IMPACT Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/1534
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]

ID: M001222

Follow the money

The bill

IMPACT Act

HR. 1534, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.

The sponsor

Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$125,700 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Energy and Related Commissions" section, p. 425-427 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

March 25, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater. The IMPACT Act, or "Innovative Mitigation Partnerships for Asphalt and Concrete Technologies Act," because who doesn't love a good acronym? This bill is a perfect example of how politicians and bureaucrats can take a simple idea – in this case, reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete, and asphalt production – and turn it into a bloated, self-serving monstrosity.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The IMPACT Act claims to aim at "strengthening and enhancing the competitiveness of American industry" by researching and developing advanced technologies for more efficient cement, concrete, and asphalt production. Yeah, right. The real purpose is to funnel taxpayer money into the pockets of special interest groups, universities, and private companies under the guise of "research and development."

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a new program within the Department of Energy (DOE) to fund research, development, demonstration, and commercial application of advanced technologies for low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt production. It also creates a 5-year strategic plan, because who doesn't love a good bureaucratic exercise in futility? The DOE will coordinate with various program offices, leveraging existing research infrastructure (read: pork barrel spending). Oh, and there's a lot of jargon about "engineering performance-based standards" and "alternative fuels." Yawn.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: universities, private companies, special interest groups, and government agencies. The bill will create new opportunities for crony capitalism, as favored industries and institutions receive handouts and subsidies under the guise of "research and development."

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "greenwashing" – using environmental concerns to justify wasteful spending and corporate welfare. The actual impact on greenhouse gas emissions will be negligible, while the real beneficiaries will be the special interest groups and industries that lobbied for this boondoggle. Taxpayers will foot the bill, as always.

In conclusion, the IMPACT Act is a textbook example of legislative malpractice – a self-serving, pork-laden monstrosity masquerading as a noble effort to save the planet. I give it two thumbs down and a strong recommendation for a healthy dose of skepticism.

Related Topics

Energy Production & ConservationClimate Change & Sustainability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$125,700
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$1,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$124,700

No PAC contributions found

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
GROVER, JACOB
1 transaction
$13,200
2
BEREN, ADAM
1 transaction
$6,600
3
SHEAR, HERB
1 transaction
$6,600
4
STAHL, LEWIS
1 transaction
$6,600
5
DARIVOFF, PHILIP
1 transaction
$6,600
6
PACKER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
7
SINGER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
8
FRIEDMAN, MARK
1 transaction
$6,600
9
HABER, JAMES
1 transaction
$6,600
10
MORENO, KEVIN
1 transaction
$6,600
11
FISHER, KENNETH
1 transaction
$6,600
12
FISHER, SHERRILYN
1 transaction
$6,600
13
KLINGENSTEIN, THOMAS
1 transaction
$6,600
14
SURACE, JAMES MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
15
SCHALL, BRIAN
1 transaction
$5,000
16
WEINBERG, RONALD
1 transaction
$5,000
17
SALZBERG, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$5,000
18
BLAHA, GEORGE
1 transaction
$3,900
19
STRUNK, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$3,500
20
HAWKINS, SHAFRON E
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4]

ID: F000477

Top Contributors

20

1
PERRY, ROGER L.
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC
$3,300
Dec 14, 2023
2
IRELAND, LORI A.
IRELAND FAMILY FOUNDATION • PRESIDENT
IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
3
JOHNSON, LACY
TAFT LAW • ATTORNEY
IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Dec 28, 2023
4
TUCKER, THOMAS
SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONAL
IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC
$3,300
Dec 3, 2023
5
BURROUGHS, MIA DAY
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC
$3,300
Mar 3, 2023
6
KUHN, MARK A.
KUHN ADVISORS INC. • INVESTMENT ADVISOR
IndividualDURHAM, NC
$3,300
Mar 4, 2024
7
NIEDEL, JAMES
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC
$3,300
Feb 29, 2024
8
KUHN, CYNTHIA
DUKE UNIVERSITY • SCIENTIST
IndividualDURHAM, NC
$3,300
Feb 29, 2024
9
JURVETSON, KARLA
SELF EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN
IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA
$3,300
May 11, 2023
10
RUMER, ANDREW
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Aug 1, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 54 nodes and 50 connections

Total contributions: $50

Top Donors - Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

1 Org20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.

  • Section 2(b)(1) states the program aims to 'Increase the technological and economic competitiveness of industry and production in the United States' for advanced production of low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt, directly benefiting construction and engineering firms involved in these materials.

  • +Chemicals & Plasticsconfidence 0.85

    Section 2(e)(10)(A) focuses on 'Novel materials and alternative domestic feedstocks and processing operations' for low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt, which could benefit chemical manufacturers developing new binders, additives, or alternative materials.

  • Section 2(e)(3) discusses 'Medium- and high-temperature heat-generation technologies' including 'Alternative fuels' and 'Electrification of heating processes,' which could benefit energy infrastructure firms involved in fuel supply, renewable energy, or grid modernization for industrial heat.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Strong
Vector: 59%
Pages: 425-427AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The IMPACT Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's emphasis on advancing U.S. technological competitiveness, protecting taxpayer-funded R&D for American economic and national security benefit, and accelerating the transfer of innovations to the private sector—particularly through DOE-led research programs focused on strategic industries."

Key themes:DOE R&D focustechnology transfer to private sectornational economic competitivenessadvanced manufacturingsupply chain resilience

— 393 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Ensure that R&D funds are used for projects that protect and advance that edge. l Ensure that successful advances, with a focus on new natural resource development technologies, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and space, are transferred swiftly to American interests in the private sector. New Policies l Focus on benefits to Americans. OTT’s operations should be based on the recognition that the new technologies generated by American taxpayers’ investment in DOE are a significant national security asset rather than some neutral scientific gift to humanity. l Increase oversight and coordination. OTT needs to be vigilant in overseeing and coordinating OTT offices associated with each National Lab. For security and economic espionage reasons, the work funded by the American people needs to be protected, and when commercialized, it needs to go to American businesses. OFFICE OF SCIENCE (SC) Mission/Overview The Office of Science (SC) supports and oversees research facilities and pro- grams that cover basic science through its application to the demonstration and deployment of energy technologies. SC oversees 10 of the 17 DOE National Labs and 28 major federal research user facilities. Its mission is to preserve U.S. leader- ship in science, fund and perform basic research, and provide the scientific facilities that the private sector is unable or unwilling to provide. New initiatives include quantum information sciences and artificial intelligence. SC is led by a Senate-con- firmed Director at the Assistant Secretary level and has eight program offices.82 Needed Reforms The next conservative President should commit the United States to scientific dominance to support national and economic security, especially in light of similar efforts by China. To aid in this effort, the Office of Science should: l Return to its primary mission: nonpartisan and basic science. SC’s mission should be international leadership in basic and early applied science and provision of world-leading facilities for this work. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act mark the major — 394 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise reorientation of DOE primarily from defense applications in the NNSA and basic and early applied science across SC and the applied offices to a massive federal research, development, demonstration, and commercialization body.83 Distraction from SC’s basic science mission should be prevented. l Increase the level of accountability. The National Laboratories need to be more directly accountable to the Secretary of Energy and Congress for their work and management. New Policies l Commit to U.S. science dominance. The United States is losing its dominance in scientific discoveries and technological development. China and other adversaries have been stealing American science and technology for years and are now on the verge of dominating science—a development that is fraught with negative strategic and economic implications for the United States. The next Administration must commit itself to ensuring that the U.S. continues to dominate scientific discovery and technological advancement. l Refocus on mission and eliminate duplication and waste. The Administration should work with Congress to rationalize the National Lab network to meet specific national objectives (such as the NNSA laboratories’ role in national defense) and conduct basic research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct. Activities that duplicate those of other government agencies or the private sector should be eliminated. l Properly manage the National Labs’ contributions to the private sector. SC should improve private-sector access to the National Labs, through programs like the GAIN voucher program and consistent with national security considerations, while ensuring that the economic benefits of taxpayer-funded technologies flow back to taxpayers through patent- review sharing or a revolving fund. Budget The Office of Science was appropriated slightly more than $7 billion in FY 2021, and DOE requested slightly less than $7.8 billion for FY 2023.84 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM) Mission/Overview The Office of Environmental Management’s mission is to “complete the safe cleanup of [the] environmental legacy resulting from decades of nuclear

Small Business Administration

Moderate
Vector: 61%
Pages: 789-791AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the IMPACT Act and the Project 2025 SBA section aim to bolster domestic manufacturing competitiveness and supply chain resilience, but the IMPACT Act focuses on industry-wide R&D for low-emissions construction materials without explicit small‑business capital access or SBA program reforms."

