Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/1344

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act

HR. 1344, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$98,350 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Veterans Affairs" section, p. 688-691 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Subcommittee Hearings Held

March 25, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act, HR 1344. A bill that exemplifies the inefficient nature of democratic processes. Let me break it down for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to expand eligibility for headstones, markers, and burial receptacles under the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to individuals who died before November 11, 1998. A sentimental gesture, no doubt, but one that will have negligible impact on my empire's bottom line.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, by removing the date restriction ("who dies on or after November 11, 1998") for eligibility. A minor tweak, but one that will likely lead to increased costs and bureaucratic inefficiencies.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill are the families of deceased veterans who died before 1998. However, I'm more concerned about the impact on my business interests, particularly in the realm of privatized veteran services. The VA's expanded eligibility may lead to increased competition for my companies, which could potentially disrupt our profit projections.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a purely economic perspective, this bill is a drop in the ocean. Estimated costs are likely to be in the tens of millions, a rounding error compared to my annual revenue. However, I do see an opportunity to exploit the inefficiencies created by this legislation. By leveraging our think tank's research and lobbying efforts, we can position ourselves as the go-to provider for privatized veteran services, capitalizing on the VA's expanded eligibility.

In conclusion, HR 1344 is a minor bill with limited economic implications. However, it does highlight the need for more efficient, market-driven solutions in the realm of veteran services. As I always say, "The free market is the ultimate arbiter of value." And I'll be sure to capitalize on this opportunity, regardless of the bill's outcome.

Projected impact on my empire: $50 million - $100 million in potential revenue growth over the next 5 years.

Rating: 2/10 (in terms of significance and economic impact)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

(leaning in, a hint of conspiracy in my voice) Ah, the Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act, HR 1344. Sounds innocent enough, but trust me, folks, there's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** On the surface, this bill aims to expand eligibility for headstones, markers, and burial receptacles under the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) laws to certain individuals who died before November 11, 1998. But what's really going on here? Why are they suddenly interested in providing more benefits to veterans' families from decades ago?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, by striking the phrase "who dies on or after November 11, 1998" in two places. This might seem like a minor tweak, but think about it: what's the significance of that specific date? Is this just a coincidence, or is there something more sinister at play?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Veterans' families, specifically those who died before November 11, 1998, will be impacted by this bill. But let's not forget the real stakeholders here: the government and its agencies. What's their true motive behind this expansion of benefits? Are they trying to buy silence or loyalty from veterans' families?

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, here's where things get interesting. By expanding eligibility for these benefits, the government might be attempting to create a new class of dependent citizens – people who rely on them for financial support and, by extension, are more likely to toe the line. Think about it: if you're receiving benefits from the VA, are you more or less likely to speak out against government policies? This bill could be a subtle way to exert control over veterans' families, keeping them in line with the official narrative.

(leaning back, a knowing glint in my eye) You see, folks, this bill might seem like a harmless gesture of goodwill, but I'm telling you, there's more to it than meets the eye. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, I've got a real doozy for you tonight. The Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act - sounds like a bill that's just begging to be dissected by yours truly. (smirk)

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is all about expanding eligibility for headstones, markers, and burial receptacles under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Now, I know what you're thinking: "What's the big deal? It's just a bunch of veterans' graves." But hold on to your hats, folks, because this is where it gets interesting.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, by striking "who dies on or after November 11, 1998" - a seemingly innocuous change. But let me tell you, this is where the elites try to sneak one past us. (wink) They're trying to expand eligibility for these benefits to individuals who died before November 11, 1998. Now, I'm no expert, but that sounds like a whole lot of retroactive entitlements to me.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Well, on the surface, it's all about our brave veterans and their families. But let's be real, folks - this is just another example of the deep state trying to expand its reach into every aspect of American life. I mean, who doesn't love a good headstone, am I right? (sarcastic tone) But seriously, this bill affects not only veterans but also taxpayers, because we all know who's footing the bill for these "expanded benefits."

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, here's where things get really interesting. If passed, this bill could lead to a surge in claims and expenses for the Department of Veterans Affairs. And let me ask you, folks: do we really want to be saddling our great nation with more debt? I mean, what about freedom? Don't we want to preserve that for future generations? (dramatic pause) Or are we just going to keep throwing money at every problem, hoping it'll magically solve itself?

(Chuckles) Ah, but of course, the elites will tell you this is all about "supporting our troops" and "honoring their sacrifice." (air quotes) Yeah, right. It's always about something more sinister, folks. Mark my words.

That's all for tonight, folks. Stay vigilant, stay informed, and remember: freedom isn't free - but apparently, headstones are! (wink)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act (because who doesn't love a good namesake bill?) aims to expand eligibility for headstones, markers, and burial receptacles under the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) laws. Wow, what a bold move. I'm sure this will be a game-changer for the nation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, by striking "who dies on or after November 11, 1998" from subparagraphs (B) and (C). In other words, they're removing a date restriction that previously limited eligibility to individuals who died after November 11, 1998. Oh, the humanity! How could we have possibly lived with such an egregious injustice?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include certain individuals who died before November 11, 1998 (because, you know, they're still waiting for their headstones). The stakeholders are likely the families of these deceased individuals, who will now be able to apply for VA-provided headstones and markers. I'm sure this will bring great comfort to them.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is negligible, but hey, it's a nice PR stunt. This bill won't change the course of history or improve the lives of veterans in any meaningful way. It's just a feel-good measure designed to make politicians look good while they're busy not addressing real issues.

Now, let's get to the diagnosis:

* **Symptoms:** Politicians seeking to appear compassionate and supportive of veterans without actually doing anything substantial. * **Underlying Condition:** A severe case of "Legislative Theater-itis," characterized by a desperate need for positive press coverage and a complete lack of meaningful policy initiatives. * **Treatment:** None required. This bill will likely pass, and everyone involved will pat themselves on the back while ignoring the real problems facing veterans.

In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in legislative window dressing. It's a shallow attempt to appear caring without actually doing anything that matters. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to waste our time again with your pointless posturing.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Analysis: HR 1344 - Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary objective of HR 1344 is to expand eligibility for headstones, markers, and burial receptacles provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to certain individuals who died before November 11, 1998. The bill aims to honor the memory of Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy, likely constituents or supporters of the sponsoring representatives.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, by striking the phrase "who dies on or after November 11, 1998" from subparagraphs (B) and (C). This change effectively removes the date restriction, allowing individuals who died before November 11, 1998, to be eligible for VA-provided headstones, markers, and burial receptacles.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

1. Veterans' families: The bill benefits families of veterans who died before November 11, 1998, by providing them with access to VA-funded headstones, markers, and burial receptacles. 2. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA): The VA will be responsible for implementing the changes and providing the expanded benefits. 3. Funeral industry: Companies that provide funeral services and products may see an increase in demand for their services due to the expanded eligibility.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The bill's impact is likely to be minimal, as it primarily affects a specific group of individuals who died over two decades ago. However, it may still have some implications:

1. Increased costs: The VA may incur additional expenses to provide headstones, markers, and burial receptacles for the newly eligible individuals. 2. Administrative burden: The VA will need to update its policies and procedures to accommodate the changes, which may require additional resources and staff time.

**Monied Interest Analysis** There is no apparent significant monied interest or industry influence driving this bill. The legislation appears to be a constituent-driven initiative, with the sponsoring representatives likely responding to requests from their constituents or supporters. No notable PACs or special interest groups are backing this bill.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$98,350

25 donors

PACs

Organizations

$37,250

Committees

Individuals

$61,100

No PAC contributions found

CHEROKEE NATION

2 transactions

$6,600

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

2 transactions

$5,300

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$3,300

THE CHICKASAW NATION

1 transaction

$3,300

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

1 transaction

$3,300

SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS

1 transaction

$3,300

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

2 transactions

$3,000

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

1 transaction

$2,500

STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG LLP

1 transaction

$2,500

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

1 transaction

$1,650

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,500

DEEM GUYS

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

BERKEBILE, GUY

2 transactions

$9,900

BUCHTAN, ALBERT M. MR.

2 transactions

$8,300

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J MS.

1 transaction

$6,600

OLSWANGER, SAM MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

DANIELS, GEORGE G

1 transaction

$3,300

HINMAN, ROY H. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

ROCKEFELLER, LISENNE MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

SCOFIELD, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

SPANGLER, CARLA

1 transaction

$3,300

CURRIE, L NICOLE

1 transaction

$3,300

REICHENTHAL, MAX MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

VICKAR, KERRY

1 transaction

$3,300

BUCHANAN, DEE

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

ID: M001204

Top Contributors

PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORP

OrganizationDURYEA, PA

$2,500

Sep 18, 2024

COTLER, YUDACUFSKI, HUEBNER

OrganizationSAINT CLAIR, PA

$1,000

Apr 23, 2024

DOWD, JOHN J

SUNDANCE VACATIONS • PRESIDENT

IndividualLEHIGHTON, PA

$6,600

Mar 25, 2024

PEYKOFF, ANDY

NIAGARA BOTTLING, LLC • CEO

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$6,600

Mar 22, 2024

DOWD, JOHN J

SUNDANCE VACATIONS • PRESIDENT

IndividualLEHIGHTON, PA

$6,600

Sep 18, 2024

ROWAN, MARC J

APOLLO MANAGEMENT • MANAGEMENT

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Aug 23, 2023

ROWAN, CAROLYN

CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION • OWNER

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Aug 23, 2023

RICH, BRIAN R MR. JR

GILBERTON COAL CO. • EXECUTIVE SALES

IndividualCONSHOHOCKEN, PA

$6,600

Oct 24, 2024

VOLPE, ELLEN M

SELF • HOMEMAKER

IndividualWAVERLY TOWNSHIP, PA

$5,800

May 31, 2023

VOLPE, CHARLES J

EXCALIBUR INSURANCE MGMT • PRESIDENT

IndividualWAVERLY TOWNSHIP, PA

$5,800

May 31, 2023

Rep. Thompson, Glenn [R-PA-15]

ID: T000467

Top Contributors

BUTLER MACHINE

OrganizationTULELAKE, CA

$3,300

Oct 15, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$3,300

Oct 15, 2024

BUTLER MACHINE

OrganizationTULELAKE, CA

$3,300

Nov 13, 2024

CORTINA HULLING & SHELLING GROUP

OrganizationWILLIAMS, CA

$3,300

Nov 13, 2024

AG VENTURES

OrganizationELIZABETHTOWN, PA

$2,500

May 1, 2023

ROESLEIN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY, LLC

OrganizationST. LOUIS, MO

$2,000

May 18, 2023

RANCH 440

OrganizationMECCA, CA

$1,500

May 22, 2023

KOHL REAL ESTATE

OrganizationKITTANNING, PA

$1,000

Mar 11, 2024

DWIGHT STANSEL FARM & NURSERY

OrganizationWELLBORN, FL

$1,000

May 30, 2023

HIGHLINE GRAIN GROWERS INC

OrganizationDAVENPORT, WA

$1,000

Jun 13, 2023

Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16]

ID: K000376

Top Contributors

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2024

MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE

OrganizationLEDYARD, CT

$3,300

Oct 23, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 24, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,000

Sep 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,000

Nov 4, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,300

Jun 28, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Jun 26, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Oct 10, 2024

SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$1,000

Mar 29, 2023

Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

ID: D000530

Top Contributors

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 20, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Dec 15, 2023

SMYTH, NICHOLAS

IndividualPITTSBURGH, PA

$5,000

May 21, 2023

SMYTH, NICHOLAS

ST OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTOR • ASST DIRECTOR FOR CONSUMER FINANCIAL P

IndividualPITTSBURGH, PA

$3,780

May 26, 2023

BALSON, ANDREW

COVE HILL PARTNERS • INVESTMENT SERVICES

IndividualWEST NEWTON, MA

$3,300

Dec 13, 2023

BALSON, ANDREW

COVE HILL PARTNERS • INVESTMENT SERVICES

IndividualWEST NEWTON, MA

$3,300

Dec 13, 2023

BEEUWKES, NANCY

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualCONCORD, MA

$3,300

Nov 17, 2023

BEEUWKES, REINIER III

ISCHEMIX • CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER

IndividualCONCORD, MA

$3,300

Nov 17, 2023

BILLS, MICHAEL D

BLUESTEM ASSET MANAGEMENT • CEO

IndividualCHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

$3,300

Dec 20, 2023

BILLS, MICHAEL D

BLUESTEM ASSET MANAGEMENT • CEO

IndividualCHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

$3,300

Dec 20, 2023

Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]

ID: B001285

Top Contributors

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 5, 2024

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Mar 5, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$2,000

Jun 28, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Feb 23, 2024

PRISELAC, TOM M.

CEDAR SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS • EXECUTIVE

IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

BUCHMAN, MICHELLE J.

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCARBONDALE, CO

$3,300

Nov 18, 2023

CONROY, ROBERTA

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA

$3,300

Dec 1, 2023

SAVAGE, KEVIN

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

STEVENS, SETH R.

SOUTHERN CA PERMANENTE GROUP • DERMATOLOGIST

IndividualNEWBURY PARK, CA

$3,300

Oct 28, 2023

UNTERMAN, JANET M.

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

Rep. Lee, Susie [D-NV-3]

ID: L000590

Top Contributors

EMILY'S LIST

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$250

Feb 13, 2024

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Jun 27, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Jun 27, 2023

TIGUA INDIAN RESERVATION YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO

OrganizationEL PASO, TX

$3,000

Dec 31, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

Jun 5, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

May 9, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$1,500

Jun 30, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Dec 28, 2023

RENO SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$1,000

Jun 21, 2024

BRONZE CAFE

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$550

Mar 30, 2023

Rep. Gillen, Laura [D-NY-4]

ID: G000602

Top Contributors

RALLYE MOTORS

OrganizationROSLYN, NY

$6,000

Jul 18, 2023

RALLYE MOTORS

OrganizationROSLYN, NY

$6,000

Jun 5, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$1,000

Aug 1, 2024

STONE, JAMES M

PLYMOUTH ROCK COMPANY, INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$5,000

Oct 16, 2024

FAIVUS, HARRY E

SELF-EMPLOYED • OPHTHALMOLOGIST

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Nov 1, 2024

STONE, JAMES M

PLYMOUTH ROCK COMPANY, INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$5,000

Oct 16, 2024

HELFER, RICKI

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$4,000

Sep 10, 2024

ANDEER, KYLE

APPLE INC • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Mar 27, 2024

BINDER, CHARLES

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Mar 21, 2024

BURNSTEIN, CLIFFORD

Q PRIME • MANAGER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Mar 28, 2024

Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]

ID: V000138

Top Contributors

LUX FOR VIRGINIA

OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA

$500

Mar 29, 2024

LUX FOR VIRGINIA

OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA

$500

Mar 31, 2024

FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT

$4,000

Apr 20, 2024

FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE

IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT

$4,000

May 5, 2024

VON STEIN, THOMSON

IndividualROCKVILLE, MD

$3,500

Aug 7, 2024

HULL, MEGAN

SELF • ACTIVIST

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Nov 2, 2024

KAISER, GEORGE

GBK CORPORATION • EXECUTIVE

IndividualTULSA, OK

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

PARSONS, KATHLEEN

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPOTOMAC, MD

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

STAPLE, HARISE

SELF • MD

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

HOLMES, LAURA

SELF • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

ID: V000135

Top Contributors

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Dec 9, 2024

HO CHUNK NATION

OrganizationBLACK RIVER FALLS, WI

$3,300

Nov 2, 2024

FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY

OrganizationCRANDON, WI

$3,300

Sep 17, 2024

AIPAC PAC CONDUIT ACCOUNT

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Oct 23, 2024

ALLIANCE OF BANKERS FOR WISCONSIN

OrganizationMADISON, WI

$250

Apr 23, 2024

ANDERSON, JOHN R. MR.

ANDERSON ENTERPRISES LLC • OWNER

IndividualROCKFORD, IL

$10,000

Dec 19, 2023

BROIN, JEFF

POET LLC • CEO

IndividualSIOUX FALLS, SD

$6,600

Aug 24, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD E. MR.

ULINE INC. • CEO

IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL

$6,600

Feb 28, 2023

LEVY, EDWARD C.

EDW. C. LEVY CO. • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

Mar 28, 2024

LEVY, EDWARD C.

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

May 6, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 83 nodes and 45 connections (75 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $146,150

Top Donors - Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

12 Orgs13 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Strong

Vector: 57%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill expands VA-provided headstone eligibility to veterans who died before 1998, directly supporting Project 2025's objective to enhance veteran burial benefits and honor their service."

