DHS Cybersecurity On-the-Job Training Program Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/1034
Last Updated: November 21, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]

ID: T000489

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another "solution" from the esteemed members of Congress, because what could possibly go wrong with more bureaucratic busywork? Let's dissect this trainwreck.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The DHS Cybersecurity On-the-Job Training Program Act (HR 1034) claims to establish a training program for Department of Homeland Security (DHS) employees who aren't currently in cybersecurity positions. The supposed goal is to "voluntarily" train them for work in matters related to cybersecurity. Because, you know, the current crop of DHS employees just isn't doing enough to protect our nation's cyber-infrastructure.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new section (SEC. 2220F) within the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which establishes the training program. The Director of DHS will lead this initiative, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management. The program's duties include developing a curriculum, setting participation criteria, and providing training to employees. Oh, and there are reports to be submitted every year for seven years because, clearly, that's the most effective way to measure success.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main beneficiaries of this bill will be DHS employees who participate in the program (if they can stomach the bureaucratic red tape). Other federal employees might also get access to training, but only if it's deemed "appropriate" by the Director. The real stakeholders, however, are the contractors and consultants who'll be hired to develop the curriculum and provide training services.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of treating symptoms rather than the underlying disease. Instead of addressing the root causes of cybersecurity vulnerabilities (e.g., inadequate funding, outdated infrastructure, or poor leadership), Congress is opting for a feel-good solution that will likely result in more paperwork and less actual progress.

The real impact will be on taxpayers' wallets, as this program will undoubtedly require significant funding to implement and maintain. Meanwhile, the actual effectiveness of the training program will be measured by meaningless metrics (e.g., number of participants, job placements) rather than tangible improvements in cybersecurity.

In conclusion, HR 1034 is a prime example of legislative theater, designed to make it seem like Congress is doing something about cybersecurity while actually accomplishing very little. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, and we should all be skeptical of its true intentions.

Related Topics

Federal Budget & Appropriations State & Local Government Affairs Congressional Rules & Procedures Civil Rights & Liberties Transportation & Infrastructure Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement National Security & Intelligence
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$224,505
27 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$3,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$221,505

No PAC contributions found

1
BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000
2
TBGI PROPERTIES LLC
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
ADAMS, MICHAEL MR.
2 transactions
$26,400
2
FOOTE, SCOTT
1 transaction
$13,200
3
WINTER, BRIAN
1 transaction
$13,200
4
HATFIELD, JAY
1 transaction
$13,200
5
MARIETTA, JASON
1 transaction
$13,200
6
HAZELTON, TANYA
1 transaction
$13,200
7
MITCHELL, CHRIS
2 transactions
$13,200
8
BRIDGES, MICHAEL MR.
2 transactions
$13,200
9
FOOTE, MICHELLE
1 transaction
$6,600
10
OLIVER, TRAVIS
1 transaction
$6,600
11
BEREN, ADAM
1 transaction
$6,600
12
KONECNY, ANN
1 transaction
$6,600
13
KONECNY, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
14
WINTER, DARCI
1 transaction
$6,600
15
HATFIELD, RHONDA
1 transaction
$6,600
16
MARIETTA, CRYSTAL
1 transaction
$6,600
17
PETERS, GRATZ
1 transaction
$6,600
18
EMERSON, TONY
1 transaction
$6,600
19
CARSON, JUDITH
1 transaction
$6,600
20
BERRY, JOHN W MR. JR.
1 transaction
$6,600
21
DUPPS, FRANK N
1 transaction
$6,600
22
DUPPS, SHELLEY
1 transaction
$6,600
23
SEABERG, KAREN
1 transaction
$3,435
24
MCKECHNIE, ARTHUR
1 transaction
$3,435
25
ROSE, DIANA
1 transaction
$3,435

Donor Network - Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 28 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $224,505

Top Donors - Rep. Turner, Sylvester [D-TX-18]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs25 Individuals