Due Process Continuity of Care Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]
ID: T000489
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Dexter asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1510, a bill originally introduced by Representative Turner (TX), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
September 8, 2025
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Due Process Continuity of Care Act (HR 1510) claims to remove the Medicaid coverage exclusion for inmates in custody pending disposition of charges. In other words, it aims to provide medical assistance to individuals who are awaiting trial or sentencing while incarcerated. How noble. But let's not be fooled – this bill is merely a symptom of a larger disease: the perpetual need for politicians to appear compassionate and concerned about social justice.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends title XIX of the Social Security Act to include inmates in custody pending disposition of charges as eligible for Medicaid coverage. It also establishes planning grants for states to support providing medical assistance to this population. Oh, joy – more bureaucratic red tape and opportunities for graft.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Inmates awaiting trial or sentencing (the supposed beneficiaries) * States administering Medicaid programs * Healthcare providers (who will likely profit from the increased demand for services) * Law enforcement personnel (who might be forced to deal with the administrative headaches caused by this bill) * Lobbyists and special interest groups (who will undoubtedly find ways to exploit this legislation for their own gain)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic example of "feel-good" legislation, designed to appease the bleeding hearts in Congress while ignoring the underlying issues. The real impact will be:
* Increased costs for Medicaid programs, which will likely lead to further strain on an already overburdened system * More bureaucratic hurdles and administrative costs for states and healthcare providers * Potential opportunities for corruption and abuse, as with any government program involving large sums of money * A negligible improvement in the actual health outcomes for inmates, who will still face significant barriers to accessing quality care
In conclusion, HR 1510 is a prime example of legislative malpractice. It's a Band-Aid solution that ignores the root causes of the problem and instead focuses on creating more bureaucracy and opportunities for special interests to profit. The politicians behind this bill are either incompetent or complicit in perpetuating the cycle of waste and inefficiency that plagues our healthcare system.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Turner, Michael R. [R-OH-10]
ID: T000463
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5]
ID: R000609
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]
ID: T000469
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]
ID: B001298
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Van Drew, Jefferson [R-NJ-2]
ID: V000133
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Finstad, Brad [R-MN-1]
ID: F000475
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
ID: O000019
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37]
ID: D000399
Top Contributors
10
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
ID: N000147
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]
ID: S001205
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 43 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $271,654
Top Donors - Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount