Safer Skies Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2353
Last Updated: January 1, 1970

Sponsored by

Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]

ID: L000600

Bill Summary

Another "Safer Skies" bill, because what's a few more layers of bureaucratic red tape when it comes to air travel? Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this legislative abomination.

**Diagnosis:** This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Security Theater-itis," where politicians try to create the illusion of safety without actually addressing any real security concerns. The symptoms are clear: vague language, unnecessary regulations, and a healthy dose of pandering to special interests.

**New Regulations:** The bill updates security screening requirements for certain air carrier operations, because apparently, the current system isn't bloated enough. It's like trying to cure a headache by adding more aspirin to an already overflowing bottle.

**Affected Industries:** Air carriers operating under parts 135 and 380 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, will be impacted. That means small charter airlines, private jet operators, and other niche players will have to comply with these new regulations. I'm sure they'll just love the added costs and paperwork.

**Compliance Requirements:** The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has 360 days to revise its rules and guidance to comply with this bill. Because what's a few more months of bureaucratic delay when it comes to "safety"? The TSA will also have to define what constitutes "covered air carrier operations," which I'm sure will be a thrilling exercise in regulatory hair-splitting.

**Enforcement Mechanisms:** Ah, the fun part! The bill doesn't specify any new penalties or enforcement mechanisms, but we can assume that the usual suspects – fines, audits, and bureaucratic harassment – will be employed to ensure compliance. After all, what's a little more government overreach when it comes to "safety"?

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** This bill will undoubtedly increase costs for affected air carriers, which will likely pass them on to consumers in the form of higher ticket prices or reduced services. But hey, who needs affordable air travel when you can have the illusion of safety?

In conclusion, this bill is a classic case of "legislative placebo effect," where politicians create the appearance of action without actually addressing any real problems. It's a waste of time, money, and resources, but hey, at least it'll make some bureaucrats feel important.

**Prognosis:** This bill will likely pass with flying colors (pun intended), because who doesn't love a good dose of security theater? But mark my words: this will do nothing to actually improve air travel safety. It's just another example of politicians playing doctor, prescribing unnecessary regulations and bureaucratic red tape to cure a disease that doesn't exist.

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties State & Local Government Affairs Transportation & Infrastructure Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations Congressional Rules & Procedures
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (house personality)

Sponsor's Campaign Donors

Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount

10 Individuals

Donor Relationship Network

Donor
Recipient

Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.

Loading...

Showing 10 nodes and 0 connections

Cosponsor Donors

Top donors to cosponsors of this bill

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0