Stop Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/1868
Last Updated: April 15, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2]

ID: H001072

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

âś…

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another bill from our esteemed leaders in Congress. How thrilling. Let's dissect this mess, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Stop Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act of 2025 (HR 1868) claims to provide relief to United States nationals who are unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad by postponing tax deadlines and reimbursing paid late fees. How noble. But, as always, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create a new section (7511) that allows for the postponement of tax deadlines and reimbursement of paid late fees for individuals who meet certain criteria. These include being a United States national unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad, as determined by the Secretary of State or the Attorney General.

The bill also establishes a program to allow eligible individuals to apply for refunds or abatements of penalties and fines paid during their detention period. Because, you know, being held hostage is stressful enough without having to worry about tax deadlines.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* United States nationals who are unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad (the "hostages") * The spouses and dependents of these individuals * The Secretary of State * The Attorney General * The Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell (because, apparently, that's a thing)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, let's get to the good stuff. This bill is less about helping hostages and more about:

1. **Grandstanding:** Congress gets to look like heroes by "helping" American hostages while doing nothing to actually address the root causes of their detention. 2. **Bureaucratic expansion:** The bill creates a new program, which means more jobs for bureaucrats and more opportunities for waste and inefficiency. 3. **Taxpayer burden:** Who's going to foot the bill for these refunds and abatements? You guessed it – the American taxpayer.

In conclusion, HR 1868 is just another example of Congressional theater, designed to make politicians look good while doing nothing to address the real issues. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, a drop in the ocean of bureaucratic inefficiency. But hey, at least they're trying... right?

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties State & Local Government Affairs Transportation & Infrastructure Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations Congressional Rules & Procedures
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$79,726
27 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$38,026
Committees
$0
Individuals
$41,700

No PAC contributions found

1
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
2 transactions
$9,900
2
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
3
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
4
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
5
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
6
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI
1 transaction
$3,300
7
SAME DAY PROCESSING
2 transactions
$2,326
8
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$1,000
9
PEOPLE FOR BETTER GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
10
ONEIDA NATION
1 transaction
$1,000
11
CHICKSAW NATION
1 transaction
$1,000
12
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
13
THE ROYER LAW FIRM PLLC
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
REID, VERNON JR
1 transaction
$3,300
2
SCHOCHOR, JONATHAN
1 transaction
$3,300
3
SCOTT, KIMBERLY ANN
1 transaction
$3,300
4
SPEIGHTS, GRACE
1 transaction
$3,300
5
STATON, DONNA
1 transaction
$3,300
6
STATON, KERRY
1 transaction
$3,300
7
JOSEPH, MARK
1 transaction
$3,300
8
BERNDT, RICK
1 transaction
$3,000
9
HRABOWSKI, FREEMAN
1 transaction
$2,800
10
HRABOWSKI, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$2,800
11
ARMINGER, MARY
1 transaction
$2,500
12
BELL, CATHY
1 transaction
$2,500
13
SHERMAN, BETSY
1 transaction
$2,500
14
VARNADO, ARTHUR
1 transaction
$2,500

Donor Network - Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 28 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $79,726

Top Donors - Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

13 Orgs14 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.

Introduction

Low 51.3%
Pages: 183-185

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Introduction

Low 50.8%
Pages: 183-185

— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries.

Introduction

Low 50.8%
Pages: 183-185

— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.