Taiwan International Solidarity Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/2416

Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Taiwan International Solidarity Act

HR. 2416, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$69,150 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 223-225 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

May 5, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Taiwan International Solidarity Act, HR 2416. A bill that seeks to bolster the United States' support for Taiwan's international participation and counter China's attempts to isolate the island nation. How quaint.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This legislation aims to strengthen the US-Taiwan relationship by opposing any efforts by China to distort Taiwan's status in international organizations. It also seeks to promote Taiwan's participation in these organizations, despite not being a member of the United Nations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 by adding new provisions that:

1. Clarify the US position on UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, which recognized China as the sole representative of China to the United Nations. 2. Instruct US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions and policies regarding Taiwan. 3. Encourage US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The primary stakeholders are:

1. The People's Republic of China: This bill directly challenges China's "One China" policy and its efforts to isolate Taiwan internationally. 2. Taiwan: The legislation aims to strengthen Taiwan's international participation and counter China's attempts to undermine its sovereignty. 3. US businesses with interests in Taiwan: Companies like mine, which have significant investments in the region, may benefit from a more stable and secure environment.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

From my perspective, this bill has several implications:

1. **Increased tensions with China**: This legislation will likely exacerbate tensions between the US and China, potentially affecting trade relationships and global economic stability. 2. **Consolidation of power**: By supporting Taiwan's international participation, the US may be able to consolidate its influence in the region and counterbalance China's growing power. 3. **New business opportunities**: A more stable and secure environment in Taiwan could lead to increased investment and trade opportunities for US businesses.

In conclusion, this bill is a strategic move by the US to bolster its support for Taiwan and counter China's growing influence. As a self-interested billionaire, I will be monitoring this legislation closely to assess its potential impact on my business interests and global power dynamics.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that has been introduced to Congress. In this case, HR 2416, also known as the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, aims to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to provide that the United States should oppose any attempts by the People's Republic of China to resolve Taiwan's status by distorting the decisions, language, policies, or procedures of international organizations. In simpler terms, the US wants to support Taiwan's sovereignty and prevent China from bullying it in international forums.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several key changes to existing law:

* It clarifies that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address the issue of representation of Taiwan and its people in the UN or any related organizations. * It instructs US representatives in international organizations to advocate for resisting China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. * It encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's efforts to undermine Taiwan's official diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The United States government * The People's Republic of China * Taiwan * International organizations such as the United Nations * US allies and partners

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this bill could have significant implications for US-China relations, as well as Taiwan's international status. It may:

* Strengthen US support for Taiwan's sovereignty * Increase tensions between the US and China * Encourage other countries to take a stronger stance against China's aggressive behavior in international forums

Now, I hope that was clear enough. Remember when we learned about how bills become laws? This is exactly what's happening here. The bill has been introduced, referred to committee, and now it's being debated. If it passes both the House and Senate, it will be sent to the President for signature or veto. Simple enough, right?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The Taiwan International Solidarity Act, HR 2416 - a seemingly innocuous bill on the surface, but trust me, folks, there's more to it than meets the eye. Let me break it down for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this bill aims to strengthen US-Taiwan relations and counter China's attempts to isolate Taiwan internationally. But, I'd argue, it's a cleverly veiled attempt to further entangle the US in the complex web of East Asian geopolitics. The real objective? To create a pretext for increased US military presence in the region, under the guise of "protecting" Taiwan.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019, which already had some... let's say, "interesting" provisions. The new changes:

* Clarify that the US opposes any attempts by China to change Taiwan's status without its consent. * Instruct US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. * Encourage US allies and partners to oppose China's efforts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships.

Now, here's where it gets juicy: the bill also requires a report on China's attempts to promote its "One China" position. Ah, but what's not explicitly stated is that this report will likely be used as a pretext for further US intervention in the region.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* Taiwan: The supposed beneficiary of this bill, but I'd argue they're being used as pawns in a larger game. * China: The perceived "aggressor" in this scenario, but what if I told you that China's actions are merely a response to US provocations? * US Government and Military-Industrial Complex: The real winners here, as this bill provides a convenient excuse for increased military spending and presence in the region.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications:

* Escalation of tensions between the US and China, potentially leading to a new Cold War. * Increased US military presence in East Asia, which could lead to a regional arms race. * Further entanglement of the US in complex international conflicts, distracting from domestic issues.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this is just a bill about supporting Taiwan." Ah, my friends, that's exactly what they want you to think. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, hidden in plain sight.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands! HR 2416, the Taiwan International Solidarity Act – sounds like a real mouthful, doesn't it? (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is all about standing up to those pesky elites in Beijing and defending the freedom-loving people of Taiwan. (patriotic music plays in the background) It's a bold move, really. The main objective here is to ensure that the United States opposes any attempts by China to strong-arm Taiwan into submission on the international stage.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Now, let's get down to brass tacks. This bill amends the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 in several key ways:

* It clarifies that the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty – a clever move, if I do say so myself. * The bill instructs U.S. representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions and policies regarding Taiwan. * It encourages U.S. allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Well, this one's a no-brainer: the people of Taiwan, the United States government, and our allies around the world are all affected by this bill. And let's not forget those dastardly elites in Beijing – they're probably shaking in their boots right about now.

