SHARE Act of 2025

The SHARE Act of 2025. A bill that, on the surface, appears to be a mundane attempt at streamlining background checks for occupational licenses. But, as is often the case with legislation, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The primary objective of this bill is to facilitate the sharing of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal history record information between states for the purpose of conducting background checks on individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice an occupation or profession. The bill aims to standardize and expedite this process, making it easier for states to verify the credentials of applicants.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The SHARE Act amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 by adding a new section that requires the FBI to provide criminal history record information to state licensing authorities upon request. The bill also establishes guidelines for the use and sharing of this information, including restrictions on how it can be used and with whom it can be shared.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The primary stakeholders affected by this bill are:

1. State licensing authorities: These entities will now have access to FBI criminal history record information, making it easier for them to conduct background checks. 2. Occupational license applicants: Individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice an occupation or profession may face more stringent background check requirements. 3. Employers and industry associations: Companies that rely on licensed professionals may benefit from the increased efficiency and accuracy of background checks.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

From a business perspective, this bill has several implications:

1. **Increased efficiency**: Streamlined background checks can reduce the time and resources required to verify applicant credentials. 2. **Enhanced security**: Access to FBI criminal history record information can improve the accuracy of background checks, reducing the risk of hiring unqualified or unsuitable individuals. 3. **Potential for increased costs**: The bill may lead to additional costs for state licensing authorities and employers, as they implement new procedures and systems to manage the sharing of sensitive information.

As a self-interested billionaire, I see this bill as an opportunity to further consolidate my influence in the industries that rely on licensed professionals. By supporting this legislation, I can help shape the regulatory environment to favor my business interests and create new opportunities for growth and profit.

In conclusion, the SHARE Act of 2025 is a bill that may seem innocuous at first glance but has significant implications for businesses and individuals alike. As a master of the game, I will continue to monitor this legislation closely and adjust my strategy accordingly to maximize my wealth and influence.

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, HR 2332, the SHARE Act of 2025. As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it becomes an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to authorize the use of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal history record information for the administration of certain licenses. Remember when we learned about the different types of laws and how they're created? This bill aims to amend existing law, specifically the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill adds a new section (SEC. 6404) that allows the FBI to share criminal history record information with state licensing authorities for the purpose of conducting background checks on individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice an occupation or profession in a compact member state. This provision restricts how state licensing authorities can use this information, prohibiting them from sharing it with other entities or the public.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* State licensing authorities * Individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice an occupation or profession * Interstate compact commissions * The FBI

As we discussed in class, laws often have unintended consequences. In this case, the bill may impact how states share information and conduct background checks, potentially affecting individuals' ability to obtain licenses.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is significant. By allowing the FBI to share criminal history record information with state licensing authorities, it could streamline the process for conducting background checks. However, as we learned about checks and balances, this provision may also raise concerns about individual privacy and the potential for misuse of sensitive information.

Now, I expect you all to remember how a bill becomes a law, including the role of committees and the importance of compromise. This bill has been referred to two committees: Education and Workforce, and Judiciary. As it moves through the legislative process, we'll see if it undergoes significant changes or faces opposition from various stakeholders.

Next class, we'll discuss how this bill might be affected by the system of checks and balances, and why that's essential for ensuring accountability in our government.

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 2332, the SHARE Act of 2025. Now, at first glance, this bill seems like a harmless attempt to streamline background checks for professionals across state lines. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated goal is to facilitate the sharing of FBI criminal history record information between states for licensing purposes. Sounds reasonable, right? But what they're not telling you is that this bill is just a Trojan horse for a larger agenda – the creation of a national database of citizens' personal info.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The SHARE Act amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, allowing states to access FBI records for background checks. But here's the kicker: it also defines "criminal history record information" in a way that's suspiciously broad. They're not just talking about convictions; they're including arrests, detentions, and even acquittals! That's right, folks – if you've ever been wrongly accused or had a run-in with the law, your info could be shared across state lines without your consent.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects anyone seeking a professional license or certification in multiple states. But let's not forget about the real stakeholders here: the government agencies and private contractors who'll be handling this sensitive information. You can bet they'll be making a pretty penny off of our personal data.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking – "But Uncle, this is just a minor tweak to existing law." Ah, no! This bill has far-reaching implications for our civil liberties and the surveillance state. Think about it: with this database in place, the government can track your movements, monitor your activities, and even predict your behavior. It's like something straight out of Minority Report!

So, what's really going on here? Is this just a case of bureaucratic inefficiency or is there something more sinister at play? I'll tell you one thing – our government loves to hide its true intentions in plain sight. Wake up, sheeple!

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, because we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. The SHARE Act of 2025 - sounds innocent enough, right? But trust me, this thing is a Trojan horse for... well, I'll get to that in a minute.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The SHARE Act claims to be all about "streamlining" the process of sharing FBI criminal history records with state licensing authorities. Yeah, because what could possibly go wrong with giving more power to the feds to snoop on our personal lives? (Sarcasm alert!) The bill's proponents say it'll help states make informed decisions about who gets licensed to practice certain professions. How noble.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, allowing the FBI to share criminal history records with state licensing authorities through interstate compacts. It also sets up a system for states to use this information to conduct background checks on individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice certain occupations.

Now, here's where it gets interesting: the bill explicitly prohibits states from sharing this sensitive info with anyone else - except, of course, when they're allowed to share it with... (dramatic pause) ...the compact commission! Yeah, because that's not a potential recipe for abuse at all. And let's not forget the part where states can inform the compact commission about whether an individual's background check was "satisfactory" or not. That's just a fancy way of saying they can share sensitive info without actually sharing it. (Wink, wink.)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects anyone seeking licenses to practice certain occupations - think doctors, lawyers, teachers... you name it. It also impacts state licensing authorities and the FBI, which will be handling all this sensitive information.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't this just a common-sense bill to help keep our communities safe?" Ah, nope! This is actually a masterclass in bureaucratic overreach. Think about it: the feds get to collect and share more of your personal info, while states get to use that info to make decisions about who gets licensed. It's like a match made in heaven... for Big Brother.

And let's not forget the potential for abuse - I mean, "unintended consequences." What happens when this sensitive information falls into the wrong hands? Or when states start using it to discriminate against certain individuals or groups? (Gasp) The possibilities are endless!

In conclusion, folks, the SHARE Act of 2025 is a bill that's all about... well, I'm not really sure what it's about, but I do know it's a slippery slope. So, let's all just take a deep breath and remember: when the government says they

**HR 2332: SHARE Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose and Objectives:** The SHARE Act aims to facilitate the sharing of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal history record information among states for the purpose of conducting background checks on individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice an occupation or profession.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 by adding a new section that allows the FBI to provide criminal history record information to state licensing authorities through agreements with state law enforcement agencies or identification bureaus. The information can be used solely for conducting background checks required by interstate compacts.

Key provisions include:

* Authorizing the FBI to share criminal history record information with state licensing authorities * Restricting the use of shared information to the purpose of conducting background checks * Permitting state licensing authorities to inform compact commissions about the completion of background checks, without sharing detailed information

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:**

* State licensing authorities * Interstate compact commissions * Individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice an occupation or profession * Law enforcement agencies * FBI

**Potential Impact and Implications:** The SHARE Act aims to streamline the process of conducting background checks for individuals seeking licenses or privileges across state lines. The bill's provisions may:

* Enhance public safety by facilitating more comprehensive background checks * Reduce administrative burdens on state licensing authorities and interstate compact commissions * Increase efficiency in the licensure process, potentially benefiting professionals who practice across state lines * Raise concerns about data privacy and security, as sensitive information is shared among agencies

However, the bill's impact will depend on its implementation and the specific agreements established between states and the FBI.

Let's break down the SHARE Act of 2025, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The SHARE Act is all about streamlining the process for states to share and use FBI criminal history record information for occupational licensing purposes. It's like, when you're tryin' to get a license to practice your profession in another state, they need to check if you've got any skeletons in your closet, man. This bill makes it easier for states to do that.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The SHARE Act amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 by adding a new section (6404) that allows the FBI to share criminal history record information with state licensing authorities through an agreement with a state law enforcement agency or identification bureau. This is a big deal, bro, 'cause it's gonna make it way easier for states to verify if someone's got a clean record before issuin' a license.

The bill also defines some key terms, like "Commission" (an interstate compact commission), "criminal history record information," and "license." It's all about gettin' the lingo right, dude.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects states, state licensing authorities, and individuals seekin' occupational licenses. If you're a nurse, doctor, or lawyer tryin' to practice in another state, this bill's got your back (or not, depending on your record, bro).

States will benefit from easier access to FBI records, makin' it simpler to verify applicants' backgrounds. State licensing authorities will also get more clarity on how to use and share this info.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The SHARE Act could have some major implications, dude:

* **Improved public safety**: By makin' it easier for states to check backgrounds, we might see fewer bad apples slippin' through the cracks. * **Increased efficiency**: States won't have to jump through as many hoops to get FBI records, savin' time and resources. * **Enhanced interstate cooperation**: This bill could lead to more seamless licensure processes across state lines, bro.

However, there are also some potential concerns:

* **Privacy issues**: We gotta make sure states aren't sharin' sensitive info willy-nilly. The bill's got some safeguards in place, but we'll need to keep an eye on it. * **Disproportionate impact**: Some folks might be unfairly affected by this bill, like those with minor offenses or expunged records.

Overall, the SHARE Act is a chill way to improve occupational licensure processes while keepin' public safety in mind. Just remember, bro: with great power comes great responsibility.

**Bill Analysis: HR 2332 - SHARE Act of 2025**

The SHARE Act of 2025, introduced by Rep. Mann and cosponsored by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, aims to facilitate the sharing of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal history record information among state licensing authorities for the purpose of conducting background checks on individuals seeking licenses or privileges to practice occupations or professions.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to streamline the process of sharing FBI criminal history records between states, enabling more efficient and effective background checks. This is achieved by authorizing the Director of the FBI to provide such information to state licensing authorities through agreements with state law enforcement agencies or identification bureaus.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Subtitle E of title VI of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, adding a new section (6404) that outlines the requirements for sharing and using FBI criminal history record information. Key provisions include:

* Authorizing the FBI to provide criminal history records to state licensing authorities for background checks * Restricting the use of such information solely for the purpose of conducting background checks * Permitting state licensing authorities to share binary determinations (i.e., pass/fail) with compact commissions, but not actual criminal history record information

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* State licensing authorities and boards responsible for issuing licenses or privileges to practice occupations or professions * Individuals seeking licenses or privileges, who will be subject to background checks using FBI criminal history records * Interstate compact commissions, which may receive binary determinations from state licensing authorities

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The SHARE Act of 2025 has several potential implications:

* **Increased efficiency:** Streamlined sharing of FBI criminal history records could expedite the background check process, reducing delays and administrative burdens on state licensing authorities. * **Enhanced public safety:** By facilitating more comprehensive background checks, the bill may help prevent individuals with a history of crime from obtaining licenses or privileges to practice occupations or professions that pose risks to public safety. * **Potential for overreach:** Critics might argue that the bill's provisions could lead to an expansion of government surveillance and data collection, potentially infringing on individual privacy rights.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there is no direct evidence of significant monied interests driving this legislation, it is worth noting that various industries and organizations may benefit from the streamlined background check process. For example:

* **Healthcare industry:** The bill's provisions could facilitate faster licensing for healthcare professionals, potentially benefiting hospitals, medical groups, and other healthcare providers. * **Education sector:** Streamlined background checks might also aid in the hiring of teachers and educators, which could be beneficial to educational institutions and organizations.

However, without further information on campaign contributions or lobbying efforts related to this bill, it is difficult to determine the extent of monied