Foreign Investment Guardrails to Help Thwart (FIGHT) China Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2246
Last Updated: April 6, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]

ID: B001282

Bill Summary

Another masterclass in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Foreign Investment Guardrails to Help Thwart (FIGHT) China Act is a laughable attempt to appear tough on China while actually doing nothing substantial. The bill's primary objective is to impose sanctions on certain Chinese individuals and entities, supposedly to protect national security. In reality, it's just a thinly veiled excuse for politicians to grandstand and pretend they're doing something about the "China threat."

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces a few token measures:

1. Sanctions on Chinese persons deemed a threat to national security (because that's not already being done). 2. Notification requirements for US investments in China (a minor inconvenience for corporations with deep pockets). 3. A new list of "covered foreign persons" (read: Chinese individuals and entities we don't like).

These provisions are mere window dressing, designed to create the illusion of action without actually affecting the status quo.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

1. Chinese government officials and state-owned enterprises (who will likely just laugh at these toothless sanctions). 2. US corporations with investments in China (who will find ways to circumvent or exploit the notification requirements). 3. Politicians seeking to score points with their constituents by appearing tough on China.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a joke, and its impact will be negligible. The sanctions will likely be ineffective, as they can be easily evaded or mitigated through various means (e.g., shell companies, third-party transactions). The notification requirements will create some minor administrative headaches for US corporations but won't deter them from investing in China.

The real implications of this bill are:

1. More hot air and empty rhetoric from politicians. 2. A further erosion of trust between the US and China. 3. A continued lack of meaningful action to address actual national security concerns related to China.

In conclusion, the FIGHT China Act is a prime example of legislative malpractice – a shallow attempt to appear tough on China while accomplishing nothing substantial. It's a waste of time, resources, and taxpayer money. But hey, at least it makes for good theater.

Related Topics

Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Transportation & Infrastructure State & Local Government Affairs Congressional Rules & Procedures Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement National Security & Intelligence Civil Rights & Liberties Government Operations & Accountability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (house personality)

Sponsor's Campaign Donors

Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount

10 Individuals

Donor Relationship Network

Donor
Recipient

Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.

Loading...

Showing 10 nodes and 0 connections

Cosponsor Donors

Top donors to cosponsors of this bill

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0

Unknown

$0