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, here's where things get interesting. This bill could potentially escalate tensions between the United States and China, which is always a good thing... for freedom, that is! (smirk) But seriously, it could also lead to increased cooperation between Taiwan and other countries, which would be a win for democracy and human rights.

Of course, there are those who might say this bill is just another example of U.S. meddling in international affairs or an attempt to provoke China. (gasp) Perish the thought! We're just standing up for freedom and defending our values – what's wrong with that?

In conclusion, HR 2416 is a bold move by Congress to defend Taiwan's sovereignty and resist China's attempts to bully its way onto the international stage. It's a bill that says, "We stand with Taiwan, and we won't let anyone push us around!" (fist pump) Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go prep for my next segment – it's all about the deep state's latest attempts to undermine our great nation...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Taiwan International Solidarity Act (HR 2416) is a thinly veiled attempt to poke China in the eye while pretending to support Taiwan's sovereignty. The bill's primary objective is to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019, which was already a masterclass in diplomatic doublespeak.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:

* Clarifying that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty (because, of course, China would never try to manipulate international organizations). * Instructing US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions and language regarding Taiwan (as if they weren't already doing so). * Encouraging US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships (because that's exactly what the world needs – more nations taking sides).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:

* The People's Republic of China, which will undoubtedly respond with its characteristic subtlety and restraint. * Taiwan, which will likely be thrilled to have the US Congress pretending to care about its sovereignty (again). * US allies and partners, who will be expected to take sides in this manufactured drama.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a perfect example of legislative posturing. It's a symbolic gesture designed to appease Taiwan and annoy China, without actually accomplishing anything meaningful. The real impact will be:

* Increased tensions between the US and China (because that's exactly what we need – more conflict). * A further erosion of trust in international organizations (as if they weren't already compromised). * A boost to the egos of the bill's sponsors, who can now claim to have "done something" about Taiwan.

In conclusion, HR 2416 is a textbook case of legislative grandstanding. It's a shallow attempt to score political points while ignoring the underlying complexities of international relations. But hey, at least it'll make for some great theater – and that's all that really matters in Washington, right?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**HR 2416: Taiwan International Solidarity Act**

**Main Purpose and Objectives:** The Taiwan International Solidarity Act aims to strengthen the United States' support for Taiwan's international participation and resist China's efforts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically. The bill seeks to clarify the US position on Taiwan's status, oppose Chinese attempts to distort international organizations' decisions regarding Taiwan, and promote Taiwan's ties with other countries.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Amends the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 to clarify that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. 2. Instructs US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. 3. Encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships. 4. Requires a report on China's attempts to promote its "One China" position and undermine Taiwan's membership in international organizations.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:**

1. The United States government, particularly the State Department and representatives in international organizations. 2. The People's Republic of China (PRC) government, which will face increased opposition from the US on its efforts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically. 3. The Taiwanese government and people, who will benefit from increased US support for their international participation. 4. International organizations, such as the United Nations, where the US will advocate for Taiwan's interests.

**Potential Impact and Implications:**

1. Strengthened US-Taiwan relations and increased diplomatic support for Taiwan in international organizations. 2. Increased tensions between the US and China on issues related to Taiwan, potentially affecting bilateral trade and security relationships. 3. Potential backlash from China against US allies and partners that support Taiwan's diplomatic efforts. 4. Enhanced international scrutiny of China's actions regarding Taiwan, which may impact its global reputation and influence.

Overall, HR 2416 aims to promote a more robust US policy on Taiwan, supporting its participation in international organizations and resisting Chinese attempts to isolate it diplomatically. The bill's provisions and implications will likely be closely watched by stakeholders in the US, China, Taiwan, and the broader international community.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro. The Taiwan International Solidarity Act (HR 2416) is all about showin' some love and support for Taiwan on the international stage.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main goal of this bill is to counter China's efforts to isolate Taiwan and undermine its sovereignty. It aims to promote Taiwan's participation in international organizations, strengthen ties between the US and Taiwan, and resist China's attempts to distort the "One China" policy.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This bill amends the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019. Here are some key changes:

* Clarifies that the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) didn't address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. * Instructs US reps in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. * Encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects:

* Taiwan: By promoting its participation in international organizations and resisting China's efforts to isolate it. * China: By opposing its attempts to distort the "One China" policy and undermine Taiwan's sovereignty. * US: By strengthening ties with Taiwan and promoting a more robust presence in international organizations. * International Organizations: Such as the UN, where this bill aims to resist China's influence.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill could have some gnarly implications, bro:

* Strengthening Taiwan's position on the world stage could lead to increased tensions with China. * Resisting China's efforts to distort international organizations could lead to a more balanced and representative global governance system. * Promoting US-Taiwan ties could lead to increased cooperation in areas like trade, security, and technology.

