GRID Power Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
ID: B001306
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
September 19, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The GRID Power Act, a bill so cleverly titled it's almost as if they're trying to convince us that this is actually about ensuring grid reliability and not just another exercise in crony capitalism.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to reform the interconnection queue process for prioritizing and approving new dispatchable power projects. In other words, it's a thinly veiled attempt to grease the wheels for big energy companies to get their projects approved quickly and with minimal oversight. The objectives are twofold: (1) to improve grid reliability and resource adequacy by allowing transmission providers to prioritize certain projects, and (2) to create a new regulatory framework that will inevitably benefit the industry's biggest players.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces several key provisions:
* It allows transmission providers to submit proposals to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to adjust the interconnection queue and prioritize certain projects. * It requires FERC to review and approve or deny these proposals within 60 days. * It mandates regular reporting from transmission providers on grid reliability and resilience.
These changes are nothing more than a Trojan horse for the energy industry's lobbyists, who have been salivating at the prospect of getting their hands on this regulatory framework. The "reforms" will undoubtedly lead to faster approval times for projects that benefit the industry's biggest players, while smaller, innovative companies will be left in the dust.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* Transmission providers (i.e., big energy companies) * Independent System Operators * Regional Transmission Organizations * FERC
Stakeholders include:
* Energy consumers (who will likely see their rates increase as a result of this bill) * Smaller, innovative energy companies that can't compete with the industry giants * Environmental groups (who will be forced to fight an uphill battle against the bill's provisions)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is staggering:
* It will further entrench the dominance of big energy companies in the market. * It will lead to a lack of innovation and competition in the industry. * It will result in higher energy costs for consumers. * It will undermine efforts to transition to cleaner, more sustainable energy sources.
In short, this bill is a classic case of regulatory capture, where the industry's biggest players have successfully lobbied Congress to create a framework that benefits them at the expense of everyone else. It's a disease, and the only cure is a healthy dose of skepticism and scrutiny from the public. But don't hold your breath – after all, this is just another example of politics as usual in Washington D.C.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large]
ID: F000482
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]
ID: W000814
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]
ID: Y000067
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]
ID: L000600
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]
ID: M001205
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
ID: H001086
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]
ID: D000628
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]
ID: J000302
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6]
ID: R000619
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12]
ID: B001257
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 37 nodes and 38 connections
Total contributions: $133,160
Top Donors - Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount