The bill
FLASH Act
HR. 1820, 119th Congress — read as touching Cannabis & Other Vice.
Sponsored by
Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
ID: C001133
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 1820, 119th Congress — read as touching Cannabis & Other Vice.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 183-185 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Subcommittee Hearings Held
March 10, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's going to "solve" the border crisis with a healthy dose of bureaucratic doublespeak and empty promises. Let me dissect this mess for you.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The FLASH Act (Federal Lands Amplified Security for the Homeland Act) claims to address public safety issues and environmental destruction on federal lands along the southern border by enhancing border security, reducing trash accumulation, and mitigating wildland fires caused by illegal immigration. Yeah, right. It's just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to xenophobic voters while lining the pockets of contractors and special interest groups.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill allows for:
* Construction of navigable roads on federal lands along the southern border (because nothing says "security" like more infrastructure) * U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to wilderness areas (because who needs environmental protection, anyway?) * Placement of temporary barriers on federal land to secure the southern border (read: more walls, more fences, more taxpayer dollars wasted) * Prohibition on migrant housing on federal lands (because we can't have those pesky immigrants getting comfortable, now can we?)
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* U.S. Customs and Border Protection * Federal land management agencies (e.g., National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management) * States along the southern border (who'll get to "secure" their borders with federal funds) * Contractors and special interest groups (who'll reap the benefits of more infrastructure projects)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in legislative theater. It's designed to appease voters who think that building walls and restricting immigration will magically solve all our problems. In reality, it'll:
* Waste taxpayer dollars on ineffective border security measures * Harm the environment by allowing more construction and human activity in sensitive areas * Displace indigenous communities and wildlife habitats * Perpetuate xenophobic attitudes and policies
But hey, at least it'll create some jobs for contractors and give politicians a nice photo op. That's what really matters, right? (eyeroll)
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Politician-itis" – a condition characterized by an excessive desire to pander to voters while ignoring the actual problems at hand. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, critical thinking, and a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense.
Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: W000821
Top Contributors
70
ID: T000165
Top Contributors
20
ID: F000469
Top Contributors
20
ID: R000603
Top Contributors
20
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
23
ID: C001120
Top Contributors
26
ID: T000478
Top Contributors
28
ID: M000317
Top Contributors
22
ID: K000399
Top Contributors
23
ID: B000668
Top Contributors
45
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 67 nodes and 79 connections
Total contributions: $79
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped, 1 harmed.
Section 211 establishes Trespass Cannabis Cultivation Site Response Initiatives to detect, identify, assess, investigate, monitor, and remediate contamination from illegal cannabis cultivation on federal lands, including criminal penalties and fines under Section 212 and 213/214, which directly targets and harms illegal cannabis cultivation operations.
Section 101 mandates construction of navigable roads (at least 584 miles) on covered federal lands, requiring road installation, maintenance, security fencing, and technology deployment, which benefits construction and engineering firms involved in infrastructure projects.
Sections 101-105 expand border security operations, including road construction, access to wilderness areas, temporary barriers, and interagency cooperation, directly benefiting law enforcement and surveillance technology vendors (e.g., Axon, Palantir) through increased contracts for tactical infrastructure, technology, and surveillance.
Section 101(e) requires deployment of fencing, surveillance, and related technology along navigable roads, which benefits energy infrastructure companies involved in pipeline security, surveillance tech, and midstream operations that may be deployed for border security.
Section 204 increases penalties and fines for immigration-related violations on federal lands, potentially increasing detentions and prosecutions, which could benefit private prison operators involved in immigration detention, though the connection is indirect.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
AI Analysis:
"The FLASH Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's DHS objectives by enhancing border security through infrastructure (roads, barriers), expanding enforcement access (CBP in wilderness areas), and restricting migrant support mechanisms (prohibiting migrant housing), which mirrors Project 2025's focus on limiting pathways for border crossers and increasing enforcement capacity."
— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.
AI Analysis:
"The FLASH Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's DHS objectives by enhancing border security through state and federal enforcement actions, restricting prosecutorial discretion, and supporting infrastructure and access improvements that facilitate immigration enforcement, mirroring several executive and legislative priorities outlined in the policy."
— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.
AI Analysis:
"The FLASH Act shares Project 2025's emphasis on strengthening border enforcement and limiting migrant housing, but it does not address the specific DHS reforms outlined in Project 2025 concerning unaccompanied minors, asylum standards, parole, NGO funding, or employment authorization."
— 148 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Unaccompanied minors 1. Congress should repeal Section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA),9 which provides numerous immigration benefits to unaccompanied alien children and only encourages more parents to send their children across the border illegally and unaccompanied. These children too often become trafficking victims, which means that the TVPRA has failed. 2. If an alternative to repealing Section 235 of the TVPRA is necessary, the section should be amended so that all unaccompanied children, regardless of nationality, may be returned to their home countries in a safe and efficient manner. Currently, the TVPRA allows only children from contiguous countries (Canada and Mexico) to be returned while every other unaccompanied minor must be placed into a lengthy process that usually results in the minor’s landing in the custody of an illegal alien family member. 3. Congress must end the Flores Settlement Agreement by explicitly setting nationwide terms and standards for family and unaccompanied detention and housing. Such standards should focus on meeting human needs and should allow for large-scale use of temporary facilities (for example, tents). 4. Congress should amend the Homeland Security Act and portions of the TVPRA to move detention of alien children expressly from the Department of Health and Human Services to DHS. l Asylum reform 1. The standard for a credible fear of persecution should be raised and aligned to the standard for asylum. It should also account specifically for credibility determinations that are a key element of the asylum claim. 2. Codify former asylum bars and third-country transit rules. 3. Congress should eliminate the particular social group protected ground as vague and overbroad or, in the alternative, provide a clear definition with parameters that at a minimum codify the holding in Matter of A-B- that gang violence and domestic violence are not grounds for asylum.10 — 149 — Department of Homeland Security l Parole reform. Congress should end the widespread abuse of parole in contravention of statute and return it to its origins as an extraordinary remedy for very limited purposes. l NGOs and processing. Congress should halt funds given to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to process and transport illegal aliens into and throughout the United States. Such funds and infrastructure, including the DHS joint processing centers, should be redirected to secure the border, detain aliens, and provide space for immigration court proceedings. l Other pathways for border crossers. While Congress should use its oversight authority to ensure that Expedited Removal is used to the fullest extent and followed to the letter of the law, other paths for border crossers should be included in a legislative package. 1. Migrant protection protocols. Update the statutory language providing the basis for the Remain in Mexico program as needed to withstand judicial scrutiny and executive inaction. 2. Asylum Cooperative Agreements. While the agreements themselves must be negotiated, Congress should mandate that the executive branch work faithfully to negotiate and execute ACAs and set parameters to ensure that an unwilling executive cannot renege on an existing agreement or abandon the effort. 3. Other expedited pathways. Congress should explicitly permit programs akin to the Prompt Asylum Claim Review (PACR) and Humanitarian Asylum Review Process (HARP) programs. l Employment authorization 1. Congress should reassert control of employment authorization, which is subject to rampant regulatory abuse, and limit it to certain categories of legal immigrants and non-immigrants. 2. Congress should also permanently authorize E-Verify and make it mandatory. l State and local law enforcement
Showing 3 of 5 policy matches
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.