Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision".

The HJRES 131 bill. A quaint attempt by Congress to exert control over the Bureau of Land Management's Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision. How...amusing.

Let's cut through the bureaucratic jargon and focus on what truly matters: the wealth and power implications.

**New Regulations:** The bill seeks to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management, effectively nullifying its authority over oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain region. This is a minor setback for my interests, but an opportunity nonetheless.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** The oil and gas industry will be directly impacted, with potential benefits accruing to companies like mine that have invested heavily in exploration and extraction technologies. I've projected a 10% increase in profits for our energy division if this bill passes.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** Since the bill aims to disapprove an existing rule, compliance requirements are minimal. However, this will create uncertainty for industry players, allowing more agile companies like mine to capitalize on the chaos.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** The Congressional Review Act provides a framework for congressional oversight, but its effectiveness is dubious at best. I've instructed my team to prepare for potential litigation, as we'll likely challenge any attempts to enforce this rule.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** By disapproving the BLM's rule, Congress will create a power vacuum that can be exploited by industry leaders like myself. I estimate a $500 million increase in revenue for our company over the next two years if this bill becomes law.

In conclusion, HJRES 131 is a minor speed bump on the road to deregulation and consolidation. It's a reminder that government should focus on facilitating innovation, not hindering it with bureaucratic red tape. As I always say, "Regulations are just obstacles to be overcome by visionary entrepreneurs like myself."

Let's break down this joint resolution, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a joint resolution is a type of bill that requires the approval of both the House and Senate, but does not need to be signed by the President. This particular resolution aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision.

Now, remember when we learned about the Congressional Review Act? It's a law that allows Congress to review and potentially overturn new regulations issued by federal agencies. In this case, the BLM's rule is being targeted for disapproval under this act.

The affected industries and sectors in this case are primarily those involved in oil and gas exploration and production on public lands. The resolution would essentially nullify the BLM's record of decision, which outlines the terms and conditions for leasing public lands for oil and gas development.

As for compliance requirements and timelines, it's a bit unclear since the resolution is focused on disapproving an existing rule rather than creating new regulations. However, if the resolution passes, the BLM would likely need to revisit its record of decision and potentially revise or rescind it.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties are also not explicitly stated in this resolution, but as we covered in 8th grade civics, federal agencies like the BLM have various tools at their disposal to ensure compliance with regulations. In this case, the BLM might need to rely on other authorities or laws to enforce any new rules or guidelines that replace the disapproved record of decision.

The economic and operational impacts of this resolution are significant, particularly for companies involved in oil and gas development on public lands. If the resolution passes, it could lead to delays or cancellations of existing leases, as well as increased uncertainty for investors and operators in the industry.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But what about the separation of powers? Doesn't Congress have a role in overseeing federal agencies?" Ah, yes, checks and balances! As we learned in middle school social studies, Congress has the authority to review and approve or disapprove regulations issued by executive branch agencies. This resolution is an example of that process in action.

Moving forward, it's essential to understand how this joint resolution fits into the broader context of federal regulatory policy. I hope this explanation has been... enlightening.

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today we're going to dissect the so-called "HJRES 131" bill, a Trojan horse masquerading as a harmless regulatory measure. But don't be fooled – this is just another example of our government's insidious attempts to control every aspect of our lives.

**New regulations being created or modified:** On the surface, this bill appears to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain. But what's really going on here? The BLM is just a puppet organization, carrying out the wishes of their true masters – the fossil fuel cartels. This "disapproval" is likely a smokescreen to distract us from the real agenda: further entrenching corporate interests and perpetuating our addiction to dirty energy.

**Affected industries and sectors:** The oil and gas industry will be impacted, but not in the way you think. This bill is actually a clever ploy to consolidate power among the big players, squeezing out smaller competitors and independent operators. It's a classic case of "regulatory capture," where the government pretends to regulate an industry while actually serving its interests.

**Compliance requirements and timelines:** Ah, but what about the compliance requirements? Don't worry, they're just a minor detail – a mere formality. The real question is: who will be enforcing these regulations? Will it be the BLM, or some shadowy agency operating outside of public scrutiny? And what are the penalties for non-compliance? Rest assured, they'll be severe enough to silence any dissenting voices.

**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Speaking of which, have you noticed how this bill conveniently omits any mention of enforcement mechanisms or penalties? That's because these details will be left to the discretion of our benevolent overlords. Mark my words: we'll see a surge in "accidental" fines and "unintended" consequences for those who dare challenge the status quo.

**Economic and operational impacts:** The economic impact of this bill will be devastating – but not for the reasons you think. By consolidating power among the fossil fuel giants, we'll see a further concentration of wealth and influence in the hands of a select few. The little guy will be squeezed out, forced to operate on the fringes or abandon their businesses altogether.

In conclusion, HJRES 131 is just another example of our government's Machiavellian tactics – using regulatory language to obscure their true intentions. Wake up, sheeple! It's time to see through the veil and demand transparency from our so-called "representatives."

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got a real doozy for you tonight! HJRES 131 is the latest salvo in the war against freedom-loving Americans by those out-of-touch elites in Washington. (Scoffs) This bill is all about disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management – because, of course, the BLM knows better than we do how to manage our own land.

Now, let's break it down. The Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision is just a fancy way of saying "we're going to restrict oil and gas drilling in certain areas." (Outraged tone) Can you believe it? These bureaucrats think they can just dictate where we can and can't drill for energy, stifling American innovation and progress. It's an affront to our freedom!

The affected industries here are obvious: oil and gas, of course. But also, the entire energy sector will feel the pinch. (Shaking head) And what about the jobs? The livelihoods that depend on these industries? Do the elites care? Nope.

Compliance requirements? Timelines? Forget about it! This bill is all about giving Congress a say in what's essentially an executive branch overreach. (Sarcastic tone) Oh, I'm sure the BLM had our best interests at heart when they crafted this rule... (eyeroll)

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties? Well, that's where things get really interesting. If this bill passes, it'll essentially nullify the BLM's rule, rendering it toothless. But don't worry, folks, I'm sure the deep state will find ways to circumvent Congress's authority. (Wink, wink)

The economic and operational impacts? Devastating! This bill is a clear example of how out-of-touch politicians are with the needs of everyday Americans. We need energy independence, not more regulations strangling our economy.

(Smirk) Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't this just a partisan ploy to undermine environmental protections?" (Chuckles) Ah, no! This is about freedom, folks! The freedom to drill, the freedom to innovate, and the freedom to make America great again. Don't let those elites fool you – this bill is a victory for the American people.

(Conspiratorial whisper) Between you and me, though... I'm not sure even our esteemed lawmakers fully understand what they're voting on here. (Wink) But hey, who needs details when it's all about sticking it to the man?

**Bill Summary: HJRES 131**

**Purpose:** This joint resolution aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) related to the "Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision." The BLM's rule, issued on December 9, 2024, would have allowed for oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain region.

**Key Provisions:**

* Disapproves the BLM's rule, rendering it without force or effect. * Applies to the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to review and potentially disapprove federal agency rules.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:**

* Oil and gas industry companies interested in leasing lands in the Coastal Plain region. * Environmental organizations and advocacy groups concerned about the potential environmental impacts of oil and gas development in the region. * Local communities and indigenous peoples who may be affected by oil and gas activities.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** None, as the bill seeks to disapprove an existing rule rather than create new regulations.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** None, as the bill's purpose is to nullify the BLM's rule, rather than establish new enforcement mechanisms or penalties.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

* The oil and gas industry may face reduced opportunities for leasing lands in the Coastal Plain region. * Environmental organizations and advocacy groups may view the disapproval of the BLM's rule as a positive development, potentially reducing the risk of environmental harm from oil and gas activities. * Local communities and indigenous peoples may benefit from the preservation of their traditional lands and resources.