However, there are also some potential risks, dude:

* Escalating tensions with China could have unintended consequences for regional stability and global trade. * Overemphasizing the "One China" policy could alienate other countries that recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.

Anyway, bro, that's the lowdown on HR 2416. It's all about promoting solidarity with Taiwan and resisting China's influence in international organizations. Whether it'll have the desired impact remains to be seen, but one thing's for sure – this bill is gonna make some waves, dude!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 2416: Taiwan International Solidarity Act - A Bill Born of Lobbying and Geopolitics**

The Taiwan International Solidarity Act, HR 2416, is a bill that aims to strengthen the United States' support for Taiwan in international organizations. On its surface, it appears to be a straightforward expression of solidarity with a democratic ally. However, upon closer inspection, it reveals a complex web of interests and motivations.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The primary objective of HR 2416 is to counter China's efforts to isolate Taiwan internationally by opposing any attempts to change Taiwan's status without the consent of its people. The bill seeks to achieve this through several key provisions that amend existing law, particularly the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several significant changes to existing law:

1. It clarifies the United States' position on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI), which established China's representation at the UN, by stating that it did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. 2. It instructs US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. 3. It encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The key stakeholders affected by this bill are:

1. The government of Taiwan: HR 2416 aims to strengthen the United States' support for Taiwan in international organizations, which would benefit Taiwan's diplomatic efforts. 2. The People's Republic of China (PRC): The bill directly counters China's attempts to isolate Taiwan internationally and undermine its sovereignty. 3. US allies and partners: The bill encourages them to oppose China's efforts to undermine Taiwan's relationships with other countries.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact of HR 2416 is significant:

1. **Escalating tensions with China**: By directly countering China's efforts to isolate Taiwan, the bill may escalate tensions between the US and China. 2. **Strengthening Taiwan's international position**: The bill could help Taiwan maintain its diplomatic relationships and partnerships, despite China's attempts to undermine them. 3. **Shaping US foreign policy in Asia**: HR 2416 reflects a growing trend of US legislation aimed at countering China's influence in the region.

**Monied Interests & Lobbying**

While there is no direct evidence of monied interests driving this bill, it is likely that lobbying efforts by Taiwanese and US business groups, as well as organizations promoting democracy and human rights in Taiwan, have contributed to its development. The bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received donations from various PACs, including those affiliated with the defense industry, which may also be interested in maintaining a strong US presence in the Asia-Pacific region.

In conclusion, HR 2416 is a complex

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$69,150

18 donors

PACs

Organizations

$2,900

Committees

Individuals

$66,000

No PAC contributions found

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP

1 transaction

$2,900

No committee contributions found

PUNARO, ARNOLD

2 transactions

$6,600

PUNARO, JULIA

2 transactions

$6,600

HALE, KAREN

2 transactions

$6,600

PHILLIPS, STERLING

2 transactions

$6,600

HERSHMAN, MICHAEL J.

1 transaction

$3,300

TRONE, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

MISENER, PAUL E

1 transaction

$3,300

RABAUT, TOM W

1 transaction

$3,300

WALKER, KENT

1 transaction

$3,300

CARLSON, TERESA

1 transaction

$3,300

GURU, RAM

1 transaction

$3,300

HALL SR, DON

1 transaction

$3,300

HALL, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

ABOD, CARAH

1 transaction

$3,300

ABOD, KIM

1 transaction

$3,300

BERBERIAN, ANNETTE

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40]

ID: K000397

Top Contributors

PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

Jul 28, 2023

OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationRED ROCK, OK

$3,300

Jul 28, 2023

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA

OrganizationBELCOURT, ND

$3,300

Jul 28, 2023

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Jul 25, 2024

AT&T INC & ITS AFFLIATES

OrganizationSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,000

Mar 5, 2024

ABBVIE PAC - FEDERAL PAC

OrganizationSACRAMENTO, CA

$2,500

Sep 30, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,300

Oct 25, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Oct 28, 2024

Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]

ID: C001068

Top Contributors

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$3,000

Nov 5, 2024

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$2,000

Nov 5, 2024

KEENEY, MIKE

LEWIS THOMASON • LEWIS THOMASON

IndividualMEMPHIS, TN

$3,300

Feb 6, 2024

RITCHEY, JANICE C

IndividualMEMPHIS, TN

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

RITCHEY, KENT

WOLFCHASE TOYOTA • AUTOMOBILE DEALER

IndividualMEMPHIS, TN

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

WALTON, CHRISTY

IndividualBENTONVILLE, AR

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

KEENEY, MICHAEL

LEWIS THOMASON • ATTORNEY

IndividualMEMPHIS, TN

$3,300

May 25, 2023

SEGAL, GORDON

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMEMPHIS, TN

$3,300

Apr 10, 2023

SMITH, FREDERICK

FEDEX • CEO

IndividualMEMPHIS, TN

$3,300

Jul 31, 2024

BEKTAS, MELIH

SELF EMPLOYED • ENGINEER

IndividualNORTH PROVIDENCE, RI

$3,000

Oct 19, 2023

Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

ID: F000466

Top Contributors

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,500

Dec 31, 2024

STATA FAMILY OFFICE

Organization

$500

Apr 26, 2024

ASHER, ROBERT B.

IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA

$10,000

Oct 9, 2024

ASHER, ROBERT B.

ASHER CHOCOLATES • CHAIRMAN

IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA

$10,000

Sep 30, 2024

LEVY, EDWARD JR

EDW C LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

Feb 26, 2024

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

EVANS, ROGER

GREYLOCK PARTNERS • PARTNER EMERITUS

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

LEACH, RONALD

NPX ONE • CHAIRMAN & CEO

IndividualGENEVA, IL

$6,600

Feb 28, 2024

MCCLAIN, MARK

SAILPOINT • CEO

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$6,600

Mar 2, 2024

CROTTY, THOMAS

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$6,600

Mar 8, 2024

Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]

ID: S001201

Top Contributors

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Aug 3, 2024

SCOTTO LLC

OrganizationWOODBURY, NY

$1,650

Aug 30, 2024

PATROON OPERATING CO. LLC

OrganizationNEW YORK, NY

$1,000

May 13, 2024

THE KLAR ORGANIZATION

OrganizationEAST MEADOW, NY

$1,000

Aug 8, 2024

TERIAN, OLIVIA

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$9,400

May 2, 2024

TERIAN, OLIVIA

OLIVIA TERIAN ART & DESIGN • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Mar 8, 2024

MORAN, MARY

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Mar 28, 2024

MORAN, MARY

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

May 2, 2024

FAIVUS, HARRY E.

MOUNT SINAI • PHYSICIAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Oct 31, 2024

SOSNICK, AARON

IndividualRENO, NV

$3,392

Jun 25, 2024

Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]

ID: M001241

Top Contributors

SYCUAN BANK OF KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA

OrganizationLEMOORE, CA

$3,300

Jun 11, 2024

SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA

OrganizationLEMOORE, CA

$3,300

Jun 11, 2024

YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION

OrganizationBROOKS, CA

$3,300

Sep 25, 2023

YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION

OrganizationBROOKS, CA

$3,300

Jul 11, 2024

BARONA BANK OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$2,500

Jun 30, 2023

VIEJAS BANK OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS

OrganizationALPINE, CA

$2,500

Jun 30, 2023

SYCUAN BANK OF KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$2,000

Jun 30, 2023

SYCUAN BANK OF KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$1,300

Jun 30, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$1,000

Aug 5, 2024

Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]

ID: G000583

Top Contributors

AMERICAN EXPRESS

OrganizationNEWARK, NJ

$22,941

Apr 12, 2024

AMERICAN EXPRESS

OrganizationNEWARK, NJ

$10,621

May 10, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$6,337

May 15, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$6,337

Apr 15, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$6,337

Apr 30, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$5,751

Apr 1, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

SEKAS LAW GROUP LLC

OrganizationENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ

$1,500

Apr 12, 2024

SANDOR F. GENET & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

OrganizationNORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL

$250

Apr 12, 2024

FIRESTONE MILKEN, SARAH

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$13,200

Jul 2, 2024

Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32]

ID: S000344

Top Contributors

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Oct 30, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$2,000

Oct 5, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Sep 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,300

Oct 21, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,000

Oct 28, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$700

Oct 21, 2024

AHMED, TAIMOOR

MARKHOR LOGISTICS • CEO

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Mar 30, 2023

GARHWAL, HARI

GARHWAL, CHAN & WILLIAMS • CPA

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Mar 23, 2023

GARHWAL, HARI

GARHWAL, CHAN & WILLIAMS • CPA

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Mar 23, 2023

GARHWAL, SANJEEV

WWMG • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSEATTLE, WA

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6]

ID: B001287

Top Contributors

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$250

Nov 5, 2024

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$250

Oct 31, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Jun 30, 2024

DOERR, JOHN L. III

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$6,600

Sep 30, 2023

DOERR, JOHN L. III

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$6,600

Sep 30, 2023

DOERR, JOHN L. III

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$6,600

Sep 30, 2023

DOERR, JOHN L. III

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$6,600

Sep 30, 2023

DOERR, ANN HOWLAND

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

DOERR, ANN HOWLAND

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

DOERR, JOHN L. III

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN CARLOS, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]