Key themes:domestic manufacturingsupply chain resiliencetechnological innovationjob creationeconomic competitiveness

— 756 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Domestic Manufacturing and Small Business. Small businesses in the manufacturing sector face shortfalls in access to capital.61 As manufacturing employment, domestic business investment, and non–information technology output have declined,62 expectations for market returns and the capital available to small manufacturing enterprises have diminished. This is especially true for capital-intensive sectors like transportation and energy that require large up-front investments and relatively lower-margin sectors like plastics, textiles, furniture, and agriculture. Yet these industries and others like them traditionally have been the backbone of American manufacturing employment. They also are sources of self-sufficiency and resilience at a time when global supply chains are increas- ingly uncertain. The public policy problems that are caused by declining small manufacturing are especially acute when it comes to the production of advanced technologies. Other agencies and programs invest immense taxpayer resources in basic science and research. Over time, that research results in some breakthrough technologies, but when it is time to put these breakthroughs into practice by manufacturing goods and services, much of the necessary productive capacity is offshore.63 For many technologies, the American economy lacks the capacity to “scale up” inno- vations that might not be immediately profitable. Instead, those technologies are put into practice abroad. In this way, foreign companies and foreign productive sites buy and implement taxpayer-funded American technologies. The SBA’s existing programs should be reformed to expand the private market for capital in small-manufacturer expansion. The next Administration should: l Ask Congress to make available a category of Section 7(a) loans with a larger available principal that is used to finance manufacturing facility construction and equipment upgrading. The proposed SBA Reauthorization and Improvement Act of 2019, for example, would have increased the maximum loan principal to $50 million for advanced manufacturing construction and upgrading.64 The Section 7(a) loan program operates through private lenders and guarantees a portion of private-sector loans made to qualifying small businesses. The maximum principal available is $5 million, but small businesses in capital-intensive sectors require significantly larger amounts of capital to finance up-front capital costs. l Reform the Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program to refocus its support on small businesses rather than technology startups only. The SBIC program operates through private venture capital and private equity funds by providing eligible funds with guaranteed debt financing to support investments in small businesses. However, the program — 757 — Small Business Administration largely duplicates private-sector venture capital to the extent that the sector receiving much of its support is software and information technology, which already receive the lion’s share of venture capital investment.65 In addition, Congress should reform the SBIC program to make its financing more favorable to capital-intense investments and small manufacturers. The Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection, and Schools (HEALS) Act, introduced in 2020,66 and American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, introduced in 2021,67 would allow SBIC to offer longer-term financing to manufacturers and make the program more fiscally sustainable. Small-Business Size Standard Modernization. Many small-business pro- grams both inside and outside the SBA use the SBA’s definition of “small business.” Under the Small Business Act, the SBA is tasked with defining what counts as a small business and ensuring that the definition varies from industry to industry to reflect differences in regular size by industry. However, the SBA’s small-business size standards reflect a one-size-fits-all approach under which all businesses within its size standard are considered small businesses for all eligible purposes, from gov- ernment contracting preferences to eligibility for SBA loans through private banks. At the same time, the SBA is an outlier among competing economies in not considering medium-sized enterprises along with small businesses, often referred to collectively as small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Medium-sized and regional businesses are increasingly critical to maintaining competition. The next Administration should: l Encourage Congress to create a “medium-sized business” classification with its eligibility for programs confined to access to capital programs from projects for which credit elsewhere does not exist. SBA POLICY PRIORITIES FOR 2025 AND BEYOND Legislation. The new Administration can support SBA reform legislation pro- posed in Congress that aligns with key measures outlined in this chapter. It also can support legislative initiatives that would help SBA to focus on its core statutory activities such as capital access, federal contracting opportunities, and regulatory advocacy. For example: l The IMPROVE the SBA Act68 would strengthen accountability, transparency, and oversight of the SBA and aligns with many of the reforms outlined in this chapter.

Environmental Protection Agency

Moderate
Vector: 59%
Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The IMPACT Act focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in industrial production, which aligns with Project 2025's climate change objectives, such as updating the endangerment finding and establishing a significant emissions rate for GHGs. However, the bill emphasizes technological innovation and domestic competitiveness rather than regulatory reform or EPA-specific actions outlined in the policy."

Key themes:greenhouse gas emissions reductionclimate change policyemissions standardsindustrial sustainabilityclean technology development

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills