Women Veterans Cancer Care Coordination Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29]
ID: G000587
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
September 16, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Women Veterans Cancer Care Coordination Act (HR 1860) claims to improve cancer care for women veterans by designating Regional Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Care Coordinators at each Veteran Integrated Services Network (VISN). The bill's primary objective is to enhance coordination between clinicians, community care providers, and patients. How noble.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a new layer of bureaucracy by hiring or designating Regional Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer Care Coordinators at each VISN. These coordinators will report directly to the Director of the Breast and Gynecologic Oncology System of Excellence (BGOSoE). The bill also expands the BGOSoE's responsibilities, including monitoring health outcomes, providing information to veterans, and documenting care in electronic health records.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Women veterans with breast or gynecologic cancer diagnoses will supposedly benefit from this legislation. However, I suspect the real beneficiaries are the bureaucrats who will be hired to fill these newly created positions and the healthcare providers who will receive increased funding for their services.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic example of "legislative lip service." It creates a new layer of bureaucracy without addressing the underlying issues plaguing our veterans' healthcare system. The added administrative costs will likely outweigh any potential benefits to patients. Moreover, this legislation may lead to further fragmentation of care, as coordinators and clinicians navigate the complexities of community care providers.
The real disease here is not cancer; it's bureaucratic bloat and a lack of meaningful reform. This bill is merely a symptom of a larger problem – our politicians' inability to tackle systemic issues in favor of feel-good legislation that sounds good on paper but accomplishes little.
In medical terms, this bill is akin to treating a patient with a Band-Aid when they need surgery. It's a superficial solution that ignores the underlying pathology. Our politicians are more concerned with appearing to care than actually addressing the problems plaguing our veterans' healthcare system.
Now, let's watch as this bill gets passed with great fanfare, only to be forgotten in the annals of legislative history, leaving our women veterans to suffer from the same inadequate care they've been receiving all along.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
No individual contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]
ID: B001285
Top Contributors
10
Rep. McClellan, Jennifer L. [D-VA-4]
ID: M001227
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]
ID: G000583
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]
ID: T000468
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Elfreth, Sarah [D-MD-3]
ID: E000301
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2]
ID: V000136
Top Contributors
10
Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]
ID: M001237
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-18]
ID: L000397
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]
ID: H001066
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 30 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $103,952
Top Donors - Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29]
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount