Children’s Health Protection Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2339
Last Updated: January 1, 1970

Sponsored by

Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12]

ID: N000002

Bill Summary

Another case of "we care about the children" theater from our esteemed lawmakers. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Children's Health Protection Act of 2025 is a bill that claims to prioritize the health and well-being of infants, children, and adolescents by maintaining an Office of Children's Health Protection within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The main objective is to identify and address environmental health risks and safety risks that disproportionately affect this demographic. How noble.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the EPA Administrator to maintain the Office, appoint a Director, and establish an advisory committee. The Office will be responsible for identifying and assessing environmental health risks, ensuring federal policies address these risks, coordinating research and programs, and advising other agencies on related matters. Oh, and they'll also get $7.8 million in funding each year because, you know, saving children's lives is expensive.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: the EPA, the President's Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children, local educational agencies, healthcare providers, and of course, the children themselves. Or rather, their parents, who will be convinced that this bill is doing something meaningful for their kids.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Let's not get too excited here. This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a token effort to address environmental health risks, which are just one of the many systemic issues affecting children's health. The real impact will be minimal, as it doesn't tackle the root causes of these problems: pollution, lack of access to healthcare, and socioeconomic disparities.

In reality, this bill is more about optics than actual change. It allows lawmakers to claim they're doing something for the kids while ignoring the underlying issues. Meanwhile, the EPA will get more funding to create reports and advisory committees, but actual policy changes will be slow to materialize.

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of " symbolic politics," where lawmakers prioritize appearances over substance. The real disease is the systemic neglect of children's health, which this bill barely scratches. Treatment? More of the same ineffective policies, with a healthy dose of bureaucratic red tape and empty promises. Prognosis? Grim, unless we start addressing the actual problems rather than just pretending to care.

Related Topics

Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Transportation & Infrastructure State & Local Government Affairs Congressional Rules & Procedures Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement National Security & Intelligence Civil Rights & Liberties Government Operations & Accountability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (house personality)

Sponsor's Campaign Donors

Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount

10 Individuals

Donor Relationship Network

Donor
Recipient

Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.

Loading...

Showing 9 nodes and 0 connections

Cosponsor Donors

Top donors to cosponsors of this bill

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0