**Conclusion:** HJRES 131 seeks to disapprove a BLM rule that would have allowed for oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain region. The bill's passage could impact the oil and gas industry, environmental organizations, and local communities, with potential economic and operational implications for these stakeholders.

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro.

HJRES 131 is all about congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The rule in question is related to the "Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision". Yeah, it's a mouthful, dude.

**New Regulations:** The BLM rule would've allowed for oil and gas leasing on the Coastal Plain, which is a sensitive area, man. This bill is like, "Whoa, hold up, we don't think that's a good idea." It's not creating new regulations, but rather trying to block an existing one.

**Affected Industries:** The main industries affected are oil and gas, bro. They're the ones who'd be impacted by the leasing program. But also, environmental groups and local communities might be stoked about this bill, since it's trying to protect the Coastal Plain from drilling.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** Since this is a disapproval resolution, there aren't really any new compliance requirements or timelines, dude. It's more like, "Hey, we don't want that rule to happen." If passed, the BLM would need to go back to the drawing board and come up with a new plan.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** There aren't any specific enforcement mechanisms or penalties mentioned in this bill, bro. It's more of a symbolic move, like a big ol' wave saying, "No way, dude." If the BLM tries to implement the rule anyway, Congress might need to take further action.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** The economic impact would be significant for oil and gas companies, man. They'd miss out on potential revenue from leasing on the Coastal Plain. On the other hand, environmental groups and local communities might see this as a win, since it could protect the area from drilling. It's like, a trade-off between economic growth and environmental protection.

In summary, HJRES 131 is all about Congress trying to block a rule that would allow oil and gas leasing on the Coastal Plain. It's a big deal for affected industries, but also for environmental groups and local communities. The bill is more of a symbolic move, but it could have significant economic and operational impacts if passed. Just remember, dude, this is all about finding that balance between growth and protection.

**The Real Story Behind HJRES 131: A Gift to Big Oil**

HJRES 131 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) "Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision." On the surface, this bill appears to be a straightforward attempt to overturn a regulatory decision. However, a closer examination reveals that it's actually a carefully crafted gift to the oil and gas industry.

**New Regulations Being Created or Modified:** The BLM's record of decision would have established a framework for oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain region of Alaska. HJRES 131 seeks to nullify this rule, effectively paving the way for more lax regulations that benefit the industry.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill are oil and gas companies, particularly those with interests in Alaska's Coastal Plain region. The American Petroleum Institute (API), a powerful lobby group representing the oil and gas industry, has been vocal in its opposition to the BLM's original rule.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** By disapproving the BLM's rule, HJRES 131 eliminates any compliance requirements that would have been imposed on oil and gas companies operating in the Coastal Plain region. This means that these companies will no longer be subject to stricter environmental regulations and safety standards.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** The bill's passage would also undermine enforcement mechanisms and penalties associated with the original rule. Without these provisions, oil and gas companies will face reduced accountability for their operations in the Coastal Plain region.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** HJRES 131 is expected to have significant economic benefits for the oil and gas industry, as it would allow companies to operate with greater freedom and lower regulatory costs. However, this comes at a cost to environmental protection and public health.

**Follow the Money Trail:** The sponsors of HJRES 131, including Reps. Don Young (R-AK) and Rob Bishop (R-UT), have received significant campaign contributions from oil and gas companies and industry PACs, such as ExxonMobil, Chevron, and the API. These donations have likely influenced their support for this bill.

**Committee Capture:** The House Committee on Natural Resources, which has jurisdiction over HJRES 131, has a history of being captured by the oil and gas industry. The committee's chairman, Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT), has been a vocal supporter of the industry and has received substantial campaign contributions from oil and gas companies.

In conclusion, HJRES 131 is not just a simple regulatory bill; it's a carefully crafted attempt to undermine environmental regulations and benefit the oil and gas industry at the expense of public health and the environment. The real story behind this bill lies in the money trail and the influence of powerful lobby groups like the API.