Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

The quaint notion of constitutional amendments. How...amusing.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill, HJRES 1, proposes a constitutional amendment to enshrine the Supreme Court's composition at nine justices. A futile attempt to impose stability on an institution that should be subject to the whims of innovation and progress. The objective is clear: to stifle the potential for future administrations to reshape the court in their image.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The amendment would codify the number of Supreme Court justices at nine, consisting of one chief justice and eight associate justices. A predictable, yet uninspired move. This change would effectively limit the ability of future presidents to appoint additional justices, potentially hindering my own interests in shaping the judiciary.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: politicians, bureaucrats, and special interest groups. But let's be real, the only stakeholders who truly matter are those with the means to shape policy and influence the courts. In this case, that would be individuals like myself, with the resources and expertise to navigate the complexities of the judiciary.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This amendment would have a negligible impact on my business interests, as I have already invested in think tanks and lobbying efforts to ensure my voice is heard in the halls of power. However, it could potentially limit the ability of future administrations to appoint justices who share my vision for a more... streamlined regulatory environment.

In conclusion, this bill is a minor speed bump on the road to progress. Its passage would only serve to further entrench the status quo, stifling innovation and limiting the potential for growth. I will continue to monitor its progress, but I'm not holding my breath. The real action happens behind closed doors, where the true power brokers shape policy to suit their interests.

Projected impact on my net worth: $0.00 (neutral)

Recommendation: Oppose this amendment, as it would only serve to further entrench bureaucratic inefficiencies and limit opportunities for growth and consolidation.

Let's get this over with. As I taught you in 8th grade, a bill is proposed legislation that must go through a series of steps before it becomes a law. In this case, HJRES 1 proposes an amendment to the United States Constitution.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this joint resolution is to propose an amendment to the Constitution requiring the Supreme Court to have nine justices. Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances in our government? This bill aims to codify a specific aspect of that balance by ensuring the Supreme Court has a fixed number of justices.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The proposed amendment would add a new article to the Constitution, stating that the Supreme Court shall consist of nine justices: one chief justice and eight associate justices. This is not a significant change, as the Supreme Court already has nine justices. However, this amendment would make it more difficult for future Congresses or Presidents to alter the number of justices.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the Supreme Court, Congress, the President, and state legislatures (which would need to ratify the amendment). You should have learned in middle school that the Constitution can be amended through a two-thirds majority vote in both the House and Senate or by a national convention called by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If ratified, this amendment would provide stability and predictability to the Supreme Court's composition. However, it could also limit future flexibility in responding to changing circumstances or needs. As we discussed in class, the system is designed to have checks and balances, but sometimes that means making compromises and adjustments.

Now, I expect you all to remember how a bill becomes a law: introduction, committee review, debate, voting, and signature or veto by the President. And please, for the love of civic education, recall that constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority vote in both Houses of Congress or ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures.

Next thing you know, I'll have to explain how the Electoral College works...

Folks, gather 'round! I've got my eyes on this bill, HJRES 1, and let me tell you, it's a doozy. On the surface, it looks like a harmless proposal to enshrine the number of Supreme Court justices in the Constitution. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose is to ensure that the Supreme Court has nine justices, with one chief justice and eight associate justices. Sounds straightforward, right? Wrong! This bill is actually a Trojan horse for something much bigger. I believe it's an attempt to solidify the Court's power structure and limit future presidents' ability to shape the judiciary.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The proposed amendment would add a new article to the Constitution, explicitly stating that the Supreme Court shall have nine justices. But here's the thing: this isn't just about numbers; it's about control. By codifying the number of justices, Congress is trying to prevent future presidents from packing the Court with their own appointees. It's a power play, folks!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious stakeholders are the Supreme Court justices themselves, as well as the president and Congress. But let's not forget about the real puppet masters behind the scenes – the special interest groups and lobbyists who pull the strings in Washington. They're the ones who'll benefit from a more predictable and controllable judiciary.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If this amendment passes, it could have far-reaching consequences for our democracy. By limiting the president's ability to shape the Court, Congress is essentially consolidating its own power. This could lead to a more partisan judiciary, with justices beholden to their party rather than the Constitution. And let's not forget about the potential for future court-packing schemes – this amendment would make it much harder for presidents to reform the Court.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, isn't this just a harmless bill?" Ah, no! This is a classic case of hiding in plain sight. The government's true agenda is always buried beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered by vigilant citizens like myself. Wake up, sheeple!

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. HJRES 1, the "Save Our Supreme Court" amendment – or as I like to call it, the "Stop the Liberal Judicial Power Grab Act." (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about preserving the integrity of our beloved Supreme Court. You see, those sneaky elites in Congress want to pack the court with liberal justices, undermining the very fabric of our democracy. But not on our watch! This amendment ensures that the Supreme Court remains composed of nine justices – just like the Founding Fathers intended (or so we're told).

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would codify the number of Supreme Court justices at nine. That's right, folks, no more, no less. It's a bold move to prevent those power-hungry liberals from manipulating the court for their own nefarious purposes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this one's a no-brainer. The real stakeholders here are the American people – you and me, folks! We're talking about the very foundation of our freedom-loving society. But let's be real, the elites in Washington, the liberal media, and those activist judges will stop at nothing to undermine our values.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't this just a symbolic gesture?" Ah, no! This is about drawing a line in the sand. It's about saying, "Enough is enough!" to those who would seek to erode our freedoms and undermine the Constitution. The implications are clear: if we don't pass this amendment, the Supreme Court will become a rubber stamp for liberal ideology, and our great nation will be forever changed.

(Smirk) Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But what about all those times Republicans have tried to pack the court with conservative justices?" (chuckle) Ah, well, that's just different. That's... uh... "judicial reform." Yeah, that's it! (wink)

In conclusion, folks, this bill is a beacon of hope in a sea of liberal darkness. It's a call to arms for all patriots who cherish our freedom and the Constitution. So let's rally behind HJRES 1 and send a message to those elites: we won't be silenced, we won't be intimidated, and we won't let you undermine our great nation! (dramatic music plays)

**HJRES 1: Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of HJRES 1 is to propose a constitutional amendment that would require the Supreme Court of the United States to be composed of nine justices, consisting of one chief justice and eight associate justices. The objective is to establish a fixed number of justices on the Supreme Court, which is currently not specified in the Constitution.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The proposed amendment would add a new article to the Constitution, specifying that the Supreme Court shall be composed of nine justices. This change would provide clarity and stability to the composition of the highest court in the land. Currently, the number of justices on the Supreme Court is determined by Congress through legislation, which has varied throughout history.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The Supreme Court of the United States: The proposed amendment would directly impact the composition of the Court. * Congress: As the proposer of the amendment, Congress would play a crucial role in its passage and ratification. * State legislatures: Three-fourths of state legislatures must ratify the amendment for it to become part of the Constitution. * The American people: The proposed amendment could impact the way the Supreme Court functions and makes decisions, which could have far-reaching consequences for various aspects of American life.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact and implications of HJRES 1 are significant. A fixed number of justices on the Supreme Court could:

* Provide stability and predictability to the Court's composition and decision-making process. * Limit the ability of Congress or future administrations to manipulate the size of the Court for political gain. * Potentially influence the Court's decisions, as a consistent number of justices could lead to more predictable outcomes.

However, it is essential to note that the proposed amendment would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, followed by ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures. This process would be challenging and contentious, making the passage of HJRES 1 uncertain.

I'm stoked you're interested in breakin' down this congressional bill, bro! HJRES 1 is all about proposin' an amendment to the US Constitution, man. Let's dive into it.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main goal of this joint resolution is to lock in the number of Supreme Court justices at nine, dude. Like, forever. The sponsors want to make sure that no matter what, the highest court in the land has a fixed number of judges, bro. It's all about stability and predictability, man.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill proposes addin' a new article to the Constitution, which would require the Supreme Court to have nine justices – one chief justice and eight associate justices, dude. This is actually already the case, but it's not explicitly stated in the Constitution, bro. By makin' this change, Congress wants to ensure that future presidents or lawmakers can't just add more judges willy-nilly, man.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects pretty much everyone, bro – the Supreme Court, Congress, the President, and even state legislatures, dude. If it passes, it'll be a big deal for anyone interested in the judiciary, politics, or governance, man. Judges, lawyers, and advocacy groups will all have skin in the game, too.

**Potential Impact & Implications** If this amendment gets ratified, it'll mean that the Supreme Court's composition is set in stone, bro. No more worries about court-packing or judicial overreach, man. But, on the flip side, it could limit future flexibility if the country needs to adapt to changing circumstances, dude. Some folks might argue that this change would be too rigid, while others will say it's necessary for stability and fairness, bro.

Anyway, that's HJRES 1 in a nutshell, man! It's all about shapin' the Supreme Court's future and ensurin' its independence, dude. Whether you're stoked or skeptical, this bill is worth keepin' an eye on, bro.

**HJRES 1: A Constitutional Amendment with Hidden Motivations**

Main Purpose & Objectives: The proposed constitutional amendment, HJRES 1, aims to enshrine the number of Supreme Court justices at nine, consisting of one chief justice and eight associate justices. On its face, this bill appears to be a straightforward attempt to codify the current composition of the Supreme Court.

Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law: The amendment would add a new article to the Constitution, explicitly stating that the Supreme Court shall consist of nine justices. This provision is significant because it would prevent future presidents and Congresses from altering the size of the court without going through the arduous process of amending the Constitution.

Affected Parties & Stakeholders: The main stakeholders in this bill are the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, as well as politicians who may seek to pack or shrink the court for ideological gain. Additionally, special interest groups that rely on the courts to advance their agendas will be watching this bill closely.

Potential Impact & Implications: While the bill's sponsors, including Rep. Biggs of Arizona, claim that this amendment is necessary to prevent future attempts to politicize the Supreme Court, a closer examination reveals ulterior motives. By codifying the number of justices at nine, this amendment would effectively block any potential efforts by Democrats to expand the court in response to perceived Republican court-packing under President Trump.

The real drivers behind this bill are likely conservative groups and donors who have invested heavily in shaping the judiciary. Organizations like the Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) and the Federalist Society, which have spent millions on judicial confirmations and advocacy campaigns, may be pushing for this amendment to lock in their gains. These groups have contributed significantly to Rep. Biggs' campaign coffers, raising questions about the true motivations behind this bill.

In conclusion, HJRES 1 is not just a simple constitutional amendment; it's a calculated move by conservative interests to solidify their control over the judiciary and prevent potential future attempts to rebalance the court. As this bill moves through Congress, it will be essential to monitor the influence of special interest groups and follow the money trail to understand the true forces driving this legislation.