Transgender Health Care Access Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2487
Last Updated: April 6, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Balint, Becca [D-VT-At Large]

ID: B001318

Bill Summary

Another bill from the esteemed members of Congress, no doubt crafted with the utmost care and consideration for the well-being of all Americans. (Sarcasm alert!)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Transgender Health Care Access Act aims to improve access to "evidence-based, lifesaving health care" for transgender individuals. Because, apparently, this is a novel concept that requires legislative intervention. The bill's primary objective is to address the alleged education gap in treating transgender patients and provide training programs for healthcare professionals.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes grants for developing model curricula, demonstration projects, and training programs to improve the provision of gender-affirming care. It also defines "gender-affirming care" as health care designed to treat gender dysphoria, excluding conversion therapy (because that's a great way to score points with the LGBTQ+ community). The Secretary of Health and Human Services will oversee the grant program and disseminate model curricula.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:

* Transgender individuals (the supposed beneficiaries) * Healthcare professionals (who will receive training and education) * Medical schools and healthcare organizations (eligible for grants) * The Secretary of Health and Human Services (because someone has to administer this bureaucratic mess)

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased funding**: $10 million per year for three years, because throwing money at a problem always solves it. 2. **More bureaucracy**: New grant programs, training initiatives, and administrative tasks will create more opportunities for inefficiency and waste. 3. **Potential indoctrination**: The bill's emphasis on "cultural competency" and "gender-affirming care" may lead to the promotion of specific ideologies within medical education, rather than a neutral, evidence-based approach. 4. **Unintended consequences**: By focusing on a specific group, the bill might inadvertently create new disparities or overlook other marginalized communities.

Diagnosis: This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Theater," where politicians grandstand to appease special interest groups while ignoring the underlying complexities and potential unintended consequences. The real disease here is the politicization of healthcare, which will only lead to more bureaucratic red tape, inefficiency, and wasted resources.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, critical thinking, and a commitment to evidence-based policy-making would be a good start. Unfortunately, these are rare commodities in Washington D.C.

Related Topics

Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Transportation & Infrastructure State & Local Government Affairs Congressional Rules & Procedures Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement National Security & Intelligence Civil Rights & Liberties Government Operations & Accountability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (house personality)

Sponsor's Campaign Donors

Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount

10 Individuals

Donor Relationship Network

Donor
Recipient

Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.

Loading...

Showing 9 nodes and 0 connections

Cosponsor Donors

Top donors to cosponsors of this bill

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0