Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2389
Last Updated: February 4, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Randall, Emily [D-WA-6]

ID: R000621

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.

December 10, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterclass in legislative theater, folks! Let's dissect this farce and get to the real diagnosis.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer Act (HR 2389) is a cleverly crafted bill that pretends to benefit the Quinault Indian Nation by transferring approximately 72 acres of land in Washington state into trust for their benefit. But don't be fooled – this is just a symptom of a deeper disease: politicians trying to buy votes and curry favor with Native American tribes while lining their own pockets.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill takes land from the Forest Service and gives it to the Department of the Interior, which will then administer it for the Quinault Indian Nation. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "gaming prohibited" clause – because we wouldn't want those Native Americans getting too rich off casino revenue, would we? The bill also claims to have no impact on treaty rights, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The Quinault Indian Nation gets some land, yay! But let's not forget the real stakeholders here: the politicians who sponsored this bill (Ms. Randall, I'm looking at you), the lobbyists who greased the wheels, and the bureaucrats who'll get to administer this new land. And of course, the taxpayers who'll foot the bill for this feel-good legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a prime example of "symbolic politics" – it looks good on paper but accomplishes nothing meaningful. The Quinault Indian Nation might get some token land, but it's just a drop in the bucket compared to the real issues facing Native American communities. Meanwhile, politicians will pat themselves on the back for being "pro-Native American," and lobbyists will collect their paychecks.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Legislative Lip Service" – a disease characterized by empty promises, token gestures, and a complete lack of substance. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out politicians on their BS.

Prognosis: This bill will likely pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good photo op with Native American leaders? But don't expect it to actually change anything meaningful – that would require real leadership and a commitment to actual progress.

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties State & Local Government Affairs Transportation & Infrastructure Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations Congressional Rules & Procedures
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Randall, Emily [D-WA-6]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$174,900
27 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$30,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$144,900

No PAC contributions found

1
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE
2 transactions
$6,600
2
PROTECT OUR HERITAGE
1 transaction
$5,000
3
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
2 transactions
$3,500
4
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
5
SNOQUALMIE TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
6
THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON
1 transaction
$3,300
7
QUINAULT INDIAN NATION
1 transaction
$1,500
8
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
9
SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE
1 transaction
$1,000
10
SAMISH TYEE
1 transaction
$1,000
11
BOGART ASSOCIATES, INC.
1 transaction
$500

No committee contributions found

1
ANWAR, S JAVAID
1 transaction
$13,200
2
PARKER, SEAN
1 transaction
$13,200
3
DOLL, MARK
2 transactions
$13,200
4
WELLS, MIKE
1 transaction
$12,500
5
LAURIDSEN, NIXON
1 transaction
$10,000
6
CROOKHAM, JOE
1 transaction
$10,000
7
CROELL, KURT
1 transaction
$10,000
8
DE YAGER, PETER
1 transaction
$10,000
9
STARK, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
10
SABIN, ANDREW
1 transaction
$6,600
11
FAISON, JAY
1 transaction
$6,600
12
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
1 transaction
$6,600
13
CHILDS, JOHN
1 transaction
$6,600
14
UNDERWOOD, ROGER
1 transaction
$6,600
15
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$6,600
16
STEPHENS, WARREN
1 transaction
$6,600

Donor Network - Rep. Randall, Emily [D-WA-6]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 28 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $174,900

Top Donors - Rep. Randall, Emily [D-WA-6]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

11 Orgs16 Individuals