The bill
FLASH Act
HR. 1820, 119th Congress β read as touching Cannabis & Other Vice.
Sponsored by
Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
ID: C001133
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 1820, 119th Congress β read as touching Cannabis & Other Vice.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Subcommittee Hearings Held
March 10, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's going to "solve" the border crisis with a healthy dose of bureaucratic doublespeak and empty promises. Let me dissect this mess for you.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The FLASH Act (Federal Lands Amplified Security for the Homeland Act) claims to address public safety issues and environmental destruction on federal lands along the southern border by enhancing border security, reducing trash accumulation, and mitigating wildland fires caused by illegal immigration. Yeah, right. It's just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to xenophobic voters while lining the pockets of contractors and special interest groups.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill allows for:
* Construction of navigable roads on federal lands along the southern border (because nothing says "security" like more infrastructure) * U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to wilderness areas (because who needs environmental protection, anyway?) * Placement of temporary barriers on federal land to secure the southern border (read: more walls, more fences, more taxpayer dollars wasted) * Prohibition on migrant housing on federal lands (because we can't have those pesky immigrants getting comfortable, now can we?)
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* U.S. Customs and Border Protection * Federal land management agencies (e.g., National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management) * States along the southern border (who'll get to "secure" their borders with federal funds) * Contractors and special interest groups (who'll reap the benefits of more infrastructure projects)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in legislative theater. It's designed to appease voters who think that building walls and restricting immigration will magically solve all our problems. In reality, it'll:
* Waste taxpayer dollars on ineffective border security measures * Harm the environment by allowing more construction and human activity in sensitive areas * Displace indigenous communities and wildlife habitats * Perpetuate xenophobic attitudes and policies
But hey, at least it'll create some jobs for contractors and give politicians a nice photo op. That's what really matters, right? (eyeroll)
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Politician-itis" β a condition characterized by an excessive desire to pander to voters while ignoring the actual problems at hand. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, critical thinking, and a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense.
Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: W000821
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000165
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000469
Top Contributors
10
ID: R000603
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001120
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000478
Top Contributors
10
ID: M000317
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000399
Top Contributors
10
ID: B000668
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 86 nodes and 45 connections (79 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $231,139
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped, 1 harmed.
Section 211 establishes Trespass Cannabis Cultivation Site Response Initiatives to detect, identify, assess, investigate, monitor, and remediate contamination from illegal cannabis cultivation on federal lands, including criminal penalties and fines under Section 212 and 213/214, which directly targets and harms illegal cannabis cultivation operations.
Section 101 mandates construction of navigable roads (at least 584 miles) on covered federal lands, requiring road installation, maintenance, security fencing, and technology deployment, which benefits construction and engineering firms involved in infrastructure projects.
Sections 101-105 expand border security operations, including road construction, access to wilderness areas, temporary barriers, and interagency cooperation, directly benefiting law enforcement and surveillance technology vendors (e.g., Axon, Palantir) through increased contracts for tactical infrastructure, technology, and surveillance.
Section 101(e) requires deployment of fencing, surveillance, and related technology along navigable roads, which benefits energy infrastructure companies involved in pipeline security, surveillance tech, and midstream operations that may be deployed for border security.
Section 204 increases penalties and fines for immigration-related violations on federal lands, potentially increasing detentions and prosecutions, which could benefit private prison operators involved in immigration detention, though the connection is indirect.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Equitable Access to School Facilities Act
119/hr/7086
To amend the Sikes Act to increase flexibility with respect to cooperative and interagency agreements for land management off of installations.
119/hr/4293
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13355 North Lon Adams Road in Marana, Arizona, as the Mayor Ed Honea Memorial Post Office.
119/hr/6247