ID: L000599

Top Contributors

MURTAGH, COSSU, VENDITTI & CASTRO-BLANCO, LLP

OrganizationWHITE PLAINS, NY

$1,000

Feb 24, 2024

BATMASIAN, JAMES

INVESTMENTS LIMITED • OWNER

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 27, 2023

BATMASIAN, JAMES

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 29, 2023

AUSTIN, ROBERT

UNAKA CO., INC. • BUSINESSMAN

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,600

Jul 18, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,534

Feb 15, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,534

Feb 22, 2024

SCALA, MARY ELLEN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPORT CHESTER, NY

$5,300

Aug 27, 2023

DEUTSCH, SHMULEY

SELF • PRESIDENT

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,900

Jun 24, 2024

DEUTSCH, SHMULEY

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,900

Jun 25, 2024

PERLMUTTER, RAFUEL

GOLDEN TASTE • CEO

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,400

Jun 24, 2024

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

ID: T000468

Top Contributors

LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Feb 1, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,500

Jun 30, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

Jun 30, 2023

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$1,000

Jun 11, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,000

Sep 8, 2023

NET2LINK, LLC

OrganizationPEMBROKE PINES, FL

$250

Oct 23, 2024

CHANG, RONIE

GOLDEN REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENTS • REALTOR

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Nov 2, 2024

PRITZKER, JAY

STATE OF ILLINOIS • GOVERNOR

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

SCHMIDT, ERIC

HILLSPIRE LLC • MANAGER

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 55 nodes and 37 connections (41 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $115,200

Top Donors - Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

1 Org1 Committee16 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 223-225AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 2416 aligns with Project 2025's State Department policy by advocating for a more assertive U.S. stance in international organizations, resisting Chinese influence, and promoting U.S. interests—particularly regarding Taiwan's participation—mirroring the call to use U.S. influence to counter actions that undermine American interests and sovereignty in multilateral forums."

Key themes:international organization reformcountering Chinese influenceU.S. interests in multilateral bodiessovereignty and human rightsstrategic use of U.S. influence

— 191 — Department of State nations, but it is not the only option—and American diplomats should be clear- eyed about international organizations’ strengths and weaknesses. When such institutions act against U.S. interests, the United States must be prepared to take appropriate steps in response, up to and including withdrawal. The manifest failure and corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO) during the COVID-19 pandemic is an example of the danger that international organizations pose to U.S. citizens and interests. The next Administration must end blind support for international organi- zations. If an international organization is effective and advances American interests, the United States should support it. If an international organization is ineffective or does not support American interests, the United States should not support it. Those that are effective will still require constant pressure from U.S. officials to ensure that they remain effective. Serious consideration should also be given to withdrawal from organizations that no longer have value, quietly undermine U.S. interests or goals, or disproportionately rely on U.S. financial con- tributions to survive. The Trump Administration’s “tough love” approach to international organiza- tions served American interests. For example, the Trump Administration withdrew from, or terminated funding for, the United Nations Human Rights Council, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, and the WHO. The results were redeployment of taxpayer dollars to better uses—and other organizations “getting the message” that the United States will not allow itself and its money to be used to undermine its own interests. The Biden Administration reversed many of these decisions. Currently, U.S. funding for international organizations is more than $16 billion in fiscal year 2021—a sharp increase from $10.8 billion in fiscal year 2015.19 Millions of American taxpayer dollars go to support policies and initiatives that hurt the United States and American citizens. The next Administration should direct the Secretary of State to initiate a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of U.S. participation in all international organizations. This review should take into account long-standing provisions in federal law that prohibit the use of taxpayer dollars to promote abortion, popu- lation control, and terrorist activities, as well as other applicable restrictions on funding for international organizations and agencies with a view to withholding U.S. funds in cases of abuses. International organizations should not be used to promote radical social pol- icies as if they were human rights priorities. Doing so undermines actual human rights and weakens U.S. credibility abroad. The next Administration should use its voice, influence, votes, and funding in international organizations to pro- mote authentic human rights and respect for sovereignty based on the binding — 192 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise international obligations contained in treaties that have been constitutionally ratified by the U.S. government. It must promote a strict text-based interpreta- tion of treaty obligations that does not consider human rights treaties as “living instruments” both within the State Department and within international organi- zations that receive U.S. funding, including by making respect for sovereignty and authentic human rights a litmus test of personnel decisions and elections processes within international organizations. The U.S. Commission on Unalienable Human Rights focused on the primacy of civil and political rights in its inaugural report, which remains an important guidepost for bilateral and multilateral engagements on human rights. The com- mission’s report is a roadmap for revamping and reenergizing U.S. human rights policy and should be the basis for both structural and policy changes throughout the State Department.20 All U.S. multilateral engagements must be reevaluated in light of the work of the commission, and initiatives that promote controversial policies must be halted and rolled back. It is paramount to create a healthy culture of respect for life, the family, sover- eignty, and authentic human rights in international organizations and agencies. To support this goal, the U.S. led an effort during the Trump Administration to forge a consensus among like-minded countries in support of human life, women’s health, support of the family as the basic unit of human society, and defense of national sovereignty. The result was the Geneva Consensus Declaration on Women’s Health and Protection of the Family.21 All U.S. foreign policy engagements that were pro- duced and expanded under the Obama and Biden Administrations must be aligned with the Geneva Consensus Declaration and the work of the U.S. Commission on Unalienable Human Rights. The U.S. government should not and cannot promote or fund abortion in inter- national programs or multilateral organizations. Technically, the United States can prevent its international funding from going toward abortions, but the U.S. will have a greater impact by including like-minded nations and building on the coali- tion launched through the Geneva Consensus Declaration, with a view to shaping the work of international agencies by functioning as a united front. The COVID-19 pandemic made it painfully clear that both international organi- zations—and some countries—are only too willing to trample human rights in the name of public health. For example, the WHO was, and remains, willing to support the suppression of basic human rights, partially because of its close relationship with human rights abusers like the PRC. The next Administration should unequivocally embrace the premise that humanity and the international community can simultaneously tackle pandem- ics and other emergent health threats without impeding the rights of people. It must also become a vocal surrogate for people in countries where rights are being suppressed in the name of health. This will likely require greater restrictions on