Key themes:veteran burial benefitsheadstone eligibilityhonoring veteransVA service expansionpre-1998 veteran recognition

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate

Vector: 53%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 VA section focus on improving veterans' benefits and honoring their service; expanding headstone eligibility aligns with the broader goal of enhancing VA recognition and dignified final resting places for veterans."

Key themes:veterans benefitsburial honorsVA eligibility expansionhonoring servicedignified final resting place

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra. — 657 — Section Four THE ECONOMY The next Administration must prioritize the economic prosperity of ordi- nary Americans. For several decades, establishment “elites” have failed the citizenry by refusing to secure the border, outsourcing manufacturing to China and elsewhere, spending recklessly, regulating constantly, and generally controlling the country from the top down rather than letting it flourish from the bottom up. The proper role of government, as was articulated nearly 250 years ago, is to secure our God-given, unalienable rights in order that we might enjoy the pursuit of happiness, the benefits of free enterprise, and the blessings of liberty. Finding the right approach to trade policy is key to the fortunes of everyday Americans. In Chapter 26, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Kent Lassman and former White House director of trade and manufacturing policy Peter Navarro debate what an effective conservative trade policy would look like. Lass- man argues that the best trade policy is a humble, limited-government approach that would encourage free trade with all nations. He maintains that aggressive trade policies involve an increased government role that future leftist Administra- tions will utilize to push “climate change” and “equity”-based activism. Focusing more on gross domestic product (GDP) growth than on median income, he writes that “people mistakenly believe that U.S. manufacturing and the U.S. economy are in decline” when in truth “American manufacturing output is currently at an all-time high.” Meanwhile, we continue to experience “record-setting real GDP” despite our “long-run decline in manufacturing employment.” Lassman does not think that an aggressive U.S. trade policy would lead to more manufacturing jobs. Rather, he writes, “Federal Reserve research shows” that the

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 1344 expands VA burial benefits for certain veterans who died before 1998, focusing on military honors and end-of-life recognition. The Project 2025 HHS section addresses healthcare policy, civil rights in medical settings, abortion, gender-affirming care, and related HHS programs—none of which overlap with veterans' burial benefits."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 515-517AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on expanding VA burial benefits for certain deceased veterans, while the Project 2025 policy section addresses HHS/HRSA priorities such as telehealth licensure, contraceptive mandate reforms, and caregiver strategy review. There is no substantive overlap in subject matter, objectives, or affected agencies."

