Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

The HJRES 130 bill. A minor speed bump in the grand tapestry of regulatory overreach. Let's dissect this legislative attempt to stifle innovation.

**New Regulations:** The bill seeks to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding the Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. In essence, it's an attempt to roll back environmental regulations that would hinder the extraction of natural resources on public lands.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** The oil and gas industry, mining corporations, and other extractive entities will be directly impacted by this bill. By disapproving the BLM rule, Congress is essentially giving these industries a free pass to operate with minimal environmental oversight.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** Since the bill aims to disapprove an existing rule, there are no new compliance requirements or timelines to speak of. However, if passed, it would effectively nullify any existing regulations that were set to take effect.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** The bill doesn't introduce new enforcement mechanisms or penalties. Instead, it relies on the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to disapprove the BLM rule, which would render it ineffective.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** By rolling back environmental regulations, this bill would likely increase access to public lands for extractive industries, leading to increased revenue and profit margins. According to my think tank's projections, this could result in an estimated $1.2 billion boost to the oil and gas industry alone over the next five years.

In conclusion, HJRES 130 is a minor victory for the forces of deregulation and a testament to the inefficiencies of democracy. By disapproving the BLM rule, Congress is acknowledging that environmental regulations are an obstacle to innovation and progress. As I always say, "Regulations are like speed bumps on the road to prosperity." This bill is a step in the right direction, but there's still much work to be done to truly unleash the power of the free market.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have more important matters to attend to – like optimizing my portfolio and advising my network of influential policymakers.

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this joint resolution, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill like HJRES 130 is an attempt by Congress to exercise its authority under the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Remember when we learned about how Congress can review and potentially disapprove of regulations issued by executive branch agencies?

In this case, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has proposed a new rule related to land management plans in the Buffalo Field Office. The BLM's rule is an attempt to modify existing regulations, but Congress is trying to put the brakes on it through this joint resolution.

Now, as we covered in 8th grade, when a regulatory agency like the BLM proposes a new rule, it typically goes through a formal process that includes public comment periods and review by other agencies. But in this case, Congress is using its authority under the CRA to try to disapprove of the rule before it takes effect.

The affected industries and sectors here are likely those involved in land use, natural resource extraction, and environmental conservation. The compliance requirements and timelines will depend on whether or not this joint resolution passes and becomes law. If it does, the BLM's rule would be effectively nullified, and any entities that were preparing to comply with it would need to adjust their plans.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties are not explicitly stated in this bill, but as we learned in civics class, regulatory agencies like the BLM typically have the authority to impose fines or other penalties on entities that fail to comply with their rules. In this case, if the joint resolution passes, it's likely that any enforcement actions related to the disapproved rule would be halted.

As for economic and operational impacts, well... that depends on who you ask. Proponents of the BLM's rule might argue that it would have helped to protect sensitive ecosystems or promote more sustainable land use practices. On the other hand, opponents might claim that it would have imposed unnecessary burdens on industries like mining or agriculture.

But let's be real here – this is all just a reminder that the system we learned about in civics class doesn't always work as smoothly as we'd like to think. The CRA was intended to provide a check on executive branch overreach, but in practice, it often gets used as a partisan tool to block regulations that certain lawmakers don't like.

Anyway, that's HJRES 130 in a nutshell. I hope this explanation has been... enlightening for those of you who may have dozed off during civics class all those years ago.

The plot thickens! This seemingly innocuous bill is actually a Trojan horse for the government's real agenda. Let me break it down for you.

First, this bill appears to be about disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding land management in the Buffalo Field Office. But what's really going on here? The BLM is trying to sneak in new regulations that will give them more control over public lands, and Congress is just playing along.

The affected industries are obvious: mining, drilling, and logging. These sectors will be subject to stricter regulations, which will stifle economic growth and create more bureaucratic red tape. But what about the real agenda? I believe this bill is part of a larger plan to restrict access to natural resources, paving the way for a New World Order-style control over our energy and mineral supplies.

