To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building".
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
ID: D000530
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
December 9, 2025
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another thrilling episode of "Congressional Theater" brought to you by the esteemed members of the 119th Congress. Today's feature presentation is HR 1461, a bill that will undoubtedly change the course of human history... or not.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this earth-shattering legislation is to rename a post office in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, after Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is the lack of properly named postal facilities.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1 of the bill designates the facility at 521 Thorn Street as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building." Wow, I can barely contain my excitement. The bill also includes a cleverly crafted provision that ensures any references to the old name will be retroactively changed to the new one. Because, you know, consistency is key when it comes to postal facilities.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole's family and friends, who will undoubtedly be thrilled to see her name immortalized on a post office. * The residents of Sewickley, Pennsylvania, who will now have the privilege of mailing their letters from the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building." * The United States Postal Service, which will have to update its records and signage.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill will be negligible, but I'll humor you by pointing out a few potential implications:
* This bill may lead to an increase in postal-related tourism in Sewickley, Pennsylvania. (Just kidding, that's never going to happen.) * The renaming of the post office might inspire other communities to follow suit, leading to a wave of creatively named postal facilities across the nation. * More likely, this bill will serve as a distraction from actual pressing issues facing our country, allowing politicians to pretend they're doing something meaningful while accomplishing nothing.
**Diagnosis:** This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Narcissism," where politicians engage in self-aggrandizing behavior by introducing bills that serve no practical purpose. The sponsors and cosponsors of this bill are likely suffering from a bad case of "Ego-Inflation Syndrome," which causes them to believe their actions have actual significance.
**Treatment:** A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong injection of reality, should cure these politicians of their delusions. Unfortunately, the prognosis is poor, as they will likely continue to indulge in this type of legislative theater, wasting taxpayer time and money on trivial pursuits.
In conclusion, HR 1461 is a pointless exercise in congressional grandstanding, designed to stroke the egos of its sponsors rather than address any actual problems facing our nation. But hey, at least it's not as if they're trying to sneak through some nefarious legislation
Related Topics
đź’° Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Donor Network - Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 19 nodes and 22 connections
Total contributions: $72,480
Top Donors - Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
— 160 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Officer’s procurement of innovative technology; and the facilities plan, including the consolidation into the St. Elizabeth’s campus. They should also be prepared to help implement any end to unionization of DHS components in response to an executive order pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7103.15 Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO). DHS responsibilities to work with Congress have been split between the Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA) and OCFO. OLA deals with the authorizing committees on policy issues, and OCFO works with the appropriations committees on budget planning, execution, and reprogramming. This split creates communication and visibility issues within DHS and inconsistency in answers to Congress. This is an issue not only within the HQ model, but also through- out the components. Either appropriations personnel should be moved to OLA and there should be a “dotted line” reporting structure to OCFO, or a policy that OLA per- sonnel must be included on communications to Congress should be implemented. To avoid “answer shopping” by congressional staff, particularly appropriations staff, all budget communications from the OCFO, including from the CFO him/ herself, should first be provided to the Director of OLA to ensure consistency of information, messaging, and answers. This may be deemed awkward given that the OCFO is a Senate-confirmed position, but it is necessary to avoid inaccuracies and inconsistencies in messaging. Federal Protective Service (FPS). FPS needs federal agents to develop, share, and receive operational information and maintain direct contact with the Secretary in the midst of heightened threats. Before the summer 2020 civil unrest, position- ing FPS under MGMT was justified, but given the current climate, they should not be reporting through MGMT. This may be especially problematic if a Management Directorate Under Secretary lacking law enforcement or military experience is in place when a situation like summer 2020 arises. FPS should report to the Secretary as other components (e.g., FLETC) do. This would add little to the Secretary’s current burden unless or until civil unrest arises, at which point reporting to the Secretary creates a direct line between the primary DHS decision-maker (S1 or S2) and the FPS Director. Regarding operational communication, there should be information-sharing mandates (MOAs)—which are applicable under specific circumstances where fed- eral facilities are involved—between FPS and the U.S. Marshals, U.S. Park Police, and FBI. Agreements with U.S. Capitol Police and Supreme Court Police should also be considered, but it is noteworthy that those entities are jurisdictionally out- side of the executive branch. OFFICE OF STRATEGY, POLICY, AND PLANS (PLCY) Department-Level Reforms. PLCY should perform a complete inventory, analysis, and reevaluation of the department’s domestic terrorism lines of effort to ensure that they are consistent with the President’s priorities, congressional authorization, and Americans’ constitutional rights. — 161 — Department of Homeland Security PLCY should likewise do a complete inventory, analysis, and evaluation of any of the department’s work, in coordination with social media outlets, to censor or otherwise change or affect Americans’ speech. PLCY should comprehensively report on and publish this history in full so that the American people can know the facts. The department should remove all personnel who participated in any of this activity. The department has significant authority and budget to provide grants for var- ious purposes. This effort is diffused across components and lacks central policy thought and coordination. PLCY should set a departmentwide policy that estab- lishes how granting choices are to be made and is consistent with the President’s priorities. PLCY should clear all granting decisions to ensure that they are con- sistent with the new policy. PLCY-Wide Reforms. PLCY should work with Congress to streamline the department’s reporting requirements. Because there has not been a departmen- tal reauthorization bill and these requirements have been added piecemeal over two decades, they significantly overlap and even conflict—wasting resources and distracting from the department’s mission. PLCY should seek the elimination of the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review. Issue-Area Reforms. PLCY should bolster its Immigration Statistics program and make it the one-stop shop for the timely production of all department immi- gration statistics and analysis. OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS (I&A) The Office of Intelligence and Analysis should be eliminated both because it has not added value and because it has been weaponized for domestic politi- cal purposes. The Intelligence Community (IC) already provides raw intelligence to DHS components. In addition, the FBI, National Counter Terrorism Center, and other agencies where necessary already provide holistic threat assessment products to federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments as well as to private-sector entities at both the classified and unclassified levels where appropriate. I&A’s work as an interlocuter between the IC and DHS components’ individual intelligence operations on the one hand and government and the private sector on the other, as well as between the IC and the components, is at best duplicative. At worst, it is used and discussed in the media as a political tool, resulting in more harm than good to the U.S. government and IC writ large. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which is not a member of the IC, should create cyber intelligence products in a collaborative fashion with the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command. Such efforts would lead to timelier usable classified and unclassified products for stakeholders that exceed the quality and capability of I&A’s efforts. This same principle applies to other
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.