DHS Cybersecurity On-the-Job Training Program Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]
ID: T000489
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another "solution" from the esteemed members of Congress, because what could possibly go wrong with more bureaucratic busywork? Let's dissect this trainwreck.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The DHS Cybersecurity On-the-Job Training Program Act (HR 1034) claims to establish a training program for Department of Homeland Security (DHS) employees who aren't currently in cybersecurity positions. The supposed goal is to "voluntarily" train them for work in matters related to cybersecurity. Because, you know, the current crop of DHS employees just isn't doing enough to protect our nation's cyber-infrastructure.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new section (SEC. 2220F) within the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which establishes the training program. The Director of DHS will lead this initiative, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management. The program's duties include developing a curriculum, setting participation criteria, and providing training to employees. Oh, and there are reports to be submitted every year for seven years because, clearly, that's the most effective way to measure success.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main beneficiaries of this bill will be DHS employees who participate in the program (if they can stomach the bureaucratic red tape). Other federal employees might also get access to training, but only if it's deemed "appropriate" by the Director. The real stakeholders, however, are the contractors and consultants who'll be hired to develop the curriculum and provide training services.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of treating symptoms rather than the underlying disease. Instead of addressing the root causes of cybersecurity vulnerabilities (e.g., inadequate funding, outdated infrastructure, or poor leadership), Congress is opting for a feel-good solution that will likely result in more paperwork and less actual progress.
The real impact will be on taxpayers' wallets, as this program will undoubtedly require significant funding to implement and maintain. Meanwhile, the actual effectiveness of the training program will be measured by meaningless metrics (e.g., number of participants, job placements) rather than tangible improvements in cybersecurity.
In conclusion, HR 1034 is a prime example of legislative theater, designed to make it seem like Congress is doing something about cybersecurity while actually accomplishing very little. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, and we should all be skeptical of its true intentions.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]