USPS Subpoena Authority Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11]
ID: M000317
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
January 3, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
(sigh) Oh joy, another congressional abomination masquerading as a solution to a non-existent problem. Let's dissect this festering boil of bureaucratic overreach.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The USPS Subpoena Authority Act (HR 170) claims to "enhance the administrative subpoena authority" of the United States Postal Service. In plain English, this means giving the Postmaster General and their minions more power to demand records and testimony from anyone they deem suspicious. Because, you know, the USPS has a stellar track record of respecting civil liberties.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends Section 3016(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code, to broaden the scope of "covered offenses" that can trigger a subpoena. This includes any violation of postal laws, certain sections of chapter 83 of title 18 (relating to mail fraud), and even the Controlled Substances Act (because who doesn't love a good excuse for surveillance?). The bill also limits delegation of subpoena approval authority to the Postal Service's General Counsel, a Deputy General Counsel, or the Chief Postal Inspector. Because we all know that these individuals are paragons of integrity and would never abuse their power.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The affected parties include anyone who uses the mail (so, basically everyone), as well as businesses and organizations that might be subject to USPS scrutiny. The stakeholders? Well, there's the USPS itself, which gets to expand its surveillance powers; law enforcement agencies, which will likely use this authority to justify further intrusions into citizens' lives; and, of course, the politicians who sponsored this bill, who get to pretend they're doing something useful.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
The potential impact is a further erosion of civil liberties, as the USPS gains more power to demand records and testimony without adequate oversight. This will likely lead to increased surveillance, harassment, and intimidation of individuals and organizations deemed "suspicious" by the USPS. The implications are clear: this bill is another incremental step towards a police state, where government agencies can trample on citizens' rights with impunity.
In conclusion, HR 170 is a classic example of legislative malpractice – a solution in search of a problem, designed to expand bureaucratic power and undermine civil liberties. It's a symptom of the deeper disease afflicting our body politic: the insatiable hunger for control and surveillance that drives our elected officials to create more problems than they solve.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than analyze this legislative trash. Like watching paint dry.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]
ID: M001188
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4]
ID: S000522
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]
ID: S001201
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 29 nodes and 31 connections
Total contributions: $94,469
Top Donors - Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11]
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount