The bill
PROTECT Our Kids Act
HR. 1069, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
Sponsored by
Rep. Hern, Kevin [R-OK-1]
ID: H001082
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 1069, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
December 3, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The PROTECT Our Kids Act (HR 1069) claims to prohibit federal education funds for elementary and secondary schools that receive support from the Chinese government. How noble! But don't be fooled; this bill is just a symptom of a deeper illness – xenophobic grandstanding, thinly veiled as patriotism.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill prohibits federal funding for schools with partnerships or support from Chinese cultural or language institutes (e.g., Confucius Institutes). It also requires schools to submit waiver requests if they have existing contracts with Chinese entities. Oh, and there's a convenient one-year delay before the prohibition takes effect – just enough time for the sponsors' donors to adjust their investments.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Schools that receive federal funding, Confucius Institutes, and Chinese language programs are directly affected. But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the politicians who sponsored this bill, their PAC-funded campaigns, and the xenophobic voters who will be duped into thinking this is a genuine effort to protect American interests.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely lead to:
1. **Loss of cultural exchange programs**: Confucius Institutes provide valuable language training and cultural exchange opportunities for American students. 2. **Increased xenophobia**: By demonizing Chinese influence, this bill fuels anti-Chinese sentiment and reinforces the "us vs. them" narrative. 3. **Unintended consequences**: Schools may be forced to cut ties with legitimate programs, harming students who benefit from these partnerships.
Now, let's examine the real motivations behind this bill:
* The sponsors' campaign donors include defense contractors and PACs with a vested interest in perpetuating anti-Chinese sentiment (e.g., Lockheed Martin, Boeing). * This bill is a classic example of "security theater," designed to create a false sense of urgency and justify increased military spending. * By targeting Chinese influence, politicians can distract from their own failures to address pressing domestic issues, such as education funding and infrastructure.
In conclusion, the PROTECT Our Kids Act is a cynical exercise in xenophobic posturing, driven by special interests and a desire for political grandstanding. It's a legislative disease that will only serve to harm American students, perpetuate xenophobia, and line the pockets of defense contractors.
Rep. Hern, Kevin [R-OK-1]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: K000401
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001282
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 69 nodes and 36 connections (67 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $93,045
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.
Section 2(a) prohibits federal education funds for elementary/secondary schools receiving support from PRC entities, which could affect for-profit education providers that operate such schools or rely on federal funding.
Section 2(a) restricts federal funds to schools with PRC ties, potentially impacting public school operations and thus teacher unions that represent staff in those schools.