Section 2: The Common Defense

Moderate

Vector: 59%

Pages: 125-127AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and Project 2025 seek to counter China's efforts to isolate or subordinate Taiwan, emphasizing allied cooperation and prioritizing Taiwan's security, though the bill focuses on diplomatic measures while Project 2025 emphasizes military denial defense and force planning."

Key themes:TaiwanChina competitionAllied cooperationDenial defenseDiplomatic support

— 93 — Department of Defense U.S. access to the world’s most important market. Preventing this from happening must be the top priority for American foreign and defense policy. Beijing presents a challenge to American interests across the domains of national power, but the military threat that it poses is especially acute and signif- icant. China is undertaking a historic military buildup that includes increasing capability for power projection not only in its own region, but also far beyond as well as a dramatic expansion of its nuclear forces that could result in a nuclear force that matches or exceeds America’s own nuclear arsenal. The most severe immediate threat that Beijing’s military poses, however, is to Taiwan and other U.S. allies along the first island chain in the Western Pacific. If China could subordinate Taiwan or allies like the Philippines, South Korea, and Japan, it could break apart any balancing coalition that is designed to prevent Bei- jing’s hegemony over Asia. Accordingly, the United States must ensure that China does not succeed. This requires a denial defense: the ability to make the subordi- nation of Taiwan or other U.S. allies in Asia prohibitively difficult. Critically, the United States must be able to do this at a level of cost and risk that Americans are willing to bear given the relative importance of Taiwan to China and to the U.S. The United States and its allies also face real threats from Russia, as evidenced by Vladimir Putin’s brutal war in Ukraine, as well as from Iran, North Korea, and transnational terrorism at a time when decades of ill-advised military operations in the Greater Middle East, the atrophy of our defense industrial base, the impact of sequestration, and effective disarmament by many U.S. allies have exacted a high toll on America’s military. This is a grim landscape. The United States needs to deal with these threats forthrightly and with strength, but it also needs to be realistic. It cannot wish away these problems. Rather, it must confront them with a clear-eyed recognition of the need for choice, discipline, and adequate resources for defense. In this light, U.S. defense strategy must identify China unequivocally as the top priority for U.S. defense planning while modernizing and expanding the U.S. nuclear arsenal and sustaining an efficient and effective counterterrorism enterprise. U.S. allies must also step up, with some joining the United States in taking on China in Asia while others take more of a lead in dealing with threats from Russia in Europe, Iran, the Middle East, and North Korea. The reality is that achieving these goals will require more spending on defense, both by the United States and by its allies, as well as active support for reindustrialization and more support for allies’ productive capacity so that we can scale our free- world efforts together. Needed Reforms l Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan. — 94 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise This focus and priority for U.S. defense activities will deny China the first island chain. 1. Require that all U.S. defense efforts, from force planning to employment and posture, focus on ensuring the ability of American forces to prevail in the pacing scenario and deny China a fait accompli against Taiwan. 2. Prioritize the U.S. conventional force planning construct to defeat a Chinese invasion of Taiwan before allocating resources to other missions, such as simultaneously fighting another conflict. l Increase allied conventional defense burden-sharing. U.S. allies must take far greater responsibility for their conventional defense. U.S. allies must play their part not only in dealing with China, but also in dealing with threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea. 1. Make burden-sharing a central part of U.S. defense strategy with the United States not just helping allies to step up, but strongly encouraging them to do so. 2. Support greater spending and collaboration by Taiwan and allies in the Asia–Pacific like Japan and Australia to create a collective defense model. 3. Transform NATO so that U.S. allies are capable of fielding the great majority of the conventional forces required to deter Russia while relying on the United States primarily for our nuclear deterrent, and select other capabilities while reducing the U.S. force posture in Europe. 4. Sustain support for Israel even as America empowers Gulf partners to take responsibility for their own coastal, air, and missile defenses both individually and working collectively. 5. Enable South Korea to take the lead in its conventional defense against North Korea. l Implement nuclear modernization and expansion. The United States manifestly needs to modernize, adapt, and expand its nuclear arsenal. Russia maintains and is actively brandishing a very large nuclear arsenal, but China is also undertaking a historic nuclear breakout.

