Bringing in and harboring certain aliens), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324 (accessed March 9, 2023); 8 U.S. Code § 1325 (Improper entry by alien), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ text/8/1325 (accessed February 5, 2023); 8 U.S. Code § 1326 (Reentry of removed aliens), https://www.law. cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1326 (accessed February 5, 2023); 8 U.S. Code § 1327 (Aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1327 (accessed February 5, 2023); 8 U.S. Code § 1328 (Importation of alien for immoral purpose), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1328 (accessed February 5, 2023; press release, “In Brief Filed with Supreme Court, AFL Hammers Biden Administration’s Termination of MPP—Cites Alarming Statistic That Biden Administration Has Already Released More Than 750,000 Illegal Aliens into the United States from the Border,” America First Legal Foundation, April 14, 2022, https://aflegal.org/ in-brief-filed-with-supreme-court-afl-hammers-biden-administrations-termination-of-mpp-citing-alarming- statistic-that-biden-administration-has-already-released-more-than-750000-ille/ (accessed February 5, 2023).

Department of State

Minimal

Vector: 50%

Pages: 229-231AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 2488 is a commemorative bill naming a post office after an individual, with no connection to foreign policy, national security, or State Department functions outlined in the Project 2025 policy excerpt."

— 197 — Department of State The ideas and recommendations herein are premised on the belief that a rigorous adherence to the national interest is the most enduring foundation for U.S. grand strategy in the 21st century. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Thanks to the entire State Department chapter team, the leaders and staff of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project, and my colleagues at The Heritage Foundation’s Davis Center. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the following colleagues: Russell Berman, Sarah Calvis, James Carafano, Spencer Chretien, Wesley Coopersmith, Paul Dans, Steven Groves, Simon Hankinson, Joseph Humire, Michael Pillsbury, Max Primorac, Reed Rubenstein, Brett Schaefer, Jeff Smith, Hillary Tanoff, Erin Walsh, and John Zadrozny. — 198 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of State, “About the U.S. Department of State: Our History,” https://www.state.gov/about/ (accessed March 9, 2023). 2. The balance of employment is 2,149 eligible family members and 50,223 locally employed staff. U.S. Department of State, “GTM Fact Sheet: Facts About Our Most Valuable Asset—Our People,” Global Talent Management, December 31, 2022, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/GTM_Factsheet1222. pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 3. U.S. Commission on National Security, Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, Phase III Report, February 15, 2001, p. x, http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/nssg/PhaseIIIFR.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 4. See Brett D. Schaefer, “How to Make the State Department More Effective at Implementing U.S. Foreign Policy,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3115, April 20, 2016, https://www.heritage.org/political- process/report/how-make-the-state-department-more-effective-implementing-us-foreign. 5. Historically, roughly one-third of ambassadorial appointments have been political appointments, although Republican Administrations have generally had a higher ratio of political appointments than Democratic Administrations. 6. U.S. Constitution, art. 2, sec. 2, cl. 2. 7. News release, “Secretary Blinken Launches the Office of China Coordination,” U.S. Department of State, December 16, 2022, https://www.state.gov/secretary-blinken-launches-the-office-of-china-coordination/ (accessed March 9, 2023). 8. Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S. Code § 1101 et seq., § 1253. 9. See Michael Pillsbury, The Hundred Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace the United States as a Global Superpower (NY: St. Martin’s Griffin, 2016). 10. For additional context regarding how countering China fits in a more robust U.S. strategy, see James Jay Carafano et al., “Foreign Policy: Strategy for a Post-Biden Era,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3715, July 21, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/foreign-policy-strategy-post-biden-era. 11. The Article X for China would follow George Kennan’s Article X for U.S.–Soviet competition. See George F. Kennan, “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” Foreign Affairs, July 1947, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ russian-federation/1947-07-01/sources-soviet-conduct (accessed March 22, 2023). 12. Dean Cheng et al., “Assessing Beijing’s Power: A Blueprint for the U.S. Response to China Over the Next Decades,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 221, February 20, 2010, https://www.heritage.org/asia/ report/assessing-beijings-power-blueprint-the-us-response-china-over-the-next-decades. 13. Eric W. Orts, “The Rule of Law in China,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34, No. 1 (January 2001), https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1686&context=vjtl (accessed March 9, 2023). 14. U.S. Department of Defense, Indo–Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, June 1, 2019, https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF- DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF (accessed July 28, 2022). 15. See Jeff Smith, “South Asia: A New Strategy,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3721, August 29, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/south-asia-new-strategy. 16. Emma Bryce, “Why Is There So Much Oil in the Arctic?” Live Science, August 3, 2019, https://www.livescience. com/66008-why-oil-in-arctic.html (accessed February 9, 2023). 17. “Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, updated January 26, 2021, p. 6, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R41153/177 (accessed March 9, 2023). 18. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology, “Snapshot: Overcoming the Tyranny of Distance in the Arctic,” April 20, 2020, https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2020/04/20/ snapshot-overcoming-tyranny-distance-arctic (accessed February 9, 2023). 19. U.S. Department of State, “U.S. Contributions to International Organizations, 2021,” September 20, 2022, https://www.state.gov/u-s-contributions-to-international-organizations-2021/ (accessed March 9, 2023), and U.S. Department of State, “U.S. Contributions to International Organizations, 2015,” November 1, 2016, https:// www.state.gov/u-s-contributions-to-international-organizations-2015/ (accessed March 9, 2023). 20. U.S. Department of State, Report on the Commission of Inalienable Rights, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2020/07/Draft-Report-of-the-Commission-on-Unalienable-Rights.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023).

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 50%

Pages: 611-614AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 2488 is a commemorative bill naming a post office and does not address labor policy, workforce development, or any of the Department of Labor objectives outlined in Project 2025."

— 579 — Department of Justice 93. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 94. See, for example, 8 U.S. Code §§ 1103(a)(1) and 1103(g), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1103 (accessed February 3, 2023). 95. See, for example, 8 U.S. Code §§ 1324–1326, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/chapter-12/ subchapter-II/part-VIII (accessed February 3, 2023). 96. Press release, “Justice, Labor Departments Reach Settlements with Facebook Resolving Claims of Discrimination Against U.S. Workers and Potential Regulatory Recruitment Violations,” U.S. Department of Justice, October 19, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-labor-departments-reach-settlements- facebook-resolving-claims-discrimination-against (accessed February 3, 2023). 97. “Every four years, just after the Presidential election, the ‘United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions,’ commonly known as the Plum Book, is published, alternately, by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.” Senate Committee Print No. 114-26, United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, 114th Cong., 2nd Sess., December 1, 2016, p. iii, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016/pdf/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016.pdf (accessed February 5, 2023). 98. Allen J. Beck, “Race and Ethnicity of Violent Crime Offenders and Arrestees, 2018,” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Statistical Brief No. NCJ 255969, January 2021, https:// bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/revcoa18.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). — 581 — 18 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND RELATED AGENCIES Jonathan Berry MISSION STATEMENT At the heart of The Conservative Promise is the resolve to reclaim the role of each American worker as the protagonist in his or her own life and to restore the family as the centerpiece of American life. The role that labor policy plays in that promise is twofold: Give workers the support they need for rewarding, well-paying, and self-driven careers, and restore the family-supporting job as the centerpiece of the American economy. The Judeo-Christian tradition, stretching back to Genesis, has always recognized fruitful work as integral to human dignity, as service to God, neighbor, and family. And Americans have long been known for their work ethic. While it is primarily the culture’s responsibility to affirm the dignity of work, our federal labor and employment agencies have an important role to play by protect- ing workers, setting boundaries for the healthy functioning of labor markets, and ultimately encouraging wages and conditions for jobs that can support a family. OVERVIEW The labor agencies covered in this chapter include the Department of Labor (DOL), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the National Mediation Board (NMB), the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). Congress has provided these agencies with the authority to enforce a wide range of federal statutes regulating workplace conduct, workforce development, employee benefits, labor organization and bargaining, and interna- tional labor conditions.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Bera, Ami

US-Japan-ROK Trilateral Cooperation Act

119/hr/3429

To require the Secretary of State to submit a report on participation in educational and cultural exchange programs.

119/hr/6428

Recognizing the strategic value of the historical partnership between the United States and India.

119/hres/880

Back to All Bills