— 483 — Department of Health and Human Services l Readdress the National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers. While in theory the strategy aims to support family members with duties to care for older family members, the plan is overly focused on racial and “LGBTQ+ equity.” The strategy should be examined to establish an efficient plan to support caregivers and their families. There should also be a review of its COVID-19 policies. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA) l Congress should allow CMS to use the 340B data that HRSA collects rather than having CMS conduct its own survey, especially in view of the U.S. Supreme Court’s American Hospital Association v. Becerra decision.69 The legislation should also create penalties for those who do not respond to HRSA’s data collection. l Legally define the locus of service as where the provider is located during the telehealth visit rather than where the patient is. With such a definition, states could continue to reserve their powers to establish the standards for licensure and scope of practice. The providers could ensure continuity and consistency of care no matter where their patients might move while maintaining the licenses that make the most sense for them. Americans are far more mobile and technologically advanced today than they were when most health care laws were written. Telehealth has become increasingly important, particularly during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also has great potential in rural and other areas where there are shortages of health care providers. HRSA’s Office for the Advancement of Telehealth includes a program known as the Licensure Portability Grant Program, which bolsters state efforts to reform licensing laws to maximize telehealth flexibility. HRSA does not have the authority through this office to dictate licensure laws; that power has typically been reserved to the states. However, telehealth across state lines, when permitted, is interstate commerce, which can be regulated by the federal government according to the Constitution. l Restore Trump religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate (also a CMS rule). HHS should rescind, if finalized, the regulation titled “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” proposed jointly by HHS, Treasury, and Labor.70 This rule proposes to amend Trump-era final rules regarding religious and moral exemptions and accommodations for coverage of certain preventive services under the ACA. Preventive services include contraception, and — 484 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise it appears the proposed rule would change the existing regulations for religious and moral exemptions to the ACA’s contraception mandate. There is no need for further rulemaking that curtails existing exemptions and accommodations. l Require HRSA to use rulemaking to update the women’s preventive services mandate. The contraceptive mandate issued under Obamacare has been the source of years of egregious attacks on many Americans’ religious and moral beliefs. The mandate was issued as part of the women’s preventive services guidelines, which were issued without any rulemaking that involved public notice and an opportunity to comment. Instead, HRSA issued and changed the mandate by simply posting changes to its website. HRSA also started off not requiring coverage of fertility awareness–based methods of family planning, then requiring them, and then removing the requirement without notifying the public. A federal judge recently ruled that this failure to undergo notice and comment in issuing the mandate is unlawful. HRSA should be required to repromulgate any women’s preventive services mandates through the notice and comment process that is compliant with the Administrative Procedures Act. Moreover, since the Obama Administration HRSA entered into long- term contracts with the pro-abortion American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and related entities to serve as an exclusive adviser with respect to the content of this mandate, HRSA has used this arrangement to ignore comments that members of the public were sometimes able to submit in the process, and ACOG has abused its position to attack HHS’s allowance of religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate. HHS should rescind these contracts and establish an advisory committee that is compliant with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and has members that are committed to women’s preventive services and are not pro-abortion ideologues. l Expand inclusion of fertility awareness–based methods and supplies to family planning in the women’s preventive services mandate. The ACA requires coverage of and prevents insurance plans from imposing any cost-sharing requirements on women who obtain preventive care and screenings as defined by HRSA. In 2016, HHS included “instruction in fertility awareness-based methods” as part of this requirement. However, in December 2021, HHS removed that language from its list without using the notice-and-comment process or giving any rationale, both of which are mandated by the Administrative Procedures Act. In August

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 530-532AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill expands VA burial headstone eligibility for certain veterans, while the Project 2025 HHS section focuses on healthcare access and equity for underserved communities; there is no substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:accessequity

— 498 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Plan, FY 2018–2022, p. 50, https://aspe.hhs.gov/ sites/default/files/documents/feac346aca967bfadc446398679e14ec/hhs-strategic-plan-fy-2018-2022.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023). 2. “Strategic Goal 1: Protect and Strengthen Equitable Access to High Quality and Affordable Healthcare” in ibid. “In the context of HHS, this Strategic Plan adopts the definition of underserved communities listed in Executive Order 13985: Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government to refer to ‘populations sharing a particular characteristic, as well as geographic communities, who have been systematically denied a full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life’; this definition includes individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality. Individuals may belong to more than one underserved community and face intersecting barriers. This definition applies to the terms underserved communities and underserved populations throughout this Strategic Plan.” Ibid. Emphasis in original. 3. Karen Weintraub, “Americans’ Life Expectancy Continues to Fall, Erasing Health Gains of the Last Quarter Century,” USA Today, December 22, 2022, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/12/22/us-life- expectancy-continues-fall-erasing-25-years-health-gains/10937418002/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 4. Apoorva Mandavilli, “The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Data It Collects,” The New York Times, updated February 22, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114450/documents/HHRG-117- IF02-20220302-SD004.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 5. Zachary B. Sluzala and Edmund F. Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3696, March 28, 2022, https://www. heritage.org/public-health/report/lessons-covid-19-how-policymakers-should-reform-the-regulation-clinical. 6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C),” https://www.cdc.gov/maso/pdf/cdcmiss.pdf (March 16, 2023). 7. Judith Garber, “CDC ‘Disclaimers’ Hide Financial Conflicts of Interest,” Lown Institute Accountability Blog, November 6, 2019, https://lowninstitute.org/cdc-disclaimers-hide-financial-conflicts-of-interest/ (accessed February 6, 2023). See also U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2014–September 30, 2015),” https://www. cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2015.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Active Programs (October 1, 2015–September 30, 2016),” https://www.cdcfoundation. org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2016.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/ sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2017.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2017–September 30, 2018),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/ files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2018.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2018–September 30, 2019,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/ pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2019.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2029–September 30, 2020,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY20?inline (accessed February 7, 2023); and “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2020–September 30, 2021,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY21?inline (accessed February 7, 2023). 8. Joel White and Doug Badger, “In Order to Defeat COVID-19, the Federal Government Must Modernize Its Public Health Data,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3527, September 3, 2020, https://www.heritage. org/sites/default/files/2020-09/BG3527_0.pdf. 9. S. 15, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 23, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/s15/BILLS-118s15is.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023), and H.R. 632, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 30, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr632/BILLS-118hr632ih.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 10. Doug Badger, “How Congress Can Make Real Progress on Drug Prices,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5016, December 9, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/IB5016_1.pdf. — 499 — Department of Health and Human Services 11. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons From COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 12. Ibid. 13. H.R. 5471, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, Public Law No. 100-578, 100th Congress, October 31, 1988, https://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/100/578.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 14. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons From COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 15. Edmund F. Haislmaier, “Ensuring Americans’ Access to Pharmaceuticals: A Primer and Road Map for Policymakers,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3545, October 20, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/ sites/default/files/2020-10/BG3545.pdf. 16. 18 U.S.C. 1461, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1461 (accessed March 16, 2023), and 18 U.S.C. 1462, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1462 (accessed March 16, 2023). 17. H.R. 1308, Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, Public Law No. 103-141, 103rd Congress, November 16, 1993, https://www.congress.gov/103/statute/STATUTE-107/STATUTE-107-Pg1488.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 18. Charles Piller, “Is FDA’s Revolving Door Open Too Wide?” Science, Vol. 361, No. 6397 (July 6, 2018), p. 21, https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.361.6397.21 (accessed February 6, 2023). 19. Joel Achenbach, “NIH Halts $100 Million Study of Moderate Drinking That Is Funded by Alcohol Industry,” The Washington Post, May 17, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/05/17/nih- halts-controversial-study-of-moderate-drinking/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 20. Alexander Tin, “Moderna Offers NIH Co-ownership of COVID Vaccine Patent amid Dispute with Government,” CBS News, November 15, 2021, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moderna-covid-vaccine-patent-dispute- national-institutes-health/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 21. Informed Consent Action Network, “NIH Officials Profiting from COVID-19 Vaccine,” June 3, 2021, https://www. icandecide.org/nih-officials-profiting-from-covid-19-vaccine/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 22. Adam Andrzejewski, “Substack Investigation: Fauci’s Royalties and the $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream HIDDEN by NIH,” Open the Books Substack, May 9, 2022, https://openthebooks.substack. com/p/faucis-royalties-and-the-350-million?utm_source=/profile/24758236-adam-andrzejewski&utm_ medium=reader2&s=w (accessed February 6, 2023). 23. Robert E. Moffit, “Time to Reverse Hospital Market Consolidation,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 5, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/time-reverse-hospital-market-consolidation. 24. H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law No. 111-148, 111th Congress, March 23, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ148/PLAW-111publ148.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 25. Brian J. Miller, Robert E. Moffit, James Ficke, Joseph Marine, and Jesse Ehrenfeld, “Reversing Hospital Consolidation: The Promise of Physician-Owned Hospitals,” Health Affairs Forefront, April 12, 2021, https:// www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20210408.980640/ (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Robert E. Moffit, “Medicare’s Future: Challenges and Opportunities,” testimony before the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate, November 21, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/testimony/medicares-future-challenges- and-opportunities. 27. 42 U.S. Code § 256b, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/256b (accessed March 16, 2023). 28. H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, § 3022. 29. H.R. 5376, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-169, 117th Congress, August 16, 2022, https:// www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ169/PLAW-117publ169.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 30. Robert E. Moffit, “Reducing Patient Access to New Medications Is the Left’s Latest Medicare Price-Fixing Scheme,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, July 22, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/medicare/commentary/ reducing-patient-access-new-medications-the-lefts-latest-medicare-price-fixing, and Badger, “How Congress Can Make Real Progress on Drug Prices.” 31. Nina Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3604, April 14, 2021, https:// www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/BG3604_0.pdf, and Brian C. Blase, “Punishing Conservative States: Payment Cuts to Hospitals Where Federal Spending Is Already Low,” Paragon Health Institute, December 2021, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Punishing-Conservative-States- HTML.html (accessed February 13, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Back to All Bills