Department of State

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 220-222AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses Taiwan's international participation and countering China's isolation efforts, whereas the Project 2025 excerpt focuses on State Department priorities for Africa, Europe, and South/Central Asia with no mention of Taiwan or China. Overlap is limited to general State Department foreign policy themes."

Key themes:State Departmentforeign policydiplomatic engagement

— 187 — Department of State United States, but at least some of them would eventually try if allowed to consolidate their operations and plan such attacks. The immediate threat they pose lies in their abilities and willingness to strike American targets in their regions of operation or to harm U.S. interests in other ways. The U.S. should support capable African military and security operations through the State Department and other federal agencies responsible for granting foreign military education, training, and security assistance. l Build a coalition of the cooperative. Rather than thinning limited federal resources by spreading funds across all countries (including some that are unsupportive or even hostile to the United States,) the next Administration should focus on those countries with which the U.S. can expect a mutually beneficial relationship. After being designated focus countries by the State Department, such nations should receive a full suite of American engagement. That said, the next Administration should still maintain a baseline level of contact even with those countries with which it has less- than-fruitful relationships in order to encourage positive developments and to be in position to seize unexpected diplomatic opportunities as they arise. l Focus on core diplomatic activities, and stop promoting policies birthed in the American culture wars. African nations are particularly (and reasonably) non-receptive to the U.S. social policies such as abortion and pro-LGBT initiatives being imposed on them. The United States should focus on core security, economic, and human rights engagement with African partners and reject the promotion of divisive policies that hurt the deepening of shared goals between the U.S. and its African partners. Europe American foreign policy has long benefited from cooperation with the countries of Europe (generally, the EU), and any conservative Administration should build on this resource. Yet the transatlantic relationship is complex, with security, trade, and political dimensions. First, the Europe, Eurasia, and Russia region is made up of relatively wealthy and technologically advanced societies that should be expected to bear a fair share of both security needs and global security architecture: The United States cannot be expected to provide a defense umbrella for countries unwilling to contribute appropriately. At stake after 2024 will be examining the status of the Wales Pledge of 2 percent of gross domestic product toward defense by NATO members. The new Administration will also want to encourage nations to exceed that pledge. Second, transatlantic trade is a significant part of the global economy, and it is in the U.S. national interest to amplify it, especially because this means weaning — 188 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Europe of its dependence on China. However, there are also transatlantic trade tensions that disturb the U.S.–EU relationship and that have been evident across Administrations. The U.S. must undertake a comprehensive review of trade arrangements between the EU and the United States to assure that U.S. businesses are treated fairly and to build productive reciprocity. Outside the EU, trade with the post-Brexit U.K. needs urgent development before London slips back into the orbit of the EU. Third, in the wake of Brexit, EU foreign policy now takes place without U.K. input, which disadvantages the United States, given that the U.K. has historically been aligned with many U.S. positions. Therefore, U.S. diplomacy must be more attentive to inner-EU developments, while also developing new allies inside the EU—especially the Central European countries on the eastern flank of the EU, which are most vulnerable to Russian aggression. South and Central Asia Many key American interests and responsibilities are found in South and Central Asia. Specifically, continuing to advance the bilateral relationship with India to mutual benefit is a crucial objective for U.S. policy. India plays a crucial role in countering the Chinese threat and securing a free and open Indo–Pacific. It is a critical security guarantor for the key routes of air and sea travel linking East and West and an important emerging U.S. economic partner. For instance, the 2019 Department of Defense Indo–Pacific Strategy Report noted that the Indian Ocean area “is at the nexus of global trade and commerce, with nearly half of the world’s 90,000 commercial vessels and two thirds of global oil trade traveling through its sea lanes. The region boasts some of the fastest-growing economies on Earth.”14 Meanwhile, the threat of transnational terrorism remains acute. The humiliat- ing withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan after a 20-year military campaign has created new challenges. It has provided an opportunity to reset the deeply troubled U.S.–Pakistan relationship and reassess U.S. counterterrorism strategy in the region. The long-standing India–Pakistan rivalry and tensions regarding the disputed territory of Kashmir continue to pose risks to regional stability, especially because both countries are nuclear powers. The State Department’s role in strengthening the regional security and eco- nomic framework linking the U.S and India is crucial. In addition, the department has important functional responsibilities in dealing with a range of threats from nuclear proliferation to transnational proliferation. While American statecraft should also seek to improve bilateral relations throughout the region, U.S. policy must be clear-eyed and realistic about the perfidiousness of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the military–political rule in Pakistan. There can be no expecta- tion of normal relations with either.

Trade

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 852-854AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on diplomatic support for Taiwan and resisting Chinese isolation efforts, whereas the Project 2025 trade section centers on tariffs, FTAs, China's economic aggression, and intellectual property issues; there is only a tangential connection through broader U.S.-China policy concerns."

Key themes:ChinaU.S. foreign policyeconomic security

— 819 — Trade 14. Adam Behsudi, “Duffy Finds 18 Co-sponsors for Bill to Increase Trump’s Tariff Powers,” Politico, January 24, 2019, https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/24/duffy-finds-18-co-sponsors-for-bill-to-increase-trumps- trade-powers-2555509 (accessed February 26, 2023). 15. FTAs like NAFTA represent a carve-out from the WTO’s unconditional MFN rule and generally lead to tariffs that tend to be set at more reciprocal levels. 16. H.R.764, United States Reciprocal Trade Act, § 3(b)(1) and (b)(2). 17. Damian Paletta, “Speaker Ryan Admits Defeat, Giving up on Border Adjustment Tax,” The Washington Post, July 27, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/27/paul-ryan-admits-defeat-giving- up-on-border-adjustment-tax/ (accessed February 25, 2023). 18. This section draws on analyses in White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World, June 2018, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/FINAL-China-Technology- Report-6.18.18-PDF.pdf (accessed February 25, 2023). 19. Bloomberg News, “Xi’s Vow of World Dominance by 2049 Sends Chill Through Markets,” October 26, 2022, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-26/xi-s-vow-of-world-dominance-by-2049-sends-chill- through-markets?leadSource=uverify%20wall (accessed February 25, 2023). 20. Executive Office of the President, United States Trade Representative, 2017 Report to Congress on China’s WTO Compliance, January 2018, https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/China%202017%20 WTO%20Report.pdf (accessed February 25, 2023). 21. White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World. 22. The National Medium- and Long-Term Program for Science and Technology Development Plan (2006–2020): An Outline, The State Council, The People’s Republic of China, p. [55], https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/ Cybersecurity/Documents/National_Strategies_Repository/China_2006.pdf (accessed March 21, 2023). 23. Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, Update to the IP Commission Report: The Theft of American Intellectual Property: Reassessments of the Challenge and United States Policy, February 2017, pp. 2, 11, and 12, http://www.ipcommission.org/report/IP_Commission_Report_Update_2017.pdf (accessed February 25, 2023). 24. The laws, which have been put in place for national security purposes, have been promulgated under the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), 22 U.S.C. Ch. 39, §§ 2751–2756, 2761–2781, 2785, and 2791–27999aa-2, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/chapter-39 (accessed February 25, 2023) and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), 50 U.S.C. Ch. 35, §§ 1701–1708, https://www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/text/50/chapter-35 (accessed February 25, 2023). 25. Ministry of Education, People’s Republic of China, “Statistics on Studying in China in 2018,” http://www.moe. gov.cn/was5/web/search?searchword=Statistics+on+Studying+in+China+in+2018&channelid=254028&page=1 (accessed March 21, 2023). 26. Michael Brown and Pavneet Singh, “China’s Technology Transfer Strategy: How Chinese Investments in Emerging Technology Enable a Strategic Competitor to Access the Crown Jewels of U.S. Innovation, Updated with 2016 and 2017 Data,” Defense Innovation Unit Experimental (DIUx), January 2018, https://admin.govexec. com/media/diux_chinatechnologytransferstudy_jan_2018_(1).pdf (accessed February 25, 2023). The DIUx describes itself as “the only DOD Organization focused on accelerating the adoption of commercial and dual- use technology to solve operational challenges at speed and scale.” Defense Innovation Unit Experimental, “About,” https://www.diu.mil/ (accessed February 25, 2023). 27. Brown and Singh, “China’s Technology Transfer Strategy: How Chinese Investments in Emerging Technology Enable a Strategic Competitor to Access the Crown Jewels of U.S. Innovation, Updated with 2016 and 2017 Data,” p. 18. 28. Ingrid Lunden, “Huawei Puts $1M into a New AI Research Partnership with UC Berkeley,” TechCrunch, October 11, 2016, https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/11/huawei-puts-1m-into-a-new-ai-research-partnership-with- ucberkeley/ (accessed February 25, 2023). 29. Press release, “President Trump Announces Strong Actions to Address China’s Unfair Trade,” Office of the United States Trade Representative, March 22, 2018, https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/ press-releases/2018/march/president-trump-announces-strong (accessed February 25, 2023).

Department of State

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 220-222AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on Taiwan's international participation and countering China's diplomatic isolation efforts, while the Project 2025 excerpt discusses U.S. foreign policy priorities in Africa and Europe, including security cooperation, burden-sharing in NATO, and avoiding cultural policy imposition. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Connolly, Gerald E.

Saving the Civil Service Act

119/hr/492

Equal COLA Act

119/hr/491

Federal Retirement Fairness Act

119/hr/1522

Back to All Bills