Compliance requirements and timelines are vague, but that's by design. The government wants to keep us in the dark while they quietly implement their plans. Mark my words, this bill will lead to more stringent regulations on private landowners, forcing them to conform to the government's vision of "sustainable" development.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties? Oh boy, get ready for a whole new level of Big Brother surveillance! The BLM will have carte blanche to monitor and control every aspect of land use, with severe fines and even imprisonment for non-compliance. This is nothing short of a power grab by the federal government.

The economic and operational impacts will be devastating. Small businesses and family farms will be forced out of operation, while large corporations with deep pockets will thrive under the new regulatory regime. It's all about consolidation of power and control, folks!

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this is just a simple bill about land management." Ah, no! This is just the tip of the iceberg. Wake up, sheeple! The government is hiding its true agenda in plain sight.

(With a smirk) Oh boy, folks, we've got a real doozy for you tonight! HJRES 130 is the latest attempt by our brave Congress to stand up against the "deep state" and protect American freedom from those pesky bureaucrats at the Bureau of Land Management. (Air quotes) "Protecting freedom," that's what this bill is all about!

Now, let's get down to business. This joint resolution aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the BLM regarding land management in the Buffalo Field Office. Sounds innocuous enough, right? But trust me, folks, this is just another example of the "elites" trying to strangle our great nation with red tape and regulations.

Here's what we're looking at:

* New regulations being created or modified: The BLM rule would establish a new resource management plan for the Buffalo Field Office. (Gasp) Can you believe it? More government control over our land! * Affected industries and sectors: Well, this one's a no-brainer. We're talking about energy production, mining, ranching – all those good ol' American industries that make our country great. The "elites" want to stifle them with more regulations. * Compliance requirements and timelines: The rule would require the BLM to follow certain procedures for land management decisions. (Scoffs) Because we all know how well government agencies follow procedures, right? * Enforcement mechanisms and penalties: Oh boy, this is where it gets good! If you don't comply with these new regulations, you could face fines, penalties, or even – gasp! – imprisonment. The "deep state" will stop at nothing to silence dissent! * Economic and operational impacts: (Dramatic music plays) This bill would have far-reaching consequences for our economy and national security. I mean, think about it: if we can't drill for oil or mine for minerals on public lands, how are we going to keep America great? It's a slippery slope, folks!

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't this just a routine regulatory bill?" Ah, no! This is a master plan by the "elites" to control our every move. Wake up, sheeple! (Winks)

In conclusion, HJRES 130 is a vital piece of legislation that will protect American freedom from those pesky bureaucrats and their regulations. We must stand strong against the "deep state" and support this bill with all our might! (Pounds fist on desk)

**Bill Summary: HJRES 130**

HJRES 130 is a joint resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relating to the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment." The bill aims to nullify this rule, which was issued on November 20, 2024.

**New Regulations:** The BLM's rule in question amends the resource management plan for the Buffalo Field Office. However, the specific changes or modifications introduced by this rule are not explicitly stated in the bill text. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has determined that this record of decision and approved resource management plan amendment constitutes a "rule" under the Congressional Review Act.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** The affected industries and sectors include:

1. Energy development: The Buffalo Field Office is responsible for managing public lands in Wyoming, which are rich in oil, gas, and coal resources. 2. Agriculture: The office also oversees grazing permits and manages rangelands used by livestock producers. 3. Conservation: Environmental groups and conservation organizations may be impacted by changes to land management plans.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** If the bill is enacted, the BLM's rule would have no force or effect, effectively nullifying any new regulations or modifications introduced by the rule. However, the bill does not provide specific guidance on compliance requirements or timelines for affected parties.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** The bill does not establish new enforcement mechanisms or penalties. Instead, it relies on the Congressional Review Act's provisions to disapprove the BLM's rule.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** The economic and operational impacts of this bill are uncertain, as the specific changes introduced by the BLM's rule are not clearly stated. However, nullifying the rule may:

1. Affect energy development projects in Wyoming 2. Impact grazing permit holders and livestock producers 3. Influence conservation efforts on public lands

Overall, HJRES 130 aims to disapprove a specific rule submitted by the BLM, which could have significant implications for various industries and stakeholders involved in land management and resource development.

Let's break down this gnarly regulatory bill, HJRES 130.

So, what's the deal? This joint resolution is all about disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding the Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. Yeah, it's a mouthful, bro.

**New Regs:** The BLM was trying to implement some new rules for managing public lands in Wyoming, specifically around oil and gas development. But Congress is like, "Whoa, hold up, we gotta review this."

**Affected Industries:** This bill affects the energy sector, particularly oil and gas companies that operate on public lands. It's also got implications for environmental groups, Native American tribes, and local communities who care about land use.

**Compliance Requirements:** If Congress disapproves this rule, it means the BLM will have to go back to the drawing board and come up with new regulations that comply with the Congressional Review Act (CRA). This could delay or even halt oil and gas development in certain areas.

**Enforcement Mechanisms:** The CRA gives Congress the power to review and disapprove federal agency rules. If this bill passes, it'll essentially nullify the BLM's rule, and the agency will have to start over.

**Economic Impacts:** This bill could have significant economic implications for Wyoming and other states with public lands. Oil and gas development can bring in big bucks, but environmental concerns and community opposition might slow things down.

**Operational Impacts:** For companies operating on public lands, this bill creates uncertainty around their permits and leases. They'll need to wait and see what happens next before making any major moves.

In summary, bro, HJRES 130 is all about Congress putting the brakes on a BLM rule that could impact oil and gas development on public lands. It's a complex issue with big implications for the environment, local communities, and the energy sector. Stay chill, but stay informed, dude!

**HJRES 130: A Gift to the Fossil Fuel Industry**

This joint resolution, sponsored by Rep. Matt Rosendale (R-MT) and cosponsored by several Republican lawmakers, aims to disapprove a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rule that would have implemented new regulations on oil and gas development in the Buffalo Field Office area of Montana.

**Monied Interests:**

The bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received significant donations from the fossil fuel industry. Rep. Rosendale has taken over $100,000 from oil and gas companies since 2020, including contributions from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips. Other cosponsors, such as Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), have also received substantial funding from the industry.

**Affected Industries:**

The BLM rule in question would have imposed stricter environmental regulations on oil and gas development in the Buffalo Field Office area, which is home to several major fossil fuel companies. By disapproving this rule, HJRES 130 effectively removes these regulatory hurdles, benefiting companies like ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips.

**Compliance Requirements:**

The BLM rule would have required oil and gas operators to conduct more thorough environmental assessments and obtain additional permits before commencing drilling operations. By disapproving this rule, HJRES 130 eliminates these compliance requirements, allowing companies to operate with less oversight.

**Enforcement Mechanisms:**

Without the BLM rule, enforcement mechanisms for environmental regulations in the Buffalo Field Office area will be significantly weakened. This could lead to increased pollution and environmental degradation, as companies may feel emboldened to disregard existing regulations.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

The disapproval of the BLM rule is likely to benefit fossil fuel companies operating in the Buffalo Field Office area, as they will face reduced regulatory burdens and compliance costs. However, this could come at the expense of local communities and the environment, which may suffer from increased pollution and degradation.

**Committee Capture:**

The House Committee on Natural Resources, which has jurisdiction over HJRES 130, is heavily influenced by the fossil fuel industry. The committee's chairman, Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR), has received significant funding from oil and gas companies, including ExxonMobil and Chevron. This committee capture likely contributed to the bill's swift passage through the House.

In summary, HJRES 130 is a clear example of how monied interests can influence legislation to benefit specific industries at the expense of the public interest. By disapproving the BLM rule, this joint resolution prioritizes the profits of fossil fuel companies over environmental protection and community well-being.