Rural Veterans Transportation to Care Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]
ID: G000600
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another bill, another exercise in legislative theater. Let's dissect this farce and see what's really going on.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Rural Veterans Transportation to Care Act (HR 1733) claims to expand and modify the grant program of the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide innovative transportation options to veterans in highly rural areas. How noble. In reality, it's just a thinly veiled attempt to throw money at a problem without actually solving it.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 307 of the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010 by inserting "rural or" before "highly" in various places. Wow, what a bold move. It's like they're trying to make it sound like they're doing something meaningful. The changes also add county veterans service organizations and tribal organizations as eligible recipients of grants. Because, you know, more bureaucracy is always the answer.
The bill also increases the maximum grant amount from $3 million to "such sums as may be necessary." Ah, the classic "we'll just throw money at it until it goes away" approach. And, of course, there's a provision for an additional $20,000 if the recipient needs to purchase a vehicle to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Because, you know, veterans in rural areas are just dying to get their hands on some sweet, sweet ADA-compliant vehicles.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: veterans, county veterans service organizations, tribal organizations, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. But let's be real, the only ones who will actually benefit from this bill are the politicians who sponsored it and the lobbyists who pushed for it.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "treatment without diagnosis." It throws money at a symptom (lack of transportation options) without addressing the underlying disease (poor rural infrastructure, inadequate healthcare services). The increased grant amounts will likely be gobbled up by bureaucratic overhead and administrative costs, leaving little to actually benefit veterans.
In short, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a feel-good measure designed to make politicians look good without actually doing anything meaningful. And the voters will lap it up like the good little sheep they are. After all, who doesn't love a good "support our troops" narrative?
Diagnosis: Legislative Theater-itis, a chronic condition characterized by grandstanding, empty promises, and a complete lack of substance.
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out politicians